|
|
Celiac.com Sponsor: |
Mcflurries?
#16
Posted 05 September 2011 - 07:48 AM
-Daisy
--David Sedaris
#17
Posted 05 September 2011 - 01:56 PM
How does one know the source of the glucose syrup on this label? Is there any assurance that it is NOT derived from wheat? And if glucose and dextrose are highly processed, do they fall into an exemption category because there is theoretically no protein left? I could not find any exemption language in the FDA stuff I reviewed, but there is a lot of information to sort through. Thanks!
If the glucose syrup was derived from wheat, it by law, must be listed at GLUCOSE SYRUP (Wheat). If it does not indicate wheat, its derived by something other....In the US.
The offending protein is removed during processing and it's my understanding that any remaining protein would not be detectable. It's not one level of processing, but several.
http://surefoodsliving.com/2008/09/is-glucose-syrup-gluten-free/
"Conclusions: Wheat-based starch hydrolysates, glucose syrups and maltodextrins did not have harmful effect on coeliac disease patients. Coeliac patients can thus safely continue to consume these products."
Gluten Free - August 15, 2004
"Not all who wander are lost" - JRR Tolkien
#18
Posted 05 September 2011 - 08:59 PM
http://surefoodsliving.com/2008/09/is-glucose-syrup-gluten-free/
"Conclusions: Wheat-based starch hydrolysates, glucose syrups and maltodextrins did not have harmful effect on coeliac disease patients. Coeliac patients can thus safely continue to consume these products."
I'll be honest, I haven't yet read anything that makes me feel that the matter has been adequately studied. The study from Finland that is often sited as evidence of the safety of wheat starch hydrolysates has some unfortunate flaws. So do other studies I've seen on safe gluten levels, and they all have potentially skewed the numbers to a higher gluten threshold.
The participants in the Finnish study were chosen from celiacs who were in clinical remission in Finland in 2004 and 2005. At that point, the gluten free standard for gluten free food in Finland was <200 ppm. So the study's results are only a reliable measure of safety for any celiac who can heal while eating a diet of 200 ppm of gluten or less.
Not everyone can tolerate that level of gluten. People here in the sensitive forum often can't tolerate foods with a 20 ppm concentration, so I don't think results from a study of celiacs who can tolerate 200 ppm are as useful for us. Nice to know that some people are safe with it, yeah, but not universally applicable to all celiacs, IMHO.
Gluten free since August 10, 2009.
21 years with undiagnosed Celiac Disease.
Father, brother, and daughter: celiac positive
Son: celiac negative, but symptoms resolved on gluten free diet
#19
Posted 28 May 2012 - 03:02 PM
Many people diagnosed with gluten intolerance or celiac also cross react to Whey.
I do, and I found out because I was reacting to things like ice cream and some cheeses, but not milk or yogurt. I read up on it and asked around and found out that anything with Whey listed in the first few ingredients I react to.
I would suggest avoiding Whey.
#20
Posted 28 May 2012 - 03:18 PM
It's probably not cross contamination. It's probably Whey.
Many people diagnosed with gluten intolerance or celiac also cross react to Whey.
I do, and I found out because I was reacting to things like ice cream and some cheeses, but not milk or yogurt. I read up on it and asked around and found out that anything with Whey listed in the first few ingredients I react to.
I would suggest avoiding Whey.
Whey is from milk. Not sure what your definition of " cross react" is but whey is not gluten. Many people, some with Celiac , have an inability to digest it. For many, when they have healed thier intestines, they can add it back in.
Celiac.com - Celiac Disease Board Moderator
"I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party" - Ron White
""I like the cover," he said. "Don't Panic. It's the first helpful or intelligible thing anybody's said to me all day."
― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
#21
Posted 30 May 2012 - 04:59 AM
#22
Posted 20 August 2012 - 01:49 PM
Cross-contamination from the machine IS a very likely scenario. I worked at McD's when I was in high school and would guess that the McFlurry machine still hasn't changed in all those years. While they do use a separate spoon to do the actual mixing, I can tell you that little bits of cookie still get all over the place. I know this from cleaning the machine. So, bits of Oreo could stick to the area above where the spoon is attached and then fall in while a new one is being mixed. Also, the containers where the add-ins (Oreo, etc) are stored is a potential risk for cross contamination. And, the employees who touch a spoon to make a mcflurry are likely touching many other gluten-containing things. Things like crumbs have a way of getting around.
In summary: don't rule out cross contamination, even though they do mix it with a new, theoretically clean spoon.
#23
Posted 21 August 2012 - 06:35 AM
#24
Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:44 AM
The gastro did tell me that I likely have IBS that is triggered by fructose, so I'm checking into that now.
Once I cut corn, I felt SO much better.
I sighed to not have the Mcdonalds drinks and desserts too.
Celiac diagnoses & went gluten free summer 2011
Severely fructose intolerant, primarily from corn, w/IBS June 2012
Celebrating each day of feeling GOOD.
#25
Posted 03 September 2012 - 06:34 PM
Unfortunately, there aren't any tests that would tell us that.Gluten free really should mean 100% GLUTEN FREE.
There are more sensitive tests than 20 ppm though.
#26
Posted 07 September 2012 - 05:45 AM
Getting on a strict regimen to completely eliminate corn (which is much, much, much harder than gluten because it's not regulated) made me feel the healthiest I've ever felt in my life. It's worth your effort if you have the same problem, even if you have to give away $50 worth of vitamins and eat really plain, "whole" food at restaurants.
I am not lactose intolerant (though I do primarily use Lactaid or rice milk because I was told to keep lactose under control), so if I need a dairy fix, I now go to the frozen yogurt or gelatto places that don't use corn syrup and are gluten and dextrin free. I tend to avoid the toppings since the gastro told me to be as paranoid as possible about cross contamination since really minute amounts of corn are setting off my anapyhlaxis. A little more expensive than McDonald's, but worth it. I think yogurt and kefir are low in lactose anyway? Costco's Kirkland brand ice cream is corn syrup and gluten free, I just don't like having a gallon of ice cream in the house! Otherwise, you'll find it hard to get corn/gluten-free ice cream in an avg. grocery store. Healthfood stores will work out. Just get your vanilla ice cream, a blender, and make your own flurries!
Besides corn syrup, you could also try watching your response to carmel color, corn vinegar, corn starch, and corn dextrin. It used to be mild responses for me, but one day in June, it was if all hell broke loose and I now can't tolerate any of them.
Celiac diagnoses & went gluten free summer 2011
Severely fructose intolerant, primarily from corn, w/IBS June 2012
Celebrating each day of feeling GOOD.
#27
Posted 07 September 2012 - 03:23 PM
#28
Posted 30 September 2012 - 12:43 PM
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but glucose syrup (wheat) does NOT contain the protein that is gluten, but if you have a wheat allergy as well as gluten intolerance, stay away from their ice creams. My friend's little one was taken to hospital because they assumed "gluten free" meant "wheat free" and they bought a sundae, only to find out that it does have glucose syrup in it, making it gluten free but not wheat free. She does not have coeliac disease, so able to have gluten in other forms, just no wheat of any kind.
This is incorrect
Here in the uk 95% of all glucose is made from wheat, as is malodextrin. They are highly processed which means that technically no trace of gluten remains.
That technically part actually means that upto 20ppm of gluten can remain as does some wheat proteins
The same exists with distilled vodka. There should be no gluten that comes across in the distillation but proteins do, hence thoose whom are super sensitive to it cant have grain derived vodka
It was either CC or the glucose syrup, I am betting the latta
There is no requirement in the uk to specify what the glucose is derived from because of the high processing involved. I believe this is now the same in the USA and its only though companies being nice that they list it
Rubbish isn't it
Jim
#29
Posted 01 October 2012 - 02:28 AM
This is incorrect
Here in the uk 95% of all glucose is made from wheat, as is malodextrin. They are highly processed which means that technically no trace of gluten remains.
That technically part actually means that upto 20ppm of gluten can remain as does some wheat proteins
The same exists with distilled vodka. There should be no gluten that comes across in the distillation but proteins do, hence thoose whom are super sensitive to it cant have grain derived vodka
It was either CC or the glucose syrup, I am betting the latta
There is no requirement in the uk to specify what the glucose is derived from because of the high processing involved. I believe this is now the same in the USA and its only though companies being nice that they list it
Rubbish isn't it
Jim
What I said is correct for Australian food standards.
#30
Posted 01 October 2012 - 08:11 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









