Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Biopsy Negative....now What?
0

15 posts in this topic

OK, so i had the elevated gliadin antibody with the blood work....endoscopy showed nothing...i was convinced i had celiac diesease....now what? am i gluten intolerant? do I have "some" gluten?? I am so confused.....i went gluten free for a month....then ONE week eating gluten before biopsy.....anyone???????

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

The testing (biopsy) was not properly done. Can't be gluten free that long and expect an accurate result of gluten eating status. so the results are not trustworthy. Either get it redone after eating gluten in "normal" amounts for at least 3 months, or simply try the diet for at least as long.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The testing (biopsy) was not properly done. Can't be gluten free that long and expect an accurate result of gluten eating status. so the results are not trustworthy. Either get it redone after eating gluten in "normal" amounts for at least 3 months, or simply try the diet for at least as long.

why do doctors say villi damage will still be there whether you have been gluten free or not...it is so frustrating....shouldnt they know???? i was eating gluten all the time when blood work came back slightly elevated...equivocal range....and then i went gluten free for the MONTH and then one week of gluten before endoscopy.....its crazy!! why would the gliadin antibody be elevated.....clearly there is some sort of gluten issue going on...thanks for your help

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tested recently negative to the celiac panel blood tests and a couple of years ago to biopsy. However my family history (half of my Mother's family are celiacs) and symptoms, which are responding to the gluten free diet was enough to convince my rheumatologist of the diagnosis. He is a lupus specialist who is used to diagnosing lupus and similar autoimmune disorders on the basis of symptoms which are not always reflected in the blood test results, and was willing to accept that celiac disease may also present in atypical ways. Not all doctors will do this.

Also biopsies do not always find the damaged areas, which may be patchy, or the damage may be further down than they usually look with the endoscope. Doctors also dispute amongst themselves what level of mucosal damage qualifies for celiac disease.

There are also medically proven neurological forms of gluten sensitivity, which, in may cases, do not cause any damage at all to the digestive system. If you search the internet for "from gut to brain by M Hadjivassilou" you can see more details. He is a well-known neurologist based in a celiac centre in the UK. The whole article is payment protected, but a non-printable slide show version is available to read.

I would therefore not be too disheartened about a failed biopsy, and consider whether to judge your tentative diagnosis on whether you respond to the gluten free diet or not.

If I sound a little cross about this, I am as the gastroenterologist who biopsied me 2 years ago told me not to worry any more about celiac disease as I didn't have it. As a consequence I have suffered another 2 years of rapidly worsening health, which is only now starting to resolve on a gluten free diet. I am convinced that a little more humility and willingness to accept that there is still more to learn about gluten sensitivity and a little less pompous certainty amongst many in the medical profession would go a long way.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks....my symptoms are, well have been diarrhea, lots of gas...bloating....so i have had most of the digestive part anyways......and a few other symptoms....i was convinced it was celiac disease....its like now some people are saying you can just cut back on gluten....maybe one piece of pizza, or one beer, just dont indulge....but i am staying away completely, at least for awhile.....thanks for the input....i appreciate it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




The testing (biopsy) was not properly done. Can't be gluten free that long and expect an accurate result of gluten eating status. so the results are not trustworthy. Either get it redone after eating gluten in "normal" amounts for at least 3 months, or simply try the diet for at least as long.

They were only gluten-free for a month. That isn't enough time for the villi to heal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so i had the elevated gliadin antibody with the blood work....endoscopy showed nothing...i was convinced i had celiac diesease....now what? am i gluten intolerant? do I have "some" gluten?? I am so confused.....i went gluten free for a month....then ONE week eating gluten before biopsy.....anyone???????

OMG, you sound JUST like me! I tested low positive on the blood test and went gluten free for two weeks, then back on gluten for a week before my endoscopy. The doctor let my husband stay in the room when he did the test and showed my husband my villi and said they were completely normal and I do not have celiac (still waiting for the lab results of the biopsy though). My husband told him that I had gone gluten-free for two weeks and felt much better and, are you ready for this, the doctor told him it's all in my head!??!?!! WHAT?!?!?! I too am convinced I have it. All the pieces fell into place when I got the blood test results. I have to call on Monday to get my lab results of the biopsy, but I plan on going gluten-free no matter what the results are. I may splurge once in a while, but overall I'm avoiding it at all costs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have any relief on the diet for that month? At this point I would go gluten free strictly for at least 3 months. You can always later reintroduce gluten and see what your reactions are. Sometimes, O.K. a lot of the time, elimination is the best diagnostic tool you can have. My 10.5 year old has had repeated negative celiac blood work since I was diagnosed almost three years ago. I did take him to a GI the end of July to review his past/present symptoms and she did agree to scope him. It was negative also. After soul searching for the past two years, and after his GI consult/scope, we decided to trial thim gluten free. He is getting to an age that his lack/slow growth was becoming concerning. He has been gluten free now a month and we have seen improvements. He has gained two pounds, his color is better, he is having regular BM's now and not complaining of horrible stomach/gas pains. I'm hopeful he will start growing in height now, since usually when he does gain weight he grows in height too. I plan on doing a gluten challenge mid Dec. However, we are only going to do it long enough to see what happens since we already had a scope done. At his follow up GI appointment, the doctor was willing to acknowledge the fact that he may be gluten intolerent in light of the negative celiac diagnosis. We are going to follow up in Jan. basically to let her know the results of the challange and see what she says. I have no problem now keeping him gluten free for good. My 6 year old had a positive tTg last Nov. We did not have a scope done. My thought on that was that in absence of any other autoimmune issue with him, there was no other reason his tTg would be positive unless he had celiac. Hubby regretted not doing it, he misunderstood how things worked, so we challanged him on gluten after 4.5 months being gluten free. We would have done the three months to get a biopsy, but after three days and the reactions he was having, was enough for my husband to call it quits and consider him celiac. He has no doubt what gluten does to him and that was diagnostic enough for hubby. He does want me to get him "officially diagnosed" based on his past test result(going to have it repeated to see if it went down), his positive response to the diet, and his reactions to the challange. He feels it is necessary for future issues with school (ours has been great and we don't have a 504 plan), college and future occupations.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They were only gluten-free for a month. That isn't enough time for the villi to heal.

It depends on the level of damage required by the reading pathologist. If there were minimal damage to begin with a month may have been long enough.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, you sound JUST like me! I tested low positive on the blood test and went gluten free for two weeks, then back on gluten for a week before my endoscopy. The doctor let my husband stay in the room when he did the test and showed my husband my villi and said they were completely normal and I do not have celiac (still waiting for the lab results of the biopsy though). My husband told him that I had gone gluten-free for two weeks and felt much better and, are you ready for this, the doctor told him it's all in my head!??!?!! WHAT?!?!?! I too am convinced I have it. All the pieces fell into place when I got the blood test results. I have to call on Monday to get my lab results of the biopsy, but I plan on going gluten-free no matter what the results are. I may splurge once in a while, but overall I'm avoiding it at all costs.

wow....we are totally in the same boat!!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so i had the elevated gliadin antibody with the blood work....endoscopy showed nothing...i was convinced i had celiac diesease....now what? am i gluten intolerant? do I have "some" gluten?? I am so confused.....i went gluten free for a month....then ONE week eating gluten before biopsy.....anyone???????

I'm in the same boat right now. It's confusing and frustrating. I had surgery in May and started having stomach problems a month or so after ward. A month after symptoms started, my blood was tested and was positive for both h. pylori and celiac. Did the antibiotics for the h pylori then they scope me....nothing. I lost 35 lbs in a month and a half how can there be nothing? That's been a month ago and I've been gluten free since then and haven't lost anymore weight nor been sick. When I accidentally get some gluten I end up sick.

The Dr said that he took a couple of biopsies of the intestine and one of the stomach. You hate to second guess the highly educated Dr, but you also hate to pay tons of money for a procedure that you don't think was done accurately and has left you not knowing what is wrong with you. I don't want celiac, but even more than that, I don't want to not know what the problem is. You can't treat it if you don't know what it is. Of the family Dr, hematologist (enlarged spleen that seemed to come along with this), and gastro one one has yet to tell me what causes positive celiac blood tests and negative biopsies.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tested recently negative to the celiac panel blood tests and a couple of years ago to biopsy. However my family history (half of my Mother's family are celiacs) and symptoms, which are responding to the gluten free diet was enough to convince my rheumatologist of the diagnosis. He is a lupus specialist who is used to diagnosing lupus and similar autoimmune disorders on the basis of symptoms which are not always reflected in the blood test results, and was willing to accept that celiac disease may also present in atypical ways. Not all doctors will do this.

May I ask who this doctor is?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is Dr Edwards at the London Lupus Centre in the UK. I did have to find a medical paper written by a celiac specialist (Dr Peter Green from the Columbia Celiac Centre) who quoted my exact presentation as a rare atypical presentation of Celiac (apparent polymyalgia rheumatica plus ESR (SED rate) of 100)as evidence though. He was kind and not affronted by my having done my own research.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is Dr Edwards at the London Lupus Centre in the UK. I did have to find a medical paper written by a celiac specialist (Dr Peter Green from the Columbia Celiac Centre) who quoted my exact presentation as a rare atypical presentation of Celiac (apparent polymyalgia rheumatica plus ESR (SED rate) of 100)as evidence though. He was kind and not affronted by my having done my own research.

UKGail - can you provide a link or a little more info on the article you mention above? My mother has been dxed with PMR and is having a rough time, so I am looking for more info, particularly since I have celiac disease.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UKGail - can you provide a link or a little more info on the article you mention above? My mother has been dxed with PMR and is having a rough time, so I am looking for more info, particularly since I have celiac disease.

Hi StacyA

I am sorry to hear your Mother is having a tough time with PMR. Please find below a link to the article. The reference to PMR is in the section on atypical presentations. My symptoms of presumed PMR have completely disappeared with a gluten free diet, and they resurface in a mild form on exposure to small doses of gluten, lasting for a few days or a week or so. I am also sensitive to airborne wheat and have sinus problems,which seems to be reasonably well alleviated using Zantac (an H2 anti-histamine), so am suspicious of a wheat allergy, which may possibly explain why I am seronegative to the celiac panel. I hope my Doctor will send me for allergy testing after the holidays.

Best wishes

http://www.charlotte-celiac-connection.org/files/The_Many_Faces_Of_Celiac_Disease.pdf

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,684
    • Total Posts
      921,741
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I have frequent canker sores (roughly comes back every couple of months). Some blood test results are as following. Component Your Value Standard Range TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE IgG 0.31 Index <=0.90 Index Tissue transglutaminase IgA 0.96 Index <=0.90 Index My doctor said that result is unspecific, and I unlikely have celiac disease, since I do not have other abdominal symptoms. For reference, I do have frequent constipation, excessive gas, frequent canker sore, etc. Do you think an upper endoscopy is recommended? I am a little hesitate considering the risk of this procedure and the fact that my symptoms are not that bad. I appreciate all suggestions.  
    • Hello, I see you posted this a long while ago, and perhaps--I hope-- it's no longer a matter of concern, but I thought I'd mention that shortly before I was diagnosed for celiac's, I had distinct yellow blotches on the corners of my eyelids toward my nose. Some months after I had stopped eating gluten, the yellow gradually went away, and--as it just reappeared now several years later, I googled the issue again.  I am only speculating here, but I do believe it is related to liver problems, which, in turn, are related to celiac's. I don't think liver function tests cover all aspects of liver health. I say this because when I was pregnant I developed a temporary liver condition called interhepatic colestasis of pregnancy (ICP), but my liver function tests had been fine. (The condition is diagnosed based on bile levels in the blood, not on liver function). I discovered upon some research that (of course!) ICP  can be associated with celiac's disease.  My hunch is this-- that celiac's presents two problems to the liver: 1) the malabsorption of nutrients--esp. Vit. K2-- that are vital liver health; 2) since gluten registers as a toxin to the immune system (I think?), perhaps the liver gets overloaded processing so much toxic material. Or perhaps there's some other reason. At any rate, poor liver health and celiac's do seem to be linked, according to a few articles I've found. Anyway, hope your problems are resolved now.  
    • my daughter did stool test from enterolab but this gluten sensitive blood test is from http://requestatest.com/tests/search    
    • OK, was your daughter tested by a doctor or did you do one of these order online stool tests? And the same question goes for your tests. Can you give a link to the company?
    • NO. Approx. 1/3 of the population carries the genes for celiac but that does NOT mean they will ever present with celiac. Only a small percentage of them will. A gene test is really used more to rule out celiac rather than to diagnose it. What I meant was that since your daughter is diagnosed and IF you carry one or both of the celiac genes then there is a greater chance you are celiac or "early stages" especially in light of your symptoms. All 3 of those factors weighed together was what I was referring to.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,685
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    jhc
    Joined