Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Still Angry Sometimes After 2 Years


sandsurfgirl

Recommended Posts

beebs Enthusiast

I would just like to point out this thread that couldn't have come at a better time - this woman had two negative biopsies and has just had a positive one 6 weeks ago! They are NOT reliable, its not black and white at all. Much like the ASD spectrum, not black and white!!

I had negative bloods - I haven't had an endo but the Paed GI said there is no way my symptoms aren't celiac - no diagnosis though. But if I eat gluten I can die from it - no black and white I tell you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ravenwoodglass Mentor

I had negative bloods - I haven't had an endo but the Paed GI said there is no way my symptoms aren't celiac - no diagnosis though. But if I eat gluten I can die from it - no black and white I tell you!!

I had negative bloods also but when the second challenge ordered by my GI left me bleeding on the bathroom floor I was given an 'official' diagnosis of celiac. Some here would call me gluten intolerant because of those negative bloods and because I didn't have an endo but my doctors know that gluten for me is a very serious issue. I am celiac and was celiac since childhood.

People with DH are diagnosed celiac even if they have no gut damage at all, they are not called gluten intolerant. So that blows the 'not celiac cause no villi damage' thinking right out of the room. In the end it doesn't matter what label we have, it doesn't matter what body system is impacted the most it matters that gluten is poison to us no matter what label someone chooses to put on it.

And yes I am still very angry at the doctors who took so long to diagnose me. If they had done it sooner perhaps a little bit of CC wouldn't leave me wiped out with a three day GI bleed like I have been dealing with for the last 3 days. While the anger doesn't control my life it does make me sad when I think of all I lost for the sake of doctors who trusted those blood tests like they were absolutes and never even told me what the 'sprue' they were testing me for over and over was. If I had been diagnosed sooner perhaps that a bit of CC wouldn't leave me breathless, bleeding and needing to have a phone with me for hours in the bathroom wondering if I am going to survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Di2011 Enthusiast

I have no diagnosis.

I just call gluten "my poison". I don't care what others want to call me or my condition or my reaction or my recovery. When others need some excuse/understanding for my appearance (DH all over) then I tell them I have a "problem with gluten".

I've had a long list of non-skin related (including GI issues) that have resolved gluten free that I had thought must be "normal". Some I know now would have become very serious very soon (it was getting to that point) if I hadn't worked in a bakery and fortunately developed head to ankle DH.

Knowing what it is six months later - I know what my poison does to me. I don't much care for anything official right now probably ever. I just hope that people that have "it doesn't feel right" in their head/body go with the feeling. If it doesn't feel right and medical professionals and meds don't seem to help or feel right, they probably aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintmaybe Collaborator

Yet another reason why trusting biopsy results would be misguided at best. In the U.S. at least, they're rarely performed correctly!

Open Original Shared Link

Biopsies are only performed with the correct number of samples taken about 30% of the time. When they are performed with four or more samples, the rate of diagnosis of celiac disease increases *sevenfold.* That is just plain ignorance, malfeasance. I don't even have the words for how angry that makes me.

There is no reason whatsoever that a GI specialist should not be able to perform an endoscopy correctly. This is 2011, and this is barbaric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leper Messiah Apprentice

I agree, they're pretentious know-it-alls!!

Experienced or not...you're are very lucky indeed if you've not experienced the inadequacy of modern medicine. Otherwise I would suggest your symptoms can't be that bad! Mine make me feel like death and not one doctor has eased that, in fact they have prolonged mine substantially. If I had been accurately diagnosed I could saved 10 years of suffering which started off light but is now at the point where I struggle to have any quality of life, basically dragging my sorry behind to work and then back to bed/the sofa as soon as I can.

The purpose of this forum to me is to provide the support and guidance that should be provided by the medical community....it's a sad and frankly disgusting irony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celtic Queen Explorer
There is no reason whatsoever that a GI specialist should not be able to perform an endoscopy correctly. This is 2011, and this is barbaric.

I totally agree. My GI was an arrogant idiot more interested in taking my money than helping me. I told him during our initial appointment that I hadn't been eating gluten for 4 weeks. He still ordered a colonoscopy, endoscopy, and biopsy. At that point I hadn't found all the intelligent people on this board who would tell me that it wouldn't do any good to have all those tests run since I'd been off the gluten. So when the tests were run, I'd been off of it for 6 weeks. And of course, everything came back fine. And I don't even know how many samples he took.

When the nurse called to tell me that the biopsies were fine, I asked about a follow up visit. She said, "But everything is fine." And I explained about not eating wheat before the test and that I still had a positive Celiac panel. She said she would check with him and would get back to me. She even metioned that the whole office had attended a presentation about gluten intolerance the day before and how she had learned so much.

Another nurse called back and said the doctor didn't want to see me again. I explained to her, yet again, about the positive blood work and how the diet affected the test. I said that I would have gone back on gluten if I had known it was going to affect the test. She mentioned that they wouldn't have allowed that because that would be cruel. Okay, how else are you going to diagnose me again.

Twice I tried to get the doctor of follow up with me and twice he refused. Now I'm out $1,100 of my money for a test that is basically worthless. I can't even begin to tell you how mad that made me. I did make sure to tell my GP, the one who had referred me to this idiot. She was pretty upset. So maybe I helped someone from her practice getting stuck with this guy in the future.

I've learned so much more from everyone here on the board than I have from any of my doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Nope - I still want a diagnosis. I mean- lets face it Gluten intolerance is treated like lactose intolerance by the general public - no matter how bad it makes you feel. Some people have life threatening reactions to eating gluten one time - ravenwood - myself, and when I say things like "Gluten makes me sick, gluten intolerance, gluten free" I can see how peoples eyes glaze over and they are not (including medical professionals) taking me seriously. And at restaurants if you say "Do you have gluten free" and they go "errmmm, yeah, yes, yes we do" and I think - WTF?? I could literally die on your floor if you give me gluten. It just makes me want to scream!

Part of my other reasons for wanting a correct diagnosis - is that it was literally a no brainer, family history, positive genes, severe symptoms - but because a GP lied to me and said my genes were not the right ones no one ever went down the path of celiac. Part of the anger is the ignorance surrounding Celiac testing - and it will only change if enough of us are angry about it.

Another reason - I may be torturing myself - but is the reason for all my other autoimmune crap because I was undiagnosed Celia so long?

And my very last reason for wanting a diagnosis - is what if I am wrong. What if it is not gluten? Ok - so the very last time I had a meal with gluten in I ended up in emergency with intussusception - but what if that was a fluke. And then I am scared and worried about food all the time for no reason!! I am not one of those who likes Gluten free, I doubt I'd keep to it if I didn't get so bad with it. If it was just a little intolerance I would probably fudge it here and there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

And my very last reason for wanting a diagnosis - is what if I am wrong. What if it is not gluten? Ok - so the very last time I had a meal with gluten in I ended up in emergency with intussusception - but what if that was a fluke. And then I am scared and worried about food all the time for no reason!! I am not one of those who likes Gluten free, I doubt I'd keep to it if I didn't get so bad with it. If it was just a little intolerance I would probably fudge it here and there.

I so get this.

I had no Celiac antibody testing - my ND assumed "gluten intolerance" instead of Celiac because I had no gastro symptoms and was dx'ed with Hashis and "felt bad from thyroid stuff". She thought my rash was ringworm...

Good news, she quickly recognized the mistake. Bad news is the window has passed.

Sometimes I wonder...can I eat a bit of this or that? Then I look at the pics of my rash, and look at the latest round of rash (barely at all) and I know the ONLY thing missing in my life is GLUTEN. No gluten = no rash, and better health.

You're right though, unless the gluten challenged DO something, better and more accurate and widespread dx will NOT happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

I forgot the most important reason for me to get a diag! You will only be able to get the vaccine when it comes out (In Australia) if you have been diagnosed via biopsy - otherwise it is tough luck. Now - I know that lots of people don't want to have it and that is great. But truth be told - every time I am out of the house - I bite into something and think "is this the day where it all ends for me" It is very stressful - I hate it. I just want to be able to eat again without being scared of dying, not asking much!?? haha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I forgot the most important reason for me to get a diag! You will only be able to get the vaccine when it comes out (In Australia) if you have been diagnosed via biopsy - otherwise it is tough luck. Now - I know that lots of people don't want to have it and that is great. But truth be told - every time I am out of the house - I bite into something and think "is this the day where it all ends for me" It is very stressful - I hate it. I just want to be able to eat again without being scared of dying, not asking much!?? haha!

Okay, WHAT vaccine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

They are in clinical trials here in Australia - seems to be going well .

Open Original Shared Link

09/05/11

Coeliac disease vaccine shows promising results in Phase I trial

The world

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Arrghh = I just read that it'll only work with bloody DQ2 - arrghhh!! Where is the little emoticon that hits itself in the head with a hammer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sandsurfgirl Collaborator

My concern with a vaccine would be that they are only looking at resolution of GI symptoms.

Personally I wouldn't quit being gluten free because of a vaccine, but if it could lessen the impact of getting glutened that would be great.

Saying that celiac affects 1% of the population makes me say "ARRRGH!" One percent is diagnosed but everything I've read says it's probably more like 10 to 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

And is it effective against DH?

I'm half dq2, half dq8. Wonder if it works on half genes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

I am the same ssg (can I call you that :) - Even if I had the vaccine, it wouldn't mean I would eat gluten again - just that I won't have to be scared if I did get glutened!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

And is it effective against DH?

I'm half dq2, half dq8. Wonder if it works on half genes?

Wouldn't it be which one of your genes was the one that was triggered, which they still can't tell can they? So if its your DQ8 it wouldn't work but if it was your DQ2 it would...Complicated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Wouldn't it be which one of your genes was the one that was triggered, which they still can't tell can they? So if its your DQ8 it wouldn't work but if it was your DQ2 it would...Complicated!

My dq2 is clearer, does that make sense? The dq8 is a translated gene.

I still wonder about the dh, and neuro issues...and does it stop the autoimmune cascade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Katrala Contributor

My concern with a vaccine would be that they are only looking at resolution of GI symptoms.

From my understanding, the goal of the vaccine is to make it so the body no longer attacks itself (the lining) when gluten is present.

Saying that celiac affects 1% of the population makes me say "ARRRGH!" One percent is diagnosed but everything I've read says it's probably more like 10 to 30%.

Which studies mention this percentage as an estimate for celiac disease?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintmaybe Collaborator

It sounds like the vaccine is developed on an antiquated or limited understanding of the spectrum of celiac and gluten intolerant symptoms. Perhaps.

If it stops the body from attacking itself, in whatever capacity, in response to gluten, great! If it's only addressing the intestinal response, well, that's not so helpful for the thousands of us whose primary and *first* symptoms were neurological or "Other", even if we did go on to develop more traditional symptoms of the disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

If you read up about it, it says that it is dealing with the immune response. Says nothing about the type of symptoms, but that it is similar to what they do to desensitise people who are allergic to things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintmaybe Collaborator

If you read up about it, it says that it is dealing with the immune response. Says nothing about the type of symptoms, but that it is similar to what they do to desensitise people who are allergic to things.

Eh, I'm not holding my breath. Phase II is a long way from Phase IV, or on the market. Lots of products stall out in III or IV. Let alone getting through the FDA approval process here in the U.S. which is fraught with politics.

Aside from all of which, it sounds like a weekly injection. Thanks but no thanks. I'm not giving the pharmaceutical industry one more red cent than I absolutely have to for something that seems very intrusive and time consuming. Since I can just...not eat gluten, I'm gonna go do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

This is why I ask....

https://www.celiac.com/articles/21880/1/Is-Gluten-Sensitivity-a-Neurological-Disease/Page1.html

I assume it would help with DH (iga is an autoimmune reaction).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Wow - what an interesting read prickly - especially about the 53% who felt better on the diet with no elevated anitbodies or gut damage! I know gluten intolerance is very real -but that means it is very very, common also!

I would feel much the same saintmaybe - re the vaccine, if I could guarantee that I never got glutened again :) Does sound invasive and its a fair while off - but it still gives me hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

Aside from all of which, it sounds like a weekly injection. Thanks but no thanks. I'm not giving the pharmaceutical industry one more red cent than I absolutely have to for something that seems very intrusive and time consuming. Since I can just...not eat gluten, I'm gonna go do that.

But think of all the $$$$$$ the pharm companies could make off this!!!! Would kind of make up for all the money they lose when we go on the diet. They lost thousands off me alone in the last 9 years since I no longer have to take the 5 different and very expensive meds that I had to take before diagnosis just to get painfully through the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,043
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gluten Freends
    Newest Member
    Gluten Freends
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Katiec123
      @cristiana hi!  the things I’ve read online about having untreated coeliac disease whilst pregnant has really scared me and made me very hesitant to continue eating it. I feel like the best option might be to eliminate gluten from my diet now and then continue with testing after I’ve given birth. I’ve got in touch with my gp and am due to get a phone call back on Monday. Really worried now as I’ve had 2 miscarriages in the past 
    • cristiana
      @Katiec123 Welcome to the forum. I started to have symptoms related to coeliac disease (mouth ulcers, aura migraines etc) but no gastric symptoms during my first pregnancy.  That went to term, in fact, I was 10 days over and had to be induced.  But my second baby, born 21 months later, arrived at 33 weeks.  He's now doing well, and taller than all of us - it was just an earlier than expected arrival! I agree, gluten would be very unwise to continue eating gluten if there is any suspicion that you have coeliac disease during your pregnancy.   It would of course be good to know for sure, one way or another, because I believe coeliacs receive extra monitoring during pregnancy in many countries.   I think it may be well worth asking your GP if you can be referred to a gastroenterologist for a formal diagnosis asap.   By the way you spell 'coeliac' I'm guessing you are posting from the UK?  If that is the case, the NHS may rush things along for you, I suspect they will.  If it appears that they cannot refer you urgently, if you have the money for a private consultation it might be well worth it, as there is a trend here in the UK (I'm British) to diagnose coeliacs without the need for an endoscopy if the blood test results are compelling. Sounds like this is the case for you.  If you can see a gastroenterologist privately s/he might be able to diagnose you there and then (make sure you take a printout of your blood tests). Generally, there is a lot of support for coeliacs through the NHS, with a nutritionist, annual reviews and blood tests to check for diet compliance and health related issues, DEXA scans to check bone density, extra vaccinations where indicated and in some areas, certain gluten free food available on prescription.  So for lots of reasons, if you can get a diagnosis it's worth it. I hope all goes well with your appointment, let us know how you get on.
    • Shireen32
      Hi , since being gluten free I am still having bad stomach problems . Such as constant gas in my stomach 24/7 ,burning, constant bubbling noises coming from my stomach and gurgling sounds that never stop .Pain under the left side of my rib cage when ever I eat and just always there’s pain there  .  My symptoms have not improved at all since being gluten free.  Could this be refractory coeliac disease ?? How is that even diagnosed or confirmed  ?  I had tests recently and this is what they say :Endomysial abs (IgA) -Positive  TTG abs (IgA)U/ml : My result is : 0.9 U/ml The Range:0 - 10 U/ml What does this mean pls ??? How can I still test positive for Endomysial abs when I am gluten free and am very careful about cross contamination? Do I even have coeliac disease I’m convinced some other digestive disorder is causing these symptoms .   I also have not had a endoscopy and now the gastroenterologist calls me after one year ( I’m from the uk and have free healthcare which has been such a nightmare with all this and never help me  )  so as I am gluten free the gastroenterologist advised me to start eating gluten again to be referred for a biopsy .. Is a biopsy even worth me doing ? The only proof I have is when I was eating gluten I could never get my ferretin , vitamin d and folate levels up . And since being gluten free these have gone up a little bit  . But that doesn’t always mean coeliac as I know gluten stops absorption in even normal people  . Pls can anyone shed some light it’s much needed ! And share some advice or answer my questions above . I have no idea with this whole coeliac stuff and am very much struggling .Much Appreciated .  
    • knitty kitty
      Vitamin D deficiency.  Not enough Omega Threes. Another autoimmune disease like arthritis, maybe.    
    • Eldene
      Any Naturopaths on this site?
×
×
  • Create New...