Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Still Angry Sometimes After 2 Years


sandsurfgirl

Recommended Posts

beebs Enthusiast

I would just like to point out this thread that couldn't have come at a better time - this woman had two negative biopsies and has just had a positive one 6 weeks ago! They are NOT reliable, its not black and white at all. Much like the ASD spectrum, not black and white!!

I had negative bloods - I haven't had an endo but the Paed GI said there is no way my symptoms aren't celiac - no diagnosis though. But if I eat gluten I can die from it - no black and white I tell you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ravenwoodglass Mentor

I had negative bloods - I haven't had an endo but the Paed GI said there is no way my symptoms aren't celiac - no diagnosis though. But if I eat gluten I can die from it - no black and white I tell you!!

I had negative bloods also but when the second challenge ordered by my GI left me bleeding on the bathroom floor I was given an 'official' diagnosis of celiac. Some here would call me gluten intolerant because of those negative bloods and because I didn't have an endo but my doctors know that gluten for me is a very serious issue. I am celiac and was celiac since childhood.

People with DH are diagnosed celiac even if they have no gut damage at all, they are not called gluten intolerant. So that blows the 'not celiac cause no villi damage' thinking right out of the room. In the end it doesn't matter what label we have, it doesn't matter what body system is impacted the most it matters that gluten is poison to us no matter what label someone chooses to put on it.

And yes I am still very angry at the doctors who took so long to diagnose me. If they had done it sooner perhaps a little bit of CC wouldn't leave me wiped out with a three day GI bleed like I have been dealing with for the last 3 days. While the anger doesn't control my life it does make me sad when I think of all I lost for the sake of doctors who trusted those blood tests like they were absolutes and never even told me what the 'sprue' they were testing me for over and over was. If I had been diagnosed sooner perhaps that a bit of CC wouldn't leave me breathless, bleeding and needing to have a phone with me for hours in the bathroom wondering if I am going to survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Di2011 Enthusiast

I have no diagnosis.

I just call gluten "my poison". I don't care what others want to call me or my condition or my reaction or my recovery. When others need some excuse/understanding for my appearance (DH all over) then I tell them I have a "problem with gluten".

I've had a long list of non-skin related (including GI issues) that have resolved gluten free that I had thought must be "normal". Some I know now would have become very serious very soon (it was getting to that point) if I hadn't worked in a bakery and fortunately developed head to ankle DH.

Knowing what it is six months later - I know what my poison does to me. I don't much care for anything official right now probably ever. I just hope that people that have "it doesn't feel right" in their head/body go with the feeling. If it doesn't feel right and medical professionals and meds don't seem to help or feel right, they probably aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintmaybe Collaborator

Yet another reason why trusting biopsy results would be misguided at best. In the U.S. at least, they're rarely performed correctly!

Open Original Shared Link

Biopsies are only performed with the correct number of samples taken about 30% of the time. When they are performed with four or more samples, the rate of diagnosis of celiac disease increases *sevenfold.* That is just plain ignorance, malfeasance. I don't even have the words for how angry that makes me.

There is no reason whatsoever that a GI specialist should not be able to perform an endoscopy correctly. This is 2011, and this is barbaric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leper Messiah Apprentice

I agree, they're pretentious know-it-alls!!

Experienced or not...you're are very lucky indeed if you've not experienced the inadequacy of modern medicine. Otherwise I would suggest your symptoms can't be that bad! Mine make me feel like death and not one doctor has eased that, in fact they have prolonged mine substantially. If I had been accurately diagnosed I could saved 10 years of suffering which started off light but is now at the point where I struggle to have any quality of life, basically dragging my sorry behind to work and then back to bed/the sofa as soon as I can.

The purpose of this forum to me is to provide the support and guidance that should be provided by the medical community....it's a sad and frankly disgusting irony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celtic Queen Explorer
There is no reason whatsoever that a GI specialist should not be able to perform an endoscopy correctly. This is 2011, and this is barbaric.

I totally agree. My GI was an arrogant idiot more interested in taking my money than helping me. I told him during our initial appointment that I hadn't been eating gluten for 4 weeks. He still ordered a colonoscopy, endoscopy, and biopsy. At that point I hadn't found all the intelligent people on this board who would tell me that it wouldn't do any good to have all those tests run since I'd been off the gluten. So when the tests were run, I'd been off of it for 6 weeks. And of course, everything came back fine. And I don't even know how many samples he took.

When the nurse called to tell me that the biopsies were fine, I asked about a follow up visit. She said, "But everything is fine." And I explained about not eating wheat before the test and that I still had a positive Celiac panel. She said she would check with him and would get back to me. She even metioned that the whole office had attended a presentation about gluten intolerance the day before and how she had learned so much.

Another nurse called back and said the doctor didn't want to see me again. I explained to her, yet again, about the positive blood work and how the diet affected the test. I said that I would have gone back on gluten if I had known it was going to affect the test. She mentioned that they wouldn't have allowed that because that would be cruel. Okay, how else are you going to diagnose me again.

Twice I tried to get the doctor of follow up with me and twice he refused. Now I'm out $1,100 of my money for a test that is basically worthless. I can't even begin to tell you how mad that made me. I did make sure to tell my GP, the one who had referred me to this idiot. She was pretty upset. So maybe I helped someone from her practice getting stuck with this guy in the future.

I've learned so much more from everyone here on the board than I have from any of my doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Nope - I still want a diagnosis. I mean- lets face it Gluten intolerance is treated like lactose intolerance by the general public - no matter how bad it makes you feel. Some people have life threatening reactions to eating gluten one time - ravenwood - myself, and when I say things like "Gluten makes me sick, gluten intolerance, gluten free" I can see how peoples eyes glaze over and they are not (including medical professionals) taking me seriously. And at restaurants if you say "Do you have gluten free" and they go "errmmm, yeah, yes, yes we do" and I think - WTF?? I could literally die on your floor if you give me gluten. It just makes me want to scream!

Part of my other reasons for wanting a correct diagnosis - is that it was literally a no brainer, family history, positive genes, severe symptoms - but because a GP lied to me and said my genes were not the right ones no one ever went down the path of celiac. Part of the anger is the ignorance surrounding Celiac testing - and it will only change if enough of us are angry about it.

Another reason - I may be torturing myself - but is the reason for all my other autoimmune crap because I was undiagnosed Celia so long?

And my very last reason for wanting a diagnosis - is what if I am wrong. What if it is not gluten? Ok - so the very last time I had a meal with gluten in I ended up in emergency with intussusception - but what if that was a fluke. And then I am scared and worried about food all the time for no reason!! I am not one of those who likes Gluten free, I doubt I'd keep to it if I didn't get so bad with it. If it was just a little intolerance I would probably fudge it here and there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

And my very last reason for wanting a diagnosis - is what if I am wrong. What if it is not gluten? Ok - so the very last time I had a meal with gluten in I ended up in emergency with intussusception - but what if that was a fluke. And then I am scared and worried about food all the time for no reason!! I am not one of those who likes Gluten free, I doubt I'd keep to it if I didn't get so bad with it. If it was just a little intolerance I would probably fudge it here and there.

I so get this.

I had no Celiac antibody testing - my ND assumed "gluten intolerance" instead of Celiac because I had no gastro symptoms and was dx'ed with Hashis and "felt bad from thyroid stuff". She thought my rash was ringworm...

Good news, she quickly recognized the mistake. Bad news is the window has passed.

Sometimes I wonder...can I eat a bit of this or that? Then I look at the pics of my rash, and look at the latest round of rash (barely at all) and I know the ONLY thing missing in my life is GLUTEN. No gluten = no rash, and better health.

You're right though, unless the gluten challenged DO something, better and more accurate and widespread dx will NOT happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

I forgot the most important reason for me to get a diag! You will only be able to get the vaccine when it comes out (In Australia) if you have been diagnosed via biopsy - otherwise it is tough luck. Now - I know that lots of people don't want to have it and that is great. But truth be told - every time I am out of the house - I bite into something and think "is this the day where it all ends for me" It is very stressful - I hate it. I just want to be able to eat again without being scared of dying, not asking much!?? haha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I forgot the most important reason for me to get a diag! You will only be able to get the vaccine when it comes out (In Australia) if you have been diagnosed via biopsy - otherwise it is tough luck. Now - I know that lots of people don't want to have it and that is great. But truth be told - every time I am out of the house - I bite into something and think "is this the day where it all ends for me" It is very stressful - I hate it. I just want to be able to eat again without being scared of dying, not asking much!?? haha!

Okay, WHAT vaccine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

They are in clinical trials here in Australia - seems to be going well .

Open Original Shared Link

09/05/11

Coeliac disease vaccine shows promising results in Phase I trial

The world

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Arrghh = I just read that it'll only work with bloody DQ2 - arrghhh!! Where is the little emoticon that hits itself in the head with a hammer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sandsurfgirl Collaborator

My concern with a vaccine would be that they are only looking at resolution of GI symptoms.

Personally I wouldn't quit being gluten free because of a vaccine, but if it could lessen the impact of getting glutened that would be great.

Saying that celiac affects 1% of the population makes me say "ARRRGH!" One percent is diagnosed but everything I've read says it's probably more like 10 to 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

And is it effective against DH?

I'm half dq2, half dq8. Wonder if it works on half genes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

I am the same ssg (can I call you that :) - Even if I had the vaccine, it wouldn't mean I would eat gluten again - just that I won't have to be scared if I did get glutened!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

And is it effective against DH?

I'm half dq2, half dq8. Wonder if it works on half genes?

Wouldn't it be which one of your genes was the one that was triggered, which they still can't tell can they? So if its your DQ8 it wouldn't work but if it was your DQ2 it would...Complicated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Wouldn't it be which one of your genes was the one that was triggered, which they still can't tell can they? So if its your DQ8 it wouldn't work but if it was your DQ2 it would...Complicated!

My dq2 is clearer, does that make sense? The dq8 is a translated gene.

I still wonder about the dh, and neuro issues...and does it stop the autoimmune cascade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Katrala Contributor

My concern with a vaccine would be that they are only looking at resolution of GI symptoms.

From my understanding, the goal of the vaccine is to make it so the body no longer attacks itself (the lining) when gluten is present.

Saying that celiac affects 1% of the population makes me say "ARRRGH!" One percent is diagnosed but everything I've read says it's probably more like 10 to 30%.

Which studies mention this percentage as an estimate for celiac disease?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintmaybe Collaborator

It sounds like the vaccine is developed on an antiquated or limited understanding of the spectrum of celiac and gluten intolerant symptoms. Perhaps.

If it stops the body from attacking itself, in whatever capacity, in response to gluten, great! If it's only addressing the intestinal response, well, that's not so helpful for the thousands of us whose primary and *first* symptoms were neurological or "Other", even if we did go on to develop more traditional symptoms of the disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

If you read up about it, it says that it is dealing with the immune response. Says nothing about the type of symptoms, but that it is similar to what they do to desensitise people who are allergic to things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintmaybe Collaborator

If you read up about it, it says that it is dealing with the immune response. Says nothing about the type of symptoms, but that it is similar to what they do to desensitise people who are allergic to things.

Eh, I'm not holding my breath. Phase II is a long way from Phase IV, or on the market. Lots of products stall out in III or IV. Let alone getting through the FDA approval process here in the U.S. which is fraught with politics.

Aside from all of which, it sounds like a weekly injection. Thanks but no thanks. I'm not giving the pharmaceutical industry one more red cent than I absolutely have to for something that seems very intrusive and time consuming. Since I can just...not eat gluten, I'm gonna go do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

This is why I ask....

https://www.celiac.com/articles/21880/1/Is-Gluten-Sensitivity-a-Neurological-Disease/Page1.html

I assume it would help with DH (iga is an autoimmune reaction).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Wow - what an interesting read prickly - especially about the 53% who felt better on the diet with no elevated anitbodies or gut damage! I know gluten intolerance is very real -but that means it is very very, common also!

I would feel much the same saintmaybe - re the vaccine, if I could guarantee that I never got glutened again :) Does sound invasive and its a fair while off - but it still gives me hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

Aside from all of which, it sounds like a weekly injection. Thanks but no thanks. I'm not giving the pharmaceutical industry one more red cent than I absolutely have to for something that seems very intrusive and time consuming. Since I can just...not eat gluten, I'm gonna go do that.

But think of all the $$$$$$ the pharm companies could make off this!!!! Would kind of make up for all the money they lose when we go on the diet. They lost thousands off me alone in the last 9 years since I no longer have to take the 5 different and very expensive meds that I had to take before diagnosis just to get painfully through the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,505
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Afton Horvath
    Newest Member
    Afton Horvath
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...