Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Help With Test Results!?
0

10 posts in this topic

Hi! My 4 year old daughter was recently tested for Celiac by her GI. The nurse called to say the test was negative, and so asked for a copy of the labs (they were also looking for markers for Crohn's, etc) and when it arrived it had no reference ranges! I know I should just call, but since they already said it was normal, I hate to be a pest -- and we go for a follow up in June. But, I was just wondering what you all might know?

Her Transglutaminase IgA was 3.72 unit. My concern here is that there is an astrisk next to the number. To me that seems like it might not be normal? Her IgA was 81.8. Those are the only tests we had. Does anyone know what the Transglutaminase normal range is for a 4 year 0 month old is?

Thanks sooo much!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Welcome!

Because of variances, each lab has a unique "normal" range for each test. You really need the norms from the lab that did the testing. Only two tests were done--the standard celiac panel involves more. Testing in young children is known to be unreliable.

I know I haven't helped answer your question. There just isn't enough there to give a solid answer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where was the testing done, i.e., what lab? You could always call the lab and ask for clarification. But if she were my daughter I would want more testing done than just the tTG and total IgA. The full celiac panel consists of:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

Hope you get some more answers.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome!

Because of variances, each lab has a unique "normal" range for each test. You really need the norms from the lab that did the testing. Only two tests were done--the standard celiac panel involves more. Testing in young children is known to be unreliable.

I know I haven't helped answer your question. There just isn't enough there to give a solid answer.

I appreciate the info. I know you're right. I am just frustrated that the nurse must've printed a screen from the computer that isn't really the results b/c there are no reference ranges. I would be shocked that a ped GI at the leading children's hospital in the area would miss a number that's not normal -- so I think I trust them -- but part of me wants to know if the number is close? And if the astrisk means something? I know in Aug she was a .6 on this number -- so it seems to have gone up a noticeable amount?

I just cannot get her bowels normal! No matter what we try...she's got food allergies already so I hate to pull gluten if it isn't necessary. Plus, when we go back in June the GI was going to decide if we scope or not, and so I hate to eliminate before the scope. But, she's missed 3.5 weeks of school. I know she's only 4 and it is only preschool but still.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The test was done at the children's hospital she was seen at. I've put a call into GI this morning to see if they can help me clarify. Hopefully I'll hear back today!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Even if the results are within range, she didn't have all the tests so celiac disease cannot be ruled out. Had we not had the entire blood panel, it would have been missed in my son (5 at the time). All his IgA tests were perfectly normal. It was his IgG tests that were elevated. First doctor (Pediatric GI at very respected Boston hospital) said he DID NOT have it based on his IgA tests and the fact that he seemed perfectly healthy (height, weight, very few physical symptoms, etc.). We couldn't ignore the strange IgG results so we took him to the celiac clinic at Children's Hospital. They did a scope and found extensive celiac damage.

If we had used only the IgA tests and then resumed a regular diet, he would still be sick today . . .

Get all the blood tests or just skip to the scope . . .

If you wait until June for your appointment, then decide to do the scope, you will have to wait even more to book that. I would call the doctor and ask to just schedule it now. What will change from now until June that will help with the decision?

Good luck - I know the waiting is hard.

Cara

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Cara -- this is very helpful. :) I guess they wanted to see if we could get her "straightened out" in the next couple of months, and we wouldn't have to scope? But we've had extensive GI issues...that started 18 months ago, with over active bladder and bladder spasms due to constipation and food dye intolerance. She's very food sensitive and has severe tree nut allergies, as well as more moderate egg, and possible lactose intolerant? Now she's had diarrea for 7 weeks straight and was severely impacted as of 3 weeks ago. She doesn't sleep at night, always has a tummy ache, etc.

But, like your son, she is not underweight, she doesn't look "sickly" (aside from the allergic ringers under her eyes). So, who knows? I of course missed the nurse's call today b/c she didn't call my cell phone number (even though I said to!) so I still don't have any more information.

Can I ask why you were testing for Celiac with very few symptoms? I am just curious since your case sounds a bit similar to ours?

Even if the results are within range, she didn't have all the tests so celiac disease cannot be ruled out. Had we not had the entire blood panel, it would have been missed in my son (5 at the time). All his IgA tests were perfectly normal. It was his IgG tests that were elevated. First doctor (Pediatric GI at very respected Boston hospital) said he DID NOT have it based on his IgA tests and the fact that he seemed perfectly healthy (height, weight, very few physical symptoms, etc.). We couldn't ignore the strange IgG results so we took him to the celiac clinic at Children's Hospital. They did a scope and found extensive celiac damage.

If we had used only the IgA tests and then resumed a regular diet, he would still be sick today . . .

Get all the blood tests or just skip to the scope . . .

If you wait until June for your appointment, then decide to do the scope, you will have to wait even more to book that. I would call the doctor and ask to just schedule it now. What will change from now until June that will help with the decision?

Good luck - I know the waiting is hard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So they still haven't called, but I did find the full lab results from Aug (done by her ped, not by the GI) and the ref range for Transglutiminase IgA seems to be <4. So would 3.72 be a red flag, even though it is still normal? Or is it one of those things that a positive number is usually way higher than 4? I just hate to scope unnecessarily. In 7 months (since Aug) she went from .6 to 3.72. Is that significant?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My son had an abrupt behavior change . . . he was no angel to begin with, but suddenly he was having huge tantrums over nothing (the lego piece won't fit!) and meltdowns over the tiniest frustration (putting on shoes). He suddenly hated homework (previously rushed home to do it) and things like that. He complained for about 3 days of a stomach ache - at home and at school so I took him to our pediatrician. She did the blood test and we went from there. With the switch in doctors, it took about 5 months to diagnose from start to finish. After his blood tests, I started reading about Celiac Disease and realized he had other symptoms - dark circles (always) under his eyes, poor sleep, eczema, leg pain - mostly at night, MD said it was "growing pains" but it would sometimes keep him awake. We didn't realize he had stopped growing because he was still tall for his age, but as soon as he went gluten-free, he shot up three inches and was back on his original growth curve - I didn't even notice he had fallen off.

Strangely, the horrible behavior was only at home . . . somehow he was able to keep it together at school and they never noticed a change.

When my blood came back positive (the whole family got tested after his blood test), we sort of knew for sure, but still kept him on gluten until after the biopsy. Knowing I tested positive made me more certain the first doctor was wrong - just too much of a coincidence.

Now that he has been gluten-free for a year he is doing great. His symptoms are WORSE now if he gets accidently glutened - even has some GI issues which he never had before. Usually lasts 2-3 days.

From reading your post, I think you have already done the "wait and see" . . . what more can you do? What would you do differently to try and help before you meet with the doctor again? The logical thing would be to eliminate gluten and see if she feels better, but then you wouldn't be able to do any further tests. I would just skip to the endoscopy (which could still be weeks away, depending on how appointments are booked) - you could always cancel if her symptoms disappear before the procedure.

I'm no doctor, but I would think the dramatic increase in the numbers means SOMETHING significant. Maybe you are catching it early and there are just not enough antibodies yet to put her over the maximum range? Why wait?

Also, lactose intolerance can be caused by celiac damage . . . could be a symptom, not an additional food sensitivity.

At the very least, the sooner you complete testing (endoscopy) the sooner you can try the gluten-free diet - regardless of the test results. Keep in mind that she could test negative on ALL the tests and still benefit greatly from being gluten free. How she feels gluten free is really the most obvious clue . . . the testing process is so unreliable.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to add:

I was nervous about the endoscopy too. It seemed so extreme and invasive. Except for some stitches, my son had never been to the hospital since the day he was born. Turns out it was no big deal. He had a great time (his brother was jealous!) and was back to his usual self within hours. I had one too and again, no big deal. Worrying about it in advance was much more stressful then the actual procedure.

Older son finally had one too (he had some tooth enamel issues the MD thought could be related and despite his negative blood tests, she wanted to check him out too.) Once again, no big deal.

Really, you will feel so much better with more information.

Hang in there -

Cara

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,681
    • Total Posts
      921,725
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also only really eat one meal a day and always after I get home. I never really feel hungrey. I call it 'Pavlov's dog in reverse'.  I think it comes from so many years of food making me sick. I have gotten to the point where I now at least can eat a sandwhich and some fruit during the day but it wasn't a quick process. When folks get like that it is very important to make sure that one meal has a good amount of both calories and nutrtion.  If your diet is how you describe you are starving yourself.  You need to get yourself used to eating again.  What helped me was carrying a baggie with some nuts and dry fruit with maybe even a handful of gluten free pretzels and always some chocolate baking chips. I just ate couple pieces when I thought of it throughout the day. A little bit of cheese and a couple safe crackers, a piece of fruit or a small tin or individual serving snack pack are also good. You need to get some nutrition during the day so you can feel up to cooking a simple full meal  for dinner. I hope your feeling better soon.
    • Ok, I can't seem to find my first lot of blood tests that were done for Celiac screening, they did include TTG I remember that much, and I am getting another copy of it but another test did come in today.  I don't know how different tests are done around the world and I don't get all the medical jargon but this is what it states, ******************************************************************************* HLA DR/DQ Genotyping for Coeliac Disease, Specimen type : EDTA blood Method : Detection of sequence-specific oligonucleotides (Gen-Probe). HLA-DR - 1, 13          DRB1 - 01, 13 HLA-DQ - 5,6        HLA-DQA1 - 5,6      HLA-DB1 - 05, 06 Interpretation : No genotype susceptibility for coeliac disease.  The DQ2 and DQ8 antigens associated with increased risk of coeliac disease were not identified in this patient.  In the absence of these antigens, coeliac disease is extremely unlikely.   *******************************************************************************   I have read the horror stories of blood tests and scope biopsies not be done right or flawed but here is what I do know as of now, At the moment the most non invasive test I can have done say negative.  I have double scopes (endoscopy and colonoscopy) booked for the 12th of October with results from biopsies expected a week or two after. Chances are they will show, a) signs of coeliac disease (even if the odds are low it can still happen), b) show signs of something else entirely and we will be busy dealing with the ramifications of that or c) it will show no signs of coeliac but I will still be suffering from gluten sensitivity (which is harder/impossible to measure clinically). My GP has told me that stress and anxiety can be a cause of all the symptoms I have been experiencing and suggests if the scopes show nothing that I may benefit from something to treat anxiety, i.e. antidepressants.  Not in a, "Oh we don't know what it is so have these," kind of way, he agrees with the thought that the scopes could indeed show coeliac, something else or even be negative. I did tell him that I could have a sensitivity and that even without benefit of clinical results, some people have gone on a gluten elimination diet for a period of time to see if they get any relief.  My question is this, if the scopes come up negative and I try eliminating gluten, how long would it be before I saw any results or improvements?  I have read enough here and elsewhere to know that everybody is different, some see results within days, some see results longer but are there any guidelines for how long a test like this should be undertaken for?  I have heard everything thing from two weeks to two months.  All of this is entirely moot at this point but I know that even if the results said clear, there would always be a little part of me that wonders if it could be a sensitivity that is the problem.  Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated, and a thank you to all those who have taken the time to respond and offer advice and encouragement so far.        
    • We don't delete accounts but can delete any personal information and change your screen name if you would like. Just send me a personal message with three possible screen names. For the record you can edit most things in your account area with the exception of your screen name.
    • Thanks I never heard of that dye before, I guess I have to find more natural meat thanks for the suggestion. 
    • Yes, I only eat one meal a day. Sometimes salad or fries or whatever I can find. And thanks for the replies again.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,680
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Misalina
    Joined