Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

FDA to Issue Gluten-Free Allergy Labeling Rule in 2012 - Celiac.com
0

8 posts in this topic

Celiac.com

FDA to Issue Gluten-Free Allergy Labeling Rule in 2012

Celiac.com

Celiac.com 04/26/2012 - A recent statement by the FDA announces that the agency is gathering data to respond to calls for an "alternative approach" to determining a specific gluten threshold level other than the proposed level of under 20 parts per ...

and more »

View the full article

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Not to revive a dead topic, but I've been hunting through threads- does anyone know the status of this? The FDA web didn't seem to explain this to me very well (I did dig around- found some stuff but nothing substantial).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will believe it when it actually happens.

In 2004, FALCPA said, in part:

SEC. 206. GLUTEN LABELING. Deadlines. Regulations. 21 USC 343 note.

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with appropriate experts and stakeholders, shall issue a proposed rule to define, and permit use of, the term "gluten-free" on the labeling of foods. Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a final rule to define, and permit use of, the term ``gluten-free'' on the labeling of foods.

Um, the dates in question were 2006 for the proposal, and 2008 for the final rule. Still waiting. Yawn.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This article was from April.....

:rolleyes:

If you read it again, it says FDA intends to issue rules by the end of fiscal year 2012. The fiscal year for the Federal government of the U.S. does not match the calendar year. It runs from Oct 1 of one year to Sept 30 of the year it is named for, so Fiscal Year 2012 ran from Oct 1, 2011, to Sept 30, 2012.

However, when I clicked on the pdf link, "FDA," it looks to be a copy of the Dept of Health and Human Services Fiscal year 2013 on the page header. It says Food and Drug Administration page 138, Gluten Allergy Labeling. summary: Conducted safety assessment of gluten exposure in individuals with celiac, and published a Federal Register notice in August 2011, reopening the comment period for the proposed rule. But it says they intended to finish and issue the rule, by the end of Fiscal year 2012.

http://americanceliac.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/FDA-CJ-gluten-free-.pdf?utm_source=Copy+of+February+2012&utm_campaign=24+Feb+12&utm_medium=email

So they intended to have finished this process, 2 and half months ago.

LOL. :unsure:

I think they are still in the process of "discovering" that there are more than 40,000 celiacs in the United States, and this continues to surprise them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it was from April, but I wasn't able to find anything in the forum (or many other places, except what was already linked) on this topic since. I did look. And the FY2012 deadline was why I was wondering if anyone had any news- seems like there would at least have been UPDATES since April if they're behind their deadline (which always happens with such things, I know).

On a semi-cursory search, there also seems to be an alarming lack of really good research being used in the FDA's decision-making process. Studies seem to often have very small n's, high attrition (of course, when you think about it), and a lot of them are not only not double-blind, but also not single-blind (which is mind-boggling). Someone please correct me and link if I am wrong; this is the primary document I'm drawing that conclusion from. However, it's kind of alone the lines of common issues with medical research at large, unfortunately, so I can believe a lot of the research in the decision-making process is like this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




The reason you haven't seen anything lately is that it was not approved and it was set aside. That is what Takala and Peter were trying to say.

Here's a thread from Oct about a petition to try to get a vote/resolution on the bill.

http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/97190-petition-for-gluten-free-labeling-on-white-house-website-celiaccom/page__st__15__hl__+fda#entry833685

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I am remembering correctly, they (FDA) outsourced the first commentary period on the rule change to a private company, it was not done on the FDA website, and the comment acceptance time period was short, and they did not want to be bothered unless the person was officially diagnosed as celiac, which, for technical reasons beyond our control, knocks some of us out of their persons of interest, because, as I said above, they're still surprised by the concept that there just may be more than 40,000 celiacs in the United States. If you are "just" gluten intolerant, you are in a less respected category to certain interests (except to the celiac and gluten intolerant researchers, whom have been trying to correct this misconception that you don't really exist with a real medical condition). This may be why you are not finding the answers to any customer/consumer/patient input surveys on the FDA website. This means.... I have no idea what the FDA did after they contracted out those surveys! They did send the former chemical industry FDA official to speak to some celiac groups working on the labeling, sort of like sending the ambassador to the next galaxy, we come in peace, just don't expect anything.

This contains a list of FDA Guidance of Regulatory Information, including the Gluten Category, in Topic - Specific Labeling Information

http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuidanceRegulatoryInformation/Topic-SpecificLabelingInformation/default.htm#gluten

Gluten-Free

There may be more information on their website, but this was the obvious list.

The press release from Aug 2, 2011, includes this:

_______

“Before finalizing our gluten-free definition, we want up-to-date input from affected consumers, the food industry, and others to help assure that the label strikes the right balance,” said Michael Taylor, deputy commissioner for foods. “We must take into account the need to protect individuals with celiac disease from adverse health consequences while ensuring that food manufacturers can meet the needs of consumers by producing a wide variety of gluten-free foods.”

_______

Then there has been a bit of push-back from certain lobbying groups on this, of course, all jockeying for Federal dollars for medical research, for the Farm Bill, for the export industry, etc. But I think they (FDA) are watching the expanding sales in the food industry of "gluten free foods" and seeing if it becomes a large enough industry faction to be forced to actually issue a voluntary labeling rule. If they set up their rule- needs criteria (accidentally) as to automatically weed out a lot of celiacs and gluten intolerants, or if they are behind in reading what the medical researchers claim, and what food sales seem to indicate is a real, growing amount of gluten free people, then they can be less motivated to be in any sort of hurry.

I have read an article recently in some business journal that I must not have bookmarked, I'm still looking for it, it was pretty funny. The author noted that gluten free foods were selling at an increasing rate, (maybe they based it on this story here, by Jefferson Adams,

http://www.celiac.com/articles/23103/1/Gluten-free-Market-to-Top-66-Billion-by-2017/Page1.html "Gluten Free Market to top $6.6 billion by 2017" ) but complained that the items were being purchased by people who were not diagnosed celiac, so it must be a waste. It had numbers it claimed were the number of undiagnosed purchasing gluten free food, I would love to see where they got that figure from. :ph34r: To me, this says the opposite, that there must be a large proportion of people out there who are not diagnosed with anything, but are self selecting foods that agree with them, in spite of what some magazine thinks about their shopping habits.

Now, HERE is a food reaction that is taken seriously, it's gone from about .4% of children reacting to 1.4% from 1997 to 2008. It is claimed that 1.3% of adults have the same problem, yet you would never see a serious "science" writer telling someone with a peanut allergy that they were just neurotic attention seekers making it up, or on a fad diet.

http://www.webmd.com/allergies/news/20100514/peanut-allergies-in-kids-on-the-rise

We likely have a lot more people with a "gluten problem," but because exposure doesn't kill you quickly, it isn't getting respected in the media. Yet.

:rolleyes:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,895
    • Total Posts
      919,534
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Test Results
      Update: I am about at my wit's end. I won't be able to see my new doctor until July 17 to get a referral to a GI doctor, so I continue to eat gluten and the effects continue to worsen. Today my boss, whom I have been working with for 12 years, and I had a meeting where he said he's noticed a change in many things, such as speech, not articulating well, forgetfulness, and other things that are affecting my work product. I finally told him I know there is something wrong with me medically and I've been trying to get to the doctor to no avail. I recall those four weeks early in the year when I tried out gluten free and was beginning to feel much better- more present, more sharp, and then went back on gluten in preparation for the blood test.  I just don't think I can do this gluten thing any longer and am thinking of going cold-turkey gluten free.  I'm 54 years old, am beginning not to care about a diagnosis because I just want to feel better and be able to do what I need to do. Because of how I felt going off of gluten earlier in the year, and eating gluten free when I was on the McDougall plan years ago, and how I feel while doing this gluten challenge, I am pretty convinced that my issue is gluten.  Any words of encouragement would be welcome.  If you've done gluten free and never looked back, tell me about it. 
    • Gardasil
      "I got this vaccination in 2009 when I was 20 and it completely altered my life. Made my celiac disease so much worse, sleep 15-18 hours a day, SIBO, it has completely altered my life since getting this vaccination. My doctor has two twin girls about my age and they both have digestion problems after receiving gardasil Thank you I have a young daughter and have wondered this exact question posed by the poster and your response has given me great pause about this issue which may come up in years to come. I am sorry to hear this wreak havoc on your life, but simultaneously thank you for sharing this detail to help those of us that have likely been decades misdiagnosed celiacs now raising children. Thank you.
    • Gluten does WHAT to the brain?
      "Wondering what kind of life my brother could have had - if  he had celiac - constantly haunts me" My sympathies that is just tragic, as this story is.  I hope you are at peace knowing you are aware of your celiac and help so many lost, scared, and confused celiacs here. It can never bring back your brother but I hope it can give soften some of what you feel that was/is beyond your control. His suffering and your loss has made you a better advocate to yourself and in your work helping us. I don't like my body or my  brain on gluten either. I do fear that people overlook the toll inflammation takes on the brain. It likely may explain decades of mental illness that was brain based inflammation unknown until changes in technology advancement catch up. However consuming gluten to study how one enters psychosis may not be the best method. Do no harm.  
    • Gardasil
      I got this vaccination in 2009 when I was 20 and it completely altered my life. Made my celiac disease so much worse, sleep 15-18 hours a day, SIBO, it has completely altered my life since getting this vaccination. My doctor has two twin girls about my age and they both have digestion problems after receiving gardasil
    • Gardasil And Celiac
      I have this same issue! I got gardasil in 2009 and have never been the same since. Celiac disease, thyroid problems. I used to be healthy and active and since I got that shot I have never been the same.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Jmg  »  admin

      Hello Admin!
      I don't know whether this is of interest to post on your articles feed:
      http://pratt.duke.edu/about/news/window-guts-brain
      Kind Regards,
      Matt
      · 2 replies
    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,941
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    dl2z12
    Joined