Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

My Biopsy Word For Word
0

73 posts in this topic

This is what was found in my biopsy.

"Sections consist of a single fragments of heavily denuded duodenal mucosa with an abnormal architexture comprising mild to moderate villous atrophy associated with crypt hyperplasia. There is a significant generalized increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes associated with degenerative changes with in the remaining surface epithelium. Within the lamina propria there is a mild increase in mixed inflammatory cells. parasite are not seen. The appearances are those of a moderate variable villous abnormality without diagnostic histology. A differential diagnosis include celiac disease, other protein allergies, infectious gastroenteritis and nonspecific chronic duodenitis. The appearance is consistent with but not diagnostic of partially treated cealiac disease."

So what is that saying? Yes to celiac or it may be one of many other things?

Did yours say anything like this?

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

I would interpret this as: "showing some initial, overall inflammation, but not yet severe enough to point to one specific cause. Are you gluten-free? How do you feel?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would interpret this as: "showing some initial, overall inflammation, but not yet severe enough to point to one specific cause. Are you gluten-free? How do you feel?

Yes I want gluten free after this biopsy result as the Gi Dr said it was most likely celiac. But after that my blood work

came back negative for antibodies so now she is not sure and is freaking me out. She just keeps saying hmmm not sure let's catch up again in two weeks bla bla bla. I stI'll don't have the genetic test results yet but hopefully they come Monday.

Yes I'm gluten free and felt great for the first 2 weeks. Symptoms started to go. My post nasal drip has stopped and that I've had from childhood. Even had two operations to fix it but neither worked. Even my throat just feels more open if that makes sense. But this week I am feeling very tired, lethargic, slight anxiety and some muscle weakness. Is that just gluten withdrawal?

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that I'm questioning all this because my GI Dr has suggested that (as I am gay) that I may have hiv as that can cause celiac like things. Now unless hiv has become air born in the last few years it's not possible but she has made me panic now. What if!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of us can have false negatives on blood work. The biopsy results do suggest celiac so glad to hear you are giving the diet a shot. We do have ups and downs usually in the beginning as we get used to the new lifestyle. Hopefully the diet will take care of your problems but being on the diet will not mask testing for other stuff if that should be needed. I hope you continue to improve.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I started getting headaches, as well as being very tired in the afternoon after about 3 weeks of eating gluten-free. I think that lasted about 2 weeks. However, you should probably double-check what you're eating, and possibly food prep areas, etc. to rule out being glutened. If you have improvement in a few issues, it sounds like that's your answer -- along with the biopsy results. Do you have your blood test results? If not, you should get those and post them here also. It's possible you only had partial tests. From what I've seen on here, it's not uncommon for only 1 or 2 of the full panel of tests to be positive; and sometimes not even that. It's not an exact science... so don't panic.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that I'm questioning all this because my GI Dr has suggested that (as I am gay) that I may have hiv as that can cause celiac like things. Now unless hiv has become air born in the last few years it's not possible but she has made me panic now. What if!

Don't let the doctor panic you. Sometimes doctors just like to scare the heck out of us. If she thinks that she should order a test for HIV to rule it out in her mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I'm gluten free and felt great for the first 2 weeks. Symptoms started to go. My post nasal drip has stopped and that I've had from childhood. Even had two operations to fix it but neither worked. Even my throat just feels more open if that makes sense. But this week I am feeling very tired, lethargic, slight anxiety and some muscle weakness. Is that just gluten withdrawal?

Thanks

I've been gluten-free for just a few weeks and had terrible withdrawl with a headache that lasted well over a week (now it's just sporadic), a bunch of fatigue, and I was so so grumpy that even I couldn't stand myself. The withdrawl is starting to get better for me now, so hang in there! ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all your all helping :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your biopsy sounds like a description of celiac disease.

Were your blood tests taken after you went gluten free? Even a few days can alter the results.

My son had negative blood test on the most common tests (TTG Ig A and DGP IgA) but he had a positive endoscopy and clearly has celiac disease.

Sometimes the blood tests can be negative and you can still have celiac disease.

Feeling slightly worse after going gluten free can just be a sign of withdrawal. Keep going, you will feel better soon.

Cara

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I had an hiv test and it's negative. So it really is celiac :-)

And I'm going to have words with DR GI for terrifying me so casually. Lol

So I'm a member :-) odd that I should be so happy but I am.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I had an hiv test and it's negative. So it really is celiac :-)

And I'm going to have words with DR GI for terrifying me so casually. Lol

So I'm a member :-) odd that I should be so happy but I am.

What a relief! Welcome to the community :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I had an hiv test and it's negative. So it really is celiac :-)

And I'm going to have words with DR GI for terrifying me so casually. Lol

So I'm a member :-) odd that I should be so happy but I am.

Welcome to the board! And this is a great place for you to get started:

http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that not terribly insulting? Is it also not illegal to insinuate that you could have HIV just because you are gay??? I am fairly sure that even if it isn't illegal it is not the done thing!

That result would have me thinking celiac straight away!

I should add that I'm questioning all this because my GI Dr has suggested that (as I am gay) that I may have hiv as that can cause celiac like things. Now unless hiv has become air born in the last few years it's not possible but she has made me panic now. What if!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Troy... That really IS great news! Now, you can recover... Congratulations!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When it rains it pours! Just got my genetic test back. I have both the main genes and 7 subsets. Hooray I won the genetic lottery lol!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that's what you call fate!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but seriously, a very big big thank you to everyone on this forum who answered my posts and provided help.

Thank you all :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue here is that they did a biopsy with a negative TTG. Usually one stops at a negative blood test unless one has convincing symptoms of celiac and/or a strong family history. This is why your doc is a bit unsure of how to interpret these results. That being said, in a otherwise healthy person with no recent gastrointestinal infection the pathology report is in keeping with celiac, though not conclusive. Did you have any soft markers of celiac on your bloodwork (anemia, low ferritin or folate, abnormal liver enzymes)? The real challenge here is that there is no way for you to use bloodwork as a measure of compliance to a gluten free diet (a negative test in a seropositive celiac on a gluten free diet will be negative after a few months)... There is an option of repeat biopsy after being gluten free but even then they might just inadvertently pick a healthy patch of bowel and you will erroneously conclude you have celiac. I suggest geneticist screening for HLA-DQ2 and DQ8. If you don't have these markers then it virtually eliminates the diagnosis. Unfortunately having these means you only MAY have it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue here is that they did a biopsy with a negative TTG. Usually one stops at a negative blood test unless one has convincing symptoms of celiac and/or a strong family history. This is why your doc is a bit unsure of how to interpret these results. That being said, in a otherwise healthy person with no recent gastrointestinal infection the pathology report is in keeping with celiac, though not conclusive. Did you have any soft markers of celiac on your bloodwork (anemia, low ferritin or folate, abnormal liver enzymes)? The real challenge here is that there is no way for you to use bloodwork as a measure of compliance to a gluten free diet (a negative test in a seropositive celiac on a gluten free diet will be negative after a few months)... There is an option of repeat biopsy after being gluten free but even then they might just inadvertently pick a healthy patch of bowel and you will erroneously conclude you have celiac. I suggest geneticist screening for HLA-DQ2 and DQ8. If you don't have these markers then it virtually eliminates the diagnosis. Unfortunately having these means you only MAY have it.

As per my post above, the genetic test was positive. The specialist is now convinced that its celiac. Nothing in my blood work was out of the ordinary although a few things were towards the low end but not under. She thinks my body was finding ways to compensate over the years. I also always took multivitamins so that could play a part too.

My two sisters were tested. One positive on blood and the other negative. But the negative one has the same symptom profile as me so she is having a biopsy anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest geneticist screening for HLA-DQ2 and DQ8. If you don't have these markers then it virtually eliminates the diagnosis. Unfortunately having these means you only MAY have it.

That is not entirely true. There is at least one member I'm aware of on here that is diagnosed celiac without those two associated genes. Ravenwoodglas. Maybe she will chime in.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not entirely true. There is at least one member I'm aware of on here that is diagnosed celiac without those two associated genes. Ravenwoodglas. Maybe she will chime in.

Thats true. My specialist told me 5% of celiacs don't have the genes and there is also a 25%ish false negative with the blood test. In her eyes if your positive to two out of 3 (biopsy, blood and genetic test) then you have it. I was positive in biopsy and genetic. Remember too all three ttests will yield different results depending on what stage of the disease you are at and whether your body is able to cope/compensate for it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not entirely true. There is at least one member I'm aware of on here that is diagnosed celiac without those two associated genes. Ravenwoodglas. Maybe she will chime in.

Well I don't have one of the two most common celiac genes, or at least the ones considered celiac associated here. However my genes are recognized as celiac associated genes in the far and middle east. Here they are considered the genes for RA.

I most definately have celiac and after years of misdiagnosis the diet resolved many, many issues that were thought to be unrelated to my extreme GI issues. I also have DH.

IMHO relying on gene testing at this point in time to rule out celiac is a big mistake. I have one adult child who was both biopsy and blood test positive but then had her genes tested and was told the other tests were a false positive and she isn't really celiac. All her issues were attributed to 'stress'.

IMHO in the end it is how we respond to the diet followed strictly that is the best and most conclusive test at this point. Until they gene test every celiac that is diagnosed for research purposes they really won't know how many genes are associated with celiac and 'gluten intolerance' (which I consider just another form of celiac). Gene testing can not firmly rule in or out celiac.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't have one of the two most common celiac genes, or at least the ones considered celiac associated here. However my genes are recognized as celiac associated genes in the far and middle east. Here they are considered the genes for RA.

I most definately have celiac and after years of misdiagnosis the diet resolved many, many issues that were thought to be unrelated to my extreme GI issues. I also have DH.

IMHO relying on gene testing at this point in time to rule out celiac is a big mistake. I have one adult child who was both biopsy and blood test positive but then had her genes tested and was told the other tests were a false positive and she isn't really celiac. All her issues were attributed to 'stress'.

IMHO in the end it is how we respond to the diet followed strictly that is the best and most conclusive test at this point. Until they gene test every celiac that is diagnosed for research purposes they really won't know how many genes are associated with celiac and 'gluten intolerance' (which I consider just another form of celiac). Gene testing can not firmly rule in or out celiac.

This is good to know. Thank you. I am going by current medical literature, which as we know is ever changing.

I do question the validity of diagnosing celiac based on 2/3 positive tests. That's an exceptionally unscientific way of making a diagnosis. I would be more inclined to look at your pre-test probability (the fact that immediate family history is positive and the fact that you have some symptoms to suggest celiac). In other words your chance before taking the test was pretty high already so that the biopsy results, even though inconclusive, allow a doctor to comfortably make a diagnosis. If your pre-test probability was very low (no symptoms and no family history) I would be less comfortable making a diagnosis with a negative bloodwork and inconclusive biopsy.

I also wonder about the sensitivity of the TTG blood test. Current knowledge indicates that 99% of celiacs will have positive tests, meaning a false negative is unlikely. Can anybody speak to their ecpxperience with this?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is good to know. Thank you. I am going by current medical literature, which as we know is ever changing.

I do question the validity of diagnosing celiac based on 2/3 positive tests. That's an exceptionally unscientific way of making a diagnosis. I would be more inclined to look at your pre-test probability (the fact that immediate family history is positive and the fact that you have some symptoms to suggest celiac). In other words your chance before taking the test was pretty high already so that the biopsy results, even though inconclusive, allow a doctor to comfortably make a diagnosis. If your pre-test probability was very low (no symptoms and no family history) I would be less comfortable making a diagnosis with a negative bloodwork and inconclusive biopsy.

I also wonder about the sensitivity of the TTG blood test. Current knowledge indicates that 99% of celiacs will have positive tests, meaning a false negative is unlikely. Can anybody speak to their ecpxperience with this?

I don't think one can go off of a lack of family history since so many of us are misdiagnosed or diagnosed with something else (sometimes multiple something elses). Some of us will never show up positive on blood work, up to 30%, and biopsy is iffy also. If someone is not having symptoms then I wouldn't be concerned unless they are being screened because another family member is diagnosed and the non-symptomatic person is positive. When someone is having symptoms then a trial of the diet, IMHO, is the best test there is at present when all other celiac related testing is finished.

Current medical literature in the US is sometimes lacking a bit as far as celiac goes, IMHO. Other countries seem to have a better knowledge of celiac than we do here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,099
    • Total Posts
      920,353
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What if it were something else that glutened you?  Maybe you ate too much of a good thing?  I once (three months post dx) ate too much gluten-free fried chicken, vomited, passed out and fractured my back (osteoporosis) in the process.  Paramedics, ER doc and Cardio all thought I was having a heart attack.   No.  It was sheer gluttony and bad bones.  Not good to overload with a damaged gut.    Maybe you did get some contaminated nuts.  Afterall, anything processed is suspect.  What might be well tolerated by some, might be too much for others.  We all have our various levels of gluten intolerance.   The old 20 parts per million is just a guideline, but science does not really know (lack of funding......doe anyone really care enough to find out?)  My hubby has been gluten-free for 15 years.  When I was first diagnosed, I tried to eat the gluten-free foods that I normally gave him.   Problem was he was healed and I was not.  Things like Xanthan Gum in commercial processed gluten-free breads make me feel like I have been glutened, but it is just (and still is) an intolerance.  So no bread for me unless I make it myself using a different gum.   Too lazy, so I do without.   so, ask your doctor if you really want to know or lay off the cashews and test them again in a month using a certified gluten-free nut.  I wish this was easier!    
    • I have intolerances to a few foods now, so I was wondering about that.. I love cashews though, and a month or two ago I was eating them all the time with no problems at all. I mean, could I really have developed an intolerance to them since then? I don't know if they're made on shared lines (it didn't say on the package so I assumed they weren't), but I'll give them a call. I'm really, really sensitive to cross contamination. Even if something is just made in the same facility (but not on shared lines) it will make me sick. If that's not it, then I'm not really sure
    • Research with KP and find a celiac-savvy GI in your area ( read the biographies). and ask your PCP/GP for a referral to that specific GI (not his buddy).  Ask the GI for the rest  of the celiac panel or proceed with an endoscopy/biopsies -- 4 to six.  Keep eating gluten daily until all testing is complete.  Document and request in writing.  Do not worry about symptoms.  There are over 300 of them and some celiacs have none!   Research all that you can about celiac disease.  The University of Chicago has a great celiac website that has testing Information etc.   Poet me know how it works out.  Hope you feel better soon!  
    • I react to both wheat and barley.  I've opted to just go completely gluten free, for the sake of simplicity and my sanity.  I don't have a diagnosis of celiac disease, but I strongly suspect it.  Unfortunately, I'm not willing to endure the misery of staying on gluten long enough to pursue further testing.  I just know I need to avoid the gluten grains, so I do.  
    • I think that we have to remember that celiacs often develop intolerances due to our  damaged guts.  Our guts do not ncessarily heal either (usually adults) for  a variety of reasons even if their symptoms improve (see links below).   Nuts are just plain hard to digest.   I can not tolerate almonds, but can handle walnuts and cashews in small amounts.  I can eat peanuts too, but resort to Peanutbutter after a Glutening as it is easier to digest (maybe I have to learn to chew better!  😀)  My nut symptoms have  nothing to do with gluten as I have purchased certified gluten-free nuts and suffered with the same symptoms.  .   https://www.verywell.com/celiac-disease-when-will-your-small-intestine-recover-562341 http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/treatment/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936873 i call the manufacturer when I suspect the manufacturer is sharing the line or if I just want to know.  I bought some Black English walnuts and called the company.  Those are the only nuts they process and they do not have any flavored nuts.   if you really want to test your theory out, buy some nuts from Nuts.com (certified gluten-free).   See if you get a reaction or ask your GI to retest your antibodies (which should be done annually anyway).   I just hate to have Planters get a bum rap when you do not really know for sure.......😥    
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,133
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Mycaringkidsmom
    Joined