|
|
Celiac.com Sponsor: |
Gluten-Free Label But Wheat In Ingredients List
#1
Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:11 PM
I'm a little confused. I live in NZ where apparently the food laws are very strict when it comes to labelling a product gluten-free - it must have no detectable traces of gluten. So I bought Sakata rice crackers (seaweed) as it had a gluten-free sign on the front. Started eating it then noticed that under soy sauce, where was wheat in there!
So, is there some sort of processing method that removes the gluten from it and it is actually gluten-free??
Appreciate your input =)
Ads By Google: |
#2
Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:44 AM
Hi guys,
I'm a little confused. I live in NZ where apparently the food laws are very strict when it comes to labelling a product gluten-free - it must have no detectable traces of gluten. So I bought Sakata rice crackers (seaweed) as it had a gluten-free sign on the front. Started eating it then noticed that under soy sauce, where was wheat in there!
So, is there some sort of processing method that removes the gluten from it and it is actually gluten-free??
Appreciate your input =)
There are a few little exceptions. I'm Aus but I think the laws are similar. The wheat could be from glucose syrup and if that's the case then it is gluten free due to the processing method. In Australia gluten free on a label overides any listing of wheat as it means the processing method has removed the gluten. They still declare the wheat though as some people who are very sensitive can't tolerate it.
#3
Posted 04 August 2012 - 04:46 AM
As to labelling: wheat is an allergen that is required by law to be included on the label of any food that it is in ... regardless ..
Food Standards defines gluten free as “no detectable gluten” and “no ingredient derived from oats or malt”. The product may be called gluten-free, if and only if, they do not register ie their gluten content is less than 3ppm - the limits of the testing equipment.
Wheat derivatives that are highly processed are tested for gluten - below 3ppm then they are considered to be gluten-free.
#4
Posted 04 August 2012 - 08:33 AM
#5
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:04 PM
http://www.sakata.uk...gluten-free.htm
I don't really understand what they mean by: "the wheat proteins are removed or de-natured by the soy sauce manufacturing process and therefore there is no longer any detectable gluten present."
That makes it sound like any soy sauce would be ok.
#6
Posted 08 August 2012 - 04:47 PM
As I said above, "not detectable" assumes the test for gluten works reliably on soy sauce. It doesn't. Eat at your own risk.I found this on their site:
http://www.sakata.uk.com/gluten-free.htm
I don't really understand what they mean by: "the wheat proteins are removed or de-natured by the soy sauce manufacturing process and therefore there is no longer any detectable gluten present."
That makes it sound like any soy sauce would be ok.
#7
Posted 22 August 2012 - 11:13 PM
#8
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:29 PM
It is different for every person and that is why I don't come on here often because all I see are posts about people eating gluten-free food and getting glutened. It is very depressing. Again, if you can tolerate distilled alcohol then you should be fine with this product. Personally, I think they should come out with a blood test to see if you got glutened, one that you can do at home. Now that would be interesting.
#9
Posted 18 December 2012 - 06:41 AM
> That makes it sound like any soy sauce would be ok.
I would call bullshit on that - not you what they put on their site. If that were true I would not get searing pains and all that other fun stuff that comes along with having Celiac. Plus if every other brand of soy sauce in the world does not make the claim that their soy sauc eis gluten free, I think they are just doing an end run around the laws to make their product Gluten free so that more people will buy it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






