Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Omg Doctors Are Frustrating!


cindylou7

Recommended Posts

cindylou7 Apprentice

So I had a biopsy last month. Very excited because it looked like the beginning of an "active" blister plus the surrounding skin. The results came back inconclusive with the suspicion of it being arthropod in nature. He actually suggested that i check my bed for bedbugs! I scheduled an appointment with the dermatologist who did the pathology report and discover that he only did a visual examination and not immunoflorecent test. WHAT!?!? That was what the doctor I had seen was supposed to order! Now I am preparing myself for another false negative because I have been gluten-free and he took a skin sample from an area where I often have breakouts but none active right now. :angry:

Anybody want to lay odds on the results here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Not really.

All you can do is try.

Yes, it's frustrating.

Did that doctor day he was ordering a DH test? He lied to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

And once again incompetency strikes.

That's a perfect example of why there are so many self dx'd especially with dh. We are supposed to continue eating gluten & damaging our villi & bearing the burning, stinging, itching, pain of dh for YEARS trying to get someone to get all their P's & Q's right.

I'm so sorry Cindylou. I know how badly you really wanted that official dx. By the time we've gone through battles with all the incompetent doctors we at some point realize we know far more about dh than they do. And we self diagnose & are content with our self diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cindylou7 Apprentice

Thanks squirming and prickly! I just cannot believe the doctors. I actually asked the dermatologist today about the validity of the biopsy since I was gluten-free and didnt have any active DH and he said no the likelihood of a false negative was slim! If I had antibodies they should still be there. He also said the odds of DH being celiac were limited as well. He said there are a large population of DH patients that are not celiac. Again?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

It's just all in our heads right doc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rosetapper23 Explorer

That doctor is a complete idiot! DH is considered a clear diagnosis of celiac. What school of medicine did he graduate from?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
itchy Rookie

I would consider reporting this guy to the org that oversees physicians where you live. Being careful of libel, of course.

Unfortunately many of us have encountered physicians who aren't much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jmb002 Newbie

Oh my goodness....I just posted a thread "Does this look like DH to you?" because I had the EXACT same thing happen to me. I have had two biopsies from the same dang doctor and both times it came back arthropod (or scabies...YUCK) or drug reaction. Both times WRONG! I do NOT nor have I ever had scabies and no one in my house has had them either!!! My dermatologist took biopsies only from the most active parts of the lesions, so of course the biopsies were inaccurate. Not to mention he has put me on two rounds of steroids, so now I have to wait to have accurate tests done because my immune system is suppressed but I am STILL FREAKING ITCHING!!!! It makes me want to scream! In a month absolutely miserable and it feels like the doctors are not listening.

Since I posted on this forum and have gathered some information, I have made an appointment with a second dermatologist and am going to that appointment armed with piles of papers showing exactly where to biopsy, what my symptoms are, what symptoms are commonly seen in DH, my biopsy results from the other doctor, etcetera. Hopefully this will help me start out on the right foot and get this figured out sooner rather than later!! Good luck! I hope you find relief!

Jenn

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cindylou7 Apprentice

Thank you all for your support and encouragement! I have learned more from this forum than from any doctor that I've spoken to or any article I've read. There are so many people here who have a wealth of knowledge about DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

We know because we live with it. Too bad we can't sentence doctors to a year of living with it. They'd learn how to listen to their patients real quick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

Thanks squirming and prickly! I just cannot believe the doctors. I actually asked the dermatologist today about the validity of the biopsy since I was gluten-free and didnt have any active DH and he said no the likelihood of a false negative was slim! If I had antibodies they should still be there. He also said the odds of DH being celiac were limited as well. He said there are a large population of DH patients that are not celiac. Again?!?!

Cindylou --- you need to put this one in the "Stupid stuff doctors say" thread:

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/89599-we-need-to-start-a-thread-on-stupid-stuff-doctors-say/page__st__165

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Thanks squirming and prickly! I just cannot believe the doctors. I actually asked the dermatologist today about the validity of the biopsy since I was gluten-free and didnt have any active DH and he said no the likelihood of a false negative was slim! If I had antibodies they should still be there. He also said the odds of DH being celiac were limited as well. He said there are a large population of DH patients that are not celiac. Again?!?!

1) you really don't see as much mention of a gluten-free diet affecting gluten antibodies in skin in the U.S. literature. But if you don't have "active" DH how did he take a biopsy? How did he determine WHERE to take it?

2) I've read apx. 40% of DH patients test positive on blood work. Also, that DH patients are less likely to be GI biopsy positive. I've also read that newer blood tests, or specific tests are better to catch DH patients. I've also read that DH patients almost always have GI damage, but it can be patchier. But generally, not ALL of that info is contained in the same article.

Then, you get this weird statement "DH is strongly associated with Celiac".

Huh?

I am assuming this is because we don't always test + on blood and biopsy. I also see this more in sources outside the U. S., in the states, a DH dx is a Celiac dx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cindylou7 Apprentice

1) you really don't see as much mention of a gluten-free diet affecting gluten antibodies in skin in the U.S. literature. But if you don't have "active" DH how did he take a biopsy? How did he determine WHERE to take it?

2) I've read apx. 40% of DH patients test positive on blood work. Also, that DH patients are less likely to be GI biopsy positive. I've also read that newer blood tests, or specific tests are better to catch DH patients. I've also read that DH patients almost always have GI damage, but it can be patchier. But generally, not ALL of that info is contained in the same article.

Then, you get this weird statement "DH is strongly associated with Celiac".

Huh?

I am assuming this is because we don't always test + on blood and biopsy. I also see this more in sources outside the U. S., in the states, a DH dx is a Celiac dx.

He said that the antibodies should be still present in the skin. My last good outbreak was in July. He took a small sample (about two mm) near the last scarred area. Everything that I've read suggested any testing was more accurate while ingesting gluten.

I have significant GI symptoms but bloodwork came back neg after a nearly three week challenge. My GI problems are what had me suspecting DH. I posted a few pics on the picture thread. They look like the herpes sores people get on their mouth but mine are on my arm,etc. Both derms that I've seen said it looks like it could be DH.

I believe DH is celiac. But he described it as a small percentage of people with celiac have DH and many with DH are not celiac. I cant find any literature that talks about DH that doesn't connect it to celiac.

The first dr took the sample correctly. It just did not get examined correctly by the lab pathologist who is the dr that took the second biopsy.

I'll let you know next week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Karin7 Newbie

Believe me I understand your frustration completely. I have watched Doctors bumble around and make situations worse for long enough that I no longer go to them. (unless I were to break a bone) and have been very pleased with the results of Naturopathy. Naturopaths believe most illnesses and diseases can be cured with food, herbal remedies and exercise. Doctors these days are only trained to stuff us full of toxifying drugs. We have to take charge of our own health, all the best to you on your journey!

So I had a biopsy last month. Very excited because it looked like the beginning of an "active" blister plus the surrounding skin. The results came back inconclusive with the suspicion of it being arthropod in nature. He actually suggested that i check my bed for bedbugs! I scheduled an appointment with the dermatologist who did the pathology report and discover that he only did a visual examination and not immunoflorecent test. WHAT!?!? That was what the doctor I had seen was supposed to order! Now I am preparing myself for another false negative because I have been gluten-free and he took a skin sample from an area where I often have breakouts but none active right now. :angry:

Anybody want to lay odds on the results here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,502
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nadaly100
    Newest Member
    Nadaly100
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...