Needing Reassurance :-)
Posted 19 September 2012 - 02:20 PM
diagnosed by biopsy and gene test. negative blood work. specialist says prob celiac. response to diet at this early stage is promising.
i can not stop focusing on the negative blood test. the blood test was for AGA IGG and TTG but no total IgA level test as the pathology believes its not needed with the high sensitivity with that test. Both results did not provide numbers, just that they were under 20 and 5 respectively.
GI Dr wont say 100% until a year from now when she sees the damage gone on new biopsy and then wants to do a gluten challenge!
so is a positive biopsy (moderate damage, we don't use marsh system in Australia but based on what Dr said it would be marsh 3) and HLA-DQ8 gene enough to say yes?
Posted 19 September 2012 - 03:00 PM
"I will try again tommorrow" (Mary Anne Radmacher)
celiac 49 years - Misdiagnosed for 45
Blood tested and repeatedly negative
Diagnosed by Allergist with elimination diet and diagnosis confirmed by GI in 2002
Misdiagnoses for 15 years were IBS-D, ataxia, migraines, anxiety, depression, fibromyalgia, parathesias, arthritis, livedo reticularis, hairloss, premature menopause, osteoporosis, kidney damage, diverticulosis, prediabetes and ulcers, dermatitis herpeformis
All bold resoved or went into remission with proper diagnosis of Celiac November 2002
Some residual nerve damage remains as of 2006- this has continued to resolve after eliminating soy in 2007
Mother died of celiac related cancer at 56
Twin brother died as a result of autoimmune liver destruction at age 15
Children 2 with Ulcers, GERD, Depression, , 1 with DH, 1 with severe growth stunting (male adult 5 feet)both finally diagnosed Celiac through blood testing and 1 with endo 6 months after Mom
Positive to Soy and Casien also Aug 2007
Gluten Sensitivity Gene Test Aug 2007
HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0303
HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0303
Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 3,3 (Subtype 9,9)
Posted 20 September 2012 - 06:41 AM
Personally, if you feel better on the gluten-free diet, I would not even do the follow up endoscopy.
Posted 22 September 2012 - 06:22 PM
My blood tests were negative at first and we couldn't do a biopsy at all because my duodenum is too inflamed and ulcered. Second round of tests partly a strong positive and combined with very clear (bad) results when I tried eating gluten, my doc said that was good enough for him. (There were other factors, too, but too long to go into.)
If your biopsy showed the damage, sounds like celiac to me.
Diagnosed with wheat hates me 4/13
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users