Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Gluten Challenge Before Endoscopy
0

34 posts in this topic

Today being a particularly hard day, I'm really wondering if the endoscopy is worth eating gluten. My consultation is not until the 23rd, and I don't know how long it would take to schedule it after that.

My symptoms are extreme fatigue, muscle weakness and nausea.

Do you think it's worth it to keep going? I feel like I'm torturing myself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Can you call for urgent or cancellation appointment? Sometimes your primary can request an urgent appointment if you can't.

I don't recall - did you already have positive blood tests? If not, I'd suggest getting a full celiac blood panel before you go gluten-free should you decide you it is not worth waiting for an endo to go gluten-free.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you call for urgent or cancellation appointment? Sometimes your primary can request an urgent appointment if you can't.

I don't recall - did you already have positive blood tests? If not, I'd suggest getting a full celiac blood panel before you go gluten-free should you decide you it is not worth waiting for an endo to go gluten-free.

My blood tests were negative, but my doctor still wants me to have the endoscopy. I will call and ask about getting in earlier -- that's a good idea.

I'm really surprised at how my reactions to gluten are getting worse over time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really surprised at how my reactions to gluten are getting worse over time.

This happens to many of us - I found it helpful - clear reactions confirmed the need to be as gluten-free as possible.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My blood tests were negative, but my doctor still wants me to have the endoscopy.

...

Did the Dr specifically say to keep eating gluten after the blood test?

There's certainly a case to be made that actual tissue damage can't go away as quickly as a threshold level of antibodies.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Did the Dr specifically say to keep eating gluten after the blood test?

There's certainly a case to be made that actual tissue damage can't go away as quickly as a threshold level of antibodies.

I originally went off gluten for a week after my blood tests, but after advice from people on the board, and checking with the doctor's office, was told to keep eating gluten until the endoscopy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the Dr specifically say to keep eating gluten after the blood test?

There's certainly a case to be made that actual tissue damage can't go away as quickly as a threshold level of antibodies.

If a person removes gluten before endoscopy it can reduce the amount of lymphocytes detected in the biopsies of the small intestine.

While increased lymphocytes are not specific to Celiac Disease - the increase caused in reaction to gluten ingestion is the first indication of Celiac Disease and precedes tissue damage.

Given it is difficult for many to obtain diagnosis with current medical testing - why should someone decrease the chances by removing gluten before testing is complete?

Increased lymphocytes found by endoscopic biopsy along with symptom improvement once gluten is removed could prevent future damage and lifelong health problems.

In my opinion we should give the tests currently available every possible chance to be accurate. Removing gluten could lessen accuracy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Increased lymphocytes found by endoscopic biopsy along with symptom improvement once gluten is removed could prevent future damage and lifelong health problems.

Is there a word or 2 missing from this?

Given it is difficult for many to obtain diagnosis with current medical testing - why should someone decrease the chances by removing gluten before testing is complete?

Seems like a perfectly reasonable rhetorical question to make a reasonable point.

But it's not really rhetorical when there actually *have* been Celiacs whose level of misery during a gluten challenge *has* altered their testing/challenge schedule - aka "decreased their chances".

It's not unheard of and if we want detailed reasons we'd have to ask those that did so.

I can apologize in advance if you take this personally but it's a logical inconsistency to say "eat gluten til the last minute for endoscopy/biopsy diagnosis or the lymphocytes might be gone, though the presence of lymphocytes isn't diagnostic for celiac disease" (paraphrased, of course).

If a person removes gluten before endoscopy it can reduce the amount of lymphocytes detected in the biopsies of the small intestine.

While increased lymphocytes are not specific to Celiac Disease - the increase caused in reaction to gluten ingestion is the first indication of Celiac Disease and precedes tissue damage.

...

Lastly, I could see the "first indication" possibility as helpful in cases where the patient is ambiguous about gluten, but KikiB is apparently past that.

I'm really surprised at how my reactions to gluten are getting worse over time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can apologize in advance if you take this personally

I don't take it personally. We simply disagree on what should be done to give current testing mechanisms their best chance to diagnose &/or help people.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KikiB, I understand your feelings. I went gluten free after PCP said no to blood work and wants me to have endoscopy and colonoscopy (can't afford and it doesn't change treatment). Then four days later my endocrinologist says that she will order it with my other labs, so I'm back to eating it and wondering how I was surviving and just accepting of feeling this way before.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My blood tests were negative, but my doctor still wants me to have the endoscopy. I will call and ask about getting in earlier -- that's a good idea.

I'm really surprised at how my reactions to gluten are getting worse over time.

I have to say that I think your doctor is remarkably unique and enlightened. He really wants to help you get a DX.

We often hear others report that doctors say "blood work is negative, therefore, you can't have celiac" (that assumption nearly killed me). As a result, listening to my former GI doc kept me ill for 12 years.

It must be hellish to go through a gluten challenge (I could never do it now), but unless he is willing to DX you based on

symptoms alone, it seems as if this is your only choice right now.

For what it is worth, (and this is just my opinion) I would try to stick it out and go for the best possible diagnostic outcome.

If you get really ill and unable to function, then, maybe you need to bag it. Sadly, it comes down to this: how important is a "real" DX to you?

I would also call my doc and beg for a quicker appointment and he is the kind of guy who give it to me.

Hopefully, yours can see you sooner.

Best wishes. I feel for you going through all this as I know how awful you must feel.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the Dr specifically say to keep eating gluten after the blood test?

There's certainly a case to be made that actual tissue damage can't go away as quickly as a threshold level of antibodies.

My first response to Tom was for the benefit of the OP along with anyone else reading it that may be struggling to obtain a diagnosis. My intent was to explain that the endo can provide valid information even before there is significant tissue damage.

Tom-

The specific problem I have with your post is that it suggests that the OP needn't remain gluten-free to give the doctor/endoscopy/biopsy the BEST opportunity for accuracy.

I don't see how this suggestion is helpful to someone new to Celiac Disease and to the procedures currently utilized to diagnose. She has not had years to research these processes and certainly shouldn't have to explain her choices during an already confusing time.

She came to celiac.com to find information and help with what the best course of action would be. If I remember correctly she removed gluten for trial after the negative blood work - found out she was going to have and endoscopy within the month - was told (might have been by me) that she needs to continue ingesting gluten until the endo - checked with her doc and decided it was the best course for her to continue eating gluten for the weeks leading up to the endoscopy.

To my knowledge - no one has suggested she needs to continue eating gluten if she can not tolerate the reactions.

If you want to have a discussion about the time it is necessary to be gluten-free for the endoscopy to be invalid - perhaps you can start another thread. That would be a valid conversation to have without adding confusion to an already confusing time for someone trying to obtain a diagnosis.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first response to Tom was for the benefit of the OP along with anyone else reading it that may be struggling to obtain a diagnosis. My intent was to explain that the endo can provide valid information even before there is significant tissue damage.

Tom-

The specific problem I have with your post is that it suggests that the OP needn't remain gluten-free to give the doctor/endoscopy/biopsy the BEST opportunity for accuracy.

I don't see how this suggestion is helpful to someone new to Celiac Disease and to the procedures currently utilized to diagnose. She has not had years to research these processes and certainly shouldn't have to explain her choices during an already confusing time.

She came to celiac.com to find information and help with what the best course of action would be. If I remember correctly she removed gluten for trial after the negative blood work - found out she was going to have and endoscopy within the month - was told (might have been by me) that she needs to continue ingesting gluten until the endo - checked with her doc and decided it was the best course for her to continue eating gluten for the weeks leading up to the endoscopy.

To my knowledge - no one has suggested she needs to continue eating gluten if she can not tolerate the reactions.

If you want to have a discussion about the time it is necessary to be gluten-free for the endoscopy to be invalid - perhaps you can start another thread. That would be a valid conversation to have without adding confusion to an already confusing time for someone trying to obtain a diagnosis.

Thanks, Lisa. I really appreciate how helpful you have been! I was off gluten for about 9 days, but went back on thanks to you and the board. If I can make it, I would like to get a diagnosis. As it is, I'm a little concerned the GI won't find anything because it hasn't been long enough. The majority of my symptoms started after I got mono in April (I read that viral infections can trigger Celiac). But I'm going forward. I do better when I only eat gluten at night, so I can just go to bed and sleep through the worst of it. I do worry that I'm not eating enough of it -- that part seems to vary so much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KikiB, I understand your feelings. I went gluten free after PCP said no to blood work and wants me to have endoscopy and colonoscopy (can't afford and it doesn't change treatment). Then four days later my endocrinologist says that she will order it with my other labs, so I'm back to eating it and wondering how I was surviving and just accepting of feeling this way before.

Thanks, Davina. My reaction to gluten continues to surprise me. I swear it gets worse by the day. Hang in there!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that I think your doctor is remarkably unique and enlightened. He really wants to help you get a DX.

We often hear others report that doctors say "blood work is negative, therefore, you can't have celiac" (that assumption nearly killed me). As a result, listening to my former GI doc kept me ill for 12 years.

It must be hellish to go through a gluten challenge (I could never do it now), but unless he is willing to DX you based on

symptoms alone, it seems as if this is your only choice right now.

For what it is worth, (and this is just my opinion) I would try to stick it out and go for the best possible diagnostic outcome.

If you get really ill and unable to function, then, maybe you need to bag it. Sadly, it comes down to this: how important is a "real" DX to you?

I would also call my doc and beg for a quicker appointment and he is the kind of guy who give it to me.

Hopefully, yours can see you sooner.

Best wishes. I feel for you going through all this as I know how awful you must feel.

So your blood tests were negative, too? I am going to keep going and get through this. Thank you for the encouragement!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So your blood tests were negative, too? I am going to keep going and get through this. Thank you for the encouragement!

Blood tests can be falsely negative for many reasons.

A good GI will do the endo/biopsy anyway. (even though most docs think the standard "protocol" says he should not bother if they are neg)

You sound like you are in good hands.

Good luck, hon. Hang in there.

Keep us posted. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

Tom-

The specific problem I have with your post is that it suggests that the OP needn't remain gluten-free to give the doctor/endoscopy/biopsy the BEST opportunity for accuracy.

...

The specific problem you should have is w/ the Dr not telling KikiB to continue the challenge post-serology in the first place. I specifically asked my question to clarify that.

Not sure what about that is confusing.

Do you think that the phrase "a case can be made" = "here I am, making this case!" ?

It doesn't.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blood tests can be falsely negative for many reasons.

A good GI will do the endo/biopsy anyway.

...

Wouldn't the better GIs do both blood & endo/biopsy after a single gluten challenge, not setting up the need for a SECOND gluten challenge?

Can't recall seeing this situation here before.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the better GIs do both blood & endo/biopsy after a single gluten challenge, not setting up the need for a SECOND gluten challenge?

Can't recall seeing this situation here before.

The OP stated she went off gluten herself after the blood work.

She also stated the doctor's office told her to stay on it. So she resumed it.

In your rush to pick a fight with me (as always) you may have missed that part.

yes, of course, IDEALLY a gluten challenge should be done once and both tests done. But this was not the case.

All I said was I am glad she is in good hands and her doctor is doing the biopsy, IN SPITE OF NEG BLOOD WORK.

This does not require an argument, does it? nope.

You like to argue, Tom and you like to isolate sections of what people say with little regard for the CONTEXT for how it is said. I'll not play this game with you.

You do it to me ( and often to others)---you try and twist my words.

I said it in the context that her doctor is doing the right thing by scheduling a biopsy, even though the blood panel was negative. Most doctors would just abandon her.

That is all.

Will you just leave it alone?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope your test results will reflect the truth. I hope you won't be extremely uncomfortable in the meanwhile. I hope you can go totally gluten free very soon. I am glad that you seem to have figured out the problem so soon after mono. (I didn't figure it out for 30 years) Still, you will suffer through this for a time. Be ready, get ready, to go back to your diet as soon as possible do it!

Diana

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So your blood tests were negative, too? I am going to keep going and get through this. Thank you for the encouragement!

Kiki I also had false negative blood tests and had to do 2 challenges. The first was after an allergist set up an elimination diet and I had been gluten free at that point for 2 weeks. My reaction was severe and that doctor told me never to eat gluten again. He then set me up with a GI doctor and I had to wait a month to get in. The GI doctor demanded a second challenge before the biopsy. The results were dire.

If you can keep going without becoming seriously ill then go ahead and do so if you need the official diagnosis. Do keep your doctor in the loop as to your reactions. Call and speak to the nurse in the doctor's office if things get severe so he/she can relay your reactions to the doctor. They may be able to move up your appointment or may even tell you to stop the challenge and diagnose. No matter what the results of your testing it sounds like your body is giving you the answer as far as whether you tolerate gluten or not.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

In your rush to pick a fight with me (as always) you may have missed that part.

...

? :huh:

My comment that the two-challenge GI isn't what I would call a "good GI" is somehow seen as a personal attack on YOU? :rolleyes:

I find it hard to believe that any unbiased third-party observer would call that "picking a fight".

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope your test results will reflect the truth. I hope you won't be extremely uncomfortable in the meanwhile. I hope you can go totally gluten free very soon. I am glad that you seem to have figured out the problem so soon after mono. (I didn't figure it out for 30 years) Still, you will suffer through this for a time. Be ready, get ready, to go back to your diet as soon as possible do it!

Diana

Thank you, Diana!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kiki I also had false negative blood tests and had to do 2 challenges. The first was after an allergist set up an elimination diet and I had been gluten free at that point for 2 weeks. My reaction was severe and that doctor told me never to eat gluten again. He then set me up with a GI doctor and I had to wait a month to get in. The GI doctor demanded a second challenge before the biopsy. The results were dire.

If you can keep going without becoming seriously ill then go ahead and do so if you need the official diagnosis. Do keep your doctor in the loop as to your reactions. Call and speak to the nurse in the doctor's office if things get severe so he/she can relay your reactions to the doctor. They may be able to move up your appointment or may even tell you to stop the challenge and diagnose. No matter what the results of your testing it sounds like your body is giving you the answer as far as whether you tolerate gluten or not.

Thank you. I caused part of this myself by assuming when I was done with the blood test, I could stop eating the gluten. I didn't realize you needed to keep eating it for the endoscopy.

Either way it turns out, it's obvious to me I can no longer tolerate gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

? :huh:

My comment that the two-challenge GI isn't what I would call a "good GI" is somehow seen as a personal attack on YOU? :rolleyes:

I find it hard to believe that any unbiased third-party observer would call that "picking a fight".

There you go again, avoiding the part you missed. She stopped the gluten. The doc did not tell her to do that.

And, I'll try to explain it again.

You said "the better GI". well, yeah, but, that's a "hypothetical" situation.

We are talking with the OP and HER situation.

The GI she has scheduled a biopsy, despite a negative blood test.

Her GI is following through.

This is a good thing, whether you think so or not. It means she is not being abandoned.

I also suggested if it becomes too much for her, she should bag it because I do not like to see anyone suffer.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,144
    • Total Posts
      919,566
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mnoosh, I had swollen lymph nodes prior to celiac dx and for a while after going gluten free. My neck as well as groin. The groin ones were the worst. Guess what? All gone! It's hard to recall a time line & consider that everyone is different but I think mine completely resolved within a year.  You've been given great information. Just breathe and then again, breathe. You're going to be fine. 
    • It is the only thing you have eaten, so it can't be anything else?  I eat it with no issues so I am not sure how you can be certain that is the problem.  All I am saying is that its sort of "your word against mine and the company's word".  
    • Thanks cyclinglady & manasota! I appreciate it. I came to give an update...... I'm still 99% itch free. I get a "place" like a bug bite once in a while that itches and I just use the prescription steroid cream on it & that takes care of the itch. My rash is healing up rapidly everywhere. Almost clear skin now! Yaaaaayyyyyyyyyy! Now for a rundown of the "treatment". For 20 days I took a 100mg doxycycline twice a day. Then we upped it to two 100mg doxy twice per day. I took those for 5 days & made rapid progress and the itching stopped. The doxy was getting my tummy though. It was getting really rough despite my eating yogurt. So on day 6 and day 7, I took two 100mg doxy in the am but in the pm I just took 1 of them. On day 7, I was nauseous for hours on end. So since I was still doing well without itching and the rash was healing everywhere, I decided to cut back some more. On days 8, 9, & 10 I have only taken two 100mg doxy in the am and none at night. I'm doing good and my tummy is much, much happier! No more nausea!  I'll update as things go along.
    • Many things can damage the small intestine besides celiac disease: http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/what-else-can-cause-damage-to-the-small-intestine-other-than-celiac-disease/ Happily, I can share that I became a Great-Aunt this week for the first time  to a charming little boy. Sadly, my lovely 19 year old niece was diagnosed yesterday with Crohn's.  She had so many symptoms of celiac disease, I was sure she had it.  Actually, I was hoping that she'd have it, because Crohn's can be much worse.  At least there is a "cure" or known trigger for it -- gluten!   Anyway, your daughter might be suffering from something other than celiac disease.  It is possible.  It could be a food intolerance (e.g. milk).  My niece has suffered for years with periodic episodes of abdominal pain, vomiting, etc.  She doesn't have all the "classic" Crohn's Disease symptoms either, yet a recent pill cam revealed a lot!  Her endoscopy was normal.  Celiac panel normal.  Gallbladder scan normal (non-functioning gallbladder is a family curse).  My heart goes out to her, but at least we know what we are dealing with.  Will she ever get celiac disease?  It could happen. Keep advocating, Mom.  That's what I kept telling my SIL.  I also provided my SIL  a family health history tree that each GI was happy to receive.  Unfortunately, no one has had Crohn's in the family.  But, at least it allowed him to test my nieces gallbladder and for celiac disease (a full panel,  mind you).   It would not hurt to get a second opinion.  
    • That uncle bens 10minute brown rice with the gluten free table on the box, i been going through hell these last few days, this shit is Not gluten free its contaminated 
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,176
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Red Butt in hemet
    Joined