Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Should I Bother With Getting A Bioposy
0

8 posts in this topic

I have been living with many many symptoms of celiacs for 3 years now since I had my son. I first went to my doctor about my symptoms 2.5 years ago and she brought up celiacs and did the blood test. My IgA levels were way low and she did a 2nd blood test and the results were the same. She said it was impossible that my symptoms were from celiacs and left it at that.

Now 2.5 years later and I was feeling worse then ever so I decided to cut out gluten and after a week felt way better. My bloating went down, I was less tired, and my burning rashes on varies parts of my body hurt a bit less, but then I had soy sauce and got sick all over again and went to see my new doctor. She did another blood test and my IgA levels are still low, but she said it is highly likely that celiacs is the culprit due to my stomach issues, iron levels, and burning rashes. She referred me to a GI doctor but they cannot even see me for a 1st visit until the end of January.

Now my question is should I bother with getting a biopsy or continue on being gluten free? I was also considering switching doctors again now that I live in Chicago for ones that are with UIC and their celiacs center.

Any input would be great. Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Is it ttg IgA or EMA IgA levels that are low? Doctors often run a serum IgA to make sure we have adequate levels of IgA in our bodies to properly test for ttg IgA or EMA (IgA). There is a small portion of the population (I *think* it was about 5% - can't quite remember) who are deficient in IgA and will test negative for celiac even when positive. If she just tested total IgA levels, she has not actually tested for celiac yet, but you would test negative for it (on the most common tests) in that situation. I don't know the other tests well (they were unavailable to me) but I think they are DMG Igg and ttg IGg; you could check those.

Plus if you are gluten-free or gluten-lite, that could cause negative tests too.

If you do decide to pursue a biopsy, and many around here were diagnosed on a biopsy alone, I believe you need to be eating gluten for 6-12 weeks. You would have to stat about now for a January appointment. I also heard it advised to ensure you get as many biopsied spots as possible; I think more than 6 is advised. Apparently that lessens the possibility of missing the damage. I never had a biopsy so I'm not as sure about all this.

If you can go gluten-free without a diagnosis, I would advise you to stay gluten-free and skip the biopsy. 2-3 months is a long time to eat gluten if it makes you unwell. I would have had a tough time staying gluten-free without my diagnosis though so I understand your problem.

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do. i hope you feel well soon.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the type of person you are. I think I may have celiacs but there is no way I would diagnose it without a biopsy, for me I need to know beyond a doubt that it is what I have. How annoying would it be if you cut out gluten for years to find out there was another source of your problem? That is my opinion, there are people on this board that favour improvement of symptoms over medical diagnosis but that can be flawed as studies have shown most of the healthy population would improve on a gluten free diet.

There is no doubt that gluten is bad for everyone in general however not to the degree that you would be putting yourself at risk for continuing to eat it, unless you have celiacs of course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the type of person you are. I think I may have celiacs but there is no way I would diagnose it without a biopsy, for me I need to know beyond a doubt that it is what I have. How annoying would it be if you cut out gluten for years to find out there was another source of your problem? That is my opinion, there are people on this board that favour improvement of symptoms over medical diagnosis but that can be flawed as studies have shown most of the healthy population would improve on a gluten free diet.

There is no doubt that gluten is bad for everyone in general however not to the degree that you would be putting yourself at risk for continuing to eat it, unless you have celiacs of course.

What studies have shown that most of the healthy, non-Celiac population would improve on a gluten-free diet? Anyone without Celiac Disease would not show any improvement on a gluten-free diet, unless they do indeed have Celiac. I'd be interested in seeing these studies.

While I was diagnosed through blood work and declined the biopsy, many people here have tried relentlessly to obtain a "medical" diagnosis, for all it's worth. They were not helped by the medical community except for those fortunate ones who had progressive doctors who didn't need to "see" it on a biopsy to figure it out. There are many other ways to diagnose Celiac besides a biopsy. Dietary trials, along with resolution of symptoms,

coupled with gene testing and blood work for deficiencies are extremely useful tools.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it ttg IgA or EMA IgA levels that are low? Doctors often run a serum IgA to make sure we have adequate levels of IgA in our bodies to properly test for ttg IgA or EMA (IgA). There is a small portion of the population (I *think* it was about 5% - can't quite remember) who are deficient in IgA and will test negative for celiac even when positive. If she just tested total IgA levels, she has not actually tested for celiac yet, but you would test negative for it (on the most common tests) in that situation. I don't know the other tests well (they were unavailable to me) but I think they are DMG Igg and ttg IGg; you could check those

Thanks. I need to do this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I was also considering switching doctors again now that I live in Chicago for ones that are with UIC and their celiacs center.

Being seen by UoC gets my vote if you are living in Chicago.

If you have only been gluten-free for a week, I suggest continuing to eat gluten until you can be seen. You don't need to overdo it - a slice of gluten containing bread a day is sufficient. If ingesting that much makes you extremely ill, you should consider cutting it out until you are sure that you want to move forward with testing.

Good luck to you :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone. I have been gluten free for 7 weeks now and I'm not sure about the blood work, both doctors didn't really explain too much to me. I'm just call UIC medical center since my doctors through North Western are not treating this as I would like. I was also told it I have DH tha rash can be biopsied. I have what is believed to be that on my scalp and it is still clearing up too. My desire to eat a drop of gluten is zero but I will talk to the new doctors and see

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just call UIC medical center since my doctors through North Western are not treating this as I would like.

Just wanted to clarify that I was recommending:

The University of Chicago's Celiac Center (UoC)

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/

I don't know if The University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) also has a good Celiac Center.

Good luck to you - I hope you are feeling better soon :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,650
    • Total Posts
      921,606
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This subject is often raised on this site, especially by women.  I am prompted to raise it again today, having spoken to my doctor who has said that she has noticed that celiacs often have thin hair, especially in later years.   Rather than just accept what she thinks is just the inevitable I would really like to hear from anyone who really has seen great improvement in their own hair and what they did. There are lots of tips on line but I am particularly interested in hearing from someone who has actually been there, done that, and now has better hair!  
    • This subject is often raised on this site, especially by women.  I am prompted to raise it again today, having spoken to my doctor who has said that she has noticed that celiacs often have thin hair, especially in later years.   Rather than just accept what she thinks is just the inevitable I would really like to hear from anyone who really has seen great improvement in their own hair and what they did. There are lots of tips on line but I am particularly interested in hearing from someone who has actually been there, done that, and now has better hair!  
    • Oh i hope so!! I'm really anxious about the procedure as I've never done it before. I've been through operations but never an endoscopy and the thought of it is really scaring me! Thank you for giving me some courage! 
    • You are right, the tests could be invalid.   All the celiac tests require you to be on a gluten-containing diet.  It is up to you to decide if you want to go gluten free.  You can do it.  Believe me, I know.  Hubby is not officially diagnosed.  He went gluten-free 15 years ago, based on the rather poor advice from my allergist and his GP.  It worked though.  But he would be the first to tell you that I have had way more support in terms of family and medical.    We think he has it.  Both of our families are riddled with autoimmine disorders.  I am the first to be diagnosed.   My Aunt went gluten free per the advice of her Chiropractor.  Her other doctors never suspected celiac disease.  The diet obviously worked for her.  Her daughter (my cousin) is a nurse.  She had an endoscopy but they did not check for celiac disease.  She chose to go gluten-free too since it worked for her mom.  Both will not do a gluten challenge.  However, my diagnosis has helped them get proper medical treatment.  My Aunt is very active in a celiac support group.    Now everyone in my family knows about celiac disease.  My own niece was just diagnosed with Crohn's, but her GI did test and will continue to test her for celiac disease.  You can develop additional autoimmune disorders at any time.   So far, a few other members have been tested.  No one else had had a celiac disease diagnosis yet.  Time will tell.  If I can save someone from the misery of struggling to get a diagnosis, then I can feel good.   Now, an official diagnosis will help you adhere to the diet .  You can get follow-up care.  Get checked for other things like SIBO, H. Pylori and cancer.  But ultimately, it is up to you.   Whatever you decided to do, please consider a family health history chart.  You might someday help a grandchild.   The stool tests?  In all my research, leading celiac experts do not recommend them.  http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/why-dont-you-recognize-tests-stool-tests-or-otherwise-for-gluten-sensitivity-that-are-currently-available-through-companies-like-enterolab-or-cyrex/ gene testing?  Some 30% of the poulation carries the celiac genes.  It just tells you that you have the chance to develop celiac disease.  It can not diagnose you.    
    • The procedure is a breeze. You will go in, be sedated and go to sleep for a short nap and then it's over. Some people will have a bit of a sore throat but not everyone does. For me the hardest part of the endo was not being able to drink coffee when I got up. You seem to have been back on gluten for long enough to have the test but as CLady said there is a good chance your blood work may be negative. In your case you may want to continue eating gluten after the biopsy at least until you get your blood results. If they are negative consider going a bit longer and getting them redone.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,653
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    KerryO
    Joined