Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Should I Bother With Getting A Bioposy
0

8 posts in this topic

I have been living with many many symptoms of celiacs for 3 years now since I had my son. I first went to my doctor about my symptoms 2.5 years ago and she brought up celiacs and did the blood test. My IgA levels were way low and she did a 2nd blood test and the results were the same. She said it was impossible that my symptoms were from celiacs and left it at that.

Now 2.5 years later and I was feeling worse then ever so I decided to cut out gluten and after a week felt way better. My bloating went down, I was less tired, and my burning rashes on varies parts of my body hurt a bit less, but then I had soy sauce and got sick all over again and went to see my new doctor. She did another blood test and my IgA levels are still low, but she said it is highly likely that celiacs is the culprit due to my stomach issues, iron levels, and burning rashes. She referred me to a GI doctor but they cannot even see me for a 1st visit until the end of January.

Now my question is should I bother with getting a biopsy or continue on being gluten free? I was also considering switching doctors again now that I live in Chicago for ones that are with UIC and their celiacs center.

Any input would be great. Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Is it ttg IgA or EMA IgA levels that are low? Doctors often run a serum IgA to make sure we have adequate levels of IgA in our bodies to properly test for ttg IgA or EMA (IgA). There is a small portion of the population (I *think* it was about 5% - can't quite remember) who are deficient in IgA and will test negative for celiac even when positive. If she just tested total IgA levels, she has not actually tested for celiac yet, but you would test negative for it (on the most common tests) in that situation. I don't know the other tests well (they were unavailable to me) but I think they are DMG Igg and ttg IGg; you could check those.

Plus if you are gluten-free or gluten-lite, that could cause negative tests too.

If you do decide to pursue a biopsy, and many around here were diagnosed on a biopsy alone, I believe you need to be eating gluten for 6-12 weeks. You would have to stat about now for a January appointment. I also heard it advised to ensure you get as many biopsied spots as possible; I think more than 6 is advised. Apparently that lessens the possibility of missing the damage. I never had a biopsy so I'm not as sure about all this.

If you can go gluten-free without a diagnosis, I would advise you to stay gluten-free and skip the biopsy. 2-3 months is a long time to eat gluten if it makes you unwell. I would have had a tough time staying gluten-free without my diagnosis though so I understand your problem.

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do. i hope you feel well soon.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the type of person you are. I think I may have celiacs but there is no way I would diagnose it without a biopsy, for me I need to know beyond a doubt that it is what I have. How annoying would it be if you cut out gluten for years to find out there was another source of your problem? That is my opinion, there are people on this board that favour improvement of symptoms over medical diagnosis but that can be flawed as studies have shown most of the healthy population would improve on a gluten free diet.

There is no doubt that gluten is bad for everyone in general however not to the degree that you would be putting yourself at risk for continuing to eat it, unless you have celiacs of course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the type of person you are. I think I may have celiacs but there is no way I would diagnose it without a biopsy, for me I need to know beyond a doubt that it is what I have. How annoying would it be if you cut out gluten for years to find out there was another source of your problem? That is my opinion, there are people on this board that favour improvement of symptoms over medical diagnosis but that can be flawed as studies have shown most of the healthy population would improve on a gluten free diet.

There is no doubt that gluten is bad for everyone in general however not to the degree that you would be putting yourself at risk for continuing to eat it, unless you have celiacs of course.

What studies have shown that most of the healthy, non-Celiac population would improve on a gluten-free diet? Anyone without Celiac Disease would not show any improvement on a gluten-free diet, unless they do indeed have Celiac. I'd be interested in seeing these studies.

While I was diagnosed through blood work and declined the biopsy, many people here have tried relentlessly to obtain a "medical" diagnosis, for all it's worth. They were not helped by the medical community except for those fortunate ones who had progressive doctors who didn't need to "see" it on a biopsy to figure it out. There are many other ways to diagnose Celiac besides a biopsy. Dietary trials, along with resolution of symptoms,

coupled with gene testing and blood work for deficiencies are extremely useful tools.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it ttg IgA or EMA IgA levels that are low? Doctors often run a serum IgA to make sure we have adequate levels of IgA in our bodies to properly test for ttg IgA or EMA (IgA). There is a small portion of the population (I *think* it was about 5% - can't quite remember) who are deficient in IgA and will test negative for celiac even when positive. If she just tested total IgA levels, she has not actually tested for celiac yet, but you would test negative for it (on the most common tests) in that situation. I don't know the other tests well (they were unavailable to me) but I think they are DMG Igg and ttg IGg; you could check those

Thanks. I need to do this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I was also considering switching doctors again now that I live in Chicago for ones that are with UIC and their celiacs center.

Being seen by UoC gets my vote if you are living in Chicago.

If you have only been gluten-free for a week, I suggest continuing to eat gluten until you can be seen. You don't need to overdo it - a slice of gluten containing bread a day is sufficient. If ingesting that much makes you extremely ill, you should consider cutting it out until you are sure that you want to move forward with testing.

Good luck to you :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone. I have been gluten free for 7 weeks now and I'm not sure about the blood work, both doctors didn't really explain too much to me. I'm just call UIC medical center since my doctors through North Western are not treating this as I would like. I was also told it I have DH tha rash can be biopsied. I have what is believed to be that on my scalp and it is still clearing up too. My desire to eat a drop of gluten is zero but I will talk to the new doctors and see

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just call UIC medical center since my doctors through North Western are not treating this as I would like.

Just wanted to clarify that I was recommending:

The University of Chicago's Celiac Center (UoC)

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/

I don't know if The University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) also has a good Celiac Center.

Good luck to you - I hope you are feeling better soon :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,118
    • Total Posts
      919,458
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good luck with all the testing.  You are doing the right thing by telling your son to gluten up!  Buy him one of those gluteny cakes at a bakery...if that doesn't spike his numbers, nothing will. 
    • Thank you for this response! You are right, I'm sure. My sed rate was normal. My c reactive protein was 6, which is high. My platelets were a bit elevated and I was slightly anemic. I am going tomorrow for another endoscopy. I know that these things could be related to other things... but I'm thinking there is a change they are all still related to celiac (I'm hoping). What other autoimmune disease do you have, if you don't mind me asking?
    • HIV doesn't turn off the immune system, it destroys it to the point where most people die from complications that arise from having no immune system.  Some end up with pneumonia or cancer, which takes their life. It is pretty amazing the treatments they have developed for it, to slow it down and give people longer, quality time. I am perfectly content with the gluten free diet as my treatment and honestly, if they developed a pill that they claimed would make it possible for people to eat gluten again, I doubt I would. I could not bring myself to eat a food that I am genetically programmed to not be able to digest and that totally pisses off my immune system.  However, if they succeed with some of the meds they are working on now, one of which I posted about earlier this summer, I would take those.  They are working on things that modulate the immune system down so inflammation can be tamed down further.  Even with a strict gluten-free diet, there will always be more inflammation for us than for those who don't have AI diseases.  I do everything possible to tame it down myself but it isn't in the normal range.....yet. Long term inflammation can kill you so something along those lines would be welcome.  You would still have to eat gluten-free but the disease activity would be calmed down.  This is a drug that targets those with lupus and maybe Sjogren's....which I have.  There are possibilities for other AI diseases from that!
    • Hi Anns and welcome   Do you think that I am on the right course to see if I possibly have Celiac?   Yes, it was smart of you to consider the possibility and its good that you've had the tests. Both the aneamia and bloating are symptoms, although of course they may be unrelated. Best way to find out is to check as you are doing.   Can this develope later in life ( I'm 46)?   Yes, I think its most common discovered later rather than sooner.   I ate a meal last night that was gluten free and did not feel like nearly as bloated after eating, would I notice a change that quickly?  Thanksort for your input.   Yes, I noticed far less of a heavy feeling after eating very soon after diet changes. However you would be better off not trying gluten free just yet. I collected some links and other stuff here, it may be of use: Your best bet is to eat as normal and wait for the test results. If your doctors eliminate celiac there's nothing to stop you excluding gluten at that point to see if it helps. But before then you need to keep eating it to ensure an accurate diagnosis.  All the best  
    • Well HIV undermines the entire immune system as I understand it, so that would be akin to using dynamite to put out a kitchen fire! There is some work going on to try and retrain the immune system to not see gluten as a threat though: http://www.immusant.com/docs/ImmusanT DDW Data Release FINAL 5.24.16.pdf  I'm laughing as I write this imagining the conversations you could have with people as you tell them you'd like to contract HIV so that you can eat a decent sandwich        
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,159
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Anns
    Joined