Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Ema, Ttg And What They Really Mean
0

4 posts in this topic

Hi everyone, I have been doing some research and after speaking to several doctors and I have some questions about EMA, TTG and what they really mean.

First off, both antibodies are markers of inflammatory situations, when your endomysial layering of the small intestine gets damaged, both antibodies get released, the higher the number the higher the damage.

Now the issue I see with this is that TTG has a specificity of 94 percent while EMA has anywhere between 95-99 percent, but how were these determined? They were done so through healthy screening populations VS. people with celiac, if someone that was supposedly healthy came in and tested positive to these antibodies they have the above mentioned chance of actually having the disease. So when I look at that I think Ok, but what about hospitalized or severely sick people? This list can include any type of enteritis, both bacterial and viral in nature as well as any other issues that cause problems with the stomach.

Since medical research has shown EMA and TTG to be elevated in lymphoma, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, giardiasis, salmonella, E coli, the list goes on, it leaves me wondering why do they claim the specificity to be so high? If up to 1/2 of people go through transient autoimmune reactions after infection than why would they not adjust these claims to "healthy population screenings"?

Bottom line, EMA and TTG are signs of inflammation and villi damage, both can be caused by multiple ailments and not just celiac. Continuing research is now starting to really discredit TTG in particular saying its specificity is much less than originally thought.

Thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Interesting...

Perhaps it accounts for those with the transient autoimmune reactions by the low probability that someone would be experiencing that at the time of testing. Or perhaps they based that specificity number on only healthy individuals; maybe they did not include those who had had an infection in the last 6 months?

... I'm just guessing. :unsure:

I'm of the opinion that if it looks, walks and sound like a horse it probably is a horse. That animal in front of me might not be a pure horse, maybe it has some donkey in it, but chances are it is just a horse... the simplest and most obvious solution is probably right. If someone has some celiac symptoms, and that person tests positive for celiac (be it by blood test or biopsy), that person is probably are a celiac.

That's just my thoughts though. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting...

Perhaps it accounts for those with the transient autoimmune reactions by the low probability that someone would be experiencing that at the time of testing. Or perhaps they based that specificity number on only healthy individuals; maybe they did not include those who had had an infection in the last 6 months?

... I'm just guessing. :unsure:

I'm of the opinion that if it looks, walks and sound like a horse it probably is a horse. That animal in front of me might not be a pure horse, maybe it has some donkey in it, but chances are it is just a horse... the simplest and most obvious solution is probably right. If someone has some celiac symptoms, and that person tests positive for celiac (be it by blood test or biopsy), that person is probably are a celiac.

That's just my thoughts though. :)

Those were my thoughts too, I am actually really interested in this whole issue since all the weird medical results I have gotten during salmonella and its aftermaths. Both my doctors and I hypothesized that I am probably one of the few that demanded a celiac test after salmonella and being healthy prior to infection. I am getting constant calls by doctors wanting to use me as a research project now thinking I could have started the way to a new understanding of the bodys reaction to foreign invaders. My thoughts are how weird is that? Your body creates a transient flow of antibodies to destroy itself in order to heal itself.

When I am not feeling lazy I will link you guys to all the articles my doctors and I have read, very interesting!

I feel so unique! lol.. I guess you can say with the 99 specificity I am the 1 percent ;). Hopefully that will entitle me to some tax breaks this year...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're special! :lol::P LOL

I believe the connections to viruses or bacteria. As a teen, I had a double case of mono and pneumonia, and then 6 months to a year later I developed ITP (thrombocytopenia) which made me critically ill. 15 years ago I had quite a virus, and then a few months later I had my first arthritic like attack; it could have been the start of Hashimoto's throiditis or something else. I've had numerous repeats of that symptom every year.

I've had celiac since early childhood, so i have no idea what set it off. I did have all of the usual childhood illness like fifths, and chicken pox (3 times). Who knows...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,345
    • Total Posts
      920,488
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Karen, the iodine test was a test for DH used in the 'olden' days. Iodine would be swabbed onto a spot and then it would be covered with a bandage. If someone had DH the iodined area would break out in lesions. I don't know how but we do know iodine can activate the antibodies. That is why some of us with DH have to avoid iodine in foods until the antibodies have cleared the dermis. OP, if you haven't been tested for celiac you should be and if you have active lesions a biopsy done next to a lesion by a DH knowledgable dermatologist may help in diagnosis.
    • The gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only validated treatment for celiac disease (celiac disease), but despite strict adherence, complete mucosal recovery is rarely ... View the full article
    • What's an " iodine test"?  Haven't heard doctors doing that to diagnose DH.
    • Hello! I've just been given my blood results and told they are highly suggestive of coeliacs but will have to wait till next month to see the gastroenterologist and who knows how much longer for a biopsy. My igA, igG and tissuetrans igA were all over 250 and tissuetrans igG was the only one that was normal. These results don't mean much to me yet but I'm told they are very high. I'm now quite fearful of how much damage I've gone to myself. I've had stomach problems for 25 years (just turned 40) and have often steered clear of too much bread and pasta for how bloated it made me feel but the symptoms were always vague and inconsistent so I kept eating. I had a couple of boats of gastro in the past few months (thanks kids) which I took a lot longer than normal to recover from which looking back may have been related. Then last Friday I had a blowout with wine, cheese, crackers, pizza and chocolate cake. I'm sure I've probably had blowouts like that before but I have never felt so sick before and am still slowly recovering. This is what finally prompted me to go back to my GP after being fobbed off so many times over the years. So I guess my question and my concern is whether there is still  chance of a false positive with levels like this? I worry what else it might be if not coeliac. I'm also worried that I may have done so much damage to myself that I will have several disorders going on! I'm also still recovering from last Friday and wondering when I'm going to feel better. I've stayed off gluten and dairy since my blood result a couple of days ago but feel like I'm allergic to food in general.  Thankyou!!    
    • Here's what the Klondike Bar makers say on the FAQ page of their website (August 2016): Are your products gluten free? Nope. They are not. We have not validated for gluten free. We do not operate allergen-free manufacturing sites, however we do have allergen management programs in all our facilities. The intent of these programs is to avoid unintentional cross-contamination of allergens between products. Our product labels adhere to the FDA’s strict regulations regarding declaration of ingredients and allergens. We do not use the terms “Natural” or “Artificial Flavorings” to hide the existence of any allergens. RECIPES CAN CHANGE. We strongly recommend that allergic consumers refer to ingredient declarations EVERY TIME they purchase processed foods.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,415
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Ails123
    Joined