Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Very Upset.. Told Blood Tests Are 90% Accurate! Help!
0

22 posts in this topic

So today my doctor informed me I don't have celiac because my blood panel was negative and that based on the blood panel done, he says I don't have the celiac gene. He also said the blood tests are 90% accurate. Is this true? I was under the impression that they are not very accurate. Also he told me that my biopsy was negative. I'm very devastated at this point... I literally have all the symptoms and then some! Yet my doctor says I do not have Celiac.. and none of the other 15+ specialists seem to know what's wrong if it's not Celiac disease :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Were you gluten free when these tests were done? Can you get a copy of the exact tests and results? Just to make sure the doc requested the correct tests and read them correctly.

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/archives/faq/in-blood-tests-are-false-positives-less-common-than-false-negatives

'In blood tests, are false positives less common than false negatives?

Even though blood tests are quite accurate, they are falsely positive 1-3% of the time (i.e., being positive without the person having celiac) and, although less commonly, falsely negative 1-2% of the time (i.e., being normal when a person actually has celiac).'"

http://www.celiaccenter.org/faq.asp#accurate

"How accurate are the celiac blood tests?

The current diagnostic tests for celiac disease are very accurate, particularly when tTG and anti-endomysial antibodies are elevated. The isolated presence of anti-gliadin antibodies does not necessarily imply that the subject is affected by celiac disease, with the exception of children under the age of 2 in which tTG and EMA may not be present."

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested the blood results be sent to me today.. so I should have them soon. They biopsy was taken from my small intestine in 5 different spots I think

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this helps but the blood panel I had done was the PROMETHEUS® Celiac PLUS

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and I had been eating gluten for about 7 months before being tested.. before that I was gluten free

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I requested the blood results be sent to me today.. so I should have them soon. They biopsy was taken from my small intestine in 5 different spots I think

Five is a small number, unfortunately. It is recommended that one has at least 8-12 biopsies taken otherwise it can be so very hit and miss.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could have non-celiac gluten intolerance. It is a very real condition with symptoms that are the same, just no intestinal damage. But the solution is the same - a gluten-free diet.

When you were gluten-free before, did your symptoms resolve?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could have non-celiac gluten intolerance. It is a very real condition with symptoms that are the same, just no intestinal damage. But the solution is the same - a gluten-free diet.

Thing is several drs thought it was Celiac.. because I have alot of symptoms that are not caused by simple gluten intolerance.

Five is a small number, unfortunately. It is recommended that one has at least 8-12 biopsies taken otherwise it can be so very hit and miss.

So in that case what do I do? :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is several drs thought it was Celiac.. because I have alot of symptoms that are not caused by simple gluten intolerance.

So in that case what do I do? :(

Symptoms for gluten intolerance and celiac can be very similar.

If the surgeon missed something with taking few biopsies I am unsure what to tell you. Sorry! :( It does happen, though.

But the bottom line is if gluten does make you sick, it is best you avoid it. The high number of people who do not get officially diagnosed is staggering. Many are happy to call it celiac and treat it as such as avoiding gluten makes them feel soooo much better. It is understandable that you are seeking something to put a name to your symptoms. I have read and heard that the average time for a celiac diagnosis in the U.S. and Canada is 12 YEARS! Isn't that insane??

I sincerely hope you find your answer. And soon!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Symptoms for gluten intolerance and celiac can be very similar.

If the surgeon missed something with taking few biopsies I am unsure what to tell you. Sorry! :( It does happen, though.

But the bottom line is if gluten does make you sick, it is best you avoid it. The high number of people who do not get officially diagnosed is staggering. Many are happy to call it celiac and treat it as such as avoiding gluten makes them feel soooo much better. It is understandable that you are seeking something to put a name to your symptoms. I have read and heard that the average time for a celiac diagnosis in the U.S. and Canada is 12 YEARS! Isn't that insane??

I sincerely hope you find your answer. And soon!

Exactly!

Do get written or electronic copies of your blood work and endscopy report. If you post them here, many of us can help interpret.

Often the best test for Celiac Disease and the only test for Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerance is the complete removal of gluten. Sounds like you have already spent some time gluten free. Perhaps it is time to remove it completely and document improvement.

"Loves2travel" is correct - NCGI shares many of the same symptoms as Celiac Disease and is still very new to the medical community. There has been very little research and is rare to find a Primary OR GI that will diagnose it. Sad, but true.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So today my doctor informed me I don't have celiac because my blood panel was negative and that based on the blood panel done, he says I don't have the celiac gene. He also said the blood tests are 90% accurate. Is this true? I was under the impression that they are not very accurate. Also he told me that my biopsy was negative. I'm very devastated at this point... I literally have all the symptoms and then some! Yet my doctor says I do not have Celiac.. and none of the other 15+ specialists seem to know what's wrong if it's not Celiac disease :(

did u have ALL the antibodies tested???? this is such a hard disease to diagnose- you really need ALL antibodies tested- not just the ttg for example. PLUS if you are LOW in IGA serum, then your iga antibodies will be innacurately low.

please consider going GLUTEN FREE even if you don't get a 100% dx.... i felt like i needed the dx as well, but now i know that the damage gluten can do to your body & mind is EXTENSIVE and not just localized to Celiac. i had no idea till after my Celiac self diagnosis-> just HOW MUCH Gluten had EXACERBATed my Graves :(

it could do all kinds of things like lead to Crohns, colitis, diverticulitis, cancer, thyroid disease, ataxia, etc etc etc

educate yourself- and dont rely soley on doctors- my Gi actually told me to get online- he said that they just dont know enough- and that i would find others online who would know more!

both my Gi AND my Integrative Doctor believe that Celiac is more of a spectrum, and that quite possibly (far enough into the future)- 30% of the population (with the dq genes) might all develop Celiac.

also- you dont have to have the classic celiac genes (dq2 and dq8) to have it.. others on here have been diagnosed with DQs with different #s like DQ9, DQ1, etc

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What symptoms are caused by celiac and not gluten intolerance, besides intestinal damage? I mean that as a valid question...I'm still learning.

And please dont call it simple..it pretty much ruined my life for years. There's nothing simple about it and symptoms can be every bit as severe as a celiac suffers from.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

did u have ALL the antibodies tested???? this is such a hard disease to diagnose- you really need ALL antibodies tested- not just the ttg for example. PLUS if you are LOW in IGA serum, then your iga antibodies will be innacurately low.

please consider going GLUTEN FREE even if you don't get a 100% dx.... i felt like i needed the dx as well, but now i know that the damage gluten can do to your body & mind is EXTENSIVE and not just localized to Celiac. i had no idea till after my Celiac self diagnosis-> just HOW MUCH Gluten had EXACERBATed my Graves :(

it could do all kinds of things like lead to Crohns, colitis, diverticulitis, cancer, thyroid disease, ataxia, etc etc etc

educate yourself- and dont rely soley on doctors- my Gi actually told me to get online- he said that they just dont know enough- and that i would find others online who would know more!

both my Gi AND my Integrative Doctor believe that Celiac is more of a spectrum, and that quite possibly (far enough into the future)- 30% of the population (with the dq genes) might all develop Celiac.

also- you dont have to have the classic celiac genes (dq2 and dq8) to have it.. others on here have been diagnosed with DQs with different #s like DQ9, DQ1, etc

I don't believe all the antibodies were tested.. I'll post the blood results here when I get them... as far as genetics goes he only tested me for 2 of the genes! I didn't even know there were more than 2! That makes me mad.. he led me to believe that there were only two possible for Celiac! Unbelievable!! I have my endoscopy results with me.. What part of that should I post on here? It's basically pictures of each section that passed through :/ with a small description at the bottom

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe all the antibodies were tested.. I'll post the blood results here when I get them... as far as genetics goes he only tested me for 2 of the genes! I didn't even know there were more than 2! That makes me mad.. he led me to believe that there were only two possible for Celiac! Unbelievable!! I have my endoscopy results with me.. What part of that should I post on here? It's basically pictures of each section that passed through :/ with a small description at the bottom

Did you get a copy of the pathology report? This is from the special doctor (Pathologist) that looks at the small intestine samples.

In the US, they look for the 2 most common genes:

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/archives/faq/what-is-genetic-testing-and-who-can-benefit-from-it

Of course, even if these are all negative, you could have non-celiac gluten intolerance. The only way to find that out is to eliminate gluten for a few months and see if you feel better.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a copy of the pathology report? This is from the special doctor (Pathologist) that looks at the small intestine samples.

In the US, they look for the 2 most common genes:

http://www.curecelia...benefit-from-it

Of course, even if these are all negative, you could have non-celiac gluten intolerance. The only way to find that out is to eliminate gluten for a few months and see if you feel better.

I didn't receive the pathology report. Could those results be interpreted here?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off your doctor says the tests are 90% accurate. What if you are one of the 10% for which they are not accurate? Doctors going off those blood tests cost me years of my life and some permanent damage. It sounds like you have been through a lot of what I went through, doctors and more doctors and tests and more tests and doctors still throwing their arms up and saying I don't know. I also had classic celiac symptoms that screamed I had celiac but doctors only looked at the paper and not at the person. You don't need a doctors permission to be gluten free and after all your issues fall away your doctor may open his eyes and say 'I guess it was celiac after all'.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't receive the pathology report. Could those results be interpreted here?

Yes.

You can post both the written observation from the doctor and the pathology report here and we'll try to help.

Call your doctor's office and request a written or electronic copy of the endoscopy report with pathology of any samples taken. Even though you already have the report with pictures I'd ask for them both in case the doc added any observation/explanation after your procedure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off your doctor says the tests are 90% accurate. What if you are one of the 10% for which they are not accurate? Doctors going off those blood tests cost me years of my life and some permanent damage. It sounds like you have been through a lot of what I went through, doctors and more doctors and tests and more tests and doctors still throwing their arms up and saying I don't know. I also had classic celiac symptoms that screamed I had celiac but doctors only looked at the paper and not at the person. You don't need a doctors permission to be gluten free and after all your issues fall away your doctor may open his eyes and say 'I guess it was celiac after all'.

Raven is absolutely correct!

Even though I tested positive on antibodies (barely) with total villous atrophy and have enough copies of genes that all my children have the genes. One of my sons was unable to get diagnosed because of neg blood work despite complete symptom resolution after removing gluten. You do not need a doctor's blessing - it is unfortunate that we have to fight for diagnosis in the first place.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So today my doctor informed me I don't have celiac because my blood panel was negative and that based on the blood panel done, he says I don't have the celiac gene. He also said the blood tests are 90% accurate. Is this true? I was under the impression that they are not very accurate. Also he told me that my biopsy was negative. I'm very devastated at this point... I literally have all the symptoms and then some! Yet my doctor says I do not have Celiac.. and none of the other 15+ specialists seem to know what's wrong if it's not Celiac disease :(

Hi there. I am newly diagnosed with Celiac. My family doctor was the one who diagnosed me. Fortunately, my blood work came back accurately. Although, his daughter has Celiac and she tested negative to both the bloodwork and the biopsy. Once my doctor took his daughter off of wheat, all her symptoms dissapeared within a few weeks. This goes to show that the bloodwork or a biopsy is not always accurate. I strongly suggest cutting wheat out for 2 weeks, and see how you feel. It is the most accurate test, in my eyes. Hope this helps.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the blood tests are 90% accurate, that means that 10% of the time they are not accurate. You could be one of the 10%.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to add when we had genetic testing for Celiac with Prometheus labs we got back confusing results. This genetic test was said to be at least 99% accurate. So when my test result did not have a close enough match to my biological daughter, we had questions. So Prometheus labs would not do the testing over and offered these reasons.. the known miss rate of 1%, genes mutate, and EVERY blood test has a human error rate of 30%. They very strongly put 30% error rate on the collection of specimen, handling of specimen, and interpreting of the results on human error.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe all the antibodies were tested.. I'll post the blood results here when I get them... as far as genetics goes he only tested me for 2 of the genes! I didn't even know there were more than 2! That makes me mad.. he led me to believe that there were only two possible for Celiac! Unbelievable!! I have my endoscopy results with me.. What part of that should I post on here? It's basically pictures of each section that passed through :/ with a small description at the bottom

i never had the endoscopy- and wouldnt know how to read it- BUT maybe others on here could for you

most doctors and medical journals in the US are just behind on this disease- they think it's only from DQ2 and DQ8-> but overseas they are diagnosing Celiacs with different DQ#s. believe me, it wont be the first or last time your doctors dont know anything... sorry im bitter and frustrated :/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,352
    • Total Posts
      920,502
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is EXACTLY what happens to me. It has twice now and both times was after both glutening episodes but once it was the day after and the other time it was a week and a half. So I'm still not sure if it's related or strange bug bites...

      Did they stop happening when she stopped being glutened? Did you decide they were definitely related? I'm really confused by this and would love to know whether to insecticide my house or....
    • Thankyou both! I was wondering if my high levels left much doubt on the diagnosis. I don't see the GI until the 15th Sep and I don't think I can stand to eat gluten in that time. If he tells me to I will do so after then. After 25 years of symptoms I don't think there is much chance of healing my bowel In a couple of weeks. I'm actually terrified of the damage they might find. But I think I will need the endo since there may be other things going on with me. So great they didn't put your son through the biopsy! Once I have a formal diagnosis I have my kids to worry about also. I can't even stand the thought of my daughter having a blood test. I think she would need to be sedated as she is so fearful and pain sensitive. My son is not yet 2 so I don't think they will test him. I'm feeling so off at the moment. I think I have some anxiety and reflux going on complicating things quite a bit.
    • My son's antibodies were 300. Based on his extremely high levels, his pediatric GI suggested genetic testing instead of the biopsy. Genetic testing can't diagnose celiac on its own but combined with such high levels, the gi dr was confident a positive genetic test would confidently diagnose celiac. He warned that biopsies are small snapshots of the intestine and can miss damage. He said this is an approach used very often in Europe but not as much in the US. What sold me on that approach was the ability to put my son directly on a gluten free diet instead of waiting three weeks for the biopsy, during which time he would continue to eat gluten and feel terrible. I'm not sure if this is more common with younger patients though (our son is two), based on the idea that he's had less time to inflict damage that would show in a biopsy? We are very happy that we immediately started the gluten free diet and chose the genetic testing. Our son got the proper diagnosis and his recent number shows a drop to 71 after only 4.5 months gluten free! Not sure if this helps. Good luck and I hope you feel better soon!
    • We have been off gluten for a while now, and symptoms return when I've allowed gluten full meals… so something still isn't sitting right with me.  Checking with her doc about seeing a pediactric GI although I'm not sure how long that will take since we live in small town America. I know she didn't get at least one of the recommended full panel tests but maybe two, can someone help clarify, or is she missing two? DGP for sure and possibly EMA? And if I understand what I'm reading in other posts that the DGP can be more accurate? Thanks Her blood panel results: Ttg ab iga <.5u/ml ttg igg <.8u/ml aga ab iga <.2 u/ml aga an igg <.7u/ml iga 61mg/dL  
    • I was tested for the full panel, I believe. I had normal values for t-transglutaminase (ttg) igg,t-transglutaminase (ttg) iga, deamidated gliadin abs igg, deamidated gliadin abs iga, and immunoglobulin a qn serum.  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,416
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    djs2117
    Joined