Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Is This Diagnosis Accurate
0

8 posts in this topic

I went to the celiac center at Jefferson in Philadelphia today and I have to question their analysis. I want to run it by the group here and get some opinions.

I tested positive for a gluten sensitivity via a test from Cyrex labs. I've been eating gluten-free for 4 months now and feel slightly better. Less gassy, more energy. But nothing earth shattering. The reason I was tested and decided to go gluten-free was because of sleep issues I've had for 15 years. Nothing else has worked, so after the blood test showed I was sensitive, I went gluten-free. Despite felling better in general, being gluten-free has not improved my sleep issues at all.

So, I went to the celiac center to show them my positive bloodwork showing I had a gluten allergy. I don't think I have celiac, but why not ask the experts. From my symptoms they didnt think I have celiac either, but want to test via endoscopy as well as do bloodwork for the genetic markers for celiac.

The Dr. said that if the genetic markers come back negative, I will never get celiac. Fine, I'm not predisposed to it. Here's where I have qestions. She also said that if its negative, and I do have a gluten sensitivity/intolerance that eating gluten will do no long term damage. Those who are sensitive/intolerent have short term reactions (headaches, gas, bowel issues) but that there is no long term damage.

That doesn't sound right to me. From what I've read there are few long term studies on gluten sensitivity and the long term health implications. How can seh definitively say there are no long term effects? Isnt is safer to not eat gluten and play it safe until we have further information from long term studies?

Any thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

People who have celiac disease who continue to eat gluten do have a chance of having long term effects of the gluten damaging their system. Non celiac people have a sensitivity to gluten but it does not damage the intestines as the gluten does with a celiac. Celiac disease is an autoimmune response to gluten. It sees it s an enemy and therefore has an adverse reaction on the intestines.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would respectfully point out that there are also diagnosed celiacs who have no intestinal damage, in whom the gluten has reacted upon their brains causing among other things migraines and gluten ataia, and in whom it has reacted on their skins causing dermatitis herpetiformis. Some unfortunates have all three reactions, but some only one.

Since up until a couple of years ago (or less) nobody had ever studied those gluten intolerants who did not have intestinal damage (they were told they could eat all the gluten they wanted because they did not have celiac disease), I believe the jury is still out (or the case is being retried, if you will) as to whether gluten intolerants suffer any other adverse damage from gluten. The unfortunate part about medical science is that what was seemingly irrefutably true yesterday may no longer be true tomorrow. It is going to be really interesting when these new studies come out.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

The Dr. said that if the genetic markers come back negative, I will never get celiac. Fine, I'm not predisposed to it. Here's where I have qestions. She also said that if its negative, and I do have a gluten sensitivity/intolerance that eating gluten will do no long term damage.

...

I'm with you on this one Leeloff - there's no way for her to really know this.

And also, the Dr's genetic comment is wrong. US just using 2 genes, while I've seen talk of 8 or 9 found to be involved so far, and have seen ppl here say that in Europe they already use more than the 2 we look for.

We have a few members here neg on the 2 genes but pos through testing .. .I think .. .details fuzzy right now ....

Anyway, I'd call it short-sighted & premature to definitively claim ANYTHING about long-term effects of gluten on NCGI folks.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. Based on the way I feel after being gluten-free, I will probably still maintain a gluten-free lifestyle even if I come back negative for celiac. I just don't think there is enough long term data out there to say that someone with gluten sensitivity/intolerence can eat gluten with no long term impact. I'd rather play it safe. And as much as I support medicine and doctors, the best proof is how my body feels. Being gluten-free has helped

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




"I would respectfully point out that there are also diagnosed celiacs who have no intestinal damage, in whom the gluten has reacted upon their brains causing among other things migraines and gluten ataia, and in whom it has reacted on their skins causing dermatitis herpetiformis."

I don't believe it's celiac disease then? Yes, this is purely semantics I'm talking about. It makes sense to me to categorize things as much as possible, if there are differences. (Not like 'gluten sensitivity' is any better in explaining things, we should just call it what is it, 'gluten-induced intestinal damage' or 'gluten induced migraines and nausea', etc.)

Reading about gluten ataxia reminds me of reading the studies that show that Alzheimers might just be insulin resistance in some brain cells. Is it diabetes if the pancreas isn't involved?

If you haven't found studies that show long-term impact of eating gluten for a gluten sensitive individual is negligible, or not immediately reversed or stopped or some such, then absolutely the person should not have said there is no long-term impact. I mean an answer like 'we haven't studied that, however at this point we don't know of any long-term or irreversible effects' would be minimal. But even then, it doesn't make much sense to me that continual use/eating of somethign that causes immediate bad effects would not, at some point, start to cause more longterm problems.

From mushroom's post I wanted to read about gluten ataxia (haven't before yet) and the first hit in google for gluten ataxia talks about current research that looks like it may have even found the why of it, and it really does look like a 'celiac disease of the brain', which of course involves different cells which, in the worst case, may not grow aknew or regenerate as easily as villi do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm one of those without signs in the intestines. I only had one of the blood tests come back positive and the genetic test.

As you can tell with my sig, i have other issues. I have noticed that i am doing much much better since the dx. I can sit still for a little bit, i can pay attention in class, no more "IBS" crud, my GERD is under control, my weight has stabilized and i'm still sort of loosing, and my knees have been doing better (right now as i type this the badder one of the two is throbing :lol: ). I also had major issues with absorbtion of calcium when i was a child. It caused the heel on my left food to grow jagged (was not fun to have a foot wrapped for month(s)). It eventually did what it was supposed to but still.

The thing is, the doctors just don't know. Celiac has sooo many symptoms and whathave yous that its kinda impossible to have a set example (this is what it is, etc).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a recent study confirming the existence of 2 forms of NCGI. They call it non-celiac wheat sensitivity in the study. The study does not show any conclusions about possible long term effects of the conditions. It did identify 2 possible forms of the condition, one with more severe symptoms similar to celiac disease, and one with less obvious symptoms. Where did your doctor get her information? It is not known at this point what long term effects these 2 new conditions may cause,

http://www.celiac.co...ists/Page1.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,351
    • Total Posts
      920,500
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thankyou both! I was wondering if my high levels left much doubt on the diagnosis. I don't see the GI until the 15th Sep and I don't think I can stand to eat gluten in that time. If he tells me to I will do so after then. After 25 years of symptoms I don't think there is much chance of healing my bowel In a couple of weeks. I'm actually terrified of the damage they might find. But I think I will need the endo since there may be other things going on with me. So great they didn't put your son through the biopsy! Once I have a formal diagnosis I have my kids to worry about also. I can't even stand the thought of my daughter having a blood test. I think she would need to be sedated as she is so fearful and pain sensitive. My son is not yet 2 so I don't think they will test him. I'm feeling so off at the moment. I think I have some anxiety and reflux going on complicating things quite a bit.
    • My son's antibodies were 300. Based on his extremely high levels, his pediatric GI suggested genetic testing instead of the biopsy. Genetic testing can't diagnose celiac on its own but combined with such high levels, the gi dr was confident a positive genetic test would confidently diagnose celiac. He warned that biopsies are small snapshots of the intestine and can miss damage. He said this is an approach used very often in Europe but not as much in the US. What sold me on that approach was the ability to put my son directly on a gluten free diet instead of waiting three weeks for the biopsy, during which time he would continue to eat gluten and feel terrible. I'm not sure if this is more common with younger patients though (our son is two), based on the idea that he's had less time to inflict damage that would show in a biopsy? We are very happy that we immediately started the gluten free diet and chose the genetic testing. Our son got the proper diagnosis and his recent number shows a drop to 71 after only 4.5 months gluten free! Not sure if this helps. Good luck and I hope you feel better soon!
    • We have been off gluten for a while now, and symptoms return when I've allowed gluten full meals… so something still isn't sitting right with me.  Checking with her doc about seeing a pediactric GI although I'm not sure how long that will take since we live in small town America. I know she didn't get at least one of the recommended full panel tests but maybe two, can someone help clarify, or is she missing two? DGP for sure and possibly EMA? And if I understand what I'm reading in other posts that the DGP can be more accurate? Thanks Her blood panel results: Ttg ab iga <.5u/ml ttg igg <.8u/ml aga ab iga <.2 u/ml aga an igg <.7u/ml iga 61mg/dL  
    • I was tested for the full panel, I believe. I had normal values for t-transglutaminase (ttg) igg,t-transglutaminase (ttg) iga, deamidated gliadin abs igg, deamidated gliadin abs iga, and immunoglobulin a qn serum.  
    • Would you review this on Find Me Gluten free?  You can  use the app or just go to it on line. If the restaurant isn't listed, there is a way to suggest it.  I have done that and it works.  Many of us look at that site/ app
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,415
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Ails123
    Joined