Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Genetic Testing?


cdaviles

Recommended Posts

cdaviles Rookie

My doctor is sending me to get blood work done. He doesn't want me to start eating gluten in order to see if I have celiac disease, so he's just sending me out to get the celiac genetic test. He didn't really explain it well though... What exactly does this exam do? What is it testing for? It won't tell me if I have celiac or not, right? Just if I'm genetically predisposed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



megsybeth Enthusiast

Hi Cdaviles, Why are you gluten free in the first place? The genetic testing is useful to possibly rule out celiac (though some have celiac with atypical genes, it is very rare). But I think 1/3 of all people, with celiac or not, have those genes. Unfortunately the genetic testing can be misused. For example, my son's pediatric GI was very anti-celiac for some reason and even after I was confirmed celiac she felt my son's DQ2 subtype made it virtually impossible for him to be celiac because the prometheus report put his odds at less than one times higher than the general population. I also have that "unlikely" single gene.

I've learned in my short experience with this disease that many doctors focus very intently on ruling out celiac. A patient can stand in front of them looking like a textbook celiac sufferer and they find some reason not to want to dx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient

I've learned in my short experience with this disease that many doctors focus very intently on ruling out celiac. A patient can stand in front of them looking like a textbook celiac sufferer and they find some reason not to want to dx.

Isn't that the truth??!!!! You would think they were getting a kickback from Big Pharma for every time they failed to diagnose celiac. I know, it doesn't make sense; maybe just the realization of the patronage they are losing by your not needing to come back to have scrips refilled, not to mention the potential development of other auto-immune diseases (you can hear them licking their chops, here, at the potential involved in some of these diseases :lol: )

No, sorry to the OP :( , I am being much too cynical here on a very real problem. The genetic testing is not really going to provide you with much useful information, but it could say to the doctor (who undoubtedly does not believe in any celiac genes other than DQ2 and DQ8), aha, you cannot have celiac disease. Therefore, I am going to prescribe x and y and z for your IBS or whatever he decides you might have, and you will need to come back and see me in a month for follow-up, at which point I might test you some more for something else.....

You see, there are two major genes recognized as predisposing to celiac disease, and if you don't have either one, well then you can't have it, can you??? is the way the thinking goes. Just today on the forum, Ravenwoodglass posted that she found an old copy of a celiac blood test which shows she tested positive for AGA IgA (although her doctor told her it was negative). She had the celiac genetic test and didn't have either DQ2 or DQ8, and went undiagnosed for a further ten years of suffering and was seriously impaired and to this day, to a great degree, remains so. Hers was a classic case of the genetics being used against her.

You must decide for yourself what you hope to learn from this test. Unless your parents, other siblings, your offspring are also going to be tested for the genes, no pattern will emerge on genetic inheritance. So perhaps you need to ask him the purpose of the test. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
megsybeth Enthusiast

Mushroom, my son's GI, just two days ago, tried to put him on zantac! And then she said, "Well the only problem is that it might cause a little diarrhea.". He's underweight, he's four, he still wears some clothes that are sized 18 MONTHS, he's had diarrhea since August. He doesn't have any acid reflux signs but he does have a mother with celiac and a strong positive DGP IGA. And no, I'm not going to give him something that causes diarrhea for a problem he doesn't have!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient

Mushroom, my son's GI, just two days ago, tried to put him on zantac! And then she said, "Well the only problem is that it might cause a little diarrhea.". He's underweight, he's four, he still wears some clothes that are sized 18 MONTHS, he's had diarrhea since August. He doesn't have any acid reflux signs but he does have a mother with celiac and a strong positive DGP IGA. And no, I'm not going to give him something that causes diarrhea for a problem he doesn't have!

Did she specify what the zantac was supposed to do for him?? :unsure: (rather than TO him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shadowicewolf Proficient

Mushroom, my son's GI, just two days ago, tried to put him on zantac! And then she said, "Well the only problem is that it might cause a little diarrhea.". He's underweight, he's four, he still wears some clothes that are sized 18 MONTHS, he's had diarrhea since August. He doesn't have any acid reflux signs but he does have a mother with celiac and a strong positive DGP IGA. And no, I'm not going to give him something that causes diarrhea for a problem he doesn't have!

I wore toddler clothes until i was in first or second grade (so 6 or 7 years old).

I agree don't give him the zantac. That stuff is nasty to deal with.

zantac generally reduces the amount of acid in the stomach and helps with GERD issues. If he has tummy troubles outside of the "D" then that might have been why the GI wanted to perscribe it. Before i got sick i was told to take it every evening to be able to eat in the morning (would wake up with terrible upset stomach, didn't help though).

Genetic tests are useful. I have both genes DQ2 and DQ8 along with a positive IGA TTG (other issues that were related to this were ruled out i believe), negative biopsy (4 weeks gluten free before though) and the rest of the blood panel was negative. ALl my other issues cleared up on the diet.

In this case (and i've had a doctor tell me yes while my GI says intolerence) i believe i do have it (or at least caught it before it could do major damage?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...