Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

If Not Super Sensitive..is Damage Still Being Done?
0

18 posts in this topic

Hi...so...my husband hasn't tried to eat gluten or anything but he has yet to have any reaction to anything. I've found myself with at least one reaction even though I was more careful. I don't think I'm super sensitive ..at least not as of a while back because i was able to eat amy's products. But....it got us thinking..and it worries my husband...even if you don't react to gluten will it still be doing the damage? Do you have to get sick to be damaged by it? And if not...shouldn't everyone be living as if they are super sensitive anyhow? Kind of confused on this particular topic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Yep, same thing goes for the silent celiacs (aka those who get no symptoms whatsoever).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is hard, isn't it? We can't readily see the damage going on inside.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if super sensitives react to even trace amounts of gluten....and there are people who don't have reactions at all....wouldn't that mean that even people who are not super sensitives are damaging their system even eating 10-20 ppm in food? Kinda confused. My husband wanted me to ask this after i read your answers to him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have thought about this too. I am super sensitive, and so if my son. My daughter is less sensitive, and husband hardly shows any symptoms even if he eats gluten by accident. My reading of the literature, especially the review published by the FDA: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/RiskAssessmentSafetyAssessment/UCM264152.pdf

has lead me to believe that different celiacs have different levels of sensitivity. It is known that there are different genetic make ups which produce celiac disease, and I think that these are likely to be at least part of the cause of the differences. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944025/

There are also cases of asymptomatic celiac coming down with cancer and stuff like that. Most don't. If concerned, I would do a follow up colonoscopy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I'm not sure if you misunderstood what I am saying. I'm simply saying...for all of us...should the less sensitive people be treating themselves as super sensitive even if their not considering the fact that even if you are not sensitive damage is being done to your gut anyhow? How do we know 10 ppm is okay for some if super sensitives react? Because if people who are non sensitive are not reacting but damage is still being done wouldn't that mean we should all eat as super sensitive celiacs? Regardless of if we get a reaction?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words if super sensitives react to something shouldn't we all write it off as that means gluten is present and will damage the less sensitive people even though they don't react?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that I misunderstood your question. It seems that I wasn't clear enough in my answer. It would seem that a very low level that causes a reaction to a super sensitive would not cause a reaction or harm to someone who is not super sensitive. There is a Fasano study where people eating 10 mg per day of gluten were given repeat colonoscopies after 90 days and they were negative.

http://americanceliac.org/experts-respond-to-fda/

"This study is very clear in indicating that the daily intake of 10 mg of gluten (i.e. an amount 667 times higher than the estimated TDI of 15 micrograms!) for 3 months (!) in known adult celiac patients did not cause any damage"

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So there have been studies about non reactors too then where they did have damage? So what you're saying is that there are different levels of reactions....but then there is also the chance to be super sensitive and not feel it because you simply don't react? But your gut is?

The issue for my husband is that if he's reacting to something but not feeling it..there's no way to pinpoint what might or might not be doing him damage. He's scared he's still doing damage and just not knowing it. He wants to know if he's simply a non reactor but he's worried he could be doing damage on small amounts without knowing it because he doesn't react. We did the enterolab stool tests because it seems to be about right and all especially for me. The main thing besides elevated immuno reactions in his stool he had TWICE the fat in his stool to mine even though i have worse reactions to things. So i guess he should just re-test after a year and see if he's any better? We don't see the point to colonoscopies unless worried about cancer because much of the time they seem to miss anything and say you are fine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are really difficult issues that haven't yet been resolved. Colonoscopies do seem to miss diagnoses often. There are studies in which negative colonoscopies were followed up a year or so later and became positive. There are doctors who don't take enough biopsies which cause a false negative. What about all the celiacs with DH yet negative colonoscopies? The enterolab results give far too many positives in many peoples opinions and must be false positives. There are supposed to be other non celiac related reasons to have elevated antibodies to gluten, but I haven't seen any that make sense to me. What about if there is damage that even a properly done colonoscopy could miss? Does damage always occur in the upper intestine first? There isn't much done yet about other types of damage such as neurological.

This makes diet choices very difficult. In my case, I am so sensitive that I am happy if I can manage to be symptom free. My son needs the same diet for the same reason. My daughter is less sensitive and off at college so it isn't practical for her to eat as carefully as we do. Still, I am trying to make changes so that I can offer her as much safe food as possible. She gets glutened much more often than she would like. Then there is my typical celiac husband. He eats whatever. He doesn't think that he has symptoms, but I see a big difference in his mood depending on what he has just eaten. I recommend to him that he at least only eat foods certified to be below 5 ppm, but he doesn't. If it says gluten free on the label that is good enough for him. His follow up enterolab test was still pretty high.

Maybe in 20 years the medical understanding of this condition will be great enough to give us better advise. In the meantime we have to live our lives best we can.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of myself i had a reaction at one point in august a few months in and a ton of mucus came out so i'm pretty sure i'm celiac. I also had elevated fat malabsorption etc. My husband never seemed to react to anything but planned on going gluten free too to make our lives easier anyhow. He has had less constipation and his malabsorption was 700....about twice mine. He's had a lot of random illnesses for quite a few years etc for a while so since he was going to go gluten free anyhow it's really not too bad for him only for the fact that he doesn't know how sensitive he is though he has contemplated eating gluten to see what happens that could end up a disaster. I don't have a drivers license and we'd be stuck at home all the time etc heh

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

p.s. I had to go gluten free anyhow because I was diagnosed possibly hypothyroid which might have been caused by gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wendy,

You raised a good question about possible undetected damage at lower levels of gluten. I sort of remember one study was done where they tested people for I think it was 20 ppm, but a few people had to drop out due to symptoms at that level. Most were fine though. So there is a difference in what people can tolerate.

A repeat endoscopy might be a good idea to be sure if there is damage. That is one way to check for it besides blood antibodies. But endoscopy is expensive and invasive too so it may not be worth the risk. If antibodies in the blood are staying low and there are no symptoms it seems like that is fairly good sign. Maybe the only signs we have at this point too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you misunderstood what I am saying. I'm simply saying...for all of us...should the less sensitive people be treating themselves as super sensitive even if their not considering the fact that even if you are not sensitive damage is being done to your gut anyhow? How do we know 10 ppm is okay for some if super sensitives react? Because if people who are non sensitive are not reacting but damage is still being done wouldn't that mean we should all eat as super sensitive celiacs? Regardless of if we get a reaction?

Well I am Celiac, I had many classic symptoms since I was 9 years old. I am very careful about what I eat but I don't get paranoid about 10 ppm. My answer to your question is its up to you how careful you want to be. As long as I always cook my own food and when I don't, I know how to identify gluten on labels and eat right in restaurants, I am fine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"In other words if super sensitives react to something shouldn't we all write it off as that means gluten is present and will damage the less sensitive people even though they don't react?"

I too worry that I accidentally ingest because I haven't pinned down an obvious gluten reaction. The closest thing I can think of would be kinda feeling like I should have a fever but don't, and being moody...and that's just a maybe because such things are so hard to pinpoint.

From what I've read about this, as steph has already talked about, is that celiac disease, as it stands right now, is only defined by damaged villi. There have been various studies that find the upper limit on how much gluten diagnosed celiacs can have before they will show damaged villi. That's around 20ppm. Whatever a super sensitive's reaction, no matter how severe, I suspect they wouldn't show damaged villi from it.

As to non-villi damage...well, yes, maybe all celiacs should be more careful due to reactions super sensitives have. But without symptoms, known long-term health benefits, or a full understanding of celiac disease and gluten intolerance, that's a pretty hard sell.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whatever a super sensitive's reaction, no matter how severe, I suspect they wouldn't show damaged villi from it.

Refractory celiacs definitely show villi damage while on a gluten free diet. Whether or not that is caused by trace gluten is debatable.

My GI doc thinks that refractory celiacs are super sensitive celiacs.

I get "poop in the pants" uncontrollable diarrhea from what I believe is trace gluten. Fasano used that term in the talk I heard him give, and said that it indicates total villi damage.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would poop in the pants then not happen all the time, not just in response to gluten? I mean, if absolutely nothing's getting absorbed...

I really don't know, but if I had to guess, it'd be that refractory celiacs are suffering from something besides/as well as celiac disease.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if super sensitives react to even trace amounts of gluten....and there are people who don't have reactions at all....wouldn't that mean that even people who are not super sensitives are damaging their system even eating 10-20 ppm in food? Kinda confused. My husband wanted me to ask this after i read your answers to him.

I think I've read that the less sensitive people will have less damage. If the damage were occurring, then your husband would know because he wouldn't be absorbing all of the nutrients, because the villi would be destroyed. For example, my iron levels were very low. Think that's what you mean....?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,651
    • Total Posts
      918,471
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Milling vs buying gluten-free flour
      Hello... 3 weeks ago I was diagnosed with Celiac. Looking at the various flours used to replace traditional flour is a bit overwhelming. I have a Retsel grain mill and I'm considering milling my own gluten-free flour. I have a few questions. First and foremost, would it be cost effective? Obviously, buying flour already processed is more convenient but terribly expensive. Does anyone here have experience with how accessible the ingredients are to do the milling yourself? Rice is readily accessible as well as many varieties of beans. What about milling coconut flour and some of the more exotic flours? Secondly, I'm wondering if milling at home will produce a fine enough product to be comparable to what can be purchased in store. Any experiences or suggestions would be appreciated.
    • Celiac Night Vision
      A very good suggestion GFinDC. I have thought for some time that I should have made the title of the topic night vision celiac because it may have nothing to do with celiac disease even if it started at the same time. Key words are so important. I will search first and may post on one of these sites later. I have now searched quite extensively and have not so far discovered anything helpful except that if you google night vision scotomas you get to this topic!
    • Anxiously waiting
      I'll check withthe Doctor tomorrow. So weird coz i feel ok today. In a weird way i hope the endoscopy is positive at least then I'll know what the issue is lol.
    • Biopsy confirmed?
      Sorry  To give you more info I had the endoscopy because I was diagnosed last year with Barretts Esophagus and gastritis. I've been on medication since but still had issues so they went back in to check how everything was going and to make sure the Barretts hadn't turned into anything nasty. I had a celiac blood test in 2014 ( negative) and the endoscopy in 2015 didn't show lymphocytes in the duodenum well that's if he biopsied that. I also had a colonoscopy with this years endo and all of that came back fine - I thought if I was celiac that would be affected also? As far as I know the biopsy only showed lymphocytes (white blood cells?) in the duodenum no damage to the villi but he used many big words that I didn't understand so he could have said more. With the blood test all I know is that I had a blood test for Celiac - I didn't know there were different tests for it. I'm a complete newbie with all this stuff so I just don't get what questions to ask him.  I'm so impatient I just want to know. I have a big family, a husband that is FIFO and I'm a stresser. 
    • Help interpreting biopsy results after gluten-free for 7 months
      Hi there, Just got my follow up biopsy results after being dx with celiac 7 months ago (dx with blood test + biopsy). Could anyone help interpret these new results as the doc wasn't much help... Basically he said good news is it looks like gut has healed up due to gluten-free diet. Bad news is that he has no explanation as to why I still have all of my symptoms.  Any help interpreting the attached results would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
    • ChiaChick  »  Peaceflower

      Hi Peaceflower, Just wanted to say thank you for the chat.
      · 0 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,744
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    TheBajan
    Joined