Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Kids' Test Results
0

9 posts in this topic

I was diagnosed with Celiac about 3 weeks ago and was told to have my children tested. Two of my kids have symptoms, two do not. Their pediatrician tested their IgA level (she said this one was the most used to test). We did not test my 7 month old. The range was less than 20 for normal. My oldest was 11, and the other two were 3. I know they were less than 20, but doesn't it show something since their results weren't 0? Does it mean their bodies are producing some antibodies? I'm confused by this because the ped said they were fine. We would just retest at their yearly PE's. (I hope my question makes sense :-) ).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

1-19 is normal for someone (if i've got the scale right), 20-30 is considered a low positive, and anything above 31 a high positive.

It is normal for a body to produce a low amount of antibodies to my understanding.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1-19 is normal for someone (if i've got the scale right), 20-30 is considered a low positive, and anything above 31 a high positive.

It is normal for a body to produce a low amount of antibodies to my understanding.

Ok, I'm glad to know it's normal to produce some antibodies. Thanks :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm glad to know it's normal to produce some antibodies. Thanks :-)

Indeed. The body produces, to my understanding, a certain amount of antibodies and whatnot (believe it or not, this also includes cancer cells in their 'dorment' form or so i've heard). It is when you start producing more than normal (or less for that matter) that it becomes concerning :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a little understanding of antibody tests.

To begin with, an antibody test is NOT a simple number of antibodies in the blood. It is not as simple as reading little dots and counting them like one antibody, two antibody, three antibody. The number you are seeing is a dilution titre to a reactivity staining pattern, the gliadin peptides are diluted by a machine (ELISA). The number references how many dilutions it took for the reaction to completely fade, through certain laboratory methods a "positive reaction" is chosen at a certain number. What this means is that your children's reactions were negative, requiring a less than positive dilution titre to vanish the pattern, the number under negative is irrelevant and does not mean you have some antibodies in your blood. That being said, having some antibodies is normal as well.

This is why a slightly over positive blood test means nothing, it requires a certain positive reaction to indicate that there is an autoimmune response strong enough to warrant concern over damage to the affecting organs. This is the cause of why many A.I patients will have false positive autoantibody tests in other areas, the cross reactivity will cause a false positive staining reactivity pattern.

You will notice that Antinuclear can have a positive staining pattern but under 40 dilutions is negative, just like the endomysial which can be reported as a positive reaction yet titred at 5 and under is negative. This is because those levels do not correlate with damage and risks or further indicate potential for a progressive autoimmune attack.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Tests can vary too. We had my son tested for same reason. He had NO visible symptoms... Which really just men's none that were obvious to us ( because we live with him and we just thought he was doing 'normal' stuff. The ped tested him and his reading was 25. A month and a half later, the ped GI tested him at it was up to 67. Biopsy revealed about 3 years worth of damage to intestines. After 1 week of diet, we could see a Difference in personality. He even gained some weight ( he was already a healthy weight though) and gained 3 cm ( apparently a big deal at his age) in less than three months.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tests are negative but you might want to retest them every few years if they continue to eat gluten. Celiac can manifest at any time, especially after a trauma or serious illness (like mono) so you'll probably want to keep an eye out for symptoms.

My boys all tested negative but my youngest visited the bathroom 5-8 times a day and my oldest had stomach and head aches, and has a tougher time controlling his emotions, so we decided make our family gluten-free. My youngest now only has bm's 1-3 times a day and my oldest says he feels quite a bit better. If your kids have any symptoms, you might want to consider going gluten-free anyways. Wheat has been so genetically modified that it hardly resmble the stuff our great grandparents ate... it's not a natural food anymore and I doubt it's that good for anyone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what were the total IgA for ea child, without that the testing is meaningless.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a little understanding of antibody tests.

To begin with, an antibody test is NOT a simple number of antibodies in the blood. It is not as simple as reading little dots and counting them like one antibody, two antibody, three antibody. The number you are seeing is a dilution titre to a reactivity staining pattern, the gliadin peptides are diluted by a machine (ELISA). The number references how many dilutions it took for the reaction to completely fade, through certain laboratory methods a "positive reaction" is chosen at a certain number. What this means is that your children's reactions were negative, requiring a less than positive dilution titre to vanish the pattern, the number under negative is irrelevant and does not mean you have some antibodies in your blood. That being said, having some antibodies is normal as well.

This is why a slightly over positive blood test means nothing, it requires a certain positive reaction to indicate that there is an autoimmune response strong enough to warrant concern over damage to the affecting organs. This is the cause of why many A.I patients will have false positive autoantibody tests in other areas, the cross reactivity will cause a false positive staining reactivity pattern.

You will notice that Antinuclear can have a positive staining pattern but under 40 dilutions is negative, just like the endomysial which can be reported as a positive reaction yet titred at 5 and under is negative. This is because those levels do not correlate with damage and risks or further indicate potential for a progressive autoimmune attack.

it is interesting what you wrote, thank you for explaining. however, i don't understand how you can write "those levels do not correlate with damage". just curious,,, how do you know that? how do you know that antibodies at a smaller amount aren't causing harm? (and i'm not questioning you. im genuinely wondering how you know that, so i can take this info to the pedi gi specialist!) thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,336
    • Total Posts
      920,446
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It starts as a piercing itch and the skin turns reddish with a few tiny red bumps. Then tiny watery vesicles appear and itch like crazy. The whole process from start to finish is about 3 weeks and the lesions leave a purplish skin tone and scab. I get them on the back side of both knees near the bend.  Sometimes it's just a few scattered vesicles in the same area. I've had Drs say eczema or herpes. My next step is to find a dermatologist familiar with dh. Thanks for the input.
    • DH can look like that but other things can as well. It would help if you described the way it acts/presents. You can get a dh biopsy. Read threads in this section to find out how the biopsy is done correctly. 
    • my celiac was triggered by pregnancy.  had no clue.  symptoms creeped up (started with indigestion, deemed as 'colitis' or 'ibs') but eventually all the ones you mentioned above all joined the party.  sounds like you are headed in the right direction.  one of the points of diagnosis is the reaction to the gluten-free diet.  keep digging.  half the people on here don't have a firm diagnosis (science really needs to catch up with this disease)  and a false negative blood test is fairly common, for whatever reason - if you've not been eating gluten every day for like 8 weeks, it may not detect antibodies, which is what these tests are measuring.  sorry you're having this dilemma!  hope you find some answers.
    • tom & chee!  good to know   they grill the sandwich on a separate pan?  or do you just order soup and salad.  so cool to find more places to eat out!!
    • Hi everybody,  I have had symptoms of Celiac since mid pregnancy and they have gotten worse over the last 5 months post partum. I have constipation, periods stopped, extreme fatigue,  joint pain, weak muscles, dizzyness, migraines, light sensitivity,  pins and needles in hands and feet, elevated TSH, depreason and anxiety. Was put on thyroid meds but it didn't help any of my symptoms. My doctor told me to try gluten free and reintroduce it. I tried it for 2 weeks and started feeling quite a bit better, then reintroduced it and felt worse than ever! It's definitely a gluten problem. She suggested I get the Celiac panel run so I got tested for Ttg iga, DGP igg and EMA all came back NEGATIVE! by this point I had only reintroduced gluten for a few days. She said my antibodies shouldn't go down by much in this time frame. Should I push for a referral to a GI doctor? I don't know why I feel the need for diagnosis? Probably my mother in law laughing when I said I can't eat gluten anymore and she tried to offer me things like donuts, saying it's just a little.  She just doesn't get it. So now, do I suffer for 6 weeks to get the biopsy or just stop eating gluten and be done with it.  I have also noticed while introducing new foods to my baby that he throws up whenever I give him anything wheat based. I doubt they can diagnose a baby and I refuse to damage his intestines for a diagnosis.  Maybe I should get my daughter tested as well? She is 3 and has been complaining of upset tummy and is frequently constipated. She is growing well though but is also quite thin. She is not a big eater. She may be constipated because she holds it. She is afraid to poop on the potty. Since I have had symptoms for only about 10 months, could there not be much damage yet? Sorry for the long post! 
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,395
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    olenalrz
    Joined