Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Pathologist Report - Help Needed!
0

6 posts in this topic

Want to clarify - diagnosed myself a month ago after negative blood tests and negative biopsy as NCGI and have been gluten free since late December.

Went to the doctor two days ago and was pleasantly surprised. Apparently it is just her nurse who is a moron...I did find it funny that the nurse wanted as little to do with me as possible after I excoriated her on the phone.

The doctor on the other hand, when I told her I was still having problems she said that I might easily be gluten intolerant (which, duh, but from what I have read on here, she seems to be one of the few doctors who acknowledge it!) and given the amount of inflammation I showed I should give up dairy for awhile. I was just very happy to hear my doctor parrot what I have been reading on here! I have also been doing my food diary all wrong - only recording major reactions and not minor ones, whoops!

Anyway, I asked her for the pathologist's report and she gave it to me. Shorter than I expected (2 pages), but shockingly some things were done that I did not expect (they DID test for eosinophils, which were not present).

Here it is, in most of its entirety:

Clinical impression: Abnormal mucosa in duodenum; normal mucosa entire stomach; erythematous esophagus.

Gross description: Received in zinc-formalin are six fragments of red-tan soft tissue measuring 0.9 cm x 0.6 cm x 0.2 cm in aggregate.

Received in zinc-formalin are two fragments of red-tan soft tissue measuring 0.4 cm x 0.3 cm x 0.2 cm in aggregate.

Received in formalin are two fragments of soft tissue measuring 0.3 cm x 0.3 cm x 0.1 cm in aggregate.

Miscroscopic description:

Small bowel mucosa with foveolar metaplasia and Brunner gland hyperplasia. Giardia and other parasites not identified.

Foveolar cell hyperplasia, edema of lamina propria and minimal inflammation. No evidence of intestinal metaplasia, malignancy or dysplasia. H.pylori not present.

Esophageal mucosa with basal layer hyperplasia and elongation of esophageal papillae. Eosinophils are not present. There is no columnar mucosa present.

Final diagnosis;

Duodenum, Biopsy with Cold Forceps:

Chronic duodenitis with focal foveolar metaplasia and Brunner gland hyperplasia.

No evidence of celiac sprue.

Giardia not identified.

Stomach, biopsy with cold forceps:

Reactive (erosive) gastropathy

Silver stain negative for H.pylori

Distal esophagus, Biopsy with cold forceps

Hyperplastic squamous mucosa most consistent with chronic reflux esophagitis.

There are no eosinophils present.

No evidence of Barrett's esophagus; no glandular mucosa present.

Phew!! Anyone able to decipher the medical speak for me?

Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Here it is, in most of its entirety:

Clinical impression: Abnormal mucosa in duodenum; normal mucosa entire stomach; erythematous esophagus.

Gross description: Received in zinc-formalin...............................

..................... able to decipher the medical speak for me?

Firstly, you have irritation of the duodenum and esophagus. What did the Doc Rx'ed? Avoid foods that cause these issues.

Secondly, zinc- formalin (ie: formaldhyde) is a perservative. 10 biopsies taken at various places. Size of each tissue sample, so indicated.

Hope this helps for starters.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, you have irritation of the duodenum and esophagus. What did the Doc Rx'ed? Avoid foods that cause these issues.

Secondly, zinc- formalin (ie: formaldhyde) is a perservative. 10 biopsies taken at various places. Size of each tissue sample, so indicated.

Hope this helps for starters.

Thanks, Opa. Formally, I was diagnosed with gastritis, esophagitis, and duodenitis...so I knew about the inflammation in all of those places.

What I really wanted more information about were the words mucosa, hyperplasia and those types of medical lingo. Since I am not a doctor I don't know what those things mean in the context of my esophagus, duodenum and stomach.

Additionally, I wasn't sure if the sizes of the biopsies taken were important or just something usually noted during the biopsy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The proper way for a pathologist to start his report is to describe the samples he received, as in the number, their size, their color, their appearance, and where they were labelled as being taken from.

He then details what he sees (or doesn't see) under the microscope.

If you see words you don't understand it often helps to google into an online dictionary to find out what they mean. For example, I googled mucosa, hyperplasia and metaplasia for you, with these results:

"Mucosa:

A mucous tissue lining various tubular structures consisting of epithelium, lamina propria, and, in the digestive tract, a layer of smooth muscle (muscularis mucosae).

hyperplasia - abnormal increase in number of cells

metaplasia - Abnormal transformation of an adult, fully differentiated tissue of one kind into a differentiated tissue of another kind; an acquired condition, in contrast to heteroplasia."

Even the answers may pose more questions than they answer for you. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like the Brunner's gland thing is not normally any problem. This linked case is an unusual one, but the article does describe the Brunner's Gland hyperplasisa.

http://www.ncbi.nlm....les/PMC2526515/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




sounds liek the Brunner's gland thing is not normally any problem. This linked case is an unusual one, bt the article does describe the Brunner's gland hyperplasisa.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526515/

Yes, the Brunner's gland hyperplasia was the most glaring thing I saw. I looked it up and saw it was a benign tumor in the duodenum - which didn't really worry me just confused me that my doctor wouldn't tell me that.

And yes, mushroom, I agree, the definitions of those words do tend to lead to more questions than answers, haha.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,352
    • Total Posts
      920,503
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I already did. Thats how i found the place. Its amazing to actually go to a restraunt again.
    • This is EXACTLY what happens to me. It has twice now and both times was after both glutening episodes but once it was the day after and the other time it was a week and a half. So I'm still not sure if it's related or strange bug bites...

      Did they stop happening when she stopped being glutened? Did you decide they were definitely related? I'm really confused by this and would love to know whether to insecticide my house or....
    • Thankyou both! I was wondering if my high levels left much doubt on the diagnosis. I don't see the GI until the 15th Sep and I don't think I can stand to eat gluten in that time. If he tells me to I will do so after then. After 25 years of symptoms I don't think there is much chance of healing my bowel In a couple of weeks. I'm actually terrified of the damage they might find. But I think I will need the endo since there may be other things going on with me. So great they didn't put your son through the biopsy! Once I have a formal diagnosis I have my kids to worry about also. I can't even stand the thought of my daughter having a blood test. I think she would need to be sedated as she is so fearful and pain sensitive. My son is not yet 2 so I don't think they will test him. I'm feeling so off at the moment. I think I have some anxiety and reflux going on complicating things quite a bit.
    • My son's antibodies were 300. Based on his extremely high levels, his pediatric GI suggested genetic testing instead of the biopsy. Genetic testing can't diagnose celiac on its own but combined with such high levels, the gi dr was confident a positive genetic test would confidently diagnose celiac. He warned that biopsies are small snapshots of the intestine and can miss damage. He said this is an approach used very often in Europe but not as much in the US. What sold me on that approach was the ability to put my son directly on a gluten free diet instead of waiting three weeks for the biopsy, during which time he would continue to eat gluten and feel terrible. I'm not sure if this is more common with younger patients though (our son is two), based on the idea that he's had less time to inflict damage that would show in a biopsy? We are very happy that we immediately started the gluten free diet and chose the genetic testing. Our son got the proper diagnosis and his recent number shows a drop to 71 after only 4.5 months gluten free! Not sure if this helps. Good luck and I hope you feel better soon!
    • We have been off gluten for a while now, and symptoms return when I've allowed gluten full meals… so something still isn't sitting right with me.  Checking with her doc about seeing a pediactric GI although I'm not sure how long that will take since we live in small town America. I know she didn't get at least one of the recommended full panel tests but maybe two, can someone help clarify, or is she missing two? DGP for sure and possibly EMA? And if I understand what I'm reading in other posts that the DGP can be more accurate? Thanks Her blood panel results: Ttg ab iga <.5u/ml ttg igg <.8u/ml aga ab iga <.2 u/ml aga an igg <.7u/ml iga 61mg/dL  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,417
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Suzette Porter
    Joined