Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

I Think Celiac Testing Is Flawed
0

7 posts in this topic

Celiac Disease (as I currently understand it) means that there is villous atrophy that is being caused by the body’s immune reaction against gliadin proteins. According to literature I’ve read by Dr. Alessio Fasano, an individual can develop Celiac Disease at any time during their lifetime.

Here are the tests that are currently used in the medical community to diagnose Celiac Disease:

  1. Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies (tTG-IgA, tTG-IgG)
  2. Anti-Gliadin Antibodies (AGA-IgA, AGA-IgG)
  3. Anti-Endomysial Antibodies (EMA-IgA, EMA-IgG)
  4. Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibodies (DGP-IgA, DGP-IgA)
  5. Total IgA count

Here are the reference ranges for the above-mentioned tests:

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgA:

0-19 is defined as normal

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgG:

0-19 is defined as normal

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgA:

0-3 is defined as normal

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgG:

0-5 is defined as normal

Total IgA Antibody count:

70-400 is defined as normal

Let’s try and define “normal.” What does “normal” mean? Does this mean that people who are perfectly healthy, who are having no reaction to gluten at all, have those numbers? Or does it just mean that people who may be having a reaction to gluten, but not enough to cause villous atrophy, may have those numbers?

I especially find “weak positive” vs “positive” to be hilarious. What does “weak positive” mean? I mean, come on! Does “weak positive” mean they THINK it might cause villous atrophy?

I suppose that scientists and/or doctors have arrived at these numbers as their definition of what (they think) is (maybe) going to cause villous atrophy. However, there are many questions and doubts I have about this, as follows:

1. How do they know that these numbers will or will not cause villous atrophy? What if a DGP IgA value of 15 causes villous atrophy in some people whereas a number of 21 does not cause villous atrophy in others?

2. What if the guy with the 21 number does not have villous atrophy yet because his body only started reacting to gliadin proteins a few months ago and not enough time has passed to develop villous atrophy?

3. Is villous atrophy all we care about? What other forms of damage can a DGP-IgA value of 20+ be doing? What about a value of 15? 10? 5? 1 even?

4. If you have a number greater than 0 of any of these SELF antibodies, doesn’t that mean you have a form of autoimmune disorder? If not, then does the body just make these antibodies just because it feels like it? Is the human body programmed by evolution to make at least a certain amount of these self antibodies (I seriously doubt it), or does it make them in response to stimuli?

5. If the latter, can the stimuli be anything besides gliadin and glutenin proteins? If so, what?

My theory: if your body is making ANY antibodies against SELF tissues, you have an autoimmune disorder, but I don't know what is causing it, nor can I tell you what type of damage it is doing to your body. I know, that's very helpful, isn't it?

What do you guys think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Hi Seeking.

Very thought provoking post and you ask some of the same questions that I have been asking myself as well. I too would like to know how they come up with establishing the ranges of normalcy. As of yet, I haven't found out the answers despite looking. I do know that my neurologist, when telling me my test results (which were 'inconclusive'), looked up at me and said, "Don't worry about that because who knows how many people in the test range were actually unconfirmed celiacs and skewed the ranges".

In one of Dr. Mario Hadjivassiliou's (UK researcher in gluten ataxia) interviews that I read on the celiac about.com page with Jane Anderson, he stated that anyone with elevated IGA should try a gluten free diet.

I have been trying to understand the ttg Iga response as well but am having a hard time wrapping my head around some of it. There are different kinds of ttg: tttg 2 (intestinal celiac), ttg3 (DH) and ttg6 (gluten ataxia - which is currently being developed for testing of gluten ataxia). So, what exactly is ttg (an enzyme, I believe) and is IgA specifically linked to ttg or is it linked other kinds of enzymes in the body but they only test for the ttg IgA?

Sorry that I can only offer more questions here and not answers but I would like to add in my voice and ask if anyone else has any answers for your questions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a lot of time, but I wanted to make a note, which I think is important:

You seem to be assuming that test results are ACTUALLY WHAT EXISTS. Tests are, by their nature, imprecise things. You get a reading of "3" on something, and there's a margin of error. Maybe what's really in your body is a 1 or a 6 (or something else - error varies by test, test type, and many, many factors). So, there needs to be some accounting for the fact that there is error in a test.

Additionally, "normal" ranges are generally set by running the test on a "large" group of "healthy" control subjects to find out what the normal range of results is. Various statistics are run, and you get what normal ranges are. Is this prone to mistake? Yes. Is this a less than perfect answer? Yes. Is it the best method we've got at the moment? Yes.

Finally, with celiac in particular, when people come up with a new blood test, you have to have something to compare it to, and that has been the classic standard of an endoscopy, which is looking for villous atrophy. So, yes, there is a bias that way. Because there is no other well established standard to compare it to.

Is testing flawed? Yes. It's getting better, but it's hardly likely to ever be perfect. Measuring these sorts of things in the human body is extraordinarily difficult, both from a "how the heck do we do a useful measurement accurately" and from the "what is it that we're measuring for".

But, you know, there is a LOT in the world that is flawed. We work with what we've got.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Tiffany. Well said.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seeking,

I'd like to say thanks for posting those questions since it motivated me to search a little harder for a few things. I found a laboratory medicine wiki for the second year university students at the University of California. This link outlines how labs establish the reference ranges for testing:

http://ucsdlabmed.wi...t.com/chapter-1

Also, in answer to your third question about villous atrophy being the sole concern of damage from antibodies, in gluten ataxia research, the atrophy or shrinkage of the cerebellum as a result of the ttg 6 IgA antibodies attacking the Pukinje cells contained within it is also used as a marker.

In answer to your fifth question, a very recent study came out in which they drew the conclusion that continued unresponsivity to a gluten free diet could be due to antibody cross reacitivity to non-gliadin foods. You can download the PDF of the study here:

www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=26626

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I don't think that it is flawed so much as there isn't enough known yet. They are researching and trying to figure it out as fast as they can with all the difficulties involved. Here is an article about the difficulties with funding with medical research: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2013/01/14/congress-is-killing-medical-research/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your fifth question, a very recent study came out in which they drew the conclusion that continued unresponsivity to a gluten free diet could be due to antibody cross reacitivity to non-gliadin foods. You can download the PDF of the study here:

www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=26626

This source says "We also observed significant cross-reactivity between a-gliadin 33-mer and various food antigens, but some of these reactions were associated with the contamination of non-gluten foods with traces of gluten."

It could be from cross reactivity or contamination.

In my experience, I don't react to things when I grow them myself, even if I do when I get the item elsewhere. There is also the problem of botanically unrelated items having very similar reactivity. I believe it is more likely to be contamination than cross reactivity.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,678
    • Total Posts
      921,703
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • At the moment it's microwave rice packets as it needs to be something easy for lunch at work. What do you choose for breakfast? At the moment I have gluten-free porridge oats with fruits but also seeing oats are a bit of a gamble in the early days. Trying to figure out how long a reaction takes to show up i.e. if I feel ropey later in the day is it really lunch as I'm blaming at present or actually is it something from the morning or even night before? The food is the toughest bit for me right now; wasn't that great with it before so will need plenty ideas from you good people... seems I'm in the right place though   
    • I know what you're going through - it's that grieving process and it's tough.  I was diagnosed in 2013, and aside from an occasional pity party, I don't look back. I have my restaurants where I feel safe, I have the food I know I can eat, and I get on with my life.  I'm lucky that I live in a big city with lots of options, but you can make this work, and you will feel better and once you do, you'll stop grieving.  The people on this site helped enormously. It is tough in the beginning to know if you've been 'glutened' vs. just going through withdrawal.  For that reason alone, it's best to avoid restaurants for a little while and be careful at home - just to be sure what's happening.  Eventually you'll be able to get back to your version of 'normal'.  Oh, I also have hypothyroid/hashimoto's.  No big deal, I take synthroid. Quinoa, eggs, nuts and beans for protein.  You don't have to go crazy on the cooking.  Just eat a lot of whole foods.  There are a lot of complicated recipes out there, but now may not be the time.  Rice noodles in veggie bouillon - easy and cheap.  gluten-free pasta with olive oil, parmesan and garlic - easy.  I eat a lot of rice and have never had a problem - you're not getting it out of one of those bulk bins, are you?  That could be contaminated.  Go with packaged.  Do you have access to the Macro Vegetarian brand of prepared rice dishes (in the refrigerated section).  They have several that are gluten free, they're delicious heated and with a little gluten-free soy sauce.  They're my go to on days I don't want to cook. Good luck!  
    • I also think that the HPV/Gardasil vaccine triggered something in my body. I had some Celiac symptoms many years before this vaccine but I felt ok. I was physically very active. However, after I received the third dose as well, I began having more problems including a more persistant pain, overall body weakness, lack of concentration, hair loss, etc.
    • OK so been to the doctor, they've sped up my referral and I should get the appointment booking form in the post shortly. They've said stay off the gluten until I have a date for the appointment then in the weeks leading up to it go back on - thoughts? Did my bit of sport last night which was a great relief to be free of any illness-related thoughts for an hour or two; didn't think I'd have the energy at the start but soon got going and was OK so that's a plus I seem to be getting some strange symptoms at the moment that have only happened since trying to remove gluten, do these sound familiar to anyone? dry forehead, just starting to go red \ itchy in places. Treating with E45-type cream tender scalp and sides of head, almost like a pulling feeling and a bit sensitive to touch. Scared this one matches the symptoms of GCA, a particularly nasty autoimmune disease that can lead to blindness 
      Edit: having said that just found this thread and funny enough did wash my hair this morning...
      http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/50920-sores-on-scalp/ one eye watering and associated fuzzy vision at times, trying to reassure myself it isn't blurred vision due to the point above sometimes bit of a lump in throat sensation, seems to come and go Been reading that some people can't handle rice - I was OK with it whilst eating gluten but have been having it for lunch each day and seem to get worse around 4-5pm so could that be a culprit? How long after coming off gluten would I be able to say I'm at a baseline to know if feeling ill is down to "glutening" vs. blaming it on the body adjusting to the change in (lack of) gluten in food?
    • First of all, welcome to the forum! it's good to have you here. Secondly, I can really relate to the fatigue portion.  it really hadn't affected me until everything hit the ceiling medically for me.  I was constantly tired all the time, and waking feeling rested in the morning. Prone to depression and anxiety, definitely.  It drove me nuts for those first few weeks.  That's when I decided to try going off the gluten to see what happened.  I still dealt with the depression, anxiety at crazy levels, and inability to focus/concentrate, but it had gotten progressively better.  The anxiety got so bad I would have panic attacks in public areas which only ramped up the anxiety because people saw what was happening.  I would encourage you and your doctor to do a full Celiac panel before you decide to try the gluten free diet.  I had my blood work done after I was off gluten for about two months or so.  Thankfully, my levels were still high to register at least a gluten sensitivity.  Since going off gluten for almost a year now, things have started to finally appear "normal".  Whatever normal means for me now.  As I am healing from the 30 years of glutenizing, I combined both natural methods with the medical methods.  If you are interested in the different avenues of natural methods, I would be willing to share with you.  I will be praying for you as you go through this journey. Let me assure you, you are not alone in this journey.  Depending on family dynamics, they can be a great source of support.  This forum is also a great place to bounce thoughts or concerns off of.  Good luck.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,675
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    JVerg11
    Joined