Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Endoscope Done Today
0

6 posts in this topic

My husband had an scope done today (blood last week, but don't have results yet-urgh) and I'm wondering if the doc would/should have seen eroded villi during the exam today or is the only way to detect damage after biopsy sample(s) are completed? Just feeling kind of anxious to know more either way. I'm somehow thinking Doc should have visually noticed changes and feeling kind of discouraged he did not, but I have no clue.

I guess all the anticipation is killing me -I've been researching and learning for several months, come to grips with having to change over my kitchen and ways of eating for the whole family (both kids and myself are at minimum wheat sensitive/intolerant) and I think just looking for the green light to tell me "GO NOW".

Any thoughts? Thanks in advance...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Sometimes, if its really bad, they will see something. The problem is the villi that is damaged is very tiny so looking at little bits under a microscope is the best way to tell. Who would think the lack of something so teeny weeny hair-like could make us feel so bad!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband had an scope done today (blood last week, but don't have results yet-urgh) and I'm wondering if the doc would/should have seen eroded villi during the exam today or is the only way to detect damage after biopsy sample(s) are completed? Just feeling kind of anxious to know more either way. I'm somehow thinking Doc should have visually noticed changes and feeling kind of discouraged he did not, but I have no clue.

I guess all the anticipation is killing me -I've been researching and learning for several months, come to grips with having to change over my kitchen and ways of eating for the whole family (both kids and myself are at minimum wheat sensitive/intolerant) and I think just looking for the green light to tell me "GO NOW".

Any thoughts? Thanks in advance...

I had a TTG of > 100 on a scale of 10 positive. After the Endoscopy Dr told my wife that he did not believe I had Celiac cause he did not see damage indicating Celiac. He only took 3 biopsys and all showed moderate villous blunting confirming Celiac disease. Dr did not see the damage in my case so I would not get discouraged.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it depends on the extent of the damage.

My intestines were so damaged that the doctor was exclaiming during the endoscopy "classic coeliac duodenum" and afterwards he showed me a picture of my completely eroded intestines. They were so wrecked that there were no villi at all to be seen. Straight after the endoscopy he told me I definitely had coeliac disease and that I should go gluten-free immediately. The biopsy results later confirmed the extreme extent of the destruction. I was so shocked by how severe the damage was!

But I think for a lot of people the damage isn't as obvious or is more patchy so they have to wait for a biopsy before any diagnosis can be made.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone, you have given me hope, I was fearful that nothing visual would just say "negative"....though I'm finding it hard to be patient. Was at the Doc with my son today and asking for a copy of hubby blood labs, but alas, doc said he would have to talk to my hubby first...then would mail. ACK!!!!!! My fingers are crossed we get a confirming diagnosis and don't have to struggle for years without knowing.

Coincidentally, my toaster zapped out this morning, so I'm hoping this is a sign I can make drastic changes. Don't think hubby/kids will go along with the necessary changes unless the doc says it's necessary. I'm convinced, but it's not enough for them...even when I point out how badly "the guys" feel after a sandwich vs chicken breast and vegtables.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




To echo others here, my doc told me it all looked normal as I came to afterwards, and told me to continue to eat a normal diet. Two weeks later, a nurse called and told me that I have Celiac disease and sent a poor-quality photocopy of a short pamphlet about how to eat gluten-free. When I asked if I should schedule a follow-up exam, I was told that the doctor was off - for the entire summer - and that they'd call me when she returned.

All of which is to say, the time between now and when you get results may seem slow, but if you suspect Celiac there's no reason not to start the "diet" now, since all tests are done. Worst case they'll come back negative and he'll be a few days or a week or so into the diet change and will know if he feels better, indicating possible sensitivity.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,352
    • Total Posts
      920,502
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is EXACTLY what happens to me. It has twice now and both times was after both glutening episodes but once it was the day after and the other time it was a week and a half. So I'm still not sure if it's related or strange bug bites...

      Did they stop happening when she stopped being glutened? Did you decide they were definitely related? I'm really confused by this and would love to know whether to insecticide my house or....
    • Thankyou both! I was wondering if my high levels left much doubt on the diagnosis. I don't see the GI until the 15th Sep and I don't think I can stand to eat gluten in that time. If he tells me to I will do so after then. After 25 years of symptoms I don't think there is much chance of healing my bowel In a couple of weeks. I'm actually terrified of the damage they might find. But I think I will need the endo since there may be other things going on with me. So great they didn't put your son through the biopsy! Once I have a formal diagnosis I have my kids to worry about also. I can't even stand the thought of my daughter having a blood test. I think she would need to be sedated as she is so fearful and pain sensitive. My son is not yet 2 so I don't think they will test him. I'm feeling so off at the moment. I think I have some anxiety and reflux going on complicating things quite a bit.
    • My son's antibodies were 300. Based on his extremely high levels, his pediatric GI suggested genetic testing instead of the biopsy. Genetic testing can't diagnose celiac on its own but combined with such high levels, the gi dr was confident a positive genetic test would confidently diagnose celiac. He warned that biopsies are small snapshots of the intestine and can miss damage. He said this is an approach used very often in Europe but not as much in the US. What sold me on that approach was the ability to put my son directly on a gluten free diet instead of waiting three weeks for the biopsy, during which time he would continue to eat gluten and feel terrible. I'm not sure if this is more common with younger patients though (our son is two), based on the idea that he's had less time to inflict damage that would show in a biopsy? We are very happy that we immediately started the gluten free diet and chose the genetic testing. Our son got the proper diagnosis and his recent number shows a drop to 71 after only 4.5 months gluten free! Not sure if this helps. Good luck and I hope you feel better soon!
    • We have been off gluten for a while now, and symptoms return when I've allowed gluten full meals… so something still isn't sitting right with me.  Checking with her doc about seeing a pediactric GI although I'm not sure how long that will take since we live in small town America. I know she didn't get at least one of the recommended full panel tests but maybe two, can someone help clarify, or is she missing two? DGP for sure and possibly EMA? And if I understand what I'm reading in other posts that the DGP can be more accurate? Thanks Her blood panel results: Ttg ab iga <.5u/ml ttg igg <.8u/ml aga ab iga <.2 u/ml aga an igg <.7u/ml iga 61mg/dL  
    • I was tested for the full panel, I believe. I had normal values for t-transglutaminase (ttg) igg,t-transglutaminase (ttg) iga, deamidated gliadin abs igg, deamidated gliadin abs iga, and immunoglobulin a qn serum.  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,416
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    djs2117
    Joined