Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Casein Intolerance...


Rachel--24

Recommended Posts

Rachel--24 Collaborator
For one, he claimed the ELISA blood tests are crap and don't work, whereas several people here have had good luck with them (then again, I know very little about the tests, but when people here have used them and a celiac disease book suggests it......makes me wonder).

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Actually most doctors are not supportive of ELISA tests. There are no guarantees with the ELISA tests...they are still controversial. They do help some people but I dont think they are foolproof...and they arent helpful to everyone. I had the tests done and I cant say it helped me at all....it really didnt tell me much. I tested negative for all the foods. <_< They also are very expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Claire Collaborator
I'm so glad we have this thread! I am going in Tuesday to see an allergist to be tested for food and other allergies. We suspect my apartment is making me sicker 9i think there's a mold problem as i CLEARLY feel better when I'm out of it and sick as a dog when I'm in it). My question is, can an allergist test for an intolerance as well as an allergy? I suspect I have a milk allergy (the chronic ear infection link for me) but I'm also wondering about a lactose/casein intolerance. Sometimes, but not always, I get really noxious gas from eating something like parmesan and other times, I'm fine. No clue but I'm glad this thread exists! Beverly

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This may or may not be useful for understanding allergy testing. I was skin tested by an allergist for just about everything known to man. Negative across the board.

I had the Blood Print Test offered by Immuno Labs (FL) and came up with sensitivies to a large number of foods including all grains except rice and oats. I agreed with most of the test but on some things I knew they had to be wrong because they were foods I dislike and have not eaten since childhood. Many allergists do not do these tests.

My naturipathic doctor is opposed to these tests because they turn up so many false negatives. They usually identify the reactive foods correctly but you have no way of sorting out the true readings from the false ones.

I now believe that the stool sample test from Enterolab is the best way to go. They can do this for gluten, casein, wheat, soy, eggs - I think that's all but these are the most common reactive foods. If you know for certain about these you can then self test for other things. Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bluelotus Contributor

The nurse called me again today to schedule the lactose test (I have put it off b/c I don't think I want it). I asked her if it tests for casein. Her response: "what?!" then dumb silence. Me: "You know, casein, the milk protein" Her: "I don't know anything about that"

Nice. Real quality professionals I am dealing with here.

And, thanks for the thoughts above, Rachel. I had only gotten the good side from my reading of books and posts here. It wasn't implied anywhere that there were problems. So I appreciate hearing the other side, so to speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elisabet Contributor
Well I don't have to worry about any *false* readings with my tests. My IgG delayed-onset tests were negative for ALL foods.  :blink:

I only reacted to mustard and alfalfa (barely).

I had these tests done when I was at my abosolute worst. Not absorbing anything...losing weight...reacting to EVERYTHING. I'm pretty sure I had leaky gut which was causing all the reactions but tests show no real immune response to any foods. Also Enterolab came back negative for casein, yeast and eggs. All IgE true allergy tests have been negative as well. The only thing I've actually tested positive for was gluten. I think my Enterolab casein test may have been positive if I'd still been consuming dairy but I wasnt for a few months.  I scored a 9 on that.

I guess after having IgG, IgE and IgA tests all come back negative theres not much left after that. Most of my *reactions* come after a glutening. Can Leaky Gut cause symptoms even though there is no actual sensitivities?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

you didn t have elevated Ige to casein,while you used diary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rachel--24 Collaborator
you didn t have  elevated Ige to casein,while you used diary?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'd have to look back at the test results to see if "casein" specifically was tested. The results showed no elevated IgG responses to ANY foods tested and I was eating dairy at that time. I did have the Enterolab tests for casein (IgA) and that was negative as well. I scored a 9...a 10 would have been positive. I had been off dairy for a few months before taking that test so I'm not sure if the results were affected by that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...
peanut369 Newbie

Hey Guys - I wonder if any of you have looked into avoiding preservatives in addition to gluten/casein? I found that I was having a similar, but not identical, reaction to store-bought gluten free items: coke, cookies, prepared meals (like that yummy stroganoff) and even some gluten-free cereals. Eliminating preservatives has helped a ton, and next is casein because I still haven't got everything under control. I don't wanna! I love my milk! :o:o

??

??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hathor Contributor

I try to avoid a lot of artificial ingredients. It does seem to help.

If it isn't clear in this thread, it is possible to have casein in things OTHER than dairy. You have to read labels and be on the lookout for anything with casein or caseinate listed among the ingredients. Manufacturers like to throw this into soy and rice cheeses, for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dbmamaz Explorer

Just wanted to jump in this thread w a few personal observations. First of all, i was off milk and wheat as an infant after a food challenge, but there was never any testing. I believed myself to be lactose intolerant most of my life, because I seemed to react better to dairy if it was lactose free or I was taking acidopholous supplement. But then I read that people who are allergic to dairy have an easier time digesting lactose-free dairy . .that kinda suprised me.

So, I quit both dairy and wheat at the same time. I did a test similar to the Elisa (A.L. C.A.T). They are similar but the test I took had a larger selection of foods - i wanted to be tested for everything. Some of the foods I was pretty sure I was reacting to werent on the other tests.

My AL C.A.T (note, if you spell it all together it gets changed in to 'lame advertising' by this website) test came back with only 2 'red' foods, 13 'orange' foods (including RICE!), and 43 or so 'yellow' (mild reaction) foods, plus a mild reaction to gluten, casien and candida.

I am kinda freaked out by how little foods I didnt react to - i guess they tested 175 foods and I reacted to more than 1/3 of them (including the various foods that casien, gluten and yeast pulled out). I am trying to console myself w the fact that there are a lot of false positives in these tests, but I need to eliminate it all before I can do a challenge . . onions, chili peppers, mushrooms, pork, the fish from my fish oil pills!!

I'm still waiting to get back my celiac test (done 6 weeks off gluten) and go to the allergist, because some of the foods i'm sure bother me (tropical fruits, shellfish and cashews) didnt show as reactions on the other test - but if I take those out, plus nightshades too, i'll be eating corn, chicken, turkey and beans, with squash and melons and berries and root veggies and greens .. and thats it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...