Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Trying To Figure Out If My Daughter Should Have Further Testing
0

9 posts in this topic

I was diagnosed with Celiacs several months ago. I then had both my daughters tested since I also was positive for both Celiac genes. DQ2 and DQ8. My older daughters results showed >100 on t-Transglutaminase (tTg) IgA (o-3 is normal). She is now on a gluten free diet. Neither myself or my daughters have or had GI issues associated with Celiacs.

My younger daughter got a 4 on the same test, which is considered Weak positive. She also got the following results on Deamidated Gliadin test:

IgA 8 (0-19 normal)

IgG 15 (0-19 normal)

Her pediatrician said she does not have Celiac.

Do you agree with this? What does weak positive mean? I just wondering if I should pursue this further for her.

Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

So she got a weak positive on the Transglutaminase (tTg) IgA test right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So she got a weak positive on the Transglutaminase (tTg) IgA test right?

Yes. That is correct
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if I was in your shoes, I would consider making her gluten-free too. You could pursue and endoscopy but what if the damage is patchy because she is so young and they miss it? She'll continue eating food that is damaging her. If she goes gluten-free, you've got it covered and she'll be healthy. Even if the doctor is right, and she is not a celiac, going gluten-free will not harm her in anyway and since you already have one child eating gluten-free, it should be an easier transition for you all.

My kids tested negative but I suspected gluten was a cause to some bathroom issues, and stomach aches and head aches that resembled my own. I made all three of my boys gluten-free and I honestly think it has helped two of them tremendously. One son does not appear to be affected by gluten but going gluten-free, and eating more whole foods is a good thing so we're sticking with it.

Best of luck in whatever you decide to do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if I was in your shoes, I would consider making her gluten-free too. You could pursue and endoscopy but what if the damage is patchy because she is so young and they miss it? She'll continue eating food that is damaging her. If she goes gluten-free, you've got it covered and she'll be healthy. Even if the doctor is right, and she is not a celiac, going gluten-free will not harm her in anyway and since you already have one child eating gluten-free, it should be an easier transition for you all.

My kids tested negative but I suspected gluten was a cause to some bathroom issues, and stomach aches and head aches that resembled my own. I made all three of my boys gluten-free and I honestly think it has helped two of them tremendously. One son does not appear to be affected by gluten but going gluten-free, and eating more whole foods is a good thing so we're sticking with it.

Best of luck in whatever you decide to do.

My younger daughter is 18 and leaving for college in September. I would hate to have her gluten free if she is not celiac. Does anyone know what "weak positive" means and if I should get more testing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




My younger daughter is 18 and leaving for college in September. I would hate to have her gluten free if she is not celiac. Does anyone know what "weak positive" means and if I should get more testing.

Yes, she should. If the TTG IGA comes back positive, more testing should be done. As of right now, its better to get it done, then it is to wait.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My younger daughter is 18 and leaving for college in September. I would hate to have her gluten free if she is not celiac. Does anyone know what "weak positive" means and if I should get more testing.

Usually a weak positive is a positive celiac test. There are some other diseases like Hashimoto's or e.coli that can cause a positive ttg IgA but it's usually celiac. I think of it like a pregnancy test; if you had a weak positive, chances are that is 9 months you'll have a baby but it could indicate hormonal problems or an ectopic preganacy... it's just not likely. KWIM?

I would get your 18 year old further testing and then encourage her go gluten-free anyways. If you consider that there is almost a 25% false negative rate in the blood tests, a weak positive is fairly significant and should be taken seriously.

Best wishes to her and your family.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a college student, there is nothing worse than getting really sick in the middle of a busy semester and then having to adjust to a new diet. If she were to get it done, and to find out she may indeed have celiac, she then has the time to be able to get accomodations (if she is in the dorms) for it. That is if she is going to school in the U.S. i'm not sure how it works outside of the States.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was diagnosed with Celiacs several months ago. I then had both my daughters tested since I also was positive for both Celiac genes. DQ2 and DQ8. My older daughters results showed >100 on t-Transglutaminase (tTg) IgA (o-3 is normal). She is now on a gluten free diet. Neither myself or my daughters have or had GI issues associated with Celiacs.

My younger daughter got a 4 on the same test, which is considered Weak positive. She also got the following results on Deamidated Gliadin test:

IgA 8 (0-19 normal)

IgG 15 (0-19 normal)

Her pediatrician said she does not have Celiac.

Do you agree with this? What does weak positive mean? I just wondering if I should pursue this further for her.

Thanks!

I wanted to add that my younger daughter started eating gluten free at home since I had been diagnosed and changed over our house. Most of her meals (but not all) were gluten free prior to being tested 2 months later. I am thinking to get her retested, but How much and for how long does she need to eat gluten to get an accurate blood test?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,115
    • Total Posts
      919,447
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, you can probably get an apple or something.  You might be able to get someone to boil you some eggs.  But be careful of things like nuts that should be naturally gluten free.  They have almost always been soaked in a flavor solution that usually containes caramel coloring, "soy" (wheat) sauce and other aditives.  If I am really hungry and must eat in a Chinese restaurant, I order plain white rice and steamed vegetables.  But even so, you must monitor it carefully.  The rice sometimes has other substances added to give it a better texture, and very often the vegetables have in fact had "just a little bit" of soy sauce added.  To be fair, celiac disease is hardly ever found in East Asians, so understandably people are not tuned it to it.  Also, culturally, with the exception of fruits, it is generally thought that the flavor of foods needs to be enhanced, so it is had to find anything natural even in the "western" gorceries. Even in the western restaurants, be careful.  Fish and meat and often vegetables are usually pre-marinated. I will not even attempt to address the issue of cross-comtamination, since that is a whole higher order of things. I do know what I am talking about; I have celiac and have worked here for nearly 7 years.  
    • I'm glad I found these forums!  I will spend some more time this evening reading through them.  But I wanted to get my question out there just to see if anyone else might have answers quicker than I can sift through the forum for them.      I've been feeling terrible for about a year, and after an elimination diet last month, figured out that if nothing else, gluten/wheat is a problem.  After lots of research, I abandoned the elimination diet and added gluten back in, so that I could get tested for Celiac.   I was off gluten for 3 weeks, from mid-June until early July.  I've had it back in my diet for almost 3 weeks now.    My question is this: Since I was off gluten for 3 weeks, and now back on for almost 3, is that enough time on to yield a positive Celiac blood test, if that indeed is what I have?  All the research I've done says 4-6 weeks for a gluten challenge, but is that really necessary if I was only not eating it for 3 weeks?  I am desperate to get this testing done and over with.  I feel terrible all the time and getting through the day is a struggle.  My doctor ran allergy panels already and everything came back clear except for a mild wheat allergy.  So if nothing else, I'll have to give up wheat for sure at the end of all this.  I get the feeling she doesn't know a ton about Celiac though, so I'm doing a lot of the research on my own. Any advice or information would be so appreciated! 
    • Hi Michael, That's quite a spike in blood pressure!  I haven't tested that myself and don't want to if it means I have to eat gluten.  Blood pressure testing to identify food reactions is something that has come up before.  It sounds like it might be possible but I don't know how much study has been done on it.  Probably not much since it is such a simple, straight forward idea. Welcome to the forum!
    • Hi Megan, Did the doctor test you for celiac disease?  You really shouldn't go gluten-free until all the testing for celiac disease is completed.  It is a little odd for a doctor to tell you to go gluten-free for no reason IMHO.  Did he/she explain the reason for it? Personally, I have learned over the years what I can eat safely and what I can't.  Occasionally I get hit but it is rare.  Simplifying your diet is a good first step.  Avoiding processed foods for a while and dairy also is good.  I suggest any change you make last for a month at least. Then try the food again. If you are eating 100 random ingredients/foods each day it is hard to figure these things out.  If you reduce it to a much smaller number of foods then things become simpler. Welcome to the forum!
    • Finally, proof that non-celiac gluten sensitivity is real. ... for the 30 percent of consumers who choose to buy gluten-free products and the 41 percent of ... View the full article
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,154
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    calla84
    Joined