Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Mislabeling Medical Illness As Mental Disorder
0

16 posts in this topic



Ads by Google:

Yikes!!! We really need to rush through our doctor training program :D on celiac disease or any undiagnosed case of celiac disease will carry the SSD diagnosis and will likely never get the testing to get a diagnosis because it is all in their head, worst case scenario :ph34r: And here I though we had gotten past that "all in your head" bit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here I though we had gotten past that "all in your head" bit.

Some Day.

Until then - - we change minds - - one at a time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This stuff is scary. They gave meds for GERD to my father because he was stressed; he was growing a huge aneurism in his aorta. :blink: They did it with me, too: "there there, it's just anxiety, you're in grad school; here take some meds" - I have a rampant hyperthyroidism which causes me bouts of thyrotoxicosis. WHERE did you get your MD, at Banana Republic School of Medicine?

I wonder, and this is something I see not only in the US, but also in other countries, whether the problems is not ignorance, but money. Tests are more expensive than meds, and I have known of cases in which doctors prescribing too many tests were 'fined.' In many countries (don't know about the US, but fill me in, because it'd be interesting) GPs receive some, ahem, 'support' from pharmaceutical companies, hence more prescriptions are given for pills as opposed to tests. This, or maybe our culture of speed and 'achievement,' creates the craving for a quick fix, so that the above interests find an eager audience.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the original link to the article in Psychology Today by Allen Frances, MD

DSM5 in Distress, the impact on mental health practice and research, mislabeling medical illness as a mental disorder 12/8/2012

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201212/mislabeling-medical-illness-mental-disorder

This is about how the American Psychiatric Association (APA) which is working on its 5th version of a new Diagnostic & Statistic Manual, version 5, aka "DSM-5," wants to make it much easier to call patients with undiagnosed, chronic pain "psychosomatic" with broadening the definition of Somatic Symptom Disorder. Also as having "psychogenic pain." In other words, "head cases."

Please read. Thank you, Sora, for the link, I am going to add this to the other thread I have going on how several news magazines are attempting to lump gluten free dieting for gluten intolerance into the "eating disorder" category, and they quoted another National Institutes of Health rheumatologist who has worked for the Veteran's Admin and who also writes for Psychology Today in those articles.

We need to get familiar with what terms these crooks in the "wheat lobbyist" business are using next to attempt to belittle patients who are not being adequately diagnosed and treated, including, but not limited to, a change of diet to avoid that which makes them ill.

quote from the above Psychology Today article:

"The DSM-5 field trials produced results that should have scared off the Work Group. One in six cancer and coronary disease patients met the criteria for DSM-5 'Somatic Symptom Disorder.' Do we really want to burden and stigmatize seriously ill people with an additional diagnosis of mental illness, just because they are worried about being sick and are vigilant about their symptoms? Might patients with life threatening diseases become reluctant to report new symptoms that might be early indicators of recurrence, metastasis or secondary disease – for fear of attracting a diagnosis of 'SSD'?

"The Work Group is not proposing to classify Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Fibromyalgia within the DSM-5 'Somatic Symptom Disorders' section, but these patients and others with conditions like chronic Lyme disease, interstitial cystitis, Gulf War illness and chemical injury will now become particularly vulnerable to misdiagnosis with a DSM-5 mental health disorder. In the field trials, more than one in four of the irritable bowel and chronic widespread pain patients who comprised the 'functional somatic' study group were coded for 'Somatic Symptom Disorder.'

"To meet requirements for Somatization Disorder (300.81) in DSM-IV, a considerably more rigorous criteria set needed to be fulfilled. There had to be a history of many medically unexplained symptoms before the age of thirty, resulting in treatment sought or psychosocial impairment. The diagnostic threshold was set high – a total of eight or more medically unexplained symptoms from four, specified symptom groups, with at least four pain and two gastrointestinal symptoms.

"In DSM-5, the requirement of eight symptoms is dropped to just one. And the requirement of 'medically unexplained' symptoms is replaced by much looser and more subjective 'excessive thoughts, behaviors and feelings' and the clinician's perception of "dysfunctional illness belief' or 'excessive preoccupation' with the bodily symptom.

"That, and a duration of at least six months, is all that is required to tick the box for a bolt-on diagnosis of a mental health disorder – Colorectal cancer + SSD; Angina + SSD; Type 2 diabetes + SSD; IBS + SSD.

(bolding mine to emphasize how this potential definition of "Somatization Disorder" by the APA impacts patients with no formal diagnosis of celiac who still have digestive troubles with the gluten grain family)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I will not tolerate this steady decline backwards, when we have the technology to make so many positive advances in medical diagnosis and testing. :blink:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will not tolerate this steady decline backwards, when we have the technology to make so many positive advances in medical diagnosis and testing. :blink:

Gotta say I have always thought (in recent years after so many issues/errors/problems that somebody has to be "bottom of their graduating class in medical school" :). I think I have had more than my fair share of those folks! My family thinks I keep picking doctors that are intent on killing me lol. I cannot understand any such motive.... I actually am a nice person lol. BUT I am increasingly assertive with these demiGods in the medical profession.

Sites like this one allow us to be better informed and more collaborative in our medical care. That is a good thing.

Sorry, I do not want to be a doc-basher but seems to me that the best ones retire or get burned out and the rest just keep practicing ('practice' being the operative concept). I had a nice supportive surgeon do my colonoscopy this week and yet he seemed to doubt (without saying so) that a gluten free diet would do much for me. It already is helping.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Takala - moderators - I wonder if that APA article could be made a sticky in the pre-diagnosis forum?

"Excessive preoccupation" - you've gotta be kidding. When did fear and C. cease to be natural survival/feedback mechanisms?

It's not just "wheat lobbyists," though - it is also psychotropic drugs lobbyists: preoccupation should not be part of a functioning human being, therefore we shut it down with drugs, and persuade otherwise mentally healthy that "some people need meds to just function." Yes, some of them do, poor souls - not 10% or more (some say 20%) of the population.

Because if "mental health" drugs are prescribed to address actual (neuro)psychiatric disorders, then the US is the county with the scariest ratio of neurological/psychiatric/cognitive congenital-and-or-acquired damage on the face of the planet. So it's either that, in which case Houston we have a problem when if 1 out of 10 (I am using APA numbers here, so they are not likely to be exaggerating) of the nation's brains is malfunctioning. Or, there are way too many "mental health" drugs prescribed to way too many people.

Now, call it the emigrant's syndrome, but I still love too much this country that adopted me to believe that 1/10 of Americans in mentally challenged. That seems like adding insult to the injury that drug companies and an inept medical system is causing to the country.

Drug companies = Satan. More often than not.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

islandmomma: You have to be beyond assertive! I honestly don't understand why doctors are so hesitant to call it celiac? Malabsorption can be assessed a multitude of ways so... malabsorption + careful observation of symptoms + careful observation of the resolution of symptoms and other benefits + reemergence of symptoms with the re-introduction of gluten....???? :blink:

I am actually very disgusted with all of the rumored and proposed changes to the DSM. Seems like another case of trying to simplify where simplification it isn't feasible... and in fact, quite clearly detrimental. Just because some doctors cannot accurately diagnose doesn't mean that the DSM should adapt and broaden the criteria. As for the plethora of other doctors who possess adequate deductive abilities... money money money. I digress... :wacko:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had a dime for every time they failed to diagnose something or incorrectly diagnosed something or gave me a med that worsened the problem or that I shouldn't have been on to begin with, I'd be rich! Alas it can be really tough to sort everything out when you have more than one medical problem like I do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that link Takala.

It's all about the money. :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had a dime for every time they failed to diagnose something or incorrectly diagnosed something or gave me a med that worsened the problem or that I shouldn't have been on to begin with, I'd be rich! Alas it can be really tough to sort everything out when you have more than one medical problem like I do.

My dad first, and now my mom are both dead because of these failures. Turns out my mom had not just ONE (multiple myeloma) but TWO (along with severe myelodysplasia) very rare disorders, and on top of that I'm still trying to get the labs out of her doc that will at least tell me her celiac genetics...she may have had celiac as well, judging from her symptoms and nutritional deficits...I battled her docs for FIVE YEARS to get them to take a closer look at mom...they blew me off.

Now, my daughter-in-law is scared to death of these new diagnostic guidelines. She has Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and severe scoliosis in her spine such that her hips are thrown cockeyed. She suffers a LOT of pain and WILL be in a wheelchair somewhere in her future...now she finds out that she is going to be labeled with a psychological problem and possibly not treated.

It all makes me sick. And they wonder why we are turning to Doctor Internet for help? :huh:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201301/bad-news-dsm-5-refuses-correct-somatic-symptom-disorder

After DSM-5 is published in May 2013, you can be tagged with an SSD diagnosis if you are referred to a mental health professional with at least six months of one or more medical symptoms – either diagnosed or unexplained – and you also display what the professional regards as a "disproportionate or maladaptive concern" for your symptoms and the inability of your doctors to help you. Interestingly, SSD (as defined in the May 2012 draft) can also be applied to caregivers and to parents of sick kids if they are perceived as over-involved in the symptoms of those for whom they have caregiver responsibility.

Bolding is mine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for pointing this out, Sora!

Whose definition of "disproportionate or maladaptive concern" are we going to be using? Furthermore, what makes "their" (I'm assuming medical personnel) definitions more accurate and applicable to my life than mine? Their schooling does not catapult them into knowing who I am any faster than a person who has not had the same training. Unfortunately for them, they gotta know me before they know my illness.

I very very very much dislike the hierarchical slant this "revision" of the DSM seems to embody.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I nearly died (I coded) 2 months ago from a bad mix of prescriptions. It was my third close call but was the one that almost did me in. I was diagnosed as bi-polar 4 years ago and was on a lot of psychotropic meds. In addition to that I was on meds for fibromyalgia, celiac, rheumatoid arthritis and Lupus. I also have CLL. I was always transparent with my doctors about all my meds and updated my med sheet regularly. I am now off all meds except those absolutely necessary (like BP meds). I am NOT bi-polar (just normal everyday crazy). I take naturopathic remedies and see my chiropractor regularly. Before my near death experience I was too doped up to know what was causing what. I constantly fell and that caused many small fractures. I am happy to say I've never been clearer and haven't fallen in months (knock on wood). I feel a lot of pain but prefer it to being a non-brain craving zombie. Hope this helps. Anyone wanting a more detailed version of my story can friend me (if you already haven't) and see my previous posts. Most on Tickly My Elbow thread.

Sending positive energy and healing hugs to all,

Loey

P.S. Stay safe in the storm and STAY OFF THE ROADS!!!!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,639
    • Total Posts
      918,435
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anxiously waiting
      Thanks heaps. I will def be going private if the wait is too long. I have done a little research but i thought a gluten intolerance and coeliac was the same lol. My iron levels are just below average apparently but she said not bad enough for me to be this tired.
    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      DH is celiac disease that appears on the skin (gluten triggered).  It does not appear when you are consuming dairy, which sounds like a separate issue for you.   A DH biopsy requires active lesions (new/fresh) from consuming gluten.  So, if you want to be tested via a skin biopsy you must go back on gluten.  Finding a dermatologist who knows exactly how to biopsy for DH is often difficult.  Be sure your Derm is knowledable and has biopsied for DH before. Why no endoscopy for now?  I bet your GI  knows that your insurance will deny the endoscopy.  After all, you tested negative to the blood panel.  Your GI should not even ordered the blood panel knowing that you had been gluten free for months.  You have to be consuming gluten daily for 8 to 12 weeks for the blood test to be accurate.   Did you ever test positive?  Why did your primary diagnose you?  Having the gene just means you can develop celiac disease.  Some 30% of the population carries the genes.  The gene test should only be used to help rule out celiac disease.  
    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      No one can say exactly how long you might be able to get a positive dh biopsy after having been gluten free as long as you have been. The Chicago Celiac Disease Center says this: http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/im-scheduled-to-have-a-skin-biopsy-to-screen-for-celiac-disease-should-i-maintain-a-gluten-containing-diet-similar-to-those-who-are-being-screened-via-blood-or-intestinal-biopsy/ http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/what-is-a-gluten-challenge/ You said you had a flare of the plaque psoriasis -- that is NOT dh so why do you think the dh biopsy will show positive? Testing positive for the celiac genes does not mean you have celiac disease. 30+% of the population have the celiac genes but only very, very small fraction of those people do or will present with celiac disease. The gene tests are only used to rule OUT celiac NOT to diagnose it. Frankly, I can understand why your GI does not put any stock in your Primary doc's thinking you have celiac disease. A positive celiac gene and the boils in your armpits which the GI never saw and were never biopsied for dh but they resolved on a gluten free diet and so did your plaque psoriasis. That's all the GI has to go on. I don't know why you are pushing an endoscopy. If you've been eating strictly gluten free then an endoscopic biopsy for celiac will be negative.  Your PCP should have done a celiac blood panel on you back when you were still eating gluten rather than dx you based on the celiac gene you tested positive for.
    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      I've been gluten free for a year now and my gastro wants to wait for the endocopy until I'm eligible for the colonoscopy when I turn 50 later this year. I don't think she believes I have celiac, even though I tested positive for one of the genes associated with celiac and my primary has diagnosed me as having celiac. The gluten sensitivity blood tests came back negative, of course, since I was gluten free for 9 months at that time. Why is she waiting? At any rate, My digestive system has improved greatly, but when I reintroduced non fat Greek yogurt in my diet, the plaques psoriasis returned on my elbows. My primary believes it is dermatitis herpetiformis (as well as I, since before going gluten free, I used to get boils in my armpits) and I'm scheduled for a skin biopsy in 3 weeks. However, I eliminated dairy from my diet 4 weeks ago and the plaques psoriasis is healing like it did when I eliminated gluten from my diet a year ago. If the scar is reduced to eczema, does that mean there still are IGA deposits in my skin? I don't want to resume dairy since I experienced a cross reaction to the casein in cheese and found lactose was on that same list. So my question is, how long do the granular IGA deposits remain in the skin in order to have a valid skin biopsy test performed for dermatitis herpetiformis? Since it takes 1-2 years for dermatitis herpetiformis to heal on a gluten free diet and I just had a recent flare up, can I continue on my dairy free diet or should I resume eating non fat Greek yogurt for the next 3 weeks just for this skin biopsy?
    • Celiac Night Vision
      Thanks Cristiana. It was Mistyx7 and night driving. Migraine type is very personal but does not appear to be closely connected to celiac or my peculiar scotomas. If you think going gluten-free has improved it that deserves a separate topic!
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
    • ChiaChick  »  Peaceflower

      Hi Peaceflower, Just wanted to say thank you for the chat.
      · 0 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,732
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    SueJ
    Joined