• Join our community!

    Do you have questions about celiac disease or the gluten-free diet?

  • Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsSubscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

  • Member Statistics

    80,766
    Total Members
    3,093
    Most Online
    beccaafeher
    Newest Member
    beccaafeher
    Joined
  • 0

    Should We Have Mass Screening for Celiac Disease?


    Jefferson Adams

    Celiac.com 01/16/2012 - Should there be mass screening for celiac disease? Currently, there is no consensus among scientists or among public policy makers in favor of mass screening for celiac disease as a public health intervention. Advocacy for mass celiac disease screening remains somewhat controversial.


    Ads by Google:




    ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADS
    Ads by Google:



    Photo: Gene Davis -- Smithsonian InstitutionA team of researchers recently conducted a mixed-method study to address the issue of mass screening for celiac disease from the perspective of newly diagnosed patients and their parents.

    The study team included Anna Rosén; Maria Emmelin; Annelie Carlsson; Solveig Hammarroth; Eva Karlsson, and Anneli Ivarsson.

    The team screened data from a total of 145 people with antibody-detected celiac disease. They got the data from a Swedish school-based screening study. They then invited the adolescents with celiac disease and their parents to join this study about one year after diagnosis.

    In all, the team conducted 14 focus group discussions with 31 adolescents and 43 parents. They obtained written narratives from 91 adolescents (63%) and 105 parents (72%), and obtained full questionnaires from 114 parents (79%).

    They then analyzed data using qualitative content analysis. They were able to use narratives and questionnaire data for quantified measures.

    They found that the majority of adolescents and parents described how they agreed to participate "for the good of others," without concern for themselves.

    Many found the invitation "hard to resist," since it introduced the possibility that they might have the disease. The majority who were diagnosed described the experience as "a bolt of lightning," but for many others, diagnosis offered an explanation for previous health problems. Many of those people describe how "suddenly everything made sense," once they were diagnosed.

    Participants largely reported "feeling grateful for being made aware," of their celiac disease, but some adolescents and parents also reported "ambivalent feelings about personal benefits."

    92% of parents supported future screening for celiac disease. The most common opinion among most adolescents and parents agreeing that mass screening should be "a right for everyone" and should be offered as early as possible.

    Though most people diagnosed with celiac disease were surprised, adolescents and parents reported feeling grateful for the diagnosis.

    Most kids with celiac disease and their parents participating in the study said that they welcomed mass screening for celiac disease, but suggested that it should be done earlier in life.

    Source:

    0


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest Clarkie

    Posted

    I've heard that all Italian school children are screened before starting schools, and that Italy is one of the easiest places to travel on a gluten-free diet. I'm all for it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Something to seriously consider as perhaps this will make McDonald's recognize that multiple issues over a lifetime related to inflammatory issues, infections, autoimmune disorders, bowel issues (sometimes), and even cancers can signal celiac disease. For those diagnosed after decades of inexplicable issues for themselves and family members, it is truly an "ah hah" moment as it has been for me. Locally, in MA there are towns health departments offering screening. Once again, the doctors need to know the proper two key tests and how to interpret these in light of someone with a longstanding unidentified diagnosis and then the alternate new test to do if there Total IgA is suppressed such that the tTG-IgA is falsely negative because of IgA deficiency. Genetic screening is often not even considered by most docs due to the cost, and the new anti-DGP is also considered costly.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Coloradosue

    Posted

    Should mass screening be done with school age children? I think the question is that children should be screened for celiac disease BEFORE they start school. The disruption that celiac disease causes to physical health is distracting enough. My grandson, age 10, was just diagnosed with celiac disease (by blood work; endoscopy to follow). My daughter who is a celiac had to fight with his pediatrician to test for celiac disease despite the fact that he has been suffering with the common symptoms for the last two years. It was only when the blood work came back positive did this doctor grudgingly agree to further test him. I can't help but wonder that if there had been testing provided by the school district, would have spared him from further damage that he is suffering now and aggravation my daughter went through convincing a doctor that something was wrong.

    Side Note: Celiac disease is rampant in my family. It may have caused the death of my sister (lymphoma) in 1990 from not being diagnosed with celiac disease. I was diagnosed in 2004. My daughter was diagnosed in 2006. My brother may have it but refused to be tested and instead has gone gluten free. He is a lot better. Granted research has chased down genetic factors that can be tested through an initial blood work. When I was growing up, I remember all children having to have all kinds of testing done and getting shots before we could go to school. So why not do the same for celiac disease by requiring that initial blood test with parents permission of course. That would be my one wish down the road. During these times when school districts are laying off teachers and closing down schools right and left, that kind of testing would be impossible. But maybe down the road...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Ads by Google:

  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. He has covered Health News for Examiner.com, and provided health and medical content for Sharecare.com. His work has appeared in Antioch Review, Blue Mesa Review, CALIBAN, Hayden's Ferry Review, Huffington Post, the Mississippi Review, and Slate, among others.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Who's Online   19 Members, 0 Anonymous, 510 Guests (See full list)

  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 04/13/2009 - A team of Spanish researchers recently set out to determine rates and clinical status of gluten sensitive enteropathy (GSE) detected by mass blood screens. The researchers also sought to determine sensitivity of anti-transglutaminase (tTGA) and anti-endomysium antibodies (EmA) in diagnosis, and compliance with a gluten-free diet (GFD) and follow-up.
    The research team was made up of doctors Meritxell Mariné, Fernando Fernández-Bañares, Montserrat Alsina, Carme Farré, Montserrat Cortijo, Rebeca Santaolalla, Antonio Salas, Margarita Tomàs, Elias Abugattas, Carme Loras, Ingrid Ordás, Josep M Viver, and Maria Esteve.
    Researchers recruited one thousand, eight hundred and sixty eight subjects, who were the screened for tTGA and EmA.
    Positive screens were referred for duodenal biopsy, DQ2/DQ8 genotyping, clinical feature charting, blood tests, and densitometry.
    More than 98% of subjects showed tTGA levels below 2 U/mL,
    so researchers designated this as the baseline level for normality, and deemed results positive at or above this level if confirmed twice in a single sample. Researchers also charted adherence to a GFD and follow-up results.
    A total of 26 subjects (1.39%) showed positive tTGA and/or EmA results, Of those, 21 underwent biopsy, with results showing six Marsh â…¢ (one â…¢a, four â…¢b, one â…¢c), nine Marsh â…  and six Marsh 0, with a GSE rate of 1:125.
    EmA sensitivity for GSE was 46.6% (11.1% for Marsh â… , 100%
    for Marsh â…¢), while tTGA, sensitivity was 93.3% (88.8% for Marsh â… , 100% for Marsh â…¢).
    All 15 patients with abnormal blood tests showed clinical manifestations related to GSE. Marsh â…  and â…¢ subjects showed more abdominal pain than Marsh 0 (P = 0.029), and also showed more distention and diarrhea. The team saw no differences in the rates of osteopenia between Marsh â…  and â…¢ (P = 0.608). They found that 66.7% of the 15 GSE patients complied with a gluten-free diet, and that 80% responded positively to the diet. 69.2% participated in follow-up study.
    This study showed positive blood screens in nearly 1.4% of those tested. The study showed frequent and clinically relevant rates of GSE among the general population. This confirms that celiac disease and related conditions are at least as common as the 1% figure commonly quoted, and indicate that when criteria are expanded to include less severe cases, they may be even higher.
    The study confirmed tTGA as the marker of choice, and showed that mass screening programs such as this one are helpful in spotting celiac disease early, and in referring people for treatment and follow-up before the disease develops into more costly and debilitating conditions often associated with untreated celiac disease.


    World J Gastroenterol. 2009 March 21; 15(11): 1331–1338.

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/17/2018 - What can fat soluble vitamin levels in newly diagnosed children tell us about celiac disease? A team of researchers recently assessed fat soluble vitamin levels in children diagnosed with newly celiac disease to determine whether vitamin levels needed to be assessed routinely in these patients during diagnosis.
    The researchers evaluated the symptoms of celiac patients in a newly diagnosed pediatric group and evaluated their fat soluble vitamin levels and intestinal biopsies, and then compared their vitamin levels with those of a healthy control group.
    The research team included Yavuz Tokgöz, Semiha Terlemez and Aslıhan Karul. They are variously affiliated with the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, the Department of Pediatrics, and the Department of Biochemistry at Adnan Menderes University Medical Faculty in Aydın, Turkey.
    The team evaluated 27 female, 25 male celiac patients, and an evenly divided group of 50 healthy control subjects. Patients averaged 9 years, and weighed 16.2 kg. The most common symptom in celiac patients was growth retardation, which was seen in 61.5%, with  abdominal pain next at 51.9%, and diarrhea, seen in 11.5%. Histological examination showed nearly half of the patients at grade Marsh 3B. 
    Vitamin A and vitamin D levels for celiac patients were significantly lower than the control group. Vitamin A and vitamin D deficiencies were significantly more common compared to healthy subjects. Nearly all of the celiac patients showed vitamin D insufficiency, while nearly 62% showed vitamin D deficiency. Nearly 33% of celiac patients showed vitamin A deficiency. 
    The team saw no deficiencies in vitamin E or vitamin K1 among celiac patients. In the healthy control group, vitamin D deficiency was seen in 2 (4%) patients, vitamin D insufficiency was determined in 9 (18%) patients. The team found normal levels of all other vitamins in the healthy group.
    Children with newly diagnosed celiac disease showed significantly reduced levels of vitamin D and A. The team recommends screening of vitamin A and D levels during diagnosis of these patients.
    Source:
    BMC Pediatrics

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/16/2018 - Did weak public oversight leave Arizonans ripe for Theranos’ faulty blood tests scam? Scandal-plagued blood-testing company Theranos deceived Arizona officials and patients by selling unproven, unreliable products that produced faulty medical results, according to a new book by Wall Street Journal reporter, whose in-depth, comprehensive investigation of the company uncovered deceit, abuse, and potential fraud.
    Moreover, Arizona government officials facilitated the deception by providing weak regulatory oversight that essentially left patients as guinea pigs, said the book’s author, investigative reporter John Carreyrou. 
    In the newly released "Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup," Carreyrou documents how Theranos and its upstart founder, Elizabeth Holmes, used overblown marketing claims and questionable sales tactics to push faulty products that resulted in consistently faulty blood tests results. Flawed results included tests for celiac disease and numerous other serious, and potentially life-threatening, conditions.
    According to Carreyrou, Theranos’ lies and deceit made Arizonans into guinea pigs in what amounted to a "big, unauthorized medical experiment.” Even though founder Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos duped numerous people, including seemingly savvy investors, Carreyrou points out that there were public facts available to elected officials back then, like a complete lack of clinical data on the company's testing and no approvals from the Food and Drug Administration for any of its tests.
    SEC recently charged the now disgraced Holmes with what it called a 'years-long fraud.’ The company’s value has plummeted, and it is now nearly worthless, and facing dozens, and possibly hundreds of lawsuits from angry investors. Meantime, Theranos will pay Arizona consumers $4.65 million under a consumer-fraud settlement Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich negotiated with the embattled blood-testing company.
    Both investors and Arizona officials, “could have picked up on those things or asked more questions or kicked the tires more," Carreyrou said. Unlike other states, such as New York, Arizona lacks robust laboratory oversight that would likely have prevented Theranos from operating in those places, he added.
    Stay tuned for more new on how the Theranos fraud story plays out.
    Read more at azcentral.com.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/14/2018 - If you’re looking for a simple, nutritious and exciting alternative to standard spaghetti and tomato sauce, look no further than this delicious version that blends ripe plum tomatoes, garlic, olive oil, basil, and firm sliced ricotta to deliver a tasty, memorable dish.
    Ingredients:
    12 ounces gluten-free spaghetti 5 or 6 ripe plum tomatoes ¼ cup extra virgin olive oil 2 cloves garlic, crushed ¾ teaspoons crushed red pepper ¼ cup chopped fresh basil 2 tablespoons chopped fresh parsley Kosher salt and black pepper ⅓ cup pecorino Romano cheese, grated ½ cup firm ricotta, shaved with peeler Directions:
    Finely chop all but one of the tomatoes; transfer to large bowl with olive oil and ¼ teaspoon salt.
    Cook spaghetti until al dente or desired firmness, and drain, reserving ¼ cup cooking water. 
    Meanwhile, chop remaining tomato, and place in food processor along with garlic, red pepper, and ½ teaspoon salt; puree until smooth. 
    Gently stir mixture into the bowl of chopped tomatoes.
    Add cooked spaghetti, basil and parsley to a large bowl.
    Toss in tomato mixture, adding some reserved pasta water, if needed. 
    Spoon pasta into bowls and top with Romano cheese, as desired.

    Jean Duane
    Celiac.com 07/13/2018 - I went to a friend’s home for dinner.  A few days before, she called and asked me what I could eat.  I asked her what she was planning to make, and she said she was grilling meats with side dishes.  I said, “Great.  Please just grill a piece of chicken for me with salt and pepper, and I’ll be happy to bring a side.” She said, “No need to bring a side.  I’ve got this.” When I arrived, she greeted me and said, “I spent all day cooking tonight’s dinner so you can eat it. Hey would you just check this salad dressing to see if it is OK for you?” I looked at the ingredients and it contained gluten and dairy, both of which I cannot eat.  Then I glanced around the kitchen and saw evidence of wheat cross-contamination, including buns being toasted on the grill, and gluten-containing barbeque sauce spilling on the grill where my “clean” chicken was cooking. She had other guests to tend to, and I couldn’t offer instruction or read the ingredients of everything she used in the meal. 
    At social gatherings, I’ve been challenged too by those who ask if I am really “allergic,” or just eating gluten free as a “fad.” I’ve been told many times by hosts and hostesses that, “a little won’t hurt you,” or “everything in moderation,” or “if it is made with loving hands, it is good for you to eat.”  Of course, all of this is bunk for those with food allergies or celiac disease.  A little bit may kill us, and whether made with loving hands or not, it will certainly make us sick. 
    Those of us with food allergies and/or celiac disease walk a tightrope with friends and relatives. The old rules of etiquette just don’t work anymore.  We don’t want to insult anybody, we don’t want to be isolated, and we also don’t want to risk our health by eating foods that may contain ingredients we cannot tolerate.  So what do we do? 
    Etiquette books advise us to eat what is put in front of us when we are guests in someone’s home. They caution us at all costs not to insult our hostess. Rather, we are instructed to compliment the hostess on her good cooking, flavor combinations, and food choices.  But when foods are prepared in a cross-contaminated environment with ingredients we are allergic to, we cannot follow the old social constructs that do not serve us.  We need to work together to rewrite the rules, so that we can be included in social gatherings without fear of cross-contamination, and without offending anyone.
    Let’s figure out how to surmount these social situations together.  
    Each edition of this column will present a scenario, and together, we’ll determine appropriate, polite, and most importantly, safe ways to navigate this tricky gluten-free/food allergies lifestyle in a graceful way.  If someone disagrees with our new behavior patterns, we can refer them to this column and say, “Here are the new rules for those of us with food allergies or celiac disease.”  When we are guests in someone’s home, we can give them links to this column so they understand the plight we are faced with, bite after bite. Perhaps this will help those of us living with us to understand, be more compassionate, and accepting of our adaptations to keep ourselves safe. 
    This column will present a scenario such as the one above, and ask that you comment on how you would navigate it. Let’s talk about it. Let’s share ideas.  Using the example above, here’s the scenario for this issue:
    What would you do?
    Your kind-hearted friend invites you to dinner and insists on cooking for you.  You arrive and the first thing she says is, “I’ve spent all day making this for you. Oh, I bought this salad dressing for you, but you might want to read the ingredients first.”  You do, and it contains malt vinegar.  You look around the kitchen and notice evidence of cross-contamination in the rest of the meal.  What do you do? 
    Please comment below and feel free to share the tricky scenarios that you’ve encountered too.  Let’s discuss how to surmount these social situations.  What would you do?

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/12/2018 - Previous research has shown that the oral administration of Bifidobacterium infantis Natren Life Start super strain (NLS-SS) reduces of gastro-intestinal symptoms in untreated celiac disease patients. The reduction of symptoms was not connected with changes in intestinal permeability or serum levels of cytokines, chemokines, or growth factors. Therefore, researchers suspected that the reduction of symptoms might be related to the modulation of innate immunity.
    To test that hypothesis, a team of researchers set out to assess the potential mechanisms of a probiotic B.infantis Natren Life Start super strain on the mucosal expression of innate immune markers in adult patients with active untreated celiac disease compared with those treated with B. infantis 6 weeks and after 1 year of gluten-free diet.
    The research team included Maria I. Pinto-Sanchez, MD, Edgardo C. Smecuol, MD, Maria P. Temprano,RD, Emilia Sugai, BSBC, Andrea Gonzalez, RD, PhD, Maria L. Moreno,MD, Xianxi Huang, MD, PhD, Premysl Bercik, MD, Ana Cabanne, MD, Horacio Vazquez, MD, Sonia Niveloni, MD, Roberto Mazure, MD, Eduardo Mauriño, MD, Elena F. Verdú, MD, PhD, and Julio C. Bai, MD. They are affiliated with the Medicine Department, Farcombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; the Small Intestinal Section, Department of Medicine and the Department of Alimentation at Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo, Gastroenterology Hospital and Research Institute at the Universidad del Salvador in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    The team determined the numbers of macrophages and Paneth cells, along with the expression of a-defensin-5 expression via immunohistochemistry in duodenal biopsies.
    Their results showed that a gluten-free diet lowers duodenal macrophage counts in celiac disease patients more effectively than B. infantis, while B. infantis lowers Paneth cell counts and reduces expression of a-defensin-5.
    This study documents the differential innate immune effects of treatment with B. infantis compared with 1 year of gluten-free diet. The team calls for further study to better understand the synergistic effects of gluten-free diet and B. infantis supplementation in celiac disease.
    Source:
    J Clin Gastroenterol