Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-m):


  • You've found your Celiac Tribe! Join our like-minded, private community and share your story, get encouragement and connect with others.

    💬

    • Sign In
    • Sign Up
  • Jefferson Adams

    Is Australia's Gluten-free Standard Unworkable?

    Jefferson Adams
    0
    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

      Is Australia's zero tolerance gluten-free standard too strict?


    Photo: CC--Marko Mikkonen
    Caption: Photo: CC--Marko Mikkonen

    Celiac.com 11/24/2016 - When Australia set it's gluten-content standards at zero ppm for gluten-free labeling, many people in the gluten-free community hailed the action as revolutionary for people with celiac disease or gluten-sensitivity.

    Sensitivity to gluten varies among celiac patients, so, in theory, restricting levels in food to under one part per million (ppm) would protect the maximum number of patients.



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):






    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12-m):




    International gluten-free standards require that foods labelled "gluten-free" (gluten-free) contain less than 20 ppm gluten. In Australia and New Zealand, however, a "no detectable gluten" standard applies.

    Now, a pair of researchers say product testing shows that 14% of imported products were non-compliant with the current Australian standard, but none contained more than 1.1 ppm gluten.

    Geoffrey M Forbes and Kenneth Dods are calling those standards "not practical or reasonable," and urging authorities revise the current Australian gluten-free standard of "no detectable gluten" to "≤ 1 ppm."

    Read the full story at: Med J Aust 2016; 205 (7): 316. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00485

    0

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest Lucille Cholerton

    Posted

    I fully endorse the Australian stand-point. I have had a gluten sufferer contact me with the problem that his anemia was not improving after a few years on the gluten free diet. When I queried what he was eating he said he was still eating oats. Oats appears to be the least problematic of the 4 specific gluten-containing grains, but it still causes problems. I think people must be aware that it is a build-up of gluten in the body that eventually leads to symptoms. So even small amounts eaten on a regular basis can lead to problems over days, weeks, or months. Zero tolerance is the way to go if sufferers are aiming for 100% health.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with Australia. I've been "poisoned" by products labeled "gluten free" in the US. Of course I can't prove it, but I suspect this is why. Perhaps a ppm number on the label would give us the information each of us needs to make a decision based on our own level of intolerance. Thank you for publishing this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Australia! 20 ppm is 20 ppm too much for me. I get sick from items "distilled" and "removed". In fact, I have gotten sick from most of the foods that were removed from the "unsafe foods" list and moved to the "safe foods" list. My doctor told me I was the lucky one because at least I knew the damage was occurring. How many people making the decisions as to what can be labeled gluten-free have experienced the consequences of eating gluten. I work hard to be on a very strict gluten free diet and I do not need my efforts to be flushed down the toilet because of unreliable and incorrect gluten-free labeling. Gluten free should mean free of gluten. Sugar free foods for diabetics are sugar free, why shouldn't we expect the same for our foods?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When the US made their requirements more stringent manufacturers, restaurants, etc. decided the risk was too high and the effort to meet the requirements far exceeded the income they got from the gluten-free community. They will no longer make efforts to even check their products as it is easier to just say they are not gluten-free than to pay to have the products checked. Even businesses who are dealing with all fresh ingredients that are naturally gluten-free will say they cannot accommodate gluten-free and send me away. I feel bad for the manufacturers and business owners. We can't just hand out requirements without some way for them to afford to stay in business. People have the idea that just because they own a business they have tons of money. That's wrong! Especially the small businesses (who are generally the ones to truly care)! Somehow we need to make it profitable for these businesses to go gluten-free! I still say education is the real issue. If people who do not NEED to be gluten-free would get educated on exactly what that means, perhaps they wouldn't be so scared of it! They think that just because something has a gluten-free label on it that it is going to taste terrible! Amazing the number of people I've had over for dinner who've thoroughly enjoyed a delightful dinner and were completely shocked to hear at the end of the meal that the entire thing was Gluten Free! Including the dinner rolls!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University, and has authored more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously served as SF Health News Examiner for Examiner.com, and devised health and medical content for Sharecare.com. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of the book "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-m):




  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 02/06/2015 - Australia is home to some of the most stringent gluten-free product standards in the world. Under current standards, all “gluten free" products sold in Australia must contain about three parts or fewer per million.
    The food industry would like the standard set at 20 parts per million, which would bring Australia into line with the United States, and the EU.
    Moreover, Coeliac Australia, a major celiac advocacy group, has suggested that Australia’s strict standards are becoming unworkable, as improved tests permit detection of smaller and smaller amounts of the gluten protein. The group has signaled an openness to the industry pla...

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 10/19/2015 - People who must avoid gluten for medical reasons just got a reason to be hopeful that gluten in medicines, which are not regulated under the current FDA law, might soon be labeled by law.
    U.S. Representatives Tim Ryan (D-OH) and Nita Lowey (D-NY) recently introduced a bill to make it easier for people with gluten-related disorders to identify medications that contain gluten.
    Their bill, the Gluten in Medicine Disclosure Act of 2015 would change the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act so that the label of any medicine intended for human use must divulge any ingredient, besides sugar alcohol, that is derived from a grain or...

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 03/22/2016 - The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the period for public comments on a proposed rule for fermented and hydrolyzed foods, or foods that contain fermented or hydrolyzed ingredients, and bear a "gluten-free" claim.
    FDA is extending the comment period for the proposed rule on gluten-free labeling for fermented or hydrolyzed foods by 60 days.
    The agency originally introduced the Proposed Rule for Gluten-Free Labeling of Fermented or Hydrolyzed Foods on November 18, 2015. The original public comment period was set to end on February 16, 2016.
    The new closure date for public comments will be 60 days after...

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 11/11/2016 - Do allergen advisory statements for wheat help US consumers with celiac disease make safe food choices?
    A team of researchers recently set out to review food that were not labeled gluten-free, but which appeared to be free of gluten ingredients based the ingredients list. The product labels indicated that the products contained no wheat, barley, rye, malt, brewers yeast. The research team included T. Thompson, TB Lyons, and A Jones. They are variously affiliated with Gluten Free Watchdog, Manchester, MA, USA; the Department of Clinical Nutrition, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA, and with Mary Rutan Hospital Nutrition...