Jump to content
  • Join Our Community!

    Do you have questions about celiac disease or the gluten-free diet?

  • Jefferson Adams
    Jefferson Adams

    Study Shows People with Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity are More Skeptical of Vaccines, GMO Foods, and the FDA

      Are Celiac Disease and Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity Patients Getting Good Health Information?

    Caption: Photo: Dawn Huczek

    Celiac.com 01/16/2018 - More and more, people are adopting a gluten-free diet due to perceived health and weight-loss benefits.

    A team of researchers recently set out to ask people with celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity about their views on the health effects of gluten, and safety of vaccines and gluten-free food products.

    The research team included Loren G. Rabinowitz, Haley M. Zylberberg, Alan Levinovitz, Melissa S. Stockwell, Peter H. R. Green, and Benjamin Lebwohl. They are variously affiliated with the Department of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons New York USA; the Department of Philosophy and Religion James Madison University Harrisonburg USA, the Department of Pediatrics Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons New York USA, the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University New York USA, the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University New York USA, and the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University New York USA.

    Their team conducted an online survey of celiac and non-celiac gluten sensitivity patients from a celiac disease center e-mail list. They used univariate and multivariate analysis to compare responses from the two groups. The overall response rate was 27%, with 217 non-celiac gluten sensitivity responses, and 1,291 celiac disease responses.

    Subjects with non-celiac gluten sensitivity were more likely than those with celiac disease to disagree with the statement that "vaccines are safe for people with celiac disease." In all, 41.3% of respondents with non-celiac gluten sensitivity said vaccines are safe for celiacs, while just 26.4% of celiac patients said so. Celiac patients were slightly more likely to decline vaccination when offered, at about 31%, compared with just over 24% of gluten-sensitive respondents.

    After adjusting for age and gender, non-celiac gluten sensitivity subjects were more likely than celiac disease subjects to avoid genetically modified (GMO) foods, eat only organic products, believe that the FDA is not a reliable source of information, and believe a gluten-free diet will improve energy and concentration.

    People with non-celiac gluten sensitivity were more likely than those with celiac disease to have doubts about vaccine safety and to believe in the value of non-GMO and organic foods.

    The team's findings suggest that there might not be enough easily accessible information on gluten and its inclusion in food and drugs, and that may reinforce incorrect beliefs that are contrary to good public health.

    Source: Springer.com.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    This study shows that those with gluten sensitivities are smarter than the general public because everything that they believe is true. For all those who are so certain that all vaccines are good, consider this: I just learned that people with egg allergies should not get the flu shot, yet neither the government nor doctors tells anyone that. That is not the behavior of people that want to present unbiased facts.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Subjects with non-celiac gluten sensitivity were more likely than those with celiac disease to disagree with the statement that "vaccines are safe for people with celiac disease." In all, 41.3% of respondents with non-celiac gluten sensitivity said vaccines are safe for celiacs, while just 26.4% of celiac patients said so." If 58.7% of non-celiacs disagree and 73.6% of celiacs disagree, then subjects with NCGS are LESS likely to disagree with the statement that celiacs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am a 73 year old celiac that was diagnosed two years ago. The FDA is a joke, they could care less about what is truly gluten free and what is not. I got gluten in a gluten free turkey that had been injected with gluten free turkey broth at Thanksgiving. Turned out the gluten free turkey broth was made with barley and MSG! I react to gluten and anything made with seaweed (MSG). I filed a formal complaint that was “investigated†by the FDA and my case was closed in 48 hours, because there were no other complaints! After nearly needing to be hospitalized two years in a row with the flu shot, my internist said “no more flu shots for youâ€. I was very sick for three weeks after these flu shots. Skeptical, you are darned right and rightly so. I did not get a flu shot this year and did not get sick with the flu. I am a rabid label reader, research paper reader from the major treatment centers for celiac disease. It pays to be informed and stay informed.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Many of us with celiac disease spent decades having the medical industry fail us by disregarding our symptoms, attributing them to depression or anxiety or perimenopause, with incorrect diagnoses, and with inappropriate treatments. When the entire industry dismisses you until you are crippled with joint inflammation and pain, have neurological symptoms, blind from eye inflammation, and incontinent with diarrhea and have lifelong damage to your intestines and joints from lack of proper treatment, it's difficult to give them credence in other areas.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think this attests more to the fact that as we start reading labels it leads us to study more things. We learn about dangerous and toxic additives that our FDA approves in vaccines and food. Then that leads us to learn about the toxins in GMO's. We learn so many bad things that can cause cancers and other diseases are approved by our own FDA. We start to wake up and realized eating organic is not necessarily more and when it is, we make sure to eat it and not waste it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I did not take the flu shot last fall because I heard about: Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuncts. Ingredients called Adjuncts in the vaccine (e.g. aluminum compounds) are designed to stimulate the immune system. In some individuals these chemical compounds can "trigger" a cascade of immune reactions and symptoms (ASIA) and may eventually manifest as overt autoimmune disease. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder. Having this susceptibility, the decision to inject adjuncts into one´s system must be carefully weighted as autoimmune diseases are debilitating and much varied.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    I did not take the flu shot last fall because I heard about: Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuncts. Ingredients called Adjuncts in the vaccine (e.g. aluminum compounds) are designed to stimulate the immune system. In some individuals these chemical compounds can "trigger" a cascade of immune reactions and symptoms (ASIA) and may eventually manifest as overt autoimmune disease. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder. Having this susceptibility, the decision to inject adjuncts into one´s system must be carefully weighted as autoimmune diseases are debilitating and much varied.

    This is a common belief that is not based on any science.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 1/23/2018 at 5:14 AM, Guest Scott Adams said:

    This is a common belief that is not based on any science.

    To the contrary.  I refer you to Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld, lead researcher, editor of premiere textbooks on autoimmunity, expert witness in Vaccine Injury cases for WHO and the Hague.  A list of 35 textbook titles are readily available in English on Amazon.com, most importantly the 2015 publication of  "Vaccines and Autoimmunity."

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That injuries can occur with any drug, including vaccines in extremely rare instances, is understood and old news. Nothing new here. That vaccines are probably in the top 3 of all scientific discoveries of all time is not debatable...millions, perhaps billions of humans have been saved from deadly diseases and needless suffering from diseases like small pox and polio.

    Further, since you cite the WHO as your appeal to authority here, why don’t you first read the WHO’s stance on vaccines, which totally destoys you position here?

    http://www.who.int/features/qa/84/en/

    “Experts” can be paid to support any position, even scientifically false positions—just ask an accident injury or criminal defense attorney.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University, and has authored more than 2,000 articles on celiac disease. His coursework includes studies in biology, anatomy, medicine, science, and advanced research, and scientific methods. He previously served as Health News Examiner for Examiner.com, and devised health and medical content for Sharecare.com. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of the book "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Are Gluten-Free Foods Misleading Consumers?
    Celiac.com 06/13/2017 - Are consumers wrongly assuming gluten-free foods to be nutritionally equivalent to their gluten-containing counterparts? Are they being mislead?
    That's the subject of a recent talk presented at the 50th Annual Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). Among the evidence cited was that gluten-free items have a significantly higher energy content and a different nutritional composition to their gluten-containing counterparts.
    The presentation also notes that many gluten-containing products, especially breads, pastas, pizzas and wheat-based flours, contain up to three times more protein than their gluten-free counterparts.
    In all, the study assessed 654 gluten-free products, and compared them against 655 gluten-containing products. Among the group's key findings were that gluten-free breads had significantly higher content of lipids and saturated fatty acids; gluten-free pasta had significantly lower content of sugar and protein; and gluten-free biscuits had significantly lower content of protein and significantly higher content of lipids.
    These differences can have adverse effects on children's growth, and increase the risk of childhood obesity.
    The gist of the presentation is that gluten-free products cannot be considered as substitutes for their gluten-containing counterparts, and that numerous gluten-free items should reformulated using healthier ingredients to help promote healthy nutrition in children.
    Not only are gluten-free products generally poorer in their nutritional composition, but consumers may not be unaware of the crucial differences, due to poor nutritional labelling. Dr Sandra Martínez -Barona, fellow lead researcher, states that "labelling needs to clearly indicate this so that patients, parents and carers can make informed decisions. Consumers should also be provided with guidance to enhance their understanding of the nutritional compositions of products, in both gluten-free and gluten-containing products, to allow them to make more informed purchases and ensure a healthier diet is followed."
    ESPGHAN expert and lead researcher, Dr Joaquim Calvo Lerma, adds that "…it is imperative that foods marketed as substitutes are reformulated to ensure that they truly do have similar nutritional values. This is especially important for children, as a well-balanced diet is essential to healthy growth and development."
    Stay tuned to see how the gluten-free food industry responds to efforts by ESPGHAN to improve both gluten-free product formulation, and gluten-free labeling to help people make better nutritional choices.
    Source:
    European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition

×
×
  • Create New...