• Join our community!

    Do you have questions about celiac disease or the gluten-free diet?

  • Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsSubscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

  • Member Statistics

    77,742
    Total Members
    3,093
    Most Online
    Laura Hoffman
    Newest Member
    Laura Hoffman
    Joined
  • 0

    Five Years Later: Still No FDA Rule on Gluten-free Food Labeling


    Jefferson Adams

    Celiac.com 02/15/2013 - If you think the FDA has dropped the ball on gluten-free food labeling, you are not alone.


    Ads by Google:




    ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADS
    Ads by Google:



    Photo: CC--mandbergIn 2004, the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCP) gave the FDA four years to create and implement final rules for gluten-free food labeling.

    The FALCP requires manufacturers to identify these allergens by their common names (i.e. wheat, milk, or soy) on labels so that consumers can easily identify them.

    In 2007, the FDA followed FALCP's mandate by issuing a proposed rule "Food Labeling: Gluten-Free Labeling of Foods." The proposed rule states that a food is gluten-free if the food does not contain any of the following:

    1. an ingredient that is any type of wheat, rye, barley, or crossbreeds of these grains;
    2. an ingredient derived from these grains and that has not been processed to remove gluten;
    3. an ingredient derived from these grains and that has been processed to remove gluten, if it results in the food containing 20 or more parts per million (ppm) gluten; or
    4. 20 ppm or more gluten. -- "Food Labeling; Gluten-Free Labeling of Foods," 72 Fed. Reg. 2795 (proposed January 23, 2007) (to be codified at 21 CFR Part 101).

    The FDA's proposed rule was based on the fact that currently-adopted analytical methods can reliably detect gluten at or above 20 parts per million in most foods. Also, under that rule, food manufacturers looking to market products as 'gluten-free' would voluntarily test those products prior to labeling.

    However, the FDA allowed the comment period for the proposed rule to pass with no action, and issued no final rule for gluten-free labeling.

    In 2011, the FDA announced a second comment period for their proposed rule, but that comment period also closed with the FDA taking no action.

    A full year and a half later, on Dec. 14, 2012, the FDA issued a new proposed rule titled "Request for Comments and Information on Initiating a Risk Assessment for Establishing Food Allergen Thresholds; Establishment of a Docket."

    They opened comment period on this proposed rule until Feb. 12, 2013, and scheduled an advisory committee meeting of the FDA for March 7, 2013 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    It has been eight years, since FALCP mandated the FDA to devise standards for gluten-free labeling, and five years since the legal deadline for final gluten-free rule, and the FDA has yet to accurately define the term "major food allergen," establish safe gluten thresholds for food products, and meet its statutory mandate to create and implement final rules for gluten-free food labeling.

    Until the FDA formally adopts a final rule for gluten-free labeling, there is no legal definition for what makes food "gluten-free" in the United States, and people with celiac disease will no clear assurance that when a product claims to be gluten-free, it is safe to consume.

    Please go to the Federal Register and comment on the FDA's latest ofrmulation of their rule (Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0711) regarding gluten-food.

    0


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    The FDA does not work for the American people. It works for the food, drug and chemical companies that own it. Don't expect any action on what gluten-free means on a label, or the words natural, or anything else that would help people in their food choices.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for including a link to comment. Can't get it to work now but will keep trying. I am so tired of the "unknown" ingredients, such as maltodextrin and "natural flavors" that may or may not be a problem.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wish this article had come out before Feb. 12th instead of now.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest David Bennett

    Posted

    From a UK/EU viewpoint (we have benefited from improving labeling and availability for some time) the scenario you describe is unbelievable. But then again, US politicians often look like they're on another planet. Or they're even more in the pocket of big business than our own. Is it resistance from food companies? It's tempting to compare them to those nutters in the NRA.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Jennifer

    Posted

    This situation is disgraceful.

     

    Another problem for individuals with celiac disease, which will not be solved even by the gluten-free labels: the addition of transglutaminase without labeling to many foods, including low fat dairy products (yogurt and cheeses) as well as deli meats. It looks like it can even be added to foods labeled "organic" (and I am having trouble getting responses from some food manufacturers to my email inquiries about whether this is added or not to their product). I have heard from an expert on celiac (a MD and researcher) that transglutaminase may not be safe for celiac patients and may provoke reactions as well, even in the absence of gluten. This additive has been classified as "GRAS- generally recognized as safe" and it may be added without being listed on ingredient list. Finding safe food for celiac patients (indeed for everyone) is becoming more difficult. The FDA does a poor job of protecting the interests of the public.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Health Canada has passed legislation as of August 2012 (with 18 months to implement labeling prior to this date) manufacturers are required by law to identify allergens on all food ingredient labels,if the gluten (or any other allergen) has not been added but may have been processed in a facility with any allergen then the "may contain" statement must appear.This is not a voluntary requirement, it's mandatory! Shopping is so much easier now that I know I can trust what I'm buying. Proudly Canadian!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest cooltools

    Posted

    Does the celiac community agree with the 20ppm as an acceptable level for declaring gluten-free? It's ridiculous to say that gluten can't be detected with accuracy below 20ppm.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    I wish this article had come out before Feb. 12th instead of now.

    Learning how to eat gluten free has been an interesting journey. I realized that labels were not always accurate very early on when I had reactions to so called gluten-free foods. Cooking from scratch, eating fruits/vegetables/grains, and buying organic meats goes a long way to nourishing my body without harmful or painful reactions.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Peter Olins, PhD

    Posted

    Breaking news! The FDA has just submitted its gluten free labeling rules for final approval.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest William Narcowich

    Posted

    It would be helpful to have a short statement to send to members of Congress.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why are there no proposed regulations for personal care products? I was diagnosed 10 days ago and this has driven me to distraction. I want gluten-free toothpaste, lip gloss, lip balm, etc.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Julie

    Posted

    They have extended the deadline for comments until May 12, 2013.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest jen

    Posted

    Julie-

    Where can we submit comments? Does anyone know if there's a lobbying group or organization who's in charge of leading this effort so we can support them? I have two celiac kids and I rely on lots of "kid" foods since everything realistically can't be homemade (although I try). Thanks!!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Ads by Google:

  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. He has covered Health News for Examiner.com, and provided health and medical content for Sharecare.com. His work has appeared in Antioch Review, Blue Mesa Review, CALIBAN, Hayden's Ferry Review, Huffington Post, the Mississippi Review, and Slate, among others.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ads by Google:

  • Who's Online   15 Members, 1 Anonymous, 767 Guests (See full list)

  • Related Articles

    Scott Adams
    Celiac.com 08/02/2011 - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today reopened the comment period for its 2007 proposal on labeling foods as “gluten-free.” The agency is also making available a safety assessment of exposure to gluten for people with celiac disease (celiac disease) and invites comment on these additional data.
    One of the criteria proposed is that foods bearing the claim cannot contain 20 parts per million (ppm) or more gluten. The agency based the proposal, in part, on the available methods for gluten detection. The validated methods could not reliably detect the amount of gluten in a food when the level was less than 20 ppm. The threshold of less than 20 ppm also is similar to “gluten-free” labeling standards used by many other countries.
    People who have celiac disease cannot tolerate gluten, a protein in wheat, rye, and barley. Celiac disease damages the small intestine and interferes with absorption of nutrients from food. About 1 percent of the United States population is estimated to have the disease.
    “Before finalizing our gluten-free definition, we want up-to-date input from affected consumers, the food industry, and others to help assure that the label strikes the right balance,” said Michael Taylor, deputy commissioner for foods. “We must take into account the need to protect individuals with celiac disease from adverse health consequences while ensuring that food manufacturers can meet the needs of consumers by producing a wide variety of gluten-free foods.”
    The proposed rule conforms to the standard set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 2008, which requires that foods labeled as “gluten-free” not contain more than 20 ppm gluten. This standard has been adopted in regulations by the 27 countries composing the Commission of European Communities.
    The FDA encourages members of the food industry, state and local governments, consumers, and other interested parties to offer comments and suggestions about gluten-free labeling in docket number FDA-2005-N-0404 at www.regulations.gov. The docket will officially open for comments after noon on Aug 3, 2011 and will remain open for 60 days.
    To submit your comments electronically to the docket go to www.regulations.gov
    1. Choose “Submit a Comment” from the top task bar
    2. Enter the docket number FDA-2005-N-0404 in the “Keyword” space
    3. Select “Search”
    To submit your comments to the docket by mail, use the following address:
    The Division of Dockets Management
    HFA-305
    Food and Drug Administration
    5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061
    Rockville, MD 20852
    Include docket number FDA-2005-N-0404 on each page of your written comments.
    For more information

    Federal Register Notice (scroll to FDA--temporary link will update when document publishes on Aug. 3):
    http://www.ofr.gov/inspection.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1  Gluten-Free Portal (scroll to Gluten-Free):
    http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuidanceRegulatoryInformation/Topic-SpecificLabelingInformation/default.htm#gluten  FDA’s Proposed Rule on the Gluten-Free Labeling of Foods:
    http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/FoodAllergensLabeling/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm077926.htm  Questions and Answers on the Gluten-Free Labeling Proposed Rule:
    http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuidanceRegulatoryInformation/Topic-SpecificLabelingInformation/ucm265309.htm  Consumer Update on the Gluten-Free Labeling Proposed Rule:
    http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm265212.htm  Source:
    http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm265838.htm

  • Recent Articles

    Roxanne Bracknell
    Celiac.com 06/22/2018 - The rise of food allergies means that many people are avoiding gluten in recent times. In fact, the number of Americans who have stopped eating gluten has tripled in eight years
    between 2009 and 2017.
    Whatever your rationale for avoiding gluten, whether its coeliac disease, a sensitivity to the
    protein, or any other reason, it can be really hard to find suitable places to eat out. When
    you’re on holiday in a new and unknown environment, this can be near impossible.
    As awareness of coeliac disease grows around the world, however, more and more cities
    are opening their doors to gluten-free lifestyles, none more so than the 10 locations on the
    list below.
    Perhaps unsurprisingly, the U.S is a hotbed of gluten-free options, with four cities making the
    top 10, as well as the Hawaiian island of Maui. Chicago, in particular, is a real haven of
    gluten-free fare, with 240 coeliac-safe eateries throughout this huge city.
    The super hip city of Portland also ranks highly on this list, with the capital of counterculture
    rich in gluten-free cuisine, with San Francisco and Denver also included.
    Outside of the states, several prominent European capitals also rank very highly on the list,
    including Prague, the picturesque and historic capital of the Czech Republic, which boasts
    the best-reviewed restaurants on this list.
    The Irish capital of Dublin, meanwhile, has the most gluten-free establishments, with a huge
    330 to choose from, while Amsterdam and Barcelona also feature prominently thanks to their
    variety of top-notch gluten-free fodder.
    Finally, a special mention must go to Auckland, the sole representative of Australasia in this
    list, with the largest city in New Zealand rounding out the top 10 thanks to its 180 coeliacsafe
    eateries.
    The full top ten gluten-free cities are shown in the graphic below:

     

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/21/2018 - Would you buy a house advertised as ‘gluten-free’? Yes, there really is such a house for sale. 
    It seems a Phoenix realtor Mike D’Elena is hoping that his trendy claim will catch the eye of a buyer hungry to avoid gluten, or, at least one with a sense of humor. D’Elena said he crafted the ads as a way to “be funny and to draw attention.” The idea, D’Elena said, is to “make it memorable.” 
    Though D’Elena’s marketing seeks to capitalizes on the gluten-free trend, he knows Celiac disease is a serious health issue for some people. “[W]e’re not here to offend anybody….this is just something we're just trying to do to draw attention and do what's best for our clients," he said. 
    Still, the signs seem to be working. D'elena had fielded six offers within a few days of listing the west Phoenix home.
    "Buying can sometimes be the most stressful thing you do in your entire life so why not have some fun with it," he said. 
    What do you think? Clever? Funny?
    Read more at Arizonafamily.com.

    Advertising Banner-Ads
    Bakery On Main started in the small bakery of a natural foods market on Main Street in Glastonbury, Connecticut. Founder Michael Smulders listened when his customers with Celiac Disease would mention the lack of good tasting, gluten-free options available to them. Upon learning this, he believed that nobody should have to suffer due to any kind of food allergy or dietary need. From then on, his mission became creating delicious and fearlessly unique gluten-free products that were clean and great tasting, while still being safe for his Celiac customers!
    Premium ingredients, bakeshop delicious recipes, and happy customers were our inspiration from the beginning— and are still the cornerstones of Bakery On Main today. We are a fiercely ethical company that believes in integrity and feels that happiness and wholesome, great tasting food should be harmonious. We strive for that in everything we bake in our dedicated gluten-free facility that is GFCO Certified and SQF Level 3 Certified. We use only natural, NON-GMO Project Verified ingredients and all of our products are certified Kosher Parve, dairy and casein free, and we have recently introduced certified Organic items as well! 
    Our passion is to bake the very best products while bringing happiness to our customers, each other, and all those we meet!
    We are available during normal business hours at: 1-888-533-8118 EST.
    To learn more about us at: visit our site.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/20/2018 - Currently, the only way to manage celiac disease is to eliminate gluten from the diet. That could be set to change as clinical trials begin in Australia for a new vaccine that aims to switch off the immune response to gluten. 
    The trials are set to begin at Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre. The vaccine is designed to allow people with celiac disease to consume gluten with no adverse effects. A successful vaccine could be the beginning of the end for the gluten-free diet as the only currently viable treatment for celiac disease. That could be a massive breakthrough for people with celiac disease.
    USC’s Clinical Trials Centre Director Lucas Litewka said trial participants would receive an injection of the vaccine twice a week for seven weeks. The trials will be conducted alongside gastroenterologist Dr. James Daveson, who called the vaccine “a very exciting potential new therapy that has been undergoing clinical trials for several years now.”
    Dr. Daveson said the investigational vaccine might potentially restore gluten tolerance to people with celiac disease.The trial is open to adults between the ages of 18 and 70 who have clinically diagnosed celiac disease, and have followed a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Anyone interested in participating can go to www.joinourtrials.com.
    Read more at the website for Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre.

    Source:
    FoodProcessing.com.au

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/19/2018 - Could baking soda help reduce the inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease? Scientists at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University say that a daily dose of baking soda may in fact help reduce inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease.
    Those scientists recently gathered some of the first evidence to show that cheap, over-the-counter antacids can prompt the spleen to promote an anti-inflammatory environment that could be helpful in combating inflammatory disease.
    A type of cell called mesothelial cells line our body cavities, like the digestive tract. They have little fingers, called microvilli, that sense the environment, and warn the organs they cover that there is an invader and an immune response is needed.
    The team’s data shows that when rats or healthy people drink a solution of baking soda, the stomach makes more acid, which causes mesothelial cells on the outside of the spleen to tell the spleen to go easy on the immune response.  "It's most likely a hamburger not a bacterial infection," is basically the message, says Dr. Paul O'Connor, renal physiologist in the MCG Department of Physiology at Augusta University and the study's corresponding author.
    That message, which is transmitted with help from a chemical messenger called acetylcholine, seems to encourage the gut to shift against inflammation, say the scientists.
    In patients who drank water with baking soda for two weeks, immune cells called macrophages, shifted from primarily those that promote inflammation, called M1, to those that reduce it, called M2. "The shift from inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory profile is happening everywhere," O'Connor says. "We saw it in the kidneys, we saw it in the spleen, now we see it in the peripheral blood."
    O'Connor hopes drinking baking soda can one day produce similar results for people with autoimmune disease. "You are not really turning anything off or on, you are just pushing it toward one side by giving an anti-inflammatory stimulus," he says, in this case, away from harmful inflammation. "It's potentially a really safe way to treat inflammatory disease."
    The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
    Read more at: Sciencedaily.com