• Join our community!

    Do you have questions about celiac disease or the gluten-free diet?

  • Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsSubscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

  • Member Statistics

    77,651
    Total Members
    3,093
    Most Online
    Kitty11
    Newest Member
    Kitty11
    Joined
  • 0

    Nearly All Tested Gluten-Free Food Products Meet FDA Standards


    Jefferson Adams


    • A new compliance survey shows over 99 percent of gluten-free foods meet FDA standards.


    Image Caption: A new FDA compliance survey shows over 99 percent of gluten-free foods meet FDA standards. Photo: CC--a.mina

    Celiac.com 07/10/2017 - For anyone with celiac disease or gluten intolerance who was wondering how well food manufacturers are complying with FDA standard for gluten-free labeling, or wondering exactly how gluten-free is my gluten-free food, some early answers are in, and the news looks good.


    Ads by Google:




    ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADS
    Ads by Google:



    A recent report by the agency indicates that the vast majority of food manufacturers are getting it right, and, correcting where they do get it wrong.

    The FDA's final rule for compliance in gluten-free labeling was August 5, 2014. To gauge compliance in gluten-free food labeling, the agency conducted a sampling assignment of products labeled "gluten free" from July 2015 to August 2016.

    The compliance testing is an important part of the FDA's mission to ensure that products labeled on or after the compliance date are properly labeled as "gluten-free."

    In all, the agency's team analyzed more than 250 types of products, and tested 702 individual samples in the categories of cereals, grain bars, and flours.

    Their complete survey showed that just five samples from one product source contained gluten in excess of the regulatory limit of 20 parts per million (ppm). That left the overall gluten-free product-based compliance rate above 99.5 percent.

    The good news here is that producers major gluten-free food products are doing a very good job of following FDA labeling standards. Also, the manufacturer of the samples that showed gluten levels above 20 ppm carried out a voluntary recall, conducted an extensive root cause analysis, and immediately implemented additional corrective actions to prevent recurrence.

    Follow-up testing by the FDA showed acceptable levels of gluten.

    This is the first hard data the FDA has gathered regarding compliance with gluten-free labeling standards. To see such high levels of compliance and responsiveness by manufacturers is encouraging.

    Read the Analytical Results of FY2015/16 Gluten-Free Food Product Sampling. SOURCE: FDA.gov

    0


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest AWOL cast iron stomach

    Posted

    I am very glad to hear this. My concern prior to the FDA ruling of 20 ppm on 8-5-14 effective date was that some companies were not consistent or confused. The label standard 20ppm appeared to give it some needed clarity. The companies who were founded by celiacs or had relatives or employees that were celiac seemed to grasp the importance prior to 8-5-14. I'm glad to hear they are testing and keeping watch that there is compliance with the labeling standards, that more companies understand and are taking the proper GMP' s, testing , and food industry guidelines that gluten-free requires.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Susan

    Posted

    This headline is very misleading. It implies that 99% of the gluten free products on the shelves are safely below the 20ppm standard. But this is total lie. The only thing that this “study†shows is that OF THE LIMITED LIST of products TESTED, 99% of them are actually within the legal definition of gluten free. That cannot be extrapolated to ALL PRODUCTS. What actions has the FDA taken against those who produce products that are above the standard? They are the ones with the power to ensure that this legal definition of gluten free is followed. What has the FDA done to ensure that 100% of products labeled gluten free are within the standard? Just testing them does nothing to keep celiacs safe from harm. What difference does it make to anyone that most products are within the legal standard? If the one dangerous products is being used by people, then they are getting sick and having their bodies damaged in a very serious way. That damage leads to starvation and cancer and death. Gluten Free Watchdog has evidence of products that are well about the standard. When they contacted the FDA, the report was ignored. 7 months later one dangerous product is still allowed to be marketed with the gluten free label and the dangerously high PPM. Then we have General Mills who advertises that their products are safe for celiacs. Yet, their testing process is very flawed. And people are still being made very ill by their gluten free oat four. This is very disappointing. I expected this site to be helpful to celiacs. Apparently, the news here is just more sensationalism.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest admin

    Posted

    This headline is very misleading. It implies that 99% of the gluten free products on the shelves are safely below the 20ppm standard. But this is total lie. The only thing that this “study†shows is that OF THE LIMITED LIST of products TESTED, 99% of them are actually within the legal definition of gluten free. That cannot be extrapolated to ALL PRODUCTS. What actions has the FDA taken against those who produce products that are above the standard? They are the ones with the power to ensure that this legal definition of gluten free is followed. What has the FDA done to ensure that 100% of products labeled gluten free are within the standard? Just testing them does nothing to keep celiacs safe from harm. What difference does it make to anyone that most products are within the legal standard? If the one dangerous products is being used by people, then they are getting sick and having their bodies damaged in a very serious way. That damage leads to starvation and cancer and death. Gluten Free Watchdog has evidence of products that are well about the standard. When they contacted the FDA, the report was ignored. 7 months later one dangerous product is still allowed to be marketed with the gluten free label and the dangerously high PPM. Then we have General Mills who advertises that their products are safe for celiacs. Yet, their testing process is very flawed. And people are still being made very ill by their gluten free oat four. This is very disappointing. I expected this site to be helpful to celiacs. Apparently, the news here is just more sensationalism.

    We are just reporting an FDA press release that is relevant to our readers.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Laura

    Posted

    This headline is very misleading. It implies that 99% of the gluten free products on the shelves are safely below the 20ppm standard. But this is total lie. The only thing that this “study†shows is that OF THE LIMITED LIST of products TESTED, 99% of them are actually within the legal definition of gluten free. That cannot be extrapolated to ALL PRODUCTS. What actions has the FDA taken against those who produce products that are above the standard? They are the ones with the power to ensure that this legal definition of gluten free is followed. What has the FDA done to ensure that 100% of products labeled gluten free are within the standard? Just testing them does nothing to keep celiacs safe from harm. What difference does it make to anyone that most products are within the legal standard? If the one dangerous products is being used by people, then they are getting sick and having their bodies damaged in a very serious way. That damage leads to starvation and cancer and death. Gluten Free Watchdog has evidence of products that are well about the standard. When they contacted the FDA, the report was ignored. 7 months later one dangerous product is still allowed to be marketed with the gluten free label and the dangerously high PPM. Then we have General Mills who advertises that their products are safe for celiacs. Yet, their testing process is very flawed. And people are still being made very ill by their gluten free oat four. This is very disappointing. I expected this site to be helpful to celiacs. Apparently, the news here is just more sensationalism.

    I agree with your assessment. I remember seeing the 4 to 5-foot amber waves of grain waving in the wind. Modern wheat differs from its origins as the result of intense cross-breeding (hybridization) programs. "The crops are neither physically nor genetically like its old self." Modern wheat (grown in 99 percent of the world's wheat fields) is dubbed "dwarf wheat." The FDA was made aware of the changes in the wheat gluten content, but did not require further research regarding the effects of gluten protein increase on humans. Modern wheat exceeds the 1960's content by 17 times. I ate wheat, barely and rye for over half- a-decade before the 2008 variation hit the grocery shelves. Modern wheat is an assault on the health of many thousands of people. Celiac enteritis, celiac encephalopathy, celiac steatorrhea, gluten-sensitive enteropathy, celiac related dermatitis hepetiformis, and gluten ataxia are a few of the modern wheat era diseases that are captured by the W.H.O. Most of the above disease listing are NEW disease occurrences that have been added to the disease reporting statistics. An estimated 1% of the world population has celiac disease alone. Keep in mind, that for many persons, it takes up to 14 years from the start of symptomology to receive a confirmed diagnosis. Physicians now consider “modern wheat†as exacerbating: fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, dementia, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes. Think back for a moment. When did your first heart of the term: gluten? When did you first hear the news media attack on: gluten? When did you first hear comedian jokes and advertisements poking fun at persons who did not consume gluten?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Ads by Google:

  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. He has covered Health News for Examiner.com, and provided health and medical content for Sharecare.com. His work has appeared in Antioch Review, Blue Mesa Review, CALIBAN, Hayden's Ferry Review, Huffington Post, the Mississippi Review, and Slate, among others.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ads by Google:

  • Who's Online   14 Members, 0 Anonymous, 652 Guests (See full list)

  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 03/22/2016 - The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the period for public comments on a proposed rule for fermented and hydrolyzed foods, or foods that contain fermented or hydrolyzed ingredients, and bear a "gluten-free" claim.
    FDA is extending the comment period for the proposed rule on gluten-free labeling for fermented or hydrolyzed foods by 60 days.
    The agency originally introduced the Proposed Rule for Gluten-Free Labeling of Fermented or Hydrolyzed Foods on November 18, 2015. The original public comment period was set to end on February 16, 2016.
    The new closure date for public comments will be 60 days after a notice appears in the Federal Register. The new rule's Federal Register Docket Number is FDA-2014-N-1021, and the relevant Federal Register Docket Name is: "Food Labeling; Gluten-Free Labeling of Fermented or Hydrolyzed Foods."
    The proposed rule does not require or establish standards for "gluten-free" labeling. Instead, it establishes compliance methods for fermented and hydrolyzed foods, or foods that contain fermented or hydrolyzed ingredients that bear a voluntary "gluten-free" labeling claim.
    Source:
    Lexology.com

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 11/11/2016 - Do allergen advisory statements for wheat help US consumers with celiac disease make safe food choices?
    A team of researchers recently set out to review food that were not labeled gluten-free, but which appeared to be free of gluten ingredients based the ingredients list. The product labels indicated that the products contained no wheat, barley, rye, malt, brewers yeast. The research team included T. Thompson, TB Lyons, and A Jones. They are variously affiliated with Gluten Free Watchdog, Manchester, MA, USA; the Department of Clinical Nutrition, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA, and with Mary Rutan Hospital Nutrition, Bellefontaine, OH, USA.
    Looking for allergen advisory statements noting wheat, gluten or both, the team retrospectively reviewed labeling information for 101 products tested for gluten content. They tested products through the gluten test reporting service Gluten Free Watchdog, LLC in Manchester, MA, USA. The review included all commercially available products tested by Gluten Free Watchdog not labeled gluten-free or low gluten at the time of this analysis.
    Gluten testing was conducted via Bia Diagnostics in Burlington, VT, USA. Each product sample was tested in duplicate using the Ridascreen Gliadin sandwich R5 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Mendez method (Ridascreen Gliadin R7001) and extracted with the cocktail solution (Art. No. R7006—official Mendez method) following the kit manufacturer’s directions (R-biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany).
    Seven of the 14 foods with quantifiable gluten in this assessment are single-ingredient foods, such as oat fiber, spices, and green tea leaves. Many single-ingredient foods are considered by consumers to be naturally gluten-free. However, US grain standards allow certain percentages of foreign material in grains, seeds and legumes.
    On the basis of this analysis, the current use of allergen advisory statements for wheat or gluten are not useful predictors of whether or not a single or multi-ingredient food product contains 20 or more p.p.m. of gluten.
    The authors are urging the regulation and standardization of such precautionary statements so that they are helpful to gluten-free consumers.
    Source:
    Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep 14. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.155.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 11/24/2016 - When Australia set it's gluten-content standards at zero ppm for gluten-free labeling, many people in the gluten-free community hailed the action as revolutionary for people with celiac disease or gluten-sensitivity.
    Sensitivity to gluten varies among celiac patients, so, in theory, restricting levels in food to under one part per million (ppm) would protect the maximum number of patients.
    International gluten-free standards require that foods labelled "gluten-free" (gluten-free) contain less than 20 ppm gluten. In Australia and New Zealand, however, a "no detectable gluten" standard applies.
    Now, a pair of researchers say product testing shows that 14% of imported products were non-compliant with the current Australian standard, but none contained more than 1.1 ppm gluten.
    Geoffrey M Forbes and Kenneth Dods are calling those standards "not practical or reasonable," and urging authorities revise the current Australian gluten-free standard of "no detectable gluten" to "≤ 1 ppm."
    Read the full story at: Med J Aust 2016; 205 (7): 316. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00485

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 01/25/2017 - The UK's Food Standards Agency (FSA) has initiated a public comment period on gluten-free labeling in England.
    The FSA is inviting industry feedback on the proposed Gluten In Food (Information for Consumers) (England) Regulations 2017. This regulation enforces the new European Union regulation (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 828/2014), which standardizes labeling information on products that are gluten-free or very low in gluten.
    The law does not require any change in formulation, ingredients or the methods for these products, but does mandate new wording for product labels. It also clarifies for consumers the difference between foods naturally free of gluten, and those specially formulated for people with gluten intolerance.
    The proposed rule applies to England only, not Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland. The rule change is, in part at least, a response to rising numbers of product complaints.
    According to the FSA, approximately 1% of the UK population (around 600,000 people) suffers from celiac disease, while nearly half a million people remain undiagnosed.
    Currently, food businesses are permitted to make voluntary gluten-free or low in gluten claims, but this has led to inconsistency and confusion in many cases. Such confusion could cause health problems for those who are gluten-intolerant.
    Many of these products also fetch a premium price because of their gluten-free claims, stated the FSA.
    The aim of the English regulation is to standardize the permitted claims about gluten. Manufacturers will be limited to the use of the words "gluten-free" or "very low gluten" along with clear and limited supporting information.
    No other claims or descriptions are allowed, and products that fail to conform to labeling standards can be fined.
    The previously accepted phrase "No gluten containing ingredients (NGCI)" can no longer be used on product labels.
    Enforcement of FSA rules will take effect February 20, 2018.

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/21/2018 - Would you buy a house advertised as ‘gluten-free’? Yes, there really is such a house for sale. 
    It seems a Phoenix realtor Mike D’Elena is hoping that his trendy claim will catch the eye of a buyer hungry to avoid gluten, or, at least one with a sense of humor. D’Elena said he crafted the ads as a way to “be funny and to draw attention.” The idea, D’Elena said, is to “make it memorable.” 
    Though D’Elena’s marketing seeks to capitalizes on the gluten-free trend, he knows Celiac disease is a serious health issue for some people. “[W]e’re not here to offend anybody….this is just something we're just trying to do to draw attention and do what's best for our clients," he said. 
    Still, the signs seem to be working. D'elena had fielded six offers within a few days of listing the west Phoenix home.
    "Buying can sometimes be the most stressful thing you do in your entire life so why not have some fun with it," he said. 
    What do you think? Clever? Funny?
    Read more at Arizonafamily.com.

    Advertising Banner-Ads
    Bakery On Main started in the small bakery of a natural foods market on Main Street in Glastonbury, Connecticut. Founder Michael Smulders listened when his customers with Celiac Disease would mention the lack of good tasting, gluten-free options available to them. Upon learning this, he believed that nobody should have to suffer due to any kind of food allergy or dietary need. From then on, his mission became creating delicious and fearlessly unique gluten-free products that were clean and great tasting, while still being safe for his Celiac customers!
    Premium ingredients, bakeshop delicious recipes, and happy customers were our inspiration from the beginning— and are still the cornerstones of Bakery On Main today. We are a fiercely ethical company that believes in integrity and feels that happiness and wholesome, great tasting food should be harmonious. We strive for that in everything we bake in our dedicated gluten-free facility that is GFCO Certified and SQF Level 3 Certified. We use only natural, NON-GMO Project Verified ingredients and all of our products are certified Kosher Parve, dairy and casein free, and we have recently introduced certified Organic items as well! 
    Our passion is to bake the very best products while bringing happiness to our customers, each other, and all those we meet!
    We are available during normal business hours at: 1-888-533-8118 EST.
    To learn more about us at: visit our site.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/20/2018 - Currently, the only way to manage celiac disease is to eliminate gluten from the diet. That could be set to change as clinical trials begin in Australia for a new vaccine that aims to switch off the immune response to gluten. 
    The trials are set to begin at Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre. The vaccine is designed to allow people with celiac disease to consume gluten with no adverse effects. A successful vaccine could be the beginning of the end for the gluten-free diet as the only currently viable treatment for celiac disease. That could be a massive breakthrough for people with celiac disease.
    USC’s Clinical Trials Centre Director Lucas Litewka said trial participants would receive an injection of the vaccine twice a week for seven weeks. The trials will be conducted alongside gastroenterologist Dr. James Daveson, who called the vaccine “a very exciting potential new therapy that has been undergoing clinical trials for several years now.”
    Dr. Daveson said the investigational vaccine might potentially restore gluten tolerance to people with celiac disease.The trial is open to adults between the ages of 18 and 70 who have clinically diagnosed celiac disease, and have followed a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Anyone interested in participating can go to www.joinourtrials.com.
    Read more at the website for Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre.

    Source:
    FoodProcessing.com.au

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/19/2018 - Could baking soda help reduce the inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease? Scientists at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University say that a daily dose of baking soda may in fact help reduce inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease.
    Those scientists recently gathered some of the first evidence to show that cheap, over-the-counter antacids can prompt the spleen to promote an anti-inflammatory environment that could be helpful in combating inflammatory disease.
    A type of cell called mesothelial cells line our body cavities, like the digestive tract. They have little fingers, called microvilli, that sense the environment, and warn the organs they cover that there is an invader and an immune response is needed.
    The team’s data shows that when rats or healthy people drink a solution of baking soda, the stomach makes more acid, which causes mesothelial cells on the outside of the spleen to tell the spleen to go easy on the immune response.  "It's most likely a hamburger not a bacterial infection," is basically the message, says Dr. Paul O'Connor, renal physiologist in the MCG Department of Physiology at Augusta University and the study's corresponding author.
    That message, which is transmitted with help from a chemical messenger called acetylcholine, seems to encourage the gut to shift against inflammation, say the scientists.
    In patients who drank water with baking soda for two weeks, immune cells called macrophages, shifted from primarily those that promote inflammation, called M1, to those that reduce it, called M2. "The shift from inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory profile is happening everywhere," O'Connor says. "We saw it in the kidneys, we saw it in the spleen, now we see it in the peripheral blood."
    O'Connor hopes drinking baking soda can one day produce similar results for people with autoimmune disease. "You are not really turning anything off or on, you are just pushing it toward one side by giving an anti-inflammatory stimulus," he says, in this case, away from harmful inflammation. "It's potentially a really safe way to treat inflammatory disease."
    The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
    Read more at: Sciencedaily.com

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/18/2018 - Celiac disease has been mainly associated with Caucasian populations in Northern Europe, and their descendants in other countries, but new scientific evidence is beginning to challenge that view. Still, the exact global prevalence of celiac disease remains unknown.  To get better data on that issue, a team of researchers recently conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis to get a reasonably accurate estimate the global prevalence of celiac disease. 
    The research team included P Singh, A Arora, TA Strand, DA Leffler, C Catassi, PH Green, CP Kelly, V Ahuja, and GK Makharia. They are variously affiliated with the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India; Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway; Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Gastroenterology Research and Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; USA Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and the Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
    For their review, the team searched Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE for the keywords ‘celiac disease,’ ‘celiac,’ ‘tissue transglutaminase antibody,’ ‘anti-endomysium antibody,’ ‘endomysial antibody,’ and ‘prevalence’ for studies published from January 1991 through March 2016. 
    The team cross-referenced each article with the words ‘Asia,’ ‘Europe,’ ‘Africa,’ ‘South America,’ ‘North America,’ and ‘Australia.’ They defined celiac diagnosis based on European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines. The team used 96 articles of 3,843 articles in their final analysis.
    Overall global prevalence of celiac disease was 1.4% in 275,818 individuals, based on positive blood tests for anti-tissue transglutaminase and/or anti-endomysial antibodies. The pooled global prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% in 138,792 individuals. That means that numerous people with celiac disease potentially remain undiagnosed.
    Rates of celiac disease were 0.4% in South America, 0.5% in Africa and North America, 0.6% in Asia, and 0.8% in Europe and Oceania; the prevalence was 0.6% in female vs 0.4% males. Celiac disease was significantly more common in children than adults.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis showed celiac disease to be reported worldwide. Blood test data shows celiac disease rate of 1.4%, while biopsy data shows 0.7%. The prevalence of celiac disease varies with sex, age, and location. 
    This review demonstrates a need for more comprehensive population-based studies of celiac disease in numerous countries.  The 1.4% rate indicates that there are 91.2 million people worldwide with celiac disease, and 3.9 million are in the U.S.A.
    Source:
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;16(6):823-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037.