• Join our community!

    Do you have questions about celiac disease or the gluten-free diet?

  • Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsSubscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

  • Member Statistics

    77,691
    Total Members
    3,093
    Most Online
    JHAllen
    Newest Member
    JHAllen
    Joined
  • 1 1

    Scientists Catch Culprit Oat Peptides That Trigger Celiac Immune Response


    Jefferson Adams

    Celiac.com 02/29/2016 - Previous studies have shown that oat proteins trigger an adverse anti-33-mer monoclonal antibody reaction that is proportional to the immune responses in terms of T-cell proliferation.


    Ads by Google:




    ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADS
    Ads by Google:



    Photo: CC--Pedro ReynaAlthough there has been some research regarding the impact of these varieties on the adaptive response, researchers still don't know very much about the role of the dendritic cells. A research team recently set out to characterize different oat fractions and to study their effect on dendritic cells from celiac patients.

    The research team included Isabel Comino, David Bernardo, Emmanuelle Bancel, María de Lourdes Moreno, Borja Sánchez, Francisco Barro, Tanja Šuligoj, Paul J. Ciclitira, Ángel Cebolla, Stella C. Knight, Gérard Branlard and Carolina Sousa.

    They are variously affiliated with the Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; the Gastroenterology Unit, Antigen Presentation Research Group, Imperial College London & St Mark′s Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom; the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain; the INRA UMR-1095, Clermont-Ferrand, France; the Nutrition and Bromatology Group, Department of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Food Science and Technology Faculty, University of Vigo-Ourense Campus, Ourense, Spain; the Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (CSIC), Córdoba, Spain; the Division of Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, Gastroenterology, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and the Biomedal S.L., Sevilla, Spain.

    The team first isolated protein fragments from oat grains and then analyzed them using SDS–PAGE. They then characterized several proteins in the prolamin fraction using immunological and proteomic tools, as well as Nano-LC-MS/MS. These proteins were very similar to α- and γ-gliadin, and showed reactive sequences to anti-33-mer antibody, indicating their potential for causing adverse immune reactions.

    Furthermore, the team found that some of the newly identified oat peptides triggered a range of immune responses on circulating dendritic cells from celiac patients, as compared with healthy controls.

    This is the first study to show that newly identified oat peptides can trigger a range of stimulatory responses on circulating dendritic cells from celiac patients, which highlights the potential of these oat peptides to trigger adverse immune responses in people with celiac disease.

    Source:

    1 1


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I avoid oats and this article explains why.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Are oats safe if there are no symptoms?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have never been able to eat gluten-free oats and this shows why allowing them to be in food labeled gluten-free was the wrong thing to do.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about labeling them gluten free, but possibly causing a reaction in some people. I have a friend who reacted to everything that she ate for longer than a short period of time. Her family ate a huge variety of meats from the regular pork, beef, and chicken to moose, antelope and buffalo with arrowroot flour and other such things and this was over 50 years ago. From what I can see in the literature, the vast majority of celiacs who eat uncontaminated oats have little or no reaction. The important word in that sentence is "uncontaminated". In any industrial scale process, it is hard to believe that some tiny amount might not slip by. That does not mean that every effort should not be taken to make sure of the purity of oats used for various products. If a certain small percentage of celiacs also respond to pure oats, that is a separate issue. That issue should not be ignored and testing should be carried out to make sure that oat products claiming to be gluten free truly are.

     

    As a casual perusal of the many posts on this site will attest, there is a huge range of reactions to a variety of products within just the readers of this site. Attacking individuals for their particular reactions is not useful. People with different reactions from those portrayed in other posts should merely document "their" reactions and not generalize or assume that some other poster is incorrect. The science on most of this is unclear or unreliable, making it difficult for sufferers to make personal decisions other than by experiment. Even those who choose to be purely vegan or ovo-lacto-vegans are challenged by daily decisions when they are away from home. Extended travel as on vacations can prove to be almost impossible to manage properly.

    I am feeling my way, day by day, and hoping that I can survive the huge intrusion into my life that is represented by celiac disease. My thanks go out to all who participate in this site and those who manage the content.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Ads by Google:

  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. He has covered Health News for Examiner.com, and provided health and medical content for Sharecare.com. His work has appeared in Antioch Review, Blue Mesa Review, CALIBAN, Hayden's Ferry Review, Huffington Post, the Mississippi Review, and Slate, among others.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ads by Google:

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 271 Guests (See full list)

  • Related Articles

    Diana Gitig Ph.D.
    Celiac.com 03/14/2011 - It is still a matter of controversy whether or not oats are safe for people with celiac disease. The general consensus at this point seems to be that pure oats are safe for most, but not all, people with celiac. Since oats can easily be contaminated with wheat during harvest, storage, or other stages of processing, it has been stressed that the oats be certified as pure. Although the classic 33-amino acid long oligopeptide that acts as the immunogenic stimulus in gliadin had not yet been found in oats, other peptides isolated from oats do activate T-cells isolated from celiac patients. A new study performed in Spain by Isabel Comino et al. suggests that it is not that some celiac patients can’t tolerate all oats, but rather that all celiac patients can’t tolerate some oats. Their results are reported in the January 2011 issue of GUT: An International Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
    Dr. Comina and her colleagues examined nine different cultivars of oats. They exposed each of them to a sensitive monoclonal antibody generated to recognize the toxic 33-mer from gliadin, and also measured if each of the oat varieties could elicit an immune response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from celiac patients. They wanted to see if they could correlate recognition by the monoclonal antibody to induction of a T-cell response, and found that they certainly could.
    The nine varieties of oats segregated neatly into three groups of three varieties each: those for which the antibody had high affinity, low affinity, and no affinity. This affinity was validated by two different experimental methods, so was not an artifact of the technique chosen. When T cells from patients with celiac were exposed to extracts of the oat variety the antibody bound to strongest, they proliferated the most and released interferon-gamma, an immunostimulatory cytokine whose aberrant expression is associated with autoinflammatory disease. In contrast, the oats that didn’t react with the antibody did not elicit these immune responses. The authors note that the avenin – the storage protein in oats – from even the most immunogenic oats they saw bound to this antibody with 40-400 fold less affinity than gliadin (from gluten – the storage protein in wheat).
    This study thus leaves us with two valuable conclusions. One is that some oats are more toxic than others, regardless of their purity. And the other is that reactivity with this antibody can be correlated to toxicity, making it a potential tool for evaluating the toxic gluten content of other food.
    Source:

    Gut doi:10.1136/gut.2010.225268

    Dr. Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.
    This article originally appeared in the Winter 2004 edition of Celiac.com's Journal of Gluten-Sensitivity.
    Celiac.com 09/19/2014 - Experts have decreed that pure oats are safe for people with celiac disease(1,2,3).  The definition of this disease is based on a very specific type of injury to the intestinal wall that heals following the removal of gluten from the diet.  This intestinal damage, called villous atrophy, is caused by the interaction between the immune system and certain proteins found in wheat, rye, and barley.  Identical proteins are not found in oats (although there is also some variation between the protein groups found in wheat, rye, and barley).  Further, many newly diagnosed celiac patients have been shown to recover from their celiac symptoms while eating significant quantities of oats and their intestinal biopsies do not show signs of villous atrophy1 (Admittedly, the quantity of oats consumed by these study subjects does not rival the grain protein consumption in a regular, gluten-laden diet, but the quantity is significant).  Therefore, this food is considered safe for celiac consumption.
    Given these facts, it is not surprising that many gastroenterologists are now recommending that their patients eat oats.  Some claim that patients are more likely to follow a gluten-free diet if that diet allows oats.  Others point to the definition of celiac disease, which clearly requires gluten-induced villous atrophy.  Still others insist that since we now know which proteins cause the villous atrophy, oats must be safe for celiac patients to consume.
    There are several problems with these perspectives, beginning with the assumption that patients will be more compliant with the diet if it includes oats.  I have explored the medical literature and have been unable to find a single study that investigates dietary compliance as a function of including oats in the gluten-free diet.  I’d be happy to hear about such a study.  But until the question is investigated, the assumption is just one more opinion afloat in a sea of unfounded beliefs about grains and diet.
    Many celiac patients experience an addictive element in gluten.  I have long suspected that is the result of morphine-like, opioid peptides found in the digests of gluten(4-8).  Are some peptides from oats capable of producing these opioids?  Has anyone investigated that issue?  Again, I can find no evidence that this issue has been studied.
    Reliance on the biopsy to reveal problems with oat consumption is another relevant problem.  As many of us can attest, and the medical literature reports, gluten challenges that intentionally involve ingestion of relatively large quantities of gluten often fail to reveal villous atrophy for weeks, months, and sometimes, years(9).  Many celiac patients will also agree that despite our best efforts at compliance, gluten sometimes manages to sneak into our diets, particularly in the early months of following the diet.  Yet a second biopsy usually shows dramatic healing of the intestinal wall, despite these dietary errors.  Clearly, the intestinal biopsy is a fairly crude tool for measuring intestinal health.  Its use in exonerating oats thus becomes suspect.  An even more troubling element of this issue is that there are gastroenterologists who are recommending that their patients consume breakfast cereals that contain malt flavoring, because patients consuming such small quantities of malt do not show villous atrophy(10).
    Also troubling is the fact that many of the studies that support the safety of oats have not employed the Marsh system for identifying intestinal injury, a refinement that significantly increases the sensitivity of the intestinal biopsy.
    The greatest weakness of the pro-oats position is the underlying assumption that we fully understand celiac disease and gluten sensitivity.  This is simply not the case.  The research shows that some celiacs do develop symptoms when consuming oats.  While most newly diagnosed celiacs experience reduced symptoms and improved health, this may simply be the result of consuming less grain-derived protein.  Researchers have long known that even partial compliance with the gluten-free diet produces health improvements in celiac patients(11).
    The definition of celiac disease that requires villous atrophy followed the discovery of the beneficial impact of the gluten-free diet by more than 20 years (If in doubt about this point, please refer to the English translation of Dr. Dicke’s Ph.D. thesis at http://www.dangerousgrains.com).  Our current understanding of the disease began with the observed benefits of the gluten-free diet.  Intestinal biopsies were a much later development.
    A similar debate arose regarding the inclusion of wheat starch.  It was long held to be a safe nutrient in the gluten-free diet in many European countries.  In fact, the studies that showed a reduced risk of cancer and a variety of celiac-associated conditions were often conducted among patient groups living where wheat starch was deemed acceptable(12, 13).  Yet when wheat starch consumption was studied in Canada, against a back-drop of zero tolerance, most of the subjects developed signs and symptoms of celiac disease(14).
    Many celiacs and gluten-sensitive individuals know that their symptoms do not fit with the conventional view of celiac disease.  Some of us believe that there is a continuum of severity.  Others believe that there are many sub-types of celiac disease.  Still others believe, me included, that it really doesn’t matter whether a person has intestinal damage.  The important, defining characteristic should be whether a person is mounting an immune response against the proteins in the most common substance in our food supply.  
    Whatever our beliefs we turn to the experts when faced with health concerns and crises.  However, those answers often rely on the medical definition of celiac disease, where villous atrophy heals in response to a gluten-free diet.  In cases where the biopsy was improperly taken, or too few samples were taken, or patchy intestinal lesions were missed, or other forms of gluten-induced ailments are causing symptoms, we may not get answers that aid our health.  Many individuals who are gluten sensitive will be, under such circumstances, dismissed with a diagnosis of IBS.
    Given the facts, we have several hurdles to overcome before we can, in my opinion, render an informed judgment about the safety of oats.  We need a much better understanding of gluten-induced disease in all of its manifestations.  We also need a definition of celiac disease that is more useful to the patient who is experiencing symptoms of gluten sensitivity/celiac disease.  As part of this, we also need a test that is more accurate, and can identify celiac disease after beginning the diet––a challenge that many of us face.  Until we have overcome these hurdles, any pronouncement regarding the safety of oats is premature.
    Further research is, in my opinion, the greatest need of the celiac community.  We need to know more, not just about celiac disease, but about the whole range of nutritional and pathological impacts of eating grains. In my own quest, I have learned from the experiences of other celiac patients.  Each new facet of my own experience has been illuminated by someone else’s story.  I have come to understand ADHD as a frequent companion of celiac disease.  Learning disabilities are also common among celiacs.  Behavioral disturbances are the norm, and speech problems are common.  My understanding continues to grow as I hear from others who struggle with gluten sensitivity.
    Despite its usefulness, this patient-to-patient network of information sharing is not enough.  We need well designed, well executed research.  We need a better understanding of our disease and how to protect future generations from the current, inaccurate assumptions about grains.  The oats question is only one facet of a much larger need for more information and better testing methods.
    Sources:
    Storsrud S, Olsson M, Arvidsson Lenner R, Nilsson LA, Nilsson O, Kilander A.    Adult coeliac patients do tolerate large amounts of oats. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jan;57(1):163-9. Kilmartin C, Lynch S, Abuzakouk M, Wieser H, Feighery C.  Avenin fails to induce a Th1 response in coeliac tissue following in vitro culture. Gut. 2003 Jan;52(1):47-52. Janatuinen EK, Kemppainen TA, Julkunen RJ, Kosma VM, Maki M, Heikkinen M, Uusitupa MI.  No harm from five year ingestion of oats in coeliac disease. Gut. 2002 Mar;50(3):332-5. Teschemacher H.  Opioid receptor ligands derived from food proteins. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9(16):1331-44. Review. Yoshikawa M, Takahashi M, Yang S. Delta opioid peptides derived from plant proteins. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9(16):1325-30. Review. Horvath K, Graf L, Walcz E, Bodanszky H, Schuler D. Naloxone antagonises effect of alpha-gliadin on leucocyte migration in patients with coeliac disease. Lancet. 1985 Jul 27;2(8448):184-5. Zioudrou C, Streaty RA, Klee WA. Opioid peptides derived from food proteins. The exorphins. J Biol Chem. 1979 Apr 10;254(7):2446-9. Hoggan R.  Considering wheat, rye, and barley proteins as aids to carcinogens. Med Hypotheses. 1997 Sep;49(3):285-8. Fukudome S, Yoshikawa M.   Opioid peptides derived from wheat gluten: their isolation and characterization. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jan 13;296(1):107-11. Kuitunen P, Savilahti E, Verkasalo M.  Late mucosal relapse in a boy with coeliac disease and cow's milk allergy. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986 Mar;75(2):340-2. Holmes, et. al. "Malignancy in coeliac disease - effect of a gluten free diet" Gut 1989; 30: 333-338 Holmes GK.  Coeliac disease and malignancy.Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Mar;34(3):229-37 Collin P, Pukkala E, Reunala T.  Malignancy and survival in dermatitis herpetiformis: a comparison with coeliac disease. Gut. 1996 Apr;38(4):528-30. Chartrand LJ, Russo PA, Duhaime AG, Seidman EG.  Wheat starch intolerance in patients with celiac disease. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Jun;97(6):612-8.

    Dr. Rodney Ford M.D.
    This article originally appeared in the Autumn 2009 edition of Journal of Gluten Sensitivity.
    Celiac.com 02/27/2015 - The answer to the "oats questions" are becoming clearer.
    The long-asked question is "Can people with celiac disease or gluten sensitivity safely eat oats?" Some people are so sensitive, that even the tiniest bit of gluten makes them feel unwell. So this answer is important because people on a gluten-free diet should not restrict foods unnecessarily. There are several aspects to this question:
    1. Avenin: Oats do not naturally contain gluten ... but there is a similar protein called "avenin" found in oats that has the same properties as gluten (it is the "prolamine storage protein" of oat seeds, that helps protect the dormant seed and nourish it when it begins to grow).Fortunately, adverse reactions to this oat protein are rare. A study of 10 pertinent studies, with a total of 165 patients, found only 1 patient who had histological gut damage as a result of eating oats. This condition is now called "avenin-sensitive enteropathy" (ASE). This is documented by Garsed & Scott "Can oats be taken in a gluten-free diet? A systematic review" (Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2007:42: 171–8.
    Clinical reports now provide strong evidence that oats very rarely cause damage to the gut mucosa in people with celiac disease. Subsequently, guidelines from many coeliac societies now reflect this new evidence. Moderate amounts of oats (half a cup of oats a day) can be consumed by most celiacs without risk of damaging intestinal villi. However, it is important to emphasise that these oats must be free of other contaminating gluten-cereals.
    What is not reported is whether some of these people experience symptoms (feel unwell) despite the healthy appearance of their gut under a microscope. These people might have an "avenin-sensitivity" similar to gluten-sensitivity without any accompanying gut damage. This question has not yet been investigated.
     
    Cross-contamination: The reason that many people apparently react to oats is not because of the avenin, but to inadvertent gluten contamination. In other words, wheat and other gluten-grains accidentally get into the oats.Traces of gluten are commonly found in packets of oats–this is from the cross-contamination of oats with other gluten-grains. This contamination can occur during any stage of the life-cycle of oat production: the planting, the harvesting, the transportation, the processing and the refining of oats. It is almost impossible to avoid such cross-contamination unless all this machinery is exclusively devoted to oats production. This requires large-scale production as is seen in the USA.
    One research group analyzed a total of 134 oats samples, comprising grains and commercial oat products collected from Europe, the United States and Canada. This study confirmed that most oats were contaminated with mixtures of wheat, barley and rye (Hernando et al. "Measurement of wheat gluten and barley hordeins in contaminated oats from Europe, the United States and Canada by Sandwich R5 ELISA". Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jun;20:545-54.)
     
    Level of gluten sensitivity: How intensely people react to gluten varies. Some people can eat moderate amounts of gluten and have no symptoms at all. Whilst many are so sensitive that even the tiniest amount upsets them. Thus, minimal cross-contamination of oats with gluten is a problem for a significant proportion of the gluten-sensitive community.It may be that people who have extreme gluten sensitivity are more likely to react to avenin. It is my observation that super-sensitive gluten reactors seldom tolerate oats. However, this subject has not been researched.
     
    Asymptomatic gluten damage: Oddly, some people can have the gut damage of celiac disease without experiencing noticeable symptoms. They have severe gut damage but are completely unaware of it. Such a diagnosis is usually discovered by screening blood test. As these people do not get any symptoms from gluten, they would not know if oats are upsetting them either! These asymptomatic celiacs need to be followed up with regular blood tests (and perhaps subsequent biopsy) to ensure that they are healing.
      Why bother with oats?The ability to use oats in your diet gives an important source of fibre as well as other important nutrients. They have a low glycemic index (GI) which makes them satisfying to eat. Also, eating oats will contribute to lower cholesterol levels. And of course, it gives you a valuable additional food to make the topping on apple-crumble, hot oat porridge on a cold morning, and a crunchy, tasty muesli.
    Some companies certify their oats to be gluten-free, which means they are free from any cross-contamination. If you are very sensitive to gluten, then you might not tolerate oats. The best thing to do is try a little and see.
     
    Do blood tests: "Get a blood test!" is my mantra. So many people go gluten-free without a blood test. So many people with celiac disease never get follow-up blood tests. It is important to get a firm diagnosis of celiac disease / gluten sensitivity. Then to get more tests a year or two later to make sure that your body is healing. One way to check out how you are tolerating oats in your body is to get regular blood test checks for gluten (IgG-gliadin) and for tissue damage (DGP/tTG)–for more details please visit me at my website.

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/21/2018 - Would you buy a house advertised as ‘gluten-free’? Yes, there really is such a house for sale. 
    It seems a Phoenix realtor Mike D’Elena is hoping that his trendy claim will catch the eye of a buyer hungry to avoid gluten, or, at least one with a sense of humor. D’Elena said he crafted the ads as a way to “be funny and to draw attention.” The idea, D’Elena said, is to “make it memorable.” 
    Though D’Elena’s marketing seeks to capitalizes on the gluten-free trend, he knows Celiac disease is a serious health issue for some people. “[W]e’re not here to offend anybody….this is just something we're just trying to do to draw attention and do what's best for our clients," he said. 
    Still, the signs seem to be working. D'elena had fielded six offers within a few days of listing the west Phoenix home.
    "Buying can sometimes be the most stressful thing you do in your entire life so why not have some fun with it," he said. 
    What do you think? Clever? Funny?
    Read more at Arizonafamily.com.

    Advertising Banner-Ads
    Bakery On Main started in the small bakery of a natural foods market on Main Street in Glastonbury, Connecticut. Founder Michael Smulders listened when his customers with Celiac Disease would mention the lack of good tasting, gluten-free options available to them. Upon learning this, he believed that nobody should have to suffer due to any kind of food allergy or dietary need. From then on, his mission became creating delicious and fearlessly unique gluten-free products that were clean and great tasting, while still being safe for his Celiac customers!
    Premium ingredients, bakeshop delicious recipes, and happy customers were our inspiration from the beginning— and are still the cornerstones of Bakery On Main today. We are a fiercely ethical company that believes in integrity and feels that happiness and wholesome, great tasting food should be harmonious. We strive for that in everything we bake in our dedicated gluten-free facility that is GFCO Certified and SQF Level 3 Certified. We use only natural, NON-GMO Project Verified ingredients and all of our products are certified Kosher Parve, dairy and casein free, and we have recently introduced certified Organic items as well! 
    Our passion is to bake the very best products while bringing happiness to our customers, each other, and all those we meet!
    We are available during normal business hours at: 1-888-533-8118 EST.
    To learn more about us at: visit our site.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/20/2018 - Currently, the only way to manage celiac disease is to eliminate gluten from the diet. That could be set to change as clinical trials begin in Australia for a new vaccine that aims to switch off the immune response to gluten. 
    The trials are set to begin at Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre. The vaccine is designed to allow people with celiac disease to consume gluten with no adverse effects. A successful vaccine could be the beginning of the end for the gluten-free diet as the only currently viable treatment for celiac disease. That could be a massive breakthrough for people with celiac disease.
    USC’s Clinical Trials Centre Director Lucas Litewka said trial participants would receive an injection of the vaccine twice a week for seven weeks. The trials will be conducted alongside gastroenterologist Dr. James Daveson, who called the vaccine “a very exciting potential new therapy that has been undergoing clinical trials for several years now.”
    Dr. Daveson said the investigational vaccine might potentially restore gluten tolerance to people with celiac disease.The trial is open to adults between the ages of 18 and 70 who have clinically diagnosed celiac disease, and have followed a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Anyone interested in participating can go to www.joinourtrials.com.
    Read more at the website for Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre.

    Source:
    FoodProcessing.com.au

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/19/2018 - Could baking soda help reduce the inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease? Scientists at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University say that a daily dose of baking soda may in fact help reduce inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease.
    Those scientists recently gathered some of the first evidence to show that cheap, over-the-counter antacids can prompt the spleen to promote an anti-inflammatory environment that could be helpful in combating inflammatory disease.
    A type of cell called mesothelial cells line our body cavities, like the digestive tract. They have little fingers, called microvilli, that sense the environment, and warn the organs they cover that there is an invader and an immune response is needed.
    The team’s data shows that when rats or healthy people drink a solution of baking soda, the stomach makes more acid, which causes mesothelial cells on the outside of the spleen to tell the spleen to go easy on the immune response.  "It's most likely a hamburger not a bacterial infection," is basically the message, says Dr. Paul O'Connor, renal physiologist in the MCG Department of Physiology at Augusta University and the study's corresponding author.
    That message, which is transmitted with help from a chemical messenger called acetylcholine, seems to encourage the gut to shift against inflammation, say the scientists.
    In patients who drank water with baking soda for two weeks, immune cells called macrophages, shifted from primarily those that promote inflammation, called M1, to those that reduce it, called M2. "The shift from inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory profile is happening everywhere," O'Connor says. "We saw it in the kidneys, we saw it in the spleen, now we see it in the peripheral blood."
    O'Connor hopes drinking baking soda can one day produce similar results for people with autoimmune disease. "You are not really turning anything off or on, you are just pushing it toward one side by giving an anti-inflammatory stimulus," he says, in this case, away from harmful inflammation. "It's potentially a really safe way to treat inflammatory disease."
    The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
    Read more at: Sciencedaily.com

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/18/2018 - Celiac disease has been mainly associated with Caucasian populations in Northern Europe, and their descendants in other countries, but new scientific evidence is beginning to challenge that view. Still, the exact global prevalence of celiac disease remains unknown.  To get better data on that issue, a team of researchers recently conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis to get a reasonably accurate estimate the global prevalence of celiac disease. 
    The research team included P Singh, A Arora, TA Strand, DA Leffler, C Catassi, PH Green, CP Kelly, V Ahuja, and GK Makharia. They are variously affiliated with the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India; Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway; Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Gastroenterology Research and Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; USA Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and the Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
    For their review, the team searched Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE for the keywords ‘celiac disease,’ ‘celiac,’ ‘tissue transglutaminase antibody,’ ‘anti-endomysium antibody,’ ‘endomysial antibody,’ and ‘prevalence’ for studies published from January 1991 through March 2016. 
    The team cross-referenced each article with the words ‘Asia,’ ‘Europe,’ ‘Africa,’ ‘South America,’ ‘North America,’ and ‘Australia.’ They defined celiac diagnosis based on European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines. The team used 96 articles of 3,843 articles in their final analysis.
    Overall global prevalence of celiac disease was 1.4% in 275,818 individuals, based on positive blood tests for anti-tissue transglutaminase and/or anti-endomysial antibodies. The pooled global prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% in 138,792 individuals. That means that numerous people with celiac disease potentially remain undiagnosed.
    Rates of celiac disease were 0.4% in South America, 0.5% in Africa and North America, 0.6% in Asia, and 0.8% in Europe and Oceania; the prevalence was 0.6% in female vs 0.4% males. Celiac disease was significantly more common in children than adults.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis showed celiac disease to be reported worldwide. Blood test data shows celiac disease rate of 1.4%, while biopsy data shows 0.7%. The prevalence of celiac disease varies with sex, age, and location. 
    This review demonstrates a need for more comprehensive population-based studies of celiac disease in numerous countries.  The 1.4% rate indicates that there are 91.2 million people worldwide with celiac disease, and 3.9 million are in the U.S.A.
    Source:
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;16(6):823-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037.