Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-m):


  • You've found your Celiac Tribe! Join our like-minded, private community and share your story, get encouragement and connect with others.

    💬

    • Sign In
    • Sign Up
  • Jefferson Adams

    Solid Phase Plates Are Crucial to Accurate ELISA Tests

    Jefferson Adams
    0
    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

      The team's report, published in Heliyon highlights the properties of solid phases and their effects on the detection of autoantibodies by ELISA.


    Researchers at work in their lab. Image: CC BY 2.0--NWABR
    Caption: Researchers at work in their lab. Image: CC BY 2.0--NWABR

    Celiac.com 02/05/2020 - The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a critical diagnostic tool for spotting or differentiating diseases, such as celiac disease, and other autoimmune conditions, and also to monitor disease progression or drug efficacy. However, accuracy is a crucial factor in such tests. 

    Chitinase-3-like protein 1, aka CHI3L1, is a potential new culprit in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A team of researchers recently set out to develop an ELISA that can identify IgA and IgG autoantibodies against chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), in the serum of both control and disease groups.



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):






    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12-m):




    The research team included Claudia Deutschmann, Dirk Roggenbuck, Peter Schierack, and Stefan Rödigera. They are variously affiliated with the Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty Environment and Natural Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Universitätsplatz 1, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany; and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Joint Faculty of the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - Senftenberg, The Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, The University of Potsdam, Senftenberg, Germany.

    While ELISA is often used to spot the difference between diseased or healthy states, it can also be used for quantitative assessment of biomarkers, like autoantibodies. In this way, ELISA technology can help to discover and confirm new autoantibodies. 

    Researchers have been keen to develop immunoassays that can detect diseases, such as celiac disease in the early stages. 

    To produce an ELISA, researchers must work extra hard, and they can be forced to deal with numerous factors, including buffer systems or antigen-autoantibody interactions. This often means lots of testing to dial-in several blocking substances to yield highly accurate results. In this case, the research team developed an ELISA to detect IgA and IgG autoantibodies against chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), a newly identified autoantigen in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in the serum of 23 control subjects and 23 disease patients.

    The spot any issues with reproducibility, the team tested microwell plates with both PolySorp and MaxiSorp surface coatings. Among the important issues they discovered with the surface properties of the microwell plates: IgA antibody reactivity was markedly lower, since it was in the range of background noise, when measured on MaxiSorp coated plates (p < 0.0001). 

    The IgG antibody reactivity did not change between plates, but the plate surface significantly influenced test results (p = 0.0005). The team's report, published in Heliyon highlights the properties of solid phases and their effects on the detection of autoantibodies by ELISA. 

    They advise that using the wrong plate can cause false negative readings, which can impair the discovery of autoantibodies, such as Chitinase-3-like protein 1, aka CHI3L1. Poor accuracy can impair the ability of doctors to accurately diagnose celiac and other diseases.

    Read more in Heliyon. 2020 Jan; 6(1): e03270.

    0

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Hopefully everyone who designs ELISAs (including me) already knows that a high binding ELISA plate, such as Maxisorp plates, might have background issues, so you only use them as a last resort.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University, and has authored more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously served as SF Health News Examiner for Examiner.com, and devised health and medical content for Sharecare.com. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of the book "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-m):




  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 03/16/2016 - If you have celiac disease, particularly if you are highly sensitive to gluten exposure, you may rely on commercial ELISA test kits for gluten detection.
    There are a large variety of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) commercially available for gluten detection in food, including new formats and assays with antibodies against relevant gluten epitopes.
    But, how accurate are these test kits for gluten detection? How reliable are they for people with celiac disease? A team of researchers recently set out to evaluate the accuracy of 14 ELISA kits for gluten detection. The kits they tested cover the full range of the...

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 02/17/2017 - In recent tests, researchers found that microwave treatment (MWT) of wet wheat kernels caused a striking reduction in R5-antibody-based ELISA gluten readings, reducing the readings to under 20 ppm, so that wheat could theoretically be labeled as gluten-free. However, the actual gluten content of the wheat remained unchanged. Just the test reading changed.
    The research team included C Gianfrani, G Mamone, B la Gatta, A Camarca, L Di Stasio, F Maurano, S Picascia, V Capozzi, G Perna, G Picariello, A Di Luccia. They are variously affiliated with the Institute of Protein Biochemistry, CNR, Naples, Italy, the Institute of Food Sciences...

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 01/30/2018 - Numerous clinicians have reported higher levels of celiac disease markers in their patients with psoriasis. A number of researchers believe that some psoriasis patients suffer from asymptomatic celiac disease, and a number of patients have reported symptom improvements with gluten-free diets.
    A team of researchers recently set out to determine the prevalence of antigliadin IgA antibodies in psoriasis vulgaris, and to assess the response of seropositive patients to a gluten-free diet.
    The research team included Nikolai A Kolchak, Maria K Tetarnikova, Maria S Theodoropoulou, Alexandra P Michalopoulou, and Demetrios S Theodoropoulos...

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 02/26/2018 - People with celiac disease and gluten-sensitivities react adversely to gluten proteins in wheat, barley and rye. The gold standard for assessing gluten levels in foods is a test called the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, aka ELISA. Now, ELISA is, by most measures, a good test. However, it does have some drawbacks.
    ELISA tests do vary by manufacturer, and can provide inconsistent results, including false negatives, which can be harmful for people with celiac disease or gluten-sensitivity.
    Also, for optimal detection, each type of gluten requires a different ELISA. So, barley, wheat and rye all require separate tests.