No popular authors found.


Get Celiac.com's E-Newsletter

Categories

No categories found.







Ads by Google:


Questions? Join Our Forum:
~1 Million Posts
& Over 66,000 Members!



SHARE THIS PAGE:
Celiac.com Sponsors:

Using Endocytoscopy to Perform Live, Real-time Imaging of Human Duodenal Mucosal Structures in Celiac Disease

Celiac.com 02/24/2010 - Proper clinical diagnosis of celiac disease still relies on confirmation of histological evidence of villous atrophy via biopsy. Getting a good sample can sometimes be tricky. If histological sections are not optimally oriented, then diagnosis may be more difficult. As a result, doctors can sometimes fail to confirm the proper diagnosis.

A team of researchers recently set out to study the viability of confirming histological evidence of villous atrophy in real time, during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, in live duodenal mucosa of patients with celiac disease, using endocytoscopy, a novel diagnostic technique allowing in vivo real-time visualization of mucosa under 450x magnification.

The research team included T.  Matysiak-Budnik, E.  Coron1, J.-F.  Mosnier, M.  Le Rhun1, H.  Inoue, and J.-P.  Galmiche. They are associated variously with the Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif - INSERM U913, CIC 04 et Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôtel Dieu, CHU de Nantes, France, the Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, E.A. Biometadys, CHU de Nantes, France, and the Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Japan

The team studied sixteen subjects with clinically proven celiac disease, together with seven controls subjects with no celiac disease. They took endocytoscopic images from multiple areas and then made a blind comparison against standard histology.

Endocytoscopy revealed three distinct patterns of in vivo histology.

Ads by Google:

First, in all controls and eight celiac disease patients (n = 15), endocytoscopy revealed the presence of normal-appearing, long, thin villi, lined with clearly distinguishable surface epithelial cells, considered to be normal duodenal mucosa.

Second, in four celiac disease patients, endocytoscopy revealed the presence of thick, shortened villi, reflecting partial villous atrophy.

Finally, in four celiac disease patients, endocytoscopy revealed the total absence of villi, along with the presence of enlarged crypt orifices, reflecting total villous atrophy.

The team found solid agreement between endocytoscopy and standard histology in all 16 patients with celiac disease.

From their results, they conclude that endocytoscopy permits live, real-time, noninvasive imaging and assessment of villous architecture, and looks to be a promising method for in vivo evaluation of duodenal mucosa in celiac disease.

Source:
Endoscopy: DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-12438

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).












Related Articles



1 Response:

 
Alan Adams
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
02 Mar 2010 7:06:38 AM PST
Jefferson Adams has many interesting and helpful articles. I will copy and pass this on to my doctor, as usual, who enjoys the articles too.




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *:




In Celiac.com's Forum Now:


Getting a celiac disease diagnosis is shocking. Expect to go through all the stages of grief. Your best defense is to learn how to read labels, avoid cross contamination and consider eating as few processed foods for a few weeks. It may speed healing (wish someone would have advised me to do s...

That is very helpful. Thank you so much.

I would read it as ?high?. In any case, you were positive on the TTG and the DGP. You only need one positive. I had pretty severe intestinal damage and never even had a positive on the EMA or the TTG even when they were re-run several times during follow-up visits.

Thank you! That does help. I was just confused about the ?negative? under the EMA Titer when my level says ?1:40 high?. Any insight there? Just wondering if it?s further confirming or denying? I first thought confirming.

Thank you! That does help. I was just confused about the ?negative? under the EMA Titer when my level says ?1:40 high?. Any insight there?