No popular authors found.
Ads by Google:

Categories

No categories found.


Get Celiac.com's E-Newsletter





Ads by Google:


Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus Pinterest RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts
SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

Mortality Rates for Celiacs with Persistent Villous Atrophy Similar to Those with Healthy Guts

Celiac.com 02/06/2013 - Villous atrophy (VA) in the small intestine is one of the prime features of celiac disease, and has been associated with increased mortality, but it is unknown if mortality is influenced by mucosal recovery.

CC--Leo ReynoldsTo better understand the relationship between mucosal healing and mortality in celiac disease, a research team set out to determine whether persistent villous atrophy is associated with mortality in celiac disease patients.

The research team included B. Lebwohl, F. Granath, A. Ekbom, S.M. Montgomery, J.A. Murray, A. Rubio-Tapia, P.H. Green, and J.F. Ludvigsson. They are variously affiliated with the Celiac Disease Center at the Department of Medicine of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York, NY, the Clinical Epidemiology Unit at the Department of Medicine of Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden.

The team used biopsy reports from every pathology department (n = 28) in Sweden to identified 7,648 individuals with celiac disease, which they defined as the presence of villous atrophy, and who had undergone a follow-up biopsy within 5 years of diagnosis. They used Cox regression to assess mortality according to follow-up biopsy.

Ads by Google:

Celiac patients were 28.4 years of age, on average, and 63% were female. The average follow-up after diagnosis was 11.5 years. Overall, patients who underwent follow-up biopsy had lower mortality rates than those who did not undergo follow-up biopsy (Hazard Ratio 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96).

Of the 7648 patients who underwent follow-up biopsy, 3317 (43%) showed persistent villous atrophy. In all, 606 (8%) patients died. However, patients with persistent villous atrophy died at about the same rates as those with mucosal healing (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.86-1.19).

Also, children with persistent villous atrophy showed no increase in mortality (HR: 1.09 95% CI: 0.37-3.16) or adults (HR 1.00 95% CI: 0.85-1.18), including adults older than age 50 years (HR: 0.96 95% CI: 0.80-1.14).

Mortality rates for celiac patients with persistent villous atrophy are about the same as for celiac patients with healthy guts. So, persistent villous atrophy is not tied to higher mortality for celiac disease patients. That means that even though a follow-up biopsy will help doctors to spot refractory disease in symptomatic patients, persistent villous atrophy is not useful in predicting future mortality.

Source:

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).












4 Responses:

 
Sue
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated
said this on
06 Feb 2013 4:39:50 PM PDT
So I interpret this to mean that a little accidental gluten may not be good for you, but it most likely won't cause any damage that will kill you. It apparently didn't trigger any other diseases that would kill you either. I wonder if the "not dead" celiacs with villous atrophy had as good a quality of life as those who had mucosal healing.

 
Kristin Jordan
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
11 Feb 2013 10:23:02 AM PDT
Interesting! I continue to have villous atrophy in the absence of gluten in my diet (my TTG test is now negative). Not all guts heal completely, especially those guts where the celiac disease took decades to diagnose. Nice to know that my imperfect villi may not take me out of this life early after all!

 
Claudia
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated
said this on
13 Feb 2013 3:57:26 PM PDT
It may not affect the length of life to have some villous atrophy, however I'm wondering about quality of life.
I believe that a little "accidental gluten" is a slippery slope. Is 20ppm not outside the amount that's accidental? How much is too much accidental?

 
Mark
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated
said this on
21 Feb 2013 12:52:00 PM PDT
So this means I am not going to die if I eat some gluten... therefore like most things in life, by exposing myself to a small amount of something that in large amounts would hurt me, I create some level of immunity to the ill effects. I was diagnosed aged 6 months old, now 47, I do not follow the diet strictly and I believe I have a much better quality of life. However, having interesting discussions with people more recently diagnosed who believe that absolute abstinence is the right way... they may be right but I have yet to see any medical evidence... thoughts?




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *:




In Celiac.com's Forum Now:


Yes you are correct. Interestingly my genes in the US are thought to be more associated with RA. Which is something they thought I had prediagnosis. In the Middle and far East they are more likely to be associated with celiac and they are rare genes in Caucasians which I am according to my parent...

It seems like you really need a concrete or near concrete answer so I would say maybe you ought to get the gene testing. Then you can decide on the gluten challenge. Thanks! I am convinced our dogs are there waiting for us. Meanwhile they are playing, running, laughing, barking & chas...

I can't help thinking that all of this would be so much easier if the doctor I went to 10 years ago would have done testing for celiac, rather than tell me I probably should avoid gluten. He was looking to sell allergy shots and hormone treatment, he had nothing to gain from me being diagnosed ce...

Most (90%-95%) patients with celiac disease have 1 or 2 copies of HLA-DQ2 haplotype (see below), while the remainder have HLA-DQ8 haplotype. Rare exceptions to these associations have been occasionally seen. In 1 study of celiac disease, only 0.7% of patients with celiac disease lacked the HLA al...

This is not quite as cut & dried as it sounds. Although rare, there are diagnosed celiacs who do not have either of those genes. Ravenwoodglass, who posted above, is one of those people. I think she has double DQ9 genes? Am I right Raven? My point is, that getting the gene testing is not an...