No popular authors found.
Ads by Google:

Categories

No categories found.


Get Celiac.com's E-Newsletter





Ads by Google:


Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus Pinterest RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts
SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

How Common is Non-celiac Gluten-sensitivity?

Celiac.com 11/14/2013 - Until now, rates of non-celiac gluten sensitivity were largely a matter of clinical speculation, basically, educated guesswork among doctors.

Photo: CC--hill_joshSome thought that rates of non-celiac gluten-sensitivity might by much higher than rates of celiac disease in the USA. But there was just no actual clinical data supporting these claims.

A team of researchers recently set out to get some good clinical data that would tell them how common non-celiac gluten sensitivity actually is.

The research team included Daniel V. DiGiacomo, Christina A. Tennyson, Peter H. Green, and Ryan T. Demmer. They are variously affiliated with the Department of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University, and the Department of Epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University in New York.

The authors used the Continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009–2010 to enroll 7762 people from the civilian, non-institutionalized, US population free of celiac disease.

They then analyzed the data to estimate rates of adherence to a gluten-free diet among participants without celiac disease as a surrogate marker for non-celiac gluten sensitivity in the US.

Ads by Google:

They also used the data to characterize the demographics and general health status of the study participants.

Overall, forty-nine participants reported adherence to a gluten-free diet. With a weighted national prevalence of 0.548%, this represents 1.3 million individuals between 6 and 80 years old in the US.

The prevalence of a gluten-free diet was higher in females (0.58%) than males (0.37%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.34).

Participants reporting a gluten-free diet were older (46.6 vs. 40.5 years, p = 0.005), had higher high-density lipoprotein, lower iron and lower body mass index.

These numbers put the estimated national prevalence of non-celiac gluten sensitivity at 0.548%, about half the rate of celiac disease.

However, the team calls for further studies in order to better understand the population burden of non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

Source:

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).












Related Articles



2 Responses:

 
celiacMom
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
19 Nov 2013 5:30:39 AM PDT
This article is very good, but the original research is mediocre. How can they call avoidance of gluten the same as gluten sensitivity? Gluten-containing grains have all sorts of other things, for example FODMAP carbs that in some people seem to cause irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); in fact doctors are telling IBS patients to prefer gluten-free foods but probably not because the gluten but because they wont have the FODMAPs either. Not very scientific research.

 
TheXenocide
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingempty Unrated
said this on
25 Nov 2013 2:23:43 PM PDT
I concur. This is either poor science or poor representation of science. Adherence to a gluten-free diet is not a valid marker. This study simply indicates, relatively accurately, that a portion of the non-celiac community is adhering to gluten-free diets (by their own report). This is a survey without many signs of noteworthy biological discussion.

I am currently looking for valid science that actually indicates Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity is a real thing (beyond people saying "I feel better" which means very little in the larger scheme of science). Until that can be demonstrated all I see are people raising the demand (and, therefore, typically the cost) of (already more expensive) gluten-free foods.

That isn't to say that I don't believe it exists, but I'm trying to find good research instead of anecdotal reports. Perhaps there is more detail in the research? I'm not for signing up for websites or paying for science journals without being able to read the abstract first.




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *:




In Celiac.com's Forum Now:


Ok so is this really true?!?! Conventional? Remember, the fecal transplant was first described in the 1950s, but took decades to catch on as a conventional treatment for gut disorders, such as c-dif bacteria, partly because it was seen as crude and somehow objectionable. But it proved to wor...

You are super sweet. I'm sorry your extended family isn't great about get togethers and cards. My family is the same. Once my parents died I don't have anyone who really cares about me except for my husband and kids. My parents started getting really weird about stuff as they got older, and my si...

Wow everyone my memory lane stuff just keeps popping up on this forum!!!! Thanks for sharing the post op and Audrey the pic. I had what looked like this on my inner left ankle in my late 20's! It never got diagnosed at the time. I was seeing Dr's at time early pregnancy and then missed misc...

I can guarantee you that once you get your weight back up to normal, your period will come back. You sound really malnourished and if your weight gets too low, your periods will stop. Don't panic.......I was down to about 92-94 pounds at diagnosis so you will be able to heal if you do the diet ...

As the other's have stated, you most certainly can go on to have additional AI diseases whether or not you are Celiac or NCGS. Many AI diseases can be figured out without mainstream testing, as you know from your severe symptoms of Sjogren's. I also have Sjogren's and knew that I did without an...