No popular authors found.


Get Celiac.com's E-Newsletter

Categories

No categories found.







Ads by Google:


Questions? Join Our Forum:
~1 Million Posts
& Over 66,000 Members!



SHARE THIS PAGE:
Celiac.com Sponsors:

FDA’s Gluten-Free Product Standards Take Effect

Celiac.com 08/21/2014 - It’s official! Since August 5th, 2014, all packaged foods sold in the U.S must comply with new federal rules for labeling foods as "gluten-free." That means that all packaged food claiming to be "gluten-free" must contain less than 20 parts per million (ppm) of gluten.

Image: Wikimedia Commons.The FDA finalized the rule in August 2013, and gave food manufacturers one year to comply. The rule went into full effect on August 5, 2014. The new standard applies equally to all products labelled “gluten free,” “no gluten,” “without gluten,” and “free of gluten.”

Ads by Google:

Until this rule went into effect, many food and product manufacturers were applying the term ‘gluten-free’ in myriad ways, some questionable. Moreover, consumers needing gluten-free food for medical reasons had no good way to know if the label was accurate, or if the food posed a potential risk to their health.

Currently, the new gluten-free standard applies all foods and dietary supplements regulated by the FDA. The rule, however, does not apply to most alcoholic beverages, cosmetics, prescription and non-prescription drugs, pet food, or to foods regulated by the USDA, such as meat or poultry.

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).












Related Articles



4 Responses:

 
Shar

said this on
25 Aug 2014 5:56:06 PM PST
A good start. Having gluten listed as an allergen along with peanuts, seafood, etc., so we don't have to read so much fine print, is my goal.

 
john j acres
Rating: ratingfullratingemptyratingemptyratingemptyratingempty Unrated
said this on
29 Aug 2014 5:50:39 PM PST
How stupid that these GF products contain gluten, does not say much for the experts as coeliacs cannot have additives or derivatives.

 
Jefferson
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated ( Author)
said this on
01 Sep 2014 11:42:52 AM PST
FYI: The new FDA standard matches the European standard. Also, there is currently no way to test for "zero" levels of gluten. Moreover, numerous clinical studies show that gluten levels below 20ppm do not trigger adverse gluten reactions in people with celiac disease. So, as "stupid" as you may find the standard, it is, nonetheless based on scientific evidence and reality. What is your statement based on?

 
Allan
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
03 Sep 2014 11:51:55 AM PST
Contrary to what you seem to think, In reality, there is no such thing as a TOTALLY gluten free diet if you are eating any kind of grains or cereal. For example:

'The term ‘gluten-free’ implies no gluten, but in practice a zero level does not exist. It is impossible to eat a zero gluten diet, because even naturally gluten-free cereals such as rice can contain up to 20 ppm or 20mg/kg of gluten. Research shows that this tiny amount of gluten is not toxic to people with celiac / coeliac disease who can eat unlimited amounts of products with gluten at a level of less than 20ppm.'

http://glutenfreepassport.com/living-gluten-allergy-free/food-product-labeling/

A detailed but highly technical/scientific account of how the FDA determined the 20 ppm to be the maximum permitted for
food products to be labelled gluten-free can be found on the
FDA web-site:

Health Hazard Assessment for Gluten Exposure in Individuals with Celiac Disease: Determination of Tolerable Daily Intake Levels and Levels of Concern for Gluten

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Allergens
/ucm362510.htm




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *:




In Celiac.com's Forum Now:


I feel the same. Every so often, someone will roll their eyes. I try not to discuss it unless I have to, only because I don't love having the topic of conversation become me, but others seem genuinely curious. Every so often I have a pity party over not being able to just pick up a sandwich a...

I can't remember, but it was a few years ago and maybe it had Maltodextrin in it, or maybe it was the 'flavorings' - which I never eat unless it's from a company like Kraft or McCormick that labels clearly. But given that you eat it safely, maybe I'll contact the company for a clear answer.

So the simple explanation is - You eat gluten. It travels along and gets to your small intestine. For some reason, your small intestine feels it is an invader. but instead of making antibodies that "attack" the gluten, the small intestine cells make antibodies that attack itself. Sort of misg...

Hi - I think some of the issue here may be stemming from confusion about the word "exposed" and the two things in bold above -- while you are very strict about eating gluten, am I right that you've been accidentally eating some and for the past month have accidentally been not-gluten-free? If so...

my thinking was that if I ate gluten tonight again , then the reaction would be there tomorrow not that there would be gluten for them to find exactly. So from what your saying It would make sense - i.e. if my body was going to react to gluten with antibodies then by eating gluten say tonight it ...