<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Latest Celiac Disease News & Research:: Ground Breaking Celiac Disease Studies]]></title><link>https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/celiac-disease-gluten-intolerance-research/page/63/?d=2</link><description><![CDATA[Latest Celiac Disease News & Research:: Ground Breaking Celiac Disease Studies]]></description><language>en</language><item><title>Identification of Celiac Disease in Primary Care</title><link>https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/identification-of-celiac-disease-in-primary-care-r130/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p> </p>
<p><i>W.  Dickey, S.A. McMillan, D.F. Hughes <br> Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1998; 33: 491-3<br> Departments of Gastroenterology and Histopathology, Altnagelvin  Hospital, Londonderry; Regional Immunology Service, Royal Group  of Hospitals, Belfast; Northern Ireland, UK</i></p> <p><b>Background:</b>  Coeliac disease is common yet often undiagnosed because symptoms  may be trivial, non-specific, or non-gastrointestinal, or because  of lack of clinician awareness. Serum IgA class endomysial antibodies  (EmA) have high specificity for coeliac disease and may facilitate  case-finding by clinicians other than gastroenterologists. We  assessed the appropriateness and diagnostic yield of requests  for EmA by primary care general practitioners in a defined geographical  area of Northern Ireland. Methods: We identified patients who  had EmA requests by their general practitioners during 1994-1996.  Individual patient questionnaires were posted to the general  practitioners concerned, seeking information on indications  for testing, management following the result and final diagnosis.  We compared new patient diagnosis rates in two catchment areas,  one served by a large district general hospital with a medical  gastroenterology facility and the other by smaller hospitals  without. </p> <p><b>Results:</b>  A total of 239 patients had coeliac profile testing by 69 of  177 general practitioners in the area. Data were available for  181 patients not previously known to have coeliac disease of  whom 20 (11%) had EmA. All EmA +ve patients were referred to  hospital where 19 underwent small bowel biopsy, which confirmed  coeliac disease in all 19. Only 7 (35%) of the 20 had diarrhea  and there was no significant difference in EmA prevalence among  patients tested with and without diarrhea. Although the mean  number of new patients (per 100,000 population per annum) diagnosed  by biopsy was 11 at the large hospital compared with 5 elsewhere,  the numbers identified by EmA in general practice for the two  catchment areas were similar (2, 3). Conclusion: General practitioners  have an important role in the identification of patients with  coeliac disease, particularly where there is no local medical  gastroenterology facility, which is facilitated by EmA testing.   </p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">130</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
