0
adelajoy

Is There Any Way I Got A False Positive?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Hey all.

 

I guess I got diagnosed with Celiac disease on Friday. I've been unwell for several months, and I went in for some blood tests, but my doctor didn't tell me what all she was testing me for, and then she called on Friday to say that everything came back normal except that it "clearly shows have Celiac disease". She didn't give me anymore information than that, like any test numbers, or even what tests were performed. She did tell me to start a gluten-free diet immediatly and she referred me to a dietitian.

 

Now, I talked to a Celiac friend of mine who said his friend got a positive test, but the endoscopy or biopsy or something came back negative. But I read that I need to keep eating gluten for that test, and my doctor told me to cut it out, and didn't mention it.

 

So basically, I'm thinking my doctor was 100% sure it is Celiac, and that's just really scary at this point to me. Is there any chance it's not, or is there any way for me to guarentee it at this point? Or do I just accept it as 100% and move on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


I had some false positives for Celiac after a bad case of Salmonella, there are things that cause elevations aside from the disease. Your doctor should have the decency to sit down with you and discuss results while showing you the ranges. Perhaps you TTG was 10 times the normal range with a very high endomysial titre and your doctor is right or there can be small false positives. Go to your doctor and get the results and post them on here, we can help you interpret the results. I am also curious as to how high the positives were for your doctor to not consider other issues/biopsy.

You said you have felt unwell, can you list your symptoms? Personally if I was feeling very sick I would be happy that the solution is a simple diet change, Celiac is certainly not the end of the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought. I'll see if I can make an appointment just to understand my results.

 

I've been getting stomach pains for several months, ranging from stabbing to shooting, but only late at night or in the middle of the night. I went to two different doctors about those, who just shrugged them off and sent me home.

 

I've also had intermittant nausau, vomitting, diarhea and constipation, but I passed them off because milk products usually don't sit with me (As in, I assume I'm lactose inolerant, I've just never been tested for it).

 

The concern was this light-headedness, and dizziness. I've felt really weak, as if I couldn't stand up if I tried, or if I am standing, I sometimes collapse. The best way I could describe it was that I felt wobbly, and I sometimes felt really shaky. And my hands and feet fell asleep frequently, in positions that they shouldn't have. I figured that was all chalked up to low blood sugar or low blood pressure, but it all persisted even when I consumed enough sugar to offset it, and I got my blood pressure checked several times.

 

I've also felt like my brain is swimming through fog, which I just completely ignored, but I've since read that can be a symptom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going through your symptoms I would suggest being tested for H. Pylori. I don't have much more to add myself but hopefully others can come in with more help to your symptoms. Let us know your results and I will get back to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


Your symptoms sure sound a lot like celiac to me. I doubt your test is a false positive, hon and I would start to learn about celiac and how it is treated by the gluten free diet. You could have a secondary lactose intolerance, common in celiac and it often resolves after a few months after being gluten-free as the villi heal. 

 

Most doctors do the endoscopy with biopsy after a positive test. My first question for the doctor would be "why aren't you scoping and biopsying me?"

 

Is the biopsy necessary?

Not according to some experts, but I'd still be curious as to why this doctor isn't doing a baseline read on you and taking a good look at your GI tract..Other things can co-exist  with celiac.

 

A good book is Real Life with Celiac Disease by Melinda Dennis, MS, RD, LDN Daniel Leffler, MD. MS and rather than repeat a bunch of info, may I direct you to this thread for the newly diagnosed:

 

http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all.

 

I guess I got diagnosed with Celiac disease on Friday. I've been unwell for several months, and I went in for some blood tests, but my doctor didn't tell me what all she was testing me for, and then she called on Friday to say that everything came back normal except that it "clearly shows have Celiac disease". She didn't give me anymore information than that, like any test numbers, or even what tests were performed. She did tell me to start a gluten-free diet immediatly and she referred me to a dietitian.

 

Now, I talked to a Celiac friend of mine who said his friend got a positive test, but the endoscopy or biopsy or something came back negative. But I read that I need to keep eating gluten for that test, and my doctor told me to cut it out, and didn't mention it.

 

So basically, I'm thinking my doctor was 100% sure it is Celiac, and that's just really scary at this point to me. Is there any chance it's not, or is there any way for me to guarentee it at this point? Or do I just accept it as 100% and move on?

 

To answer the endoscopy quesiton, it can often be "negative" in people with positive blood results because a large majority of gastroentorologists do NOT take enough samples, there have been studies showing most are surprisingly unaware how many samples they really need to be taking.  In someone who may have only had celiac for 2 or 3 years its entirely possible a biopsy with only 3 or 4 samples all from a narrow region of the small bowel may come back negaitve.  Remember, sometimes celiac panel bloodwork can be negative for a few years after the disease technicallly onsets, its as likely or even more likely large sections of the small bowel can remain normal that long as well.  Based on what your doc said that everything was normal but it clearly shows celiac its entirely possible that if she ran the recommended celiac panel everything was on the "high end" of normal.  In general most healthy people test strongly negative on all celiac panel tests, that means IgA and IgG numbers well into the single numbers, sometimes even between 1 and 3 (20 or higher is positive at most labs) and TtG numbers around 0 or 1, alot of gastro doctors become concerned when they start seeing numbers creep over 10 on either Iga/IgG test that you're at least dealing with a gluten sensitivity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your symptoms sure sound a lot like celiac to me. I doubt your test is a false positive, hon and I would start to learn about celiac and how it is treated by the gluten free diet. You could have a secondary lactose intolerance, common in celiac and it often resolves after a few months after being gluten-free as the villi heal. 

 

Most doctors do the endoscopy with biopsy after a positive test. My first question for the doctor would be "why aren't you scoping and biopsying me?"

 

Is the biopsy necessary?

Not according to some experts, but I'd still be curious as to why this doctor isn't doing a baseline read on you and taking a good look at your GI tract..Other things can co-exist  with celiac.

 

A good book is Real Life with Celiac Disease by Melinda Dennis, MS, RD, LDN Daniel Leffler, MD. MS and rather than repeat a bunch of info, may I direct you to this thread for the newly diagnosed:

 

http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

Thank you!

 

I appreciate the pointers. I feel so overwhelmed. There's so much I need to know, and I need to know it all now.

 

I'll definitely talk to my doctor as soon as I can. I've never had a problem with her, so I'm sure she just thought it unnecessary  but I would like to have a conversation about all this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer the endoscopy quesiton, it can often be "negative" in people with positive blood results because a large majority of gastroentorologists do NOT take enough samples, there have been studies showing most are surprisingly unaware how many samples they really need to be taking.  In someone who may have only had celiac for 2 or 3 years its entirely possible a biopsy with only 3 or 4 samples all from a narrow region of the small bowel may come back negaitve.  Remember, sometimes celiac panel bloodwork can be negative for a few years after the disease technicallly onsets, its as likely or even more likely large sections of the small bowel can remain normal that long as well.  Based on what your doc said that everything was normal but it clearly shows celiac its entirely possible that if she ran the recommended celiac panel everything was on the "high end" of normal.  In general most healthy people test strongly negative on all celiac panel tests, that means IgA and IgG numbers well into the single numbers, sometimes even between 1 and 3 (20 or higher is positive at most labs) and TtG numbers around 0 or 1, alot of gastro doctors become concerned when they start seeing numbers creep over 10 on either Iga/IgG test that you're at least dealing with a gluten sensitivity. 

Okay, so what you're saying is that I might not need to bother with the endoscopy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


Belmo can you share where you got this "doctors become concerned when tests go over 10"? Every test has different ranges and depending on the sensitivity some can go as high as 40, now testing 30 on a 40 being positive kit would not mean you would also be 30 on a 20 over is positive test. The numbers mean nothing within the negative ranges and healthy populations will vary with their results each time tested. 

Although the biopsy isn't always necessary it is a pretty good idea for many reasons. Of course, when one is not convinced of Celiac and has little or no symptoms a biopsy is beneficial. It is also helpful as a baseline in the diagnosis to track improvement and know what the damage was like upon diagnosis and noting healing or improvement on the follow up.

Let us know your blood results and be sure to tell your G.I you want at least 5-6 biopsies.



 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome Adelajoy!

 

Wanted to add my opinion on the need for endoscopy when diagnosed with Celiac Disease.

 

When I finally had a celiac antibody test after decades of doctors misdiagnosing me and choosing the wrong tests for me -- I was extremely thankful that we finally had a reason for my increasing severe health over the years.  Fortunately I was sent to an expert in Celiac Disease at UCSD, whom took his time examining me, my history, my bloodwork - he promptly ordered 20 viles of complete antibody tests along with nutrients that had never been tested at that point.  Ever test he ordered was positive on the antibodies or deficient on the nutrients.  Most doctors do not understand all the tests required to accurately diagnose and monitor celiac disease as they were not taught this in medical school - only that Celiac Disease is a childhood disease that presents only in the underweight child with diahrea -- yes, this is changing - but it has only been the past five years -- it will take longer for the accurate word to spread throughout the medical communtity..

 

With regard to endoscopy -- here are the reasons I highly suggest at least the initial endo with many samples of the small intestine -- I'm on the wrong computer to provide a good link on the procedure, but will add in later:

 

Not everyone heals within the first months or even years of living as gluten free as possible - should you be one of these, I can tell you from experience that you will question the need to live strictly gluten-free if you don't have enough proof to quiet the doubts.  I had all positive blood work, was defiecient in every nutrient, positive genes and totally flattened villi and even I had moments during the first year that had I not had the data from the biopsies, I MAY have cheated -- that data is important.

 

As more time passed I had to have annual endoscopies as I my small intestine was not healing AT ALL and my symptoms became even more dibilitating.  Yes, I am one of the worst case scenarios - but at diagnosis I had no clue what Celiac Disease was or how many systems in the body it can damage.  My fourth annual endoscopy finally showed some minor improvement on the Marsh Scale for Celiac Disease.  Without that intitial endo there would have been nothing to compare the subsequent ones with.

 

I also have complete blood work run -- at first it was at three and six months, then annually thereafter -- this blood has confirmed that I am as gluten free as a person can be -- which understandably would be questioned given my worsening symptoms and lack of intestinal healing.

 

Sorry for the lengthy post -- but data is invaluable.  Get as much as you can before you remove gluten.

 

Again, welcome to the forum -- read as much as possible and ask lots of questions -- it really does help pull you up a VERY STEEP learning curve :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please read some simple info from a reliable source. There are always a few posts, especially from new posters, that are not based in fact. I know I said some stupid stuff when I was new.

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer the endoscopy quesiton, it can often be "negative" in people with positive blood results because a large majority of gastroentorologists do NOT take enough samples, there have been studies showing most are surprisingly unaware how many samples they really need to be taking.  In someone who may have only had celiac for 2 or 3 years its entirely possible a biopsy with only 3 or 4 samples all from a narrow region of the small bowel may come back negaitve.  Remember, sometimes celiac panel bloodwork can be negative for a few years after the disease technicallly onsets, its as likely or even more likely large sections of the small bowel can remain normal that long as well.  Based on what your doc said that everything was normal but it clearly shows celiac its entirely possible that if she ran the recommended celiac panel everything was on the "high end" of normal.  In general most healthy people test strongly negative on all celiac panel tests, that means IgA and IgG numbers well into the single numbers, sometimes even between 1 and 3 (20 or higher is positive at most labs) and TtG numbers around 0 or 1, alot of gastro doctors become concerned when they start seeing numbers creep over 10 on either Iga/IgG test that you're at least dealing with a gluten sensitivity. 

I'm not sure where you are getting your facts. Could you please supply reliable sources? I don't understand how making antibodies makes you gluten sensitive but not Celiac? I don't believe there are any reliable tests currently in use to determine non- Celiac GI. And, like a previous poster said, different labs use different measurements. 10 may be next to nothing on a scale of normal 0-60.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, My celiac-savvy GI doc insists on follow up care.

 

Blood tests, including a CMP, CBC, Thyroid panels, vitamin levels are run He also did a small bowel follow through with barium (he was ruling out lymphoma, Crohn's and other inflammatory bowel diseases as I was long unDxed) and had I wanted it, a referral to a dietician.

He does a repeat endo on his patients (he will do mine in a few months and I have no problem with that as my initial one --with my former GI--was botched) and if they still exhibit symptoms, he gets to the bottom of it.

 

Follow up care is essential. Just sending a patient a "you have celiac, so just go gluten free message" is about as useful as an ice maker in the Arctic circle.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you know that newly diagnosed Celiacs can sell their blood plasma?  The use as the control for some of the tests.  You can only be a donator early on in your diagnoses.

 

Some of those symptoms may be caused by vitamin and nutrient defiencies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you know that newly diagnosed Celiacs can sell their blood plasma?  The use as the control for some of the tests.  You can only be a donator early on in your diagnoses.

 

Some of those symptoms may be caused by vitamin and nutrient defiencies. 

Sad... I can't find anything similar in Canada.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You did find Access Clinical information?  There is some travel expense coverage.

 

As a side note, I can't find the easy tab button to edit spelling on my last post.  (Horrible sentence structure and spelling!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You did find Access Clinical information? There is some travel expense coverage.

As a side note, I can't find the easy tab button to edit spelling on my last post. (Horrible sentence structure and spelling!)

Yeah, I found them. But their pre-screening form only has an option for a zip code, and then just asks for city, so there wasn't an easy way to say I'm Canadian. Which usually means its only open to Americans. And if there was a way for me to do it, it might not even be worth the bother.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0

  • Who's Online   14 Members, 1 Anonymous, 459 Guests (See full list)

  • Top Posters +

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/21/2018 - Would you buy a house advertised as ‘gluten-free’? Yes, there really is such a house for sale. 
    It seems a Phoenix realtor Mike D’Elena is hoping that his trendy claim will catch the eye of a buyer hungry to avoid gluten, or, at least one with a sense of humor. D’Elena said he crafted the ads as a way to “be funny and to draw attention.” The idea, D’Elena said, is to “make it memorable.” 
    Though D’Elena’s marketing seeks to capitalizes on the gluten-free trend, he knows Celiac disease is a serious health issue for some people. “[W]e’re not here to offend anybody….this is just something we're just trying to do to draw attention and do what's best for our clients," he said. 
    Still, the signs seem to be working. D'elena had fielded six offers within a few days of listing the west Phoenix home.
    "Buying can sometimes be the most stressful thing you do in your entire life so why not have some fun with it," he said. 
    What do you think? Clever? Funny?
    Read more at Arizonafamily.com.

    Advertising Banner-Ads
    Bakery On Main started in the small bakery of a natural foods market on Main Street in Glastonbury, Connecticut. Founder Michael Smulders listened when his customers with Celiac Disease would mention the lack of good tasting, gluten-free options available to them. Upon learning this, he believed that nobody should have to suffer due to any kind of food allergy or dietary need. From then on, his mission became creating delicious and fearlessly unique gluten-free products that were clean and great tasting, while still being safe for his Celiac customers!
    Premium ingredients, bakeshop delicious recipes, and happy customers were our inspiration from the beginning— and are still the cornerstones of Bakery On Main today. We are a fiercely ethical company that believes in integrity and feels that happiness and wholesome, great tasting food should be harmonious. We strive for that in everything we bake in our dedicated gluten-free facility that is GFCO Certified and SQF Level 3 Certified. We use only natural, NON-GMO Project Verified ingredients and all of our products are certified Kosher Parve, dairy and casein free, and we have recently introduced certified Organic items as well! 
    Our passion is to bake the very best products while bringing happiness to our customers, each other, and all those we meet!
    We are available during normal business hours at: 1-888-533-8118 EST.
    To learn more about us at: visit our site.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/20/2018 - Currently, the only way to manage celiac disease is to eliminate gluten from the diet. That could be set to change as clinical trials begin in Australia for a new vaccine that aims to switch off the immune response to gluten. 
    The trials are set to begin at Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre. The vaccine is designed to allow people with celiac disease to consume gluten with no adverse effects. A successful vaccine could be the beginning of the end for the gluten-free diet as the only currently viable treatment for celiac disease. That could be a massive breakthrough for people with celiac disease.
    USC’s Clinical Trials Centre Director Lucas Litewka said trial participants would receive an injection of the vaccine twice a week for seven weeks. The trials will be conducted alongside gastroenterologist Dr. James Daveson, who called the vaccine “a very exciting potential new therapy that has been undergoing clinical trials for several years now.”
    Dr. Daveson said the investigational vaccine might potentially restore gluten tolerance to people with celiac disease.The trial is open to adults between the ages of 18 and 70 who have clinically diagnosed celiac disease, and have followed a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Anyone interested in participating can go to www.joinourtrials.com.
    Read more at the website for Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre.

    Source:
    FoodProcessing.com.au

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/19/2018 - Could baking soda help reduce the inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease? Scientists at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University say that a daily dose of baking soda may in fact help reduce inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease.
    Those scientists recently gathered some of the first evidence to show that cheap, over-the-counter antacids can prompt the spleen to promote an anti-inflammatory environment that could be helpful in combating inflammatory disease.
    A type of cell called mesothelial cells line our body cavities, like the digestive tract. They have little fingers, called microvilli, that sense the environment, and warn the organs they cover that there is an invader and an immune response is needed.
    The team’s data shows that when rats or healthy people drink a solution of baking soda, the stomach makes more acid, which causes mesothelial cells on the outside of the spleen to tell the spleen to go easy on the immune response.  "It's most likely a hamburger not a bacterial infection," is basically the message, says Dr. Paul O'Connor, renal physiologist in the MCG Department of Physiology at Augusta University and the study's corresponding author.
    That message, which is transmitted with help from a chemical messenger called acetylcholine, seems to encourage the gut to shift against inflammation, say the scientists.
    In patients who drank water with baking soda for two weeks, immune cells called macrophages, shifted from primarily those that promote inflammation, called M1, to those that reduce it, called M2. "The shift from inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory profile is happening everywhere," O'Connor says. "We saw it in the kidneys, we saw it in the spleen, now we see it in the peripheral blood."
    O'Connor hopes drinking baking soda can one day produce similar results for people with autoimmune disease. "You are not really turning anything off or on, you are just pushing it toward one side by giving an anti-inflammatory stimulus," he says, in this case, away from harmful inflammation. "It's potentially a really safe way to treat inflammatory disease."
    The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
    Read more at: Sciencedaily.com

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/18/2018 - Celiac disease has been mainly associated with Caucasian populations in Northern Europe, and their descendants in other countries, but new scientific evidence is beginning to challenge that view. Still, the exact global prevalence of celiac disease remains unknown.  To get better data on that issue, a team of researchers recently conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis to get a reasonably accurate estimate the global prevalence of celiac disease. 
    The research team included P Singh, A Arora, TA Strand, DA Leffler, C Catassi, PH Green, CP Kelly, V Ahuja, and GK Makharia. They are variously affiliated with the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India; Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway; Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Gastroenterology Research and Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; USA Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and the Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
    For their review, the team searched Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE for the keywords ‘celiac disease,’ ‘celiac,’ ‘tissue transglutaminase antibody,’ ‘anti-endomysium antibody,’ ‘endomysial antibody,’ and ‘prevalence’ for studies published from January 1991 through March 2016. 
    The team cross-referenced each article with the words ‘Asia,’ ‘Europe,’ ‘Africa,’ ‘South America,’ ‘North America,’ and ‘Australia.’ They defined celiac diagnosis based on European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines. The team used 96 articles of 3,843 articles in their final analysis.
    Overall global prevalence of celiac disease was 1.4% in 275,818 individuals, based on positive blood tests for anti-tissue transglutaminase and/or anti-endomysial antibodies. The pooled global prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% in 138,792 individuals. That means that numerous people with celiac disease potentially remain undiagnosed.
    Rates of celiac disease were 0.4% in South America, 0.5% in Africa and North America, 0.6% in Asia, and 0.8% in Europe and Oceania; the prevalence was 0.6% in female vs 0.4% males. Celiac disease was significantly more common in children than adults.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis showed celiac disease to be reported worldwide. Blood test data shows celiac disease rate of 1.4%, while biopsy data shows 0.7%. The prevalence of celiac disease varies with sex, age, and location. 
    This review demonstrates a need for more comprehensive population-based studies of celiac disease in numerous countries.  The 1.4% rate indicates that there are 91.2 million people worldwide with celiac disease, and 3.9 million are in the U.S.A.
    Source:
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;16(6):823-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037.