Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Positive gliadin is now normal


Runningmomma

Recommended Posts

Runningmomma Rookie

Hello! This is my first post.

My big question is about Gliadin IgG. I was tested in 2004 and had a high positive at 64 (24 being positive). My Dr at the time told me I should cut back on gluten and diagnosed me with Sjogrens Syndrome (even though I was B12 deficient, anemic, and having such bad acid reflux that I would get sores all over the back of my throat).

Recently I was diagnosed with Lupus (SLE) and asked to be tested for Celiacs. My Gliadin tests came back negative, but TtG IgG was 6 (6-9 weak positive). TtG IgA was 1.4. Tomorrow I get the endoscopy and biopsy.

I'm so confused as to why I tested so high for Gliadin IgG and now it is negative. I am not gluten free. The Dr said she has no idea and they are just trying to figure it out. Ive read Celiacs does not go into remission unless you are gluten free. 

Does anyone know how I could have been positive 12 yrs ago and now be negative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Runningmomma Rookie

Also, I only mentioned Sjogrens and Lupus to point out that I have two autoimmunes now, and Was told you could test weak positive for other a.i.s when you have Lupus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironictruth Proficient

Had you cut back or cut out gluten prior to the test? 

Any test can produce a false positive on that test, but if you cut back on gluten then you are not making those antibodies to it either which could result in a false negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cyclinglady Grand Master

I think your doctor was wise to order an endoscopy.  My antibody result (only the DGP) was elevated at the time of my diagnosis with a Marsh Stage IIIB (biopsy moderate to severe).  I have had two good glutenings (unknown source) since then and my antibodies have gone off the chart.  So, I am assuming antibodies, like my symptoms,  can vary).  This is a perplexing disease!  

Please let us know how you are doing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Runningmomma Rookie
17 hours ago, ironictruth said:

Had you cut back or cut out gluten prior to the test? 

Any test can produce a false positive on that test, but if you cut back on gluten then you are not making those antibodies to it either which could result in a false negative.

I've definitely cut back but I probably have something with gluten in it just about everyday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
plumbago Experienced

You are correct in that celiac does not go into remission unless you are gluten-free. The only thing I could think of to explain the negative IgG gliadin now (and I may well be wrong) is if you are taking anything for the lupus (ie steroids)? In other words, could your immune suppressing medication, if you are taking any, be affecting your blood test results?

Plumbago

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RMJ Mentor

Were they exactly the same tests? Could the older one be gliadin and the newer one deamidated gliadin peptides?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ironictruth Proficient
2 hours ago, RMJ said:

Were they exactly the same tests? Could the older one be gliadin and the newer one deamidated gliadin peptides?

I think you hit the jackpot. In 2004 DGP was hardly used in  non research settings. Now you would be hard-pressed to find a non research lab that would run the old Gliadin tests.  I was actually told this by a researcher. 

The old gliadin tests  can be positive in A number of autoimmune conditions, and healthy controls as well. It also shows up positive in about 50% of folks with non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Runningmomma Rookie
15 hours ago, RMJ said:

Were they exactly the same tests? Could the older one be gliadin and the newer one deamidated gliadin peptides?

I was wondering about that. The new test didn't specify deamidated Gliadin peptides but I'm assuming it is.  How do I know? Also, I'm assuming the 2004 test was just the Gliadin test. I'm waiting on biopsy results now. My TtG IgG was weak positive which was my only positive this go around. Feeling kind of down because they found stomach ulcers and biopsied for h. pylori as well.  I'm still nursing my baby and concerned about breastfeeding through treatment, but I'll have to wait and see if that's even the cause. I was looking for info on stomach ulcers and celiac or gluten sensitivity. Now I'm wondering after all these years if I don't have celiacs or gluten sensitivity and maybe it's just the  autoimmune diseases and that's what the original Gliadin test picked up on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironictruth Proficient

DGP  was not really used in traditional labs in 2004. On the flip side, gliadin is no longer really used in traditional Labs now.  I would be shocked if you went to a lab that was still using it. If you get your test results from the lab, like an actual print out that maybe they send to the doctor, he could scan a copy to you, it may say the test was run using Inova Gliadin Lite II. That "II"  Is the indication they are using the DGP test. You could also always just call the lab and ask them But you may want to speak with a supervisor.

 You certainly have a tough case. Because that Weak positive TTG could also point to Celiac and/or other autoimmune as well.

 Have you had the genetic test yet? With a positive on the older gliadin tests and a positive on TTG it may be worth having the gene test done.  You also may want to give the gluten-free diet a really good shot regardless of what the results of the endoscopy are.

 Keep us posted!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Runningmomma Rookie
On 7/1/2017 at 2:23 AM, plumbago said:

You are correct in that celiac does not go into remission unless you are gluten-free. The only thing I could think of to explain the negative IgG gliadin now (and I may well be wrong) is if you are taking anything for the lupus (ie steroids)? In other words, could your immune suppressing medication, if you are taking any, be affecting your blood test results?

Plumbago

I have mild Lupus and am trying to stay off meds as long as possible. The only thing I take now is a multi vitamin and a fish pill.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Runningmomma Rookie
13 hours ago, ironictruth said:

DGP  was not really used in traditional labs in 2004. On the flip side, gliadin is no longer really used in traditional Labs now.  I would be shocked if you went to a lab that was still using it. If you get your test results from the lab, like an actual print out that maybe they send to the doctor, he could scan a copy to you, it may say the test was run using Inova Gliadin Lite II. That "II"  Is the indication they are using the DGP test. You could also always just call the lab and ask them But you may want to speak with a supervisor.

 You certainly have a tough case. Because that Weak positive TTG could also point to Celiac and/or other autoimmune as well.

 Have you had the genetic test yet? With a positive on the older gliadin tests and a positive on TTG it may be worth having the gene test done.  You also may want to give the gluten-free diet a really good shot regardless of what the results of the endoscopy are.

 Keep us posted!

I have not had the genetic test done. I don't know if they would run that on me because I have insurance through the state. I was shocked they rushed me in for having an endoscopy and colonoscopy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Runningmomma Rookie

Has anyone else had nausea and stomach pain after biopsy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironictruth Proficient
45 minutes ago, Runningmomma said:

Has anyone else had nausea and stomach pain after biopsy?

Yes! I will spare you the long boring backround details but it turns out those drugs they use to knock you out can wreak havoc on your gut. A nurse helped me put 2 and 2 together after a procedure. I had a few over several months and kept getting worse. It became frustrating because it became a "symptom" that we could not figure out so it was steering us in the wrong direction. Last scope they did, we changed the meds, no issues. 

1) make sure your doc knows so s/he can monitor

2) skip coffee, hot and acidic stuff, high fat foods, alcohol, uncooked veggies, sugar for a couple of weeks

3) dgl licorice. 

4) geez, I thought i edited this, apologize if it went elsewhere on the boards. Running can cause intestinal bleeds too. And advil or aspirin can increase this. Go figure. So take it easy on yourself the next few weeks. 

5) i have good health insurance and still had to pay bucks for the gene test but my sibling paid nothing. Worth a phone call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
plumbago Experienced
43 minutes ago, Runningmomma said:

I have mild Lupus and am trying to stay off meds as long as possible. The only thing I take now is a multi vitamin and a fish pill.  

Ah ok, then. It may be because you took two different gliadin tests, as others have said. You asked how you could know upthread. Take a look at the printout of your lab results, and it should say. You can ask for them if you don't already have them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced
On 7/1/2017 at 10:10 AM, ironictruth said:

I think you hit the jackpot. In 2004 DGP was hardly used in  non research settings. Now you would be hard-pressed to find a non research lab that would run the old Gliadin tests.  I was actually told this by a researcher. 

The old gliadin tests  can be positive in A number of autoimmune conditions, and healthy controls as well. It also shows up positive in about 50% of folks with non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

 

If you are referring to the AGA/IgA and IgG testing, those tests are still used in repeat antibody testing for dietary compliance, along with the newer DGP. The lab I use always runs both. Neither test will show positive unless you are reacting to the gluten in your diet that you are consuming.  Other AI issues will not show up on Gliadin testing but will sometimes elevate tTg slightly. Celiac Disease will elevate tTg by large numbers, though........much higher than other AI issues.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironictruth Proficient
14 hours ago, Gemini said:

If you are referring to the AGA/IgA and IgG testing, those tests are still used in repeat antibody testing for dietary compliance, along with the newer DGP. The lab I use always runs both. Neither test will show positive unless you are reacting to the gluten in your diet that you are consuming.  Other AI issues will not show up on Gliadin testing but will sometimes elevate tTg slightly. Celiac Disease will elevate tTg by large numbers, though........much higher than other AI issues.

 

 

That amazes me that they are still in use at your lab. Is your lab associated with a research hospital? We could not find a lab anywhere within 2 hours of me that ran the AGA tests UNLESS they were part of a reflex cascade. If TTG and DGP were negative, it would automatically test for AGA, but ONLY if the prior were negative and they absolutely would NOT solely run the AGA as they would have to                           "re-caliber" (probably not the correct word) the machines to do it. I even got the same info from a celiac researcher in Italy, that it is very difficult there to find any place that is not a research lab which runs the AGA tests anymore.

 

With regard to AGA, even healthy controls can have positive AGA but curiously it does pop up in other autoimmune conditions and diseases as well.  A few examples:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced

The lab I used was Genova Labs and they are a pretty progressive lab, with regards to testing. They bill using a Pay Assure system, where you pay up front a certain amount set by the Lab and then they bill your insurance company. If the insurance company pays out, then you get a refund. If they refuse payment, then the amount you paid is what they accept for the testing.  They do a comprehensive full panel for diagnosis and use the DGP and AGA on repeat testing for dietary compliance, along with tTg.  

All the time on this forum, people complain about the lack of complete testing in their panels for diagnosis but that is the way things are going........it's the Walmart school of medicine. Do minimum and see what comes up. By going through Genova, you may pay some out of pocket but it is reasonable and my insurance picks up most of it.  They have been covering my repeat testing but I have no idea if other insurance plans cover everything. I feel these 2 tests provide valuable information because I was diagnosed using only the AGA as I was diagnosed 12 years ago. It is true that the DGP is more sensitive as on last testing, the AGA came in at a 1 but the DGP was a 4.  I thought the difference interesting. This lab does other mainstream testing and it is always more comprehensive than what you get at most doctor's offices. On the cardiac panel, they don't just do basic cholesterol but include homocysteine and other inflammatory markers for cardiac disease, which I really like. It's annoying that other labs don't do the same but it's all about money now. Research hospitals tend to be very mainstream and may only use certain tests and discard older ones they feel are outdated. I don't always agree with that.  I failed all tests on the diagnosis panel by large numbers so like to see all of these on retest, except for the EMA as that is really a diagnostic test and doesn't have to be repeated yearly.......it's too expensive anyway.

As far as the AGA being positive in people with other AI disease, I'm not sure I buy that.  It's a test to check for reaction to gluten in the diet and if it is positive, then you probably have Celiac Disease.  As most of the diseases mentioned also occur with Celiac Disease, I wonder if they missed the diagnosis in many? They also mentioned people who worked with large amounts of wheat as showing positive but if you don't have Celiac, why would you show positive? You wouldn't be producing antibodies. tTg I could see as that does elevate with other AI diseases but far less than full blown Celiac. Very weird!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironictruth Proficient
On 7/3/2017 at 11:12 PM, Gemini said:

The lab I used was Genova Labs and they are a pretty progressive lab, with regards to testing. They bill using a Pay Assure system, where you pay up front a certain amount set by the Lab and then they bill your insurance company. If the insurance company pays out, then you get a refund. If they refuse payment, then the amount you paid is what they accept for the testing.  They do a comprehensive full panel for diagnosis and use the DGP and AGA on repeat testing for dietary compliance, along with tTg.  

All the time on this forum, people complain about the lack of complete testing in their panels for diagnosis but that is the way things are going........it's the Walmart school of medicine. Do minimum and see what comes up. By going through Genova, you may pay some out of pocket but it is reasonable and my insurance picks up most of it.  They have been covering my repeat testing but I have no idea if other insurance plans cover everything. I feel these 2 tests provide valuable information because I was diagnosed using only the AGA as I was diagnosed 12 years ago. It is true that the DGP is more sensitive as on last testing, the AGA came in at a 1 but the DGP was a 4.  I thought the difference interesting. This lab does other mainstream testing and it is always more comprehensive than what you get at most doctor's offices. On the cardiac panel, they don't just do basic cholesterol but include homocysteine and other inflammatory markers for cardiac disease, which I really like. It's annoying that other labs don't do the same but it's all about money now. Research hospitals tend to be very mainstream and may only use certain tests and discard older ones they feel are outdated. I don't always agree with that.  I failed all tests on the diagnosis panel by large numbers so like to see all of these on retest, except for the EMA as that is really a diagnostic test and doesn't have to be repeated yearly.......it's too expensive anyway.

As far as the AGA being positive in people with other AI disease, I'm not sure I buy that.  It's a test to check for reaction to gluten in the diet and if it is positive, then you probably have Celiac Disease.  As most of the diseases mentioned also occur with Celiac Disease, I wonder if they missed the diagnosis in many? They also mentioned people who worked with large amounts of wheat as showing positive but if you don't have Celiac, why would you show positive? You wouldn't be producing antibodies. tTg I could see as that does elevate with other AI diseases but far less than full blown Celiac. Very weird!

That is awesome that you have access to the lab. AGA testing comes back positive in about half of folks with ncgs too so I think it is beneficial to have labs continue to offer it. 

Testing is crazy. I am positive on one type of DGP test (combined assay) but negative on the separated assay (1 point weak positive on the IGA twice). This can happen to celiacs on a gluten free diet or first degree relatives (which i am). When my biopsy showed a          Marsh 1 I searched for a lab that offered the AGA to no avail. Did you have a doc's script? My state will not allow the type of lab where you go to without a doc's order.

As per the AI/other disease connections I agree with you that they often accompany celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced
5 hours ago, ironictruth said:

That is awesome that you have access to the lab. AGA testing comes back positive in about half of folks with ncgs too so I think it is beneficial to have labs continue to offer it. 

Testing is crazy. I am positive on one type of DGP test (combined assay) but negative on the separated assay (1 point weak positive on the IGA twice). This can happen to celiacs on a gluten free diet or first degree relatives (which i am). When my biopsy showed a          Marsh 1 I searched for a lab that offered the AGA to no avail. Did you have a doc's script? My state will not allow the type of lab where you go to without a doc's order.

As per the AI/other disease connections I agree with you that they often accompany celiac.

Just to clarify what you are saying  to make sure I have it right.......do you mean that someone with Celiac following a gluten free diet can test for a weak positive on the DGP or, on re-test, it is not zero but registers low normal?  If someone has a weak positive on re-test, then they are ingesting small enough amounts that it is pushing their blood work up over the normal range. If you are a first degree relative with symptoms and a weak positive on the DGP, then you really might have Celiac also.  Were you diagnosed based on Marsh 1 damage because I know how difficult some docs can be on that one. Damage is damage and you were lucky that it was caught early, is my response!

If you go on Genova's website, I am pretty sure they have a listing for doctor's who do the Genova kits.  You do need a doctor's order for their testing because most of their testing, if not all, are comprehensive medical tests and not the "out in left field" kind of testing.  I just find they are more comprehensive and include more tests in each panel to give a better picture of what's going on.  I can ask my doc at the end of the month at my appointment if they still do the AGA in their panels as it's been 2 years since I had my antibodies done. That's an eternity in medical time.  ;)  But check the site out.....you may be able to find someone in your area that can help.

It really shouldn't be this hard to get a simple blood test done........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Runningmomma Rookie

This is all really interesting. Thank you everyone for your input and responses! I found a relative study to Lupus and Sjogrens and weak positive IgG! 

Open Original Shared Link

How did you guys receive your biopsy results? The surgery center I went to said they mail them snail mail in 7-14 days. This sounds crazy! Shouldn't a dr go over the results with me? And it seems like they would also add the results to my online patient portal. This has been a strange experience! The office also changed my apt. time and didn't inform me until the day before the procedure when I was doing prep! They told me they sent me a letter in the mail to tell the apt. time was changed. I'm still waiting on that letter via snail mail...it's Wednesday and my procedure was last Friday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
plumbago Experienced

Doctors can take a while to get the correspondence out - sometimes I have to ask three times (tel/portal/fax - or some combination thereof) for results or a report, but it eventually gets sent. It's possible that the lab that received your sample is still processing it.

Also, what may happen is the GI doc (specialist) may send the report to your general practitioner who, ideally, will call you to go over the results. And / or the GI doc him or herself will go over the results with you. In my own case, the GI who did my scope strongly suspected celiac and told me so once I came to after the procedure, but said he would know once biopsy results came back, for sure. My regular doctor called me right away once he got the endoscope results and biopsy report.

Plumbago

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironictruth Proficient
17 hours ago, Gemini said:

Just to clarify what you are saying  to make sure I have it right.......do you mean that someone with Celiac following a gluten free diet can test for a weak positive on the DGP or, on re-test, it is not zero but registers low normal?  If someone has a weak positive on re-test, then they are ingesting small enough amounts that it is pushing their blood work up over the normal range. If you are a first degree relative with symptoms and a weak positive on the DGP, then you really might have Celiac also.  Were you diagnosed based on Marsh 1 damage because I know how difficult some docs can be on that one. Damage is damage and you were lucky that it was caught early, is my response!

If you go on Genova's website, I am pretty sure they have a listing for doctor's who do the Genova kits.  You do need a doctor's order for their testing because most of their testing, if not all, are comprehensive medical tests and not the "out in left field" kind of testing.  I just find they are more comprehensive and include more tests in each panel to give a better picture of what's going on.  I can ask my doc at the end of the month at my appointment if they still do the AGA in their panels as it's been 2 years since I had my antibodies done. That's an eternity in medical time.  ;)  But check the site out.....you may be able to find someone in your area that can help.

It really shouldn't be this hard to get a simple blood test done........

I know, confusing. INOVA has a few different types of assays which include DGP. One is your typical DGP IGA and IGG test and another is a combined assay which is the DGP screen (combines IGA and IGG in one test). On three occasions I  tested positive to the combined assay but negative on the separated IGA and IGG assays.  someone on the boards here pointed me to where you could access the FDA decision summaries on these types of tests. So I looked it up  and out of the several hundred people they studied only a few tested positive for the combined screen but negative on the separated screens.  they were celiacs on a gluten-free diet and one was a first-degree relative.  I was both on a gluten-free diet at the time and also Am A first Degree relative. So at this point I went and saw a Celiac specialist, resumed eating gluten, and re-did the testing at about 12 or 13 weeks and got the exact same result.  actually the result also came back in the same range too low thirties. The cutoff is 20.  waited another Two months  at my primary care ran the testing with a separated essays, and they came back negative. We Did the biopsy at 4 months and there was just an increase in IEL  which according to my specialist, they sometimes see in NCGS.

 So honestly, I have no freaking clue.

 At cycling lady's suggestion I asked my local GI, who is not my specialist, if we can do a pillcam. He's willing to see if the insurance will approve it.  I was told to go gluten-free by my specialist though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced

You know, they really ought to standardize testing protocol a bit better for some diseases like Celiac so we have some consistency here!  I have never seen the combined assay before and I am not really sure why they would combine antibody testing like that but hey, I am not wearing the white coat!

Increased IEL's also happen in the early stages of Celiac and we all know it can take YEARS for it to get bad enough for the blood screen to scream positive or show up as Marsh damage on biopsy. As a first degree relative, you know you probably have the ability to pop for it. Have you had the gene testing done? I think the pill cam is a good idea and it will be interesting to see what it shows when you have it done.....hopefully!  Are you gluten free now before any more testing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RMJ Mentor
6 hours ago, Gemini said:

You know, they really ought to standardize testing protocol a bit better for some diseases like Celiac so we have some consistency here!  I have never seen the combined assay before and I am not really sure why they would combine antibody testing like that but hey, I am not wearing the white coat.    

I used to work in the diagnostics industry.  It is highly likely that it is the marketing department, not the white coat wearers, who like the combined testing, allowing their product to be different from the competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,495
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Zofosho
    Newest Member
    Zofosho
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. There have been many posts on this subject on the forum, it is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, except from time to time have had a bit of mild tension in my jaw, I have had issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.   Thank you again for your input.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...