Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

mtseeg

Recommended Posts

mtseeg Newbie

Hello:

I'm new to the forum and am trying to make sense of what exactly I have.    Stool tests indicate a gluten sensitivity, as does at least one blood test.   However, I recently took another IBD blood test called, "Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae"  (ASCA) and both the IgG and IgA forms came back positive.    According to the results, I either have Crohn's disease or Celiac disease, as both diseases can manifest with a positive result.

Has anyone out there ever taken the ASCA test and did it come back positive for you?   My symptoms so far have been mild:  occasional bloating; very mild abdominal pain and nothing particularly unusual about my bathroom habits.  When the pain does happen, it's sometimes accompanied with burning eyes and mouth (particularly the gums).

And...I love pasta.  :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, mtseeg said:

Hello:

I'm new to the forum and am trying to make sense of what exactly I have.    Stool tests indicate a gluten sensitivity, as does at least one blood test.   However, I recently took another IBD blood test called, "Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae"  (ASCA) and both the IgG and IgA forms came back positive.    According to the results, I either have Crohn's disease or Celiac disease, as both diseases can manifest with a positive result.

Has anyone out there ever taken the ASCA test and did it come back positive for you?   My symptoms so far have been mild:  occasional bloating; very mild abdominal pain and nothing particularly unusual about my bathroom habits.  When the pain does happen, it's sometimes accompanied with burning eyes and mouth (particularly the gums).

And...I love pasta.  :)

Welcome!  The test you described helps to diagnose IBD.  There are two forms: Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease.  The first affects the largel bowel and the second the entire GI tract.  This test does not help diagnose celiac disease to my knowledge.  

Open Original Shared Link

It is possible to have celiac disease and one of the IBD disorders at the same time.  To learn about celiac disease testing:

Open Original Shared Link

Stool testing is controversial for diagnosing celiac disease.  Best to get a blood test and confirm with an endoscopy (biopsies from the small intestine). 

Do not give up pasta yet, until all testing is complete!  ?

mtseeg Newbie

Hi CyclingLady:

I did some research on the National Institutes of Health website.   There are several clinical studies that indicate celiac patients commonly test positive on the ASCA IBD test.   The title of one such study is, "Antibodies anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA) do not differentiate Crohn's disease from celiac disease."  

Here's the report:

Open Original Shared Link

So, I am holding out hope that I "only" have celiac (something curative through a gluten-free diet) vs. having Crohn's, (awful, devastating disease with no cure, lots of pain, boundless surgeries, etc).

I suppose time will tell.  No one was more surprised than I to get a positive test result. :(

cyclinglady Grand Master

Thanks for letting me know.  

I do understand your fears...sort of.  My niece is 20 and was recently diagnosed with Crohn's.  I could have sworn it was celiac disease, but she tested negative.  A pill camera actually helped with her diagnosis as her damage was at the far end of her small intestine out of the reach of both scopes.  

I can tell you that she is doing well now.  She is handling her treatments and college.    I also have another friend who has had Crohn's for over 20 years.  She has had one surgery, but her Crohn's has been in remission.  She focuses on eating healthy, excercising, and reducing stress.  She works full time as a Project Manager,  which is is a very stressful job launching new products on time and within budget.  

What is helpful is KNOWING what you are dealing with.  Being in diagnostic limboland is so frustrating.  Hang in there!  

  • 3 weeks later...
mtseeg Newbie

Thanks, cyclinglady.   That's encouraging to know that people can have a relatively normal life with Crohn's.   I have a co-worker whose in his 50s with Crohn's.  I understand he's had it most of his life.  Lots of surgeries, iron infusions and ongoing pain.  

My GI appointment isn't for another three weeks.   I had an abdominal CT scan 9 years ago for similar issues and it was clean.   I'm fairly old for Crohn's --I'm in my mid 40s-- and understand that it mostly affects people in their teens and 20s.  But, there are always those outliers.

Given that both my brother and his son have Celiac...I'm hoping(?) for the less destructive disease.  :)

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.