Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Well...this is discouraging


mewnicorns

Recommended Posts

mewnicorns Apprentice

I just read that only 8% of celiacs recover normal intestinal function after 16 months, and only 2/3 after 5 YEARS (despite reportedly feeling better relatively quickly). That leaves 1/3 of celiacs who never fully recover. This includes those who are maintaining a strict gluten-free diet. Those who do not fully recover are more likely to be those who were diagnosed as adults (me), and who had serious damage (also probably me, but I'll find out for sure tomorrow).

Those who do not recover are at a much higher risk for going on to develop serious and even fatal illnesses.

So we go through this onerous process of hypervigilence around food...only to be partially healed and possibly die of lymphoma or get hit with another debilitating AI disease? 

Tell me things aren't as bleak as they seem.

Edit: Forgot to mention...even the ones who never recover have no clue. They typically feel fine and their blood tests come back normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
12 hours ago, mewnicorns said:

I just read that only 8% of celiacs recover normal intestinal function after 16 months, and only 2/3 after 5 YEARS (despite reportedly feeling better relatively quickly). That leaves 1/3 of celiacs who never fully recover. This includes those who are maintaining a strict gluten-free diet. Those who do not fully recover are more likely to be those who were diagnosed as adults (me), and who had serious damage (also probably me, but I'll find out for sure tomorrow).

Those who do not recover are at a much higher risk for going on to develop serious and even fatal illnesses.

So we go through this onerous process of hypervigilence around food...only to be partially healed and possibly die of lymphoma or get hit with another debilitating AI disease? 

Tell me things aren't as bleak as they seem.

Edit: Forgot to mention...even the ones who never recover have no clue. They typically feel fine and their blood tests come back normal.

The reality is there is not much research done on celiac disease especially on patients  after their diagnosis.  Be careful reading studies that are clinical in nature or very small.  

I can not tell you how many times people who have been diagnosed with non-responsive celiac disease have made a minor mistake in their diets.  The problem is unless researchers lock up celiacs for months, they really do not know what they are ingesting.  My own PCP  has two other celiac patients.  They simply refuse to adhere to the gluten-free diet.  Shocking but true.  Others celiacs, like my friend’s sister, were told that they would outgrow their gluten intolerance.  But we all know now that that can never happen, but it did in the 1960s.  Has anyone researched these people or me?  No.  There is not enough funding.  

Sixty Minutes (CBS News) recently featured a story on COPD (formerly called emphysema).  It is in the top 3 (if I recall, of killers), yet they are 155 on the list for health research  funding.  (I guess we do not sympathize with former smokers or miners).  Celiac disease is not glamorous.  So, research funding is low.  I expect it will increase eventually because we know that less than 20% of celiac are diagnosed.  Plus, since we know celiac disease is genetic researchers hope that by studying it, they may get a handle on other autoimmune disorders.  

(Okay, I made this edit after a morning cup of coffee and I had better stop!  ?)

I can tell you that my thyroid nodules are gone and my thyroid is no longer enlarged since I have gone gluten free.  It is not all doom and gloom.  Most members heal and go on with their lives.  They have no time for this forum and they have lives to live.  

So there is not enough funding or research being done on celiac disease aftercare, but then do we really need it?  Avoiding gluten is the cure.  Aren’t we lucky?  I wish I could say the same to my little niece who has Crohn’s.  ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jmg Mentor
5 hours ago, mewnicorns said:

Tell me things aren't as bleak as they seem.

Regardless of what you've read, things definitely aren't as bleak as they seem. As per your previous thread, you're currently in the shock period and as the process goes on it will get, and look, a lot better. At the moment, at least if you're anything like I was,  you could find out that celiac patients qualify for a million dollar beach house in Costa Rica and you'll just start worrying about hurricane season and the cost of fitting a new roof :D

Having said that, where did you read these stats? They don't accord with the research I've seen. On a general point, be careful where your web searches take you. This community is notable for having a core of members who adhere to peer reviewed hard science. There are a LOT of sites out there which are twisting and distorting the picture, typically in order to sell their book/supplement etc.  These and similar conditions are scary when you're just learning about them and some folks out there exploit that fear and uncertainty. Try to keep to the reputable university sites or pubmed for your info wherever possible!

But even if they're accurate, it's as much how you look at them. Name another serious medical condition where TWO THIRDS of patients experience FULL RECOVERY after just 5 years of making a simple change to their diet?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mewnicorns Apprentice
7 hours ago, Jmg said:

Regardless of what you've read, things definitely aren't as bleak as they seem. As per your previous thread, you're currently in the shock period and as the process goes on it will get, and look, a lot better. At the moment, at least if you're anything like I was,  you could find out that celiac patients qualify for a million dollar beach house in Costa Rica and you'll just start worrying about hurricane season and the cost of fitting a new roof :D

Having said that, where did you read these stats? They don't accord with the research I've seen. On a general point, be careful where your web searches take you. This community is notable for having a core of members who adhere to peer reviewed hard science. There are a LOT of sites out there which are twisting and distorting the picture, typically in order to sell their book/supplement etc.  These and similar conditions are scary when you're just learning about them and some folks out there exploit that fear and uncertainty. Try to keep to the reputable university sites or pubmed for your info wherever possible!

But even if they're accurate, it's as much how you look at them. Name another serious medical condition where TWO THIRDS of patients experience FULL RECOVERY after just 5 years of making a simple change to their diet?

 

 

 

You are so right. I suffer from a lot of anxiety and tend to always jump to the worst case scenario, especially when it comes to matters of health. Good thing I have a therapy appointment this Friday cuz I need it. I am trying to remind myself that 2/3 is still a majority, and it's good that complete healing is even possible because it isn't in a lot of other AI diseases.

It's hard for me to find the trail of links I followed since I'm on a different computer now. I think I started with an NPR article about people who get diagnosed when they're older. I was reading it because I wasn't sure if I have had these disease my whole life or if something triggered it. In that article, there was a sentence that started like "Karen, whose father died of complications from celiac disease..." and I was like WHAT? He DIED of complications from celiac? WTF does that mean? How old was he? Is this normal?! Then went down a rabbit hole and ended up on the Schar website and VeryWell.com. At that point I decided I just needed to step away from the laptop because I was searching for encouraging, consoling information and finding the exact opposite. It was scaring me so much I had to take an Ativan, which I haven't done in years :\

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mewnicorns Apprentice
10 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

The reality is there is not much research done on celiac disease especially on patients  after their diagnosis.  Be careful reading studies that are clinical in nature or very small.  

I can not tell you how many times people who have been diagnosed with non-responsive celiac disease have made a minor mistake in their diets.  The problem is unless researchers lock up celiacs for months, they really do not know what they are ingesting.  My own PCP  has two other celiac patients.  They simply refuse to adhere to the gluten-free diet.  Shocking but true.  Others celiacs, like my friend’s sister, were told that they would outgrow their gluten intolerance.  But we all know now that that can never happen, but it did in the 1960s.  Has anyone researched these people or me?  No.  There is not enough funding.  

Sixty Minutes (CBS News) recently featured a story on COPD (formerly called emphysema).  It is in the top 3 (if I recall, of killers), yet they are 155 on the list for health research  funding.  (I guess we do not sympathize with former smokers or miners).  Celiac disease is not glamorous.  So, research funding is low.  I expect it will increase eventually because we know that less than 20% of celiac are diagnosed.  Plus, since we know celiac disease is genetic researchers hope that by studying it, they may get a handle on other autoimmune disorders.  

(Okay, I made this edit after a morning cup of coffee and I had better stop!  ?)

I can tell you that my thyroid nodules are gone and my thyroid is no longer enlarged since I have gone gluten free.  It is not all doom and gloom.  Most members heal and go on with their lives.  They have no time for this forum and they have lives to live.  

So there is not enough funding or research being done on celiac disease aftercare, but then do we really need it?  Avoiding gluten is the cure.  Aren’t we lucky?  I wish I could say the same to my little niece who has Crohn’s.  ?

 

Oh poor thing :( I'm sorry to hear that. 

Yes, I know I could definitely have it much worse. I know people who have multiple food allergies and diseases and are practically housebound because they can't eat any food they don't make themselves. I've known people on immunosuppressants that have horrible side effects and make them sick all the time, or who have degenerative diseases. I'm really being overly dramatic. I know logically this is probably not as bad as it feels right now, but I have suffered from severe anxiety in the past and even though I had it under control, this diagnosis seems to have re-triggered it.

I certainly hope we see an increase in funding and research. To even have something like a Lactaid for celiacs would be huge. Not necessarily even something that would allow us to eat normally, but something that would at least raise our tolerance so we didn't have to worry about CC. Thats the part that, IMO, makes the diet so tedious and results in so many people failing despite their efforts. Even the U of Chicago website says failure is inevitable. You WILL be glutened. To me this is not acceptable. The GFD is not an acceptable solution in and of itself. It's merely a start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...