Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help with diagnosis


Jo hay

Recommended Posts

Jo hay Newbie

Hi all this is my 1st time on a forum and I was looking for a little help/knowledge on my radiology report my doctor managed to get hold off but I still haven't heard from the hospital doctor. I was sent for a biopsy via endoscopy due to years of being iron deficient, fatigue, joint stiffness and a host of neurological symptoms.  My reports state's: 

Microscopy shows duodenal mucosa with mixed mild chronic inflammation cell infiltration within lamina propia associated with some crypt hyperplasia.  

Does anyone k ow what this means. I was give the blood tests a snort while back but they came back negative.  I did mention to my doctor that I had gone gluten free as I was diagnosed last year with autoimmune Hashimoto thyroid disease and read going gluten free helped with that but my doctor did the blood test anyway.  When the test came back I noted on the bottom of the report a little foot note stating you must be on a gluten diet for at least 6 weeks before the test or the test is invalid. I called the doc and explained I hadn't been on a gluten inclusive diet and he said "well the test was negative so you don't have gluten sensitivity." 

I'm so confused now as the biopsy states the above.  Still waiting on the response from the hospital.

Could anyone help with the above

Many thanks Jo


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ennis-TX Grand Master

Yeah if your gluten free the blood test will be negative...it is testing for antibodies to the gluten proteins....if you not eating gluten your not going to have them in you blood. There is a gluten challenge that needs to be done where you eat gluten every day for like 12 weeks to raise the antibodies for the test. The endoscope like wise requires gluten to be eaten daily for 2 weeks. If you have been gluten free for a extended amount of time and cealic your damage could have healed.
Open Original Shared Link
Though the medical gluten free is a bit different then diet gluten free and more strict, (not doubting you just saying) so you could be having tiny amounts of gluten or other issues still causing your iron issues.

In regards to your iron, try taking vitamin C supplements and eating high iron foods like red meat, or if vegan pea and pumpkin seed protein. I found my iron did not improve til I started the vitamin C supplementation.

cyclinglady Grand Master
6 hours ago, Jo hay said:

Hi all this is my 1st time on a forum and I was looking for a little help/knowledge on my radiology report my doctor managed to get hold off but I still haven't heard from the hospital doctor. I was sent for a biopsy via endoscopy due to years of being iron deficient, fatigue, joint stiffness and a host of neurological symptoms.  My reports state's: 

Microscopy shows duodenal mucosa with mixed mild chronic inflammation cell infiltration within lamina propia associated with some crypt hyperplasia.  

Does anyone k ow what this means. I was give the blood tests a snort while back but they came back negative.  I did mention to my doctor that I had gone gluten free as I was diagnosed last year with autoimmune Hashimoto thyroid disease and read going gluten free helped with that but my doctor did the blood test anyway.  When the test came back I noted on the bottom of the report a little foot note stating you must be on a gluten diet for at least 6 weeks before the test or the test is invalid. I called the doc and explained I hadn't been on a gluten inclusive diet and he said "well the test was negative so you don't have gluten sensitivity." 

I'm so confused now as the biopsy states the above.  Still waiting on the response from the hospital.

Could anyone help with the above

Many thanks Jo

I am not a doctor, but it seems that despite being on  a gluten free diet, your biopsy has shown intestinal damage.  Read this link from the Celiac Disease Foundation about your crypt hyperplasia and inflammation:

Open Original Shared Link

Exactly which celiac tests were ordered?  I can tell you that in order to save costs and still catch a lot of celiacs, the TTG has been the preferred test (though this is changing).  The problem is that some folks, like me,  (who also have Hashimoto’s but I am not sure there is an actual link) have elevated DGP antibodies instead.  I also test negative on the EMA test as well.  If my doctor had not run the entire celiac panel, my diagnosis would not have been caught.  Then there are about 10% or so of celiacs who are seronegative.  This is why intestinal biopsies still remain the “GOLD” standard in diagnosing celiac disease.  

There are probably other scenarios that could have occurred (e.g. not really complying well in the gluten free diet and that can happen despite your best efforts).  Hard to guess.  

It can be tricky to get a diagnosis!  

I just want to add that I had Hashimoto’s some 15 years prior to my celiac disease diagnosis.  After two years on  the gluten-free diet, my nodules and thyroid enlargement are gone. I also have no longer had any hypo to hyper swings.  Unfortunately, the damage to my thyroid is permanent.  I have to take thyroid hormone replacement for the rest of my life.  Did I stop the destruction of my thyroid because I went Gluten Free or because I finally treated my celiac disease and that calmed down my immune system?   Who knows?  My bet is on treating my celiac disease.  

Jo hay Newbie

Thanks for the reply Ennis_TX and cycling lady I will try the Vit c supplements along with the iron, sounds a good idea. The letter regarding my blood work didn't state figures just said negative which is a bit useless.  I'm back on iron supplements from the doctor.  I wasn't on a medical gluten free diet as I had no idea about celiac it was only me cutting out gluten as I was trying to eat healthy for my hashimoto thyroiditis which I also knew nothing about until I was diagnosed with that so its been a huge learning curve for me.  Apparently Hashimoto thyroiditis and celiac are very commonly found together so the hospital doctor told me, that's why he didn't redo the blood test instead went straight for the biopsy of which the results are what I typed above.  Right now I'm not sure what to eat I want to stay as healthy as possible. Just getting g frustrated waiting  on docs to tell me the best route. Going by the biopsy results I don't know if that means Celiac's or not. I guess I'll just have to wait and see.  

thanks again for the replies

Jo

squirmingitch Veteran

Get a copy of your celiac panel blood work. You should always do this as a matter of course anyway. If you post the results of the blood panel here, along with the reference ranges, we can help interpret it & tell you if you were given the full panel. Lots of docs are misinformed & think you have to be off the charts high in order to be celiac which is incorrect but we get plenty of people being told they are negative when they, in fact, are not. A positive is a positive and just because it's a weak positive does not negate the fact that it's positive or just b/c one doesn't test positive on ALL the tests, does not mean they are negative. Many docs don't realize this. DUH!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.