5 5
creativemuse

Stuck in the gray zone and so frustrated

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

I am so beyond frustrated. I have been having gastro symptoms for a while, accelerating recently, so I called my GP a few weeks ago. He was out for the week at the time, so I saw someone else in the office. She ran a DPG IgG and IgA as part of a bunch of tests and the IgG came back elevated (29 ref >20). She referred for an endoscopy. I took the first available and now know why he was available. He took one look at me and decided that I didn't have celiac. He ordered the rest of the celiac panel (TTG, total IgA, EMA) but was very huffy that I was even there, making several comments about "wrong test" and "not anemic" left unsaid was that I am overweight.  TTG came back positive (39 ref >20) and the EMA was negative. He called and said the bioposy was "showed inflammation but no celiac" but that I should go gluten free and see if it helps. I got the pathology summary today. He only took 3 samples and the results say "chronic peptic injury of the duodenum, no evidence of celiac or parasites". We are still waiting for the official genetic test to come back, but I did the Ancestry DNA test years ago and ran it through Promethease and it says I have the DQ2 and do not have DQA. So here I sit in the "maybe, probably, don't really know" zone. I feel better already after a week gluten free, I am sticking with it, but a true answer impacts whether my 3 kids and my siblings should have a lifetime of testing, how vigilant I have to be about cross contamination. I am so so frustrated that there is one shot at the "gold standard" test and he blew it by not taking enough samples. And "chronic peptic injury"? What the heck does that mean and should we be doing something about it? I saw a second GI this week for a second opinion and he was wonderful, but didn't have access to the pathology, so I have to wait for him to call me back when he gets the full report - and he can't go back in time and do the endoscopy correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


Posted (edited)

Hopefully the 2nd GI will get the pathology and see a clear indication.  Unfortunately though celiac disease is somewhat difficult to diagnose.  There just isn't a foolproof way to get 100% accurate testing done right now.  Even the best tests have a small chance of error.  Having a positive on one antibody test is enough to show a problem IMHO.  I hope you get a clear answer.

Being overweight is not an excluding factor for celiac disease.  Sometimes peoples bodies store extra reserves when they are missing certain nutrients.  Did you have an vitamin deficiencies?  Low on D, B or iron?

Edited by GFinDC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to be overweight....fact is when the body is being starved of certain nutrients it assumes it is being starved and for some people these means it stores everything it can like a hoarder....so you end up with a bunch of fat. Changing your meal composition and healing will help you shed it, but from my experience and dealing with many people here, weight and body size for this disease can be on either end of the spectrum.

The few positives you had, I would say something is going on and probably celiac....the intestines have the surface area of a tennis court.....always a chance your going to miss something with a tiny biopsy. He saw inflammation so something is irritating/causing damage.

Either go back on gluten and get tested done with a doctor that is not a entire asshat, or go with the partial positive dia you have and keep on gluten free. Go ahead and read the newbie 101 thread here . https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, GFinDC said:

Hopefully the 2nd GI will get the pathology and see a clear indication.  Unfortunately though celiac disease is somewhat difficult to diagnose.  There just isn't a foolproof way to get 100% accurate testing done right now.  Even the best tests have a small chance of error.  Having a positive on one antibody test is enough to show a problem IMHO.  I hope you get a clear answer.

Being overweight is not an excluding factor for celiac disease.  Sometimes peoples bodies store extra reserves when they are missing certain nutrients.  Did you have an vitamin deficiencies?  Low on D, B or iron?

The second doctor I saw felt the same, that 2 positive antibodies + inflammation was enough to at least be proactive about screening for vitamin deficiencies, etc. but he is hoping for more clarity when he sees the biopsies. I had blood drawn Tuesday and so far D is low (not shocking, upper midwest after a looooong winter). Iron and B were ok and we are waiting on a few more. I know that being overweight is not an excluding factor at all, but sadly it is a prejudice from many doctors - lose weight and all your problems will be solved. I'm actually quite active and nearly a black belt in Taekwondo, but it is easy to judge by appearance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dropped 30 lbs after going gluten free in a MONTH.  It seemed to be a lot of water flushing out of my body.  Underneath I was underweight and looked emaciated.  I've since built back 10 lbs of good weight in muscle and probably bone, and much healthier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


On 6/15/2018 at 1:31 PM, creativemuse said:

The second doctor I saw felt the same, that 2 positive antibodies + inflammation was enough to at least be proactive about screening for vitamin deficiencies, etc. but he is hoping for more clarity when he sees the biopsies. I had blood drawn Tuesday and so far D is low (not shocking, upper midwest after a looooong winter). Iron and B were ok and we are waiting on a few more. I know that being overweight is not an excluding factor at all, but sadly it is a prejudice from many doctors - lose weight and all your problems will be solved. I'm actually quite active and nearly a black belt in Taekwondo, but it is easy to judge by appearance.

Hopefully the biopsy results will tell the tale as they say.  I am on rx D myself.  You can find info on vitamin D at the vitamin D  council site.  Seeing they just announced higher levels of vitamin D can help prevent colon cancer it's even a better reason to take some.  You can get natural vitamin D from oily fish like mackeral, sardines, salmon and tuna.  Other than that they do add it to milk and some orange juice in the USA.  The sun is another good source but only during certain hours of the day depending on your local latitude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a negative biopsy, but was able to get a diagnosis of Celiac. I had positive blood work across the board with a ttg-IgA of 76.9, normal being < 15.  When the biopsy came back negative I was sent for a genetic test. The genetic test came back positive with DQ2. 5 which labeled me "high risk". So I was put on a trial gluten free diet.  My antibodies went to normal in 12 weeks. I was later tested for vitamin deficienies and a bone density scan. I was found to also have osteoporosis and a vitamin D deficiency. Since then my daughter has also been diagnosed. Keep on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Followup - nurse sent me a note via mychart that "the gene test was negative" but if I feel better gluten free, I should continue it. This was a big surprise, since I already ran the info through Promethease and it said Dq2 Positive Dq8 negative. So I went to the test results themselves. Sure enough Dq2 positive, Dq8 negative with a note from the doctor saying "patient carries only the dq2 gene, not the dq8. This means she is much less likely to have celiac sprue."  I could spit nails. I am educated, I know that 80% of people with celiac carry only DQ2. I have already had a followup with a different GI who was wonderful. But this is how people go 10 years undiagnosed and only find it when they are so sick.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is so frustrating that so many in the medical field know so little about celiac disease!  After you have been on the gluten free diet for 6 to 12 months perhaps your new GI can order the antibody tests again to see if the levels have gone down.  Lower antibodies on a gluten free diet would point towards celiac disease.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After I posted this, he called me because I replied to the note questioning if I was reading the test results correctly because they didn't look negative to me. He told me that A. diarrhea is not really a symptom of celiac (huh, wonder why all the poop jokes about it then...) B. if I had both genes plus a positive antibody test, that would mean that there was about a 95% chance that I do have celiac right now, not a potential to develop it and C. if I stay on a gluten free diet (which I don't have to because he says I don't have celiac) then he won't retest the antibodies because of course they will go down and there is no need to test. I'm pretty much speechless. It is abundantly clear why he was the first available when others had a wait.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


2 minutes ago, creativemuse said:

After I posted this, he called me because I replied to the note questioning if I was reading the test results correctly because they didn't look negative to me. He told me that A. diarrhea is not really a symptom of celiac (huh, wonder why all the poop jokes about it then...) B. if I had both genes plus a positive antibody test, that would mean that there was about a 95% chance that I do have celiac right now, not a potential to develop it and C. if I stay on a gluten free diet (which I don't have to because he says I don't have celiac) then he won't retest the antibodies because of course they will go down and there is no need to test. I'm pretty much speechless. It is abundantly clear why he was the first available when others had a wait.

Fun fact, google your doctors name, 2-4 review sites will have them and their info. You can submit a public review of your doctor.......inform people of this story on the review sites and this doctors "incompetence" in relation to your disease.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
5 5

  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 227 Guests (See full list)

  • Top Posters +

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/17/2018 - What can fat soluble vitamin levels in newly diagnosed children tell us about celiac disease? A team of researchers recently assessed fat soluble vitamin levels in children diagnosed with newly celiac disease to determine whether vitamin levels needed to be assessed routinely in these patients during diagnosis.
    The researchers evaluated the symptoms of celiac patients in a newly diagnosed pediatric group and evaluated their fat soluble vitamin levels and intestinal biopsies, and then compared their vitamin levels with those of a healthy control group.
    The research team included Yavuz Tokgöz, Semiha Terlemez and Aslıhan Karul. They are variously affiliated with the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, the Department of Pediatrics, and the Department of Biochemistry at Adnan Menderes University Medical Faculty in Aydın, Turkey.
    The team evaluated 27 female, 25 male celiac patients, and an evenly divided group of 50 healthy control subjects. Patients averaged 9 years, and weighed 16.2 kg. The most common symptom in celiac patients was growth retardation, which was seen in 61.5%, with  abdominal pain next at 51.9%, and diarrhea, seen in 11.5%. Histological examination showed nearly half of the patients at grade Marsh 3B. 
    Vitamin A and vitamin D levels for celiac patients were significantly lower than the control group. Vitamin A and vitamin D deficiencies were significantly more common compared to healthy subjects. Nearly all of the celiac patients showed vitamin D insufficiency, while nearly 62% showed vitamin D deficiency. Nearly 33% of celiac patients showed vitamin A deficiency. 
    The team saw no deficiencies in vitamin E or vitamin K1 among celiac patients. In the healthy control group, vitamin D deficiency was seen in 2 (4%) patients, vitamin D insufficiency was determined in 9 (18%) patients. The team found normal levels of all other vitamins in the healthy group.
    Children with newly diagnosed celiac disease showed significantly reduced levels of vitamin D and A. The team recommends screening of vitamin A and D levels during diagnosis of these patients.
    Source:
    BMC Pediatrics

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/16/2018 - Did weak public oversight leave Arizonans ripe for Theranos’ faulty blood tests scam? Scandal-plagued blood-testing company Theranos deceived Arizona officials and patients by selling unproven, unreliable products that produced faulty medical results, according to a new book by Wall Street Journal reporter, whose in-depth, comprehensive investigation of the company uncovered deceit, abuse, and potential fraud.
    Moreover, Arizona government officials facilitated the deception by providing weak regulatory oversight that essentially left patients as guinea pigs, said the book’s author, investigative reporter John Carreyrou. 
    In the newly released "Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup," Carreyrou documents how Theranos and its upstart founder, Elizabeth Holmes, used overblown marketing claims and questionable sales tactics to push faulty products that resulted in consistently faulty blood tests results. Flawed results included tests for celiac disease and numerous other serious, and potentially life-threatening, conditions.
    According to Carreyrou, Theranos’ lies and deceit made Arizonans into guinea pigs in what amounted to a "big, unauthorized medical experiment.” Even though founder Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos duped numerous people, including seemingly savvy investors, Carreyrou points out that there were public facts available to elected officials back then, like a complete lack of clinical data on the company's testing and no approvals from the Food and Drug Administration for any of its tests.
    SEC recently charged the now disgraced Holmes with what it called a 'years-long fraud.’ The company’s value has plummeted, and it is now nearly worthless, and facing dozens, and possibly hundreds of lawsuits from angry investors. Meantime, Theranos will pay Arizona consumers $4.65 million under a consumer-fraud settlement Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich negotiated with the embattled blood-testing company.
    Both investors and Arizona officials, “could have picked up on those things or asked more questions or kicked the tires more," Carreyrou said. Unlike other states, such as New York, Arizona lacks robust laboratory oversight that would likely have prevented Theranos from operating in those places, he added.
    Stay tuned for more new on how the Theranos fraud story plays out.
    Read more at azcentral.com.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/14/2018 - If you’re looking for a simple, nutritious and exciting alternative to standard spaghetti and tomato sauce, look no further than this delicious version that blends ripe plum tomatoes, garlic, olive oil, basil, and firm sliced ricotta to deliver a tasty, memorable dish.
    Ingredients:
    12 ounces gluten-free spaghetti 5 or 6 ripe plum tomatoes ¼ cup extra virgin olive oil 2 cloves garlic, crushed ¾ teaspoons crushed red pepper ¼ cup chopped fresh basil 2 tablespoons chopped fresh parsley Kosher salt and black pepper ⅓ cup pecorino Romano cheese, grated ½ cup firm ricotta, shaved with peeler Directions:
    Finely chop all but one of the tomatoes; transfer to large bowl with olive oil and ¼ teaspoon salt.
    Cook spaghetti until al dente or desired firmness, and drain, reserving ¼ cup cooking water. 
    Meanwhile, chop remaining tomato, and place in food processor along with garlic, red pepper, and ½ teaspoon salt; puree until smooth. 
    Gently stir mixture into the bowl of chopped tomatoes.
    Add cooked spaghetti, basil and parsley to a large bowl.
    Toss in tomato mixture, adding some reserved pasta water, if needed. 
    Spoon pasta into bowls and top with Romano cheese, as desired.

    Jean Duane
    Celiac.com 07/13/2018 - I went to a friend’s home for dinner.  A few days before, she called and asked me what I could eat.  I asked her what she was planning to make, and she said she was grilling meats with side dishes.  I said, “Great.  Please just grill a piece of chicken for me with salt and pepper, and I’ll be happy to bring a side.” She said, “No need to bring a side.  I’ve got this.” When I arrived, she greeted me and said, “I spent all day cooking tonight’s dinner so you can eat it. Hey would you just check this salad dressing to see if it is OK for you?” I looked at the ingredients and it contained gluten and dairy, both of which I cannot eat.  Then I glanced around the kitchen and saw evidence of wheat cross-contamination, including buns being toasted on the grill, and gluten-containing barbeque sauce spilling on the grill where my “clean” chicken was cooking. She had other guests to tend to, and I couldn’t offer instruction or read the ingredients of everything she used in the meal. 
    At social gatherings, I’ve been challenged too by those who ask if I am really “allergic,” or just eating gluten free as a “fad.” I’ve been told many times by hosts and hostesses that, “a little won’t hurt you,” or “everything in moderation,” or “if it is made with loving hands, it is good for you to eat.”  Of course, all of this is bunk for those with food allergies or celiac disease.  A little bit may kill us, and whether made with loving hands or not, it will certainly make us sick. 
    Those of us with food allergies and/or celiac disease walk a tightrope with friends and relatives. The old rules of etiquette just don’t work anymore.  We don’t want to insult anybody, we don’t want to be isolated, and we also don’t want to risk our health by eating foods that may contain ingredients we cannot tolerate.  So what do we do? 
    Etiquette books advise us to eat what is put in front of us when we are guests in someone’s home. They caution us at all costs not to insult our hostess. Rather, we are instructed to compliment the hostess on her good cooking, flavor combinations, and food choices.  But when foods are prepared in a cross-contaminated environment with ingredients we are allergic to, we cannot follow the old social constructs that do not serve us.  We need to work together to rewrite the rules, so that we can be included in social gatherings without fear of cross-contamination, and without offending anyone.
    Let’s figure out how to surmount these social situations together.  
    Each edition of this column will present a scenario, and together, we’ll determine appropriate, polite, and most importantly, safe ways to navigate this tricky gluten-free/food allergies lifestyle in a graceful way.  If someone disagrees with our new behavior patterns, we can refer them to this column and say, “Here are the new rules for those of us with food allergies or celiac disease.”  When we are guests in someone’s home, we can give them links to this column so they understand the plight we are faced with, bite after bite. Perhaps this will help those of us living with us to understand, be more compassionate, and accepting of our adaptations to keep ourselves safe. 
    This column will present a scenario such as the one above, and ask that you comment on how you would navigate it. Let’s talk about it. Let’s share ideas.  Using the example above, here’s the scenario for this issue:
    What would you do?
    Your kind-hearted friend invites you to dinner and insists on cooking for you.  You arrive and the first thing she says is, “I’ve spent all day making this for you. Oh, I bought this salad dressing for you, but you might want to read the ingredients first.”  You do, and it contains malt vinegar.  You look around the kitchen and notice evidence of cross-contamination in the rest of the meal.  What do you do? 
    Please comment below and feel free to share the tricky scenarios that you’ve encountered too.  Let’s discuss how to surmount these social situations.  What would you do?

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 07/12/2018 - Previous research has shown that the oral administration of Bifidobacterium infantis Natren Life Start super strain (NLS-SS) reduces of gastro-intestinal symptoms in untreated celiac disease patients. The reduction of symptoms was not connected with changes in intestinal permeability or serum levels of cytokines, chemokines, or growth factors. Therefore, researchers suspected that the reduction of symptoms might be related to the modulation of innate immunity.
    To test that hypothesis, a team of researchers set out to assess the potential mechanisms of a probiotic B.infantis Natren Life Start super strain on the mucosal expression of innate immune markers in adult patients with active untreated celiac disease compared with those treated with B. infantis 6 weeks and after 1 year of gluten-free diet.
    The research team included Maria I. Pinto-Sanchez, MD, Edgardo C. Smecuol, MD, Maria P. Temprano,RD, Emilia Sugai, BSBC, Andrea Gonzalez, RD, PhD, Maria L. Moreno,MD, Xianxi Huang, MD, PhD, Premysl Bercik, MD, Ana Cabanne, MD, Horacio Vazquez, MD, Sonia Niveloni, MD, Roberto Mazure, MD, Eduardo Mauriño, MD, Elena F. Verdú, MD, PhD, and Julio C. Bai, MD. They are affiliated with the Medicine Department, Farcombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; the Small Intestinal Section, Department of Medicine and the Department of Alimentation at Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo, Gastroenterology Hospital and Research Institute at the Universidad del Salvador in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    The team determined the numbers of macrophages and Paneth cells, along with the expression of a-defensin-5 expression via immunohistochemistry in duodenal biopsies.
    Their results showed that a gluten-free diet lowers duodenal macrophage counts in celiac disease patients more effectively than B. infantis, while B. infantis lowers Paneth cell counts and reduces expression of a-defensin-5.
    This study documents the differential innate immune effects of treatment with B. infantis compared with 1 year of gluten-free diet. The team calls for further study to better understand the synergistic effects of gluten-free diet and B. infantis supplementation in celiac disease.
    Source:
    J Clin Gastroenterol