Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is this gluten sensitivity, celiac or maybe IBS?

heyyy
 Share

Recommended Posts

heyyy Newbie
heyyy
Posted

Hi, swedish young adult here.

Been having a really rough time the last year, with all kinds of disturbing and uncomfortable symptoms. Things I've experienced are:

Diarrhea/constipation (rarely anything inbetween), Severe peripheral neuropathy, intense abdominal pains along with pregnant-ish bloating, depression/anxiety, eczema in my face, mouth ulcers and also acid reflux. Pretty much all of this at the same time, constantly for a year. 

After i felt extra sick from eating pasta and bread one day, I decided to get bloodwork for Celiac, which came back negative. One doctor suspected IBS, another just thought I needed more exercise and probiotics (since I had a ton of antibiotics last year). I tried his advice, but just got worse. I still decided to go gluten free, and one month in I feel relief from ALL of the above mentioned symptoms. Every single one. No more mouth ulcers, eczema or neuropathy among other things feels amazing. Now, as I've tested negative for Celiac, could this be Non-celiac gluten sensitivity? Or is it only Celiac that causes symptoms this severe?

I called in sick for school and work several times during the last year when things were really bad, and this relief from not eating gluten is pretty overwhelming. I have a really hard time believing it's IBS, since IBS-triggering foods are no problem for me. Would you suggest that I get further testing for Celiac or is it just not worth it (since I'd have to start eating gluten again)? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

If you went gluten-free for a long period of time before you got tested, your test results will likely be a false negative. Normally you must eat gluten daily for at least two months before you can be tested for celiac disease, and this goes for either blood tests or a biopsy.

That said, given how certain you are that Gluten is causing all of your problems, do you really want to go through this process to get the official diagnosis? That is a question you will need to answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
heyyy Newbie
heyyy
  • Author
Posted

two months daily?? yikes... my doctor didn't tell me that. I did have a lot of gluten before the tests, but not daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fenrir Community Regular
Fenrir
Posted
5 minutes ago, heyyy said:

two months daily?? yikes... my doctor didn't tell me that. I did have a lot of gluten before the tests, but not daily.

Yes, if you don't have consistent gluten intake prior to the blood tests they are almost useless.  My antibody levels went from very high to normal in one month gluten-free. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nel Newbie
Nel
Posted (edited)

Hi - thank you for your question and the answer. I had a blood test but it came back as inconclusive. I had stopped eating gluten for a few months before the test because I felt better and couldn’t bear to eat it for 6-8 weeks prior to the test. Instead I binged on bread for a couple of days before the test. The upshot was neither one thing nor the other for the test. It is better to follow the instructions, although going to the bathroom 6 or 7 times every morning didn’t seem like a good option at the time. I often wonder if the inconclusive test would have been positive if I’d followed procedure since it wasn’t negative.  Now I will always wonder but don’t see the point in going back, although it would be nice to k ow if I am a celiac or just sensitive to gluten. 

Edited by Nel
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fenrir Community Regular
Fenrir
Posted
13 minutes ago, Nel said:

Hi - thank you for your question and the answer. I had a blood test but it came back as inconclusive. I had stopped eating gluten for a few months before the test because I felt better and couldn’t bear to eat it for 6-8 weeks prior to the test. Instead I binged on bread for a couple of days before the test. The upshot was neither one thing nor the other for the test. It is better to follow the instructions, although going to the bathroom 6 or 7 times every morning didn’t seem like a good option at the time. I often wonder if the inconclusive test would have been positive if I’d followed procedure since it wasn’t negative.  Now I will always wonder but don’t see the point in going back, although it would be nice to k ow if I am a celiac or just sensitive to gluten. 

Well the tests can't really be "inconclusive" they are positive or negative. There's no such thing as weak positive or inconclusive. 

Do you have the lab results? A lot of Drs. tell patients a mildly elevated TTG is inconclusive but that's not true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nel Newbie
Nel
Posted

That’s interesting. Thanks for your reply. No I don’t have the values, but I’ll ask for them. I was recently diagnosed as folate deficient which suggest malabsorption because I eat a healthy diet, but again I didn’t ask for the values. I will do when I have my follow-up test. I think you make a valid point here because my GP just says something is normal or not and I am becoming aware that we should all ask for specifics. Perhaps something on the low side of normal is biologically important. Anyway, he definitely said it was inconclusive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Fenrir Community Regular
Fenrir
Posted
35 minutes ago, Nel said:

That’s interesting. Thanks for your reply. No I don’t have the values, but I’ll ask for them. I was recently diagnosed as folate deficient which suggest malabsorption because I eat a healthy diet, but again I didn’t ask for the values. I will do when I have my follow-up test. I think you make a valid point here because my GP just says something is normal or not and I am becoming aware that we should all ask for specifics. Perhaps something on the low side of normal is biologically important. Anyway, he definitely said it was inconclusive. 

Yes, my TTG was only 8 (negative is 0-3), this is "weak positive" according to many GPs. 

Problem is, positive is positive. Even if it's 4, it's positive. At the very least other blood work should be ordered (deamidated tests) and probably have an EGD done. 

With my "weak positive" I was found to have a Marsh grade 3b which is pretty significant damage to my intestine. 

Also, my deaminated tests were:

deamidated gliadin abs, igg     42  Range: 0-19 units

deamidated gliadin abs, iga     73  Range: 0-19 units

And these were after being gluten-free for a week or so. 

So TTG may be weak positive and you can still have significant damage and very high deamidated tests. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nel Newbie
Nel
Posted

Hi Fenrir - thank you for sharing your test results. This is very useful information. I’ll definitely ask for my numbers - with hindsight you’re probably right. My GP does have a tendency to say things are OK when sub-normal or just not problematic in his mind. It would fit if my numbers were low positives - and I guess even weak negatives doesn’t mean there isn’t damage. Everything is black and white to my GP, yet it’s clear from reading these posts that there are grey areas and several tests need doing with careful study of the numbers. 

Because nothing was conclusive I let the gluten-free diet slip over Christmas so as not to be awkward as I was staying with family and was away last week and had two gluten filled meals and it was clearly all too much. Symptoms came back with a vengeance so there’s something gluten-related going on.

I guess the moral is always get the actual numbers from our GPs, listen to our own bodies and learn from the experiences and knowledge of people who have experience of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      50 YO Male Recently Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Bad Reaction To Regular Ruffles Cheddar and Sour Cream

      By Tanner L · Posted

      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...