Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Member Here - Advice Appreciated!


kaka

Recommended Posts

kaka Newbie

Hi Everyone,

I'm absolutely delighted to have found this board but please bear with me as I'm just learning about this coeliac business. Breifly this is my story: Went to the doctor last October with loads of symptoms (Brain fog,rhinitis etc) and blood samples were taken. Now i'm not sure of the results but I know that one sample showed a very high level of something - think it might be some kind of antibodies. Whatever it was, my level was 33, and the upper level of normal is 10 (are you still with me!!) Doctor suspected that I might be coeliac and arraned for a biopsy. Meanwhile I went on a strict gluten free diet and felt much better.

Anyway I went for a biopsy 2 weeks ago and the results were normal. Doctor doesn't know what to think and now neither do I!!

I was wondering if my strict diet ( For 3 months) could have shown a positive biopsy result? I just feel a bit bewildered - sounds strange but I really would like a 'label' for this

Any advice appeciated

Thanks

kaka


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator

If you were on a gluten free diet for 3 months the biopsy was useless at that point. Damage would not be visible after a strict gluten free diet. The only way to have a chance of coming back positive on the biopsy would be to go back ON gluten for several months and even then the biopsy is a "hit or miss"....so may still come back negative even if you have Celiac. You should find out exactly what test was taken for Celiac that came back high. Some tests are more specific than others. If it was tTG than its very likely you have Celiac....its the most specific test. If its Anti-Gliadin IgG than that would be the least specific for Celiac. Either way you either have Celiac or gluten intolerance and the treatment is the same....a strict gluten-free diet.

kaka Newbie

Thanks foryour speedy answer Rachel. I've just phoned my doc and the high level (33)was IGA Tissue Transglutinaminase. Maybe we use different terms here in Scotland(!!) - is that the same as tTG or IgG ??- I'm not sure but any clarification would be much appreciated

Thanks again

kaka

Guest cassidy

Kaka,

My question is, if you have been gluten free for 3 months, have you noticed a difference with your symptoms? If you feel better then that is what is important. My tests came back negative but I feel so much better. In the beginning I wanted "to know for sure" but now I'm just happy that I feel better.

Guest nini

being on the gluten free diet even for several weeks prior to your biopsy, would still skew the results. Even if there was previously damage to be detected, it may have significantly begun to heal, or they didn't take enough samples and just got an area with no damage.

With your high 33, you do at the very least have a gluten intolerance, which IN MY HUMBLE OPINION is the same thing as Celiac, only difference being that you don't have proven damage to the villi... Either way the gluten free diet is the only treatment AND I would say treat it as Celiac...

I never had the biopsy, never will... I started the diet the day I had my bloodwork drawn. If I had waited one more day I may have been dead... I was that sick... anyway. I'm almost 3 years into this, 100 pounds lighter (YAY ME!) and healthier than I have been my entire life.

You'll get the hang of the diet easily enough and depending on how ill you were before, it may take you a while before you really notice an improvement... it was a good 6 months for me before I really felt much better... still have ongoing stuff from going undiagnosed for so long but that's another story for another day.

chrissy Collaborator

kaka--my girls had tTG levels of 18 and 22, and ? (don't know the other one) the 2 that had biopsies: one was negative and the other was iffy. when i asked the doc about no damage, he said they probably did have damage because of their numbers. since your numbers are alot higher than my girls' , i would guess they just didn't hit the right spots with the biopsy

christine

Rachel--24 Collaborator

Kaka,

tTG is actually the same as Tissue Transglutinaminase. Its just alot easier to type. ;)

If yours was positive than you have Celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kaka Newbie

Thanks you all so much for your answers. I really do feel so much better gluten free, and strangely think I am beginning to lose weight (fantastic). I think you're all correct in that it doesn't really matter what the biopsy results were and to be honest I wonder why I was bothering so much that the result was inconclusive - I FEEL so much better on the new diet so I'll continue on it.

I think I wanted a 'label' for some sad reason!!

I love this board and will continue to visit to pick up tips etc, we are still in the dark ages about coeliac in Scotland!!

Thanks again

kakaxx

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,963
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cheryl minshew
    Newest Member
    Cheryl minshew
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Pasballard
      I have Celiacs and want you to be aware of the amount of weight you can potentially put on if you rely on gluten free snacks, bread etc.,they  are high in carbs.  I put on 25 lbs in a short amount of time.  Whole Foods are the best way to go but I struggle with this.  The cost of gluten free is also a problem.  I love black licorice but most have gluten.  My favorite chili seasoning as well.  The list is endless.  I take  Advil liquid gels and had no idea until I read this.  I hope you do better than I have done.  I feel I am destined to suffer daily no matter what.  My aunt didn’t take care of herself and died from complications.  I hope you can get on a good routine.
    • growlinhard1
      Thank you, I appreciate the response. I'm going to begin the gluten free diet and wait for the biopsy results. I feel fairly certain that it's the right thing for my well being. I will keep you posted.
    • Scott Adams
      The flu vaccine is indeed not 100% effective every year, as its effectiveness varies depending on how well the vaccine strains match the circulating flu viruses. However, even in years when the match is less than perfect, the flu vaccine still provides significant benefits. Studies consistently show that vaccinated individuals who contract the flu often experience milder symptoms, a lower risk of complications, and a reduced likelihood of hospitalization or death compared to those who are unvaccinated. For high-risk groups, such as the elderly, young children, and individuals with chronic health conditions, the flu vaccine remains a critical tool for reducing severe outcomes. Regarding the mention of risks associated with vaccines, it’s important to note that the flu vaccine is generally very safe for most people. Serious side effects are extremely rare, and the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks for the vast majority of individuals. If someone has specific concerns about vaccine safety due to medical conditions or allergies, they should consult their healthcare provider to discuss their options. As for alternative measures like a D Lamp (ultraviolet light disinfection), while these can be useful for reducing pathogens in the environment, they are not a substitute for vaccination. The flu virus spreads primarily through respiratory droplets, and personal protection measures like hand hygiene, masking, and improving indoor ventilation can complement vaccination but cannot replace its targeted immune protection.
    • trents
      Because you have already had the "gold standard" test done, and because you have some experiential evidence that removing gluten from your diet causes you to feel better, it would make sense to begin the gluten-free diet as you wait for biopsy results.
    • growlinhard1
      I wasn't given any blood tests. I think I should try the gluten free diet because when I cut it out a few weeks ago for just a couple of days, I know I started feeling better. The difference was actually pretty dramatic. When I learned gluten free eating may cause false negative biopsy results, I went back to gluten full force and feel like you know what × 10. Do you feel it would be okay since the gold standard for diagnosis is behind me or should I wait for biopsy results? In your opinion, of course. I know you can't offer me medical advice.
×
×
  • Create New...