Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help! My Daughter's Lab Results Are Confusing!


gillijl

Recommended Posts

gillijl Newbie

Five years ago, my then 3 1/2 year old daughter's skin started breaking out very badly. It covered her stomach, the insides of her legs and the insides of her arms...sometimes her buttocks. We met repeatedly with a dermatologist and went through all kinds of antihistamines. They helped, but didn't eliminate the problem. I had to sleep with her to keep her from scratching herself raw. Her sheets were always dotted with blood.

Then, last year, her stomach started to bother her as well. She would feel very nauseous and was missing school, soccer, etc... Her pediatrician did some blood work and told me there was a 70% chance she was "allergic to wheat". Not knowing anything about wheat allergies or celiac, I started down the road of trying to eliminate wheat from her diet. After finally educating myself more about the difference between allergies and gluten intolerance, I decided we needed to find out if she had celiac disease.

Last week we went to an allergist. He knew nothing about celiac disease and we left more frustrated then ever. The one thing I did was to get a copy of last year's blood work. I found they had tested for tTg, IgG and IgA, none of which they bothered to explain in the slightest at the time. The tTg and IgA readings were normal, but her IgG result was out the roof (73). I guess this is where the pediatrician got the "70% chance of wheat allergy".

After reading up on those results, it looks like her blood work is inconclusive. My question is, who do I go to now? The pediatrician is obviously uneducated about what we're dealing with, and I know more than the allergist! Do I take her to a GI, even though I'm not sure if that's what she has? I should mention, her major complaint is her skin, but the areas she breaks out in are different than what I've read about for DH. It does improve drastically when she doesn't eat wheat for a few weeks....the hard part is keeping an 8-year old away from wheat!!!

Any advice would be GREATLY appreciated.

Thanks,

Jennifer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



chrissy Collaborator

a pediatric gi would be the one to see.

christine

Link to comment
Share on other sites
slpinsd Contributor

my doctor said that of tTg, IgA, IgG, yes, tTg is more indicative of Celiac, but you only need one marker (IgG) to diagnose gluten sensitivity. I would also try a good naturopath if you can find one, that's who nailed it for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kasey'sMom Enthusiast

We thought my dd was allergic to wheat because her biggest symptom was skin rashes. She also had tempermant changes, and constipation. We saw 3 dermatologist and an allergist. Some of the Dr's thought the rash was related to food, while others did not. She was 2 at the time and her blood work for celiac disease was inconclusive. Her anti-gliadin antibodies were extreamlly high which signaled to us and her ped. that an immune response was occuring in the body to gluten. I was tested a few months ago and I had a positive ttg and ema.

My dd has had dramatic results with a gluten-free diet. We also had her tested for IgE inhalants IgE & IgG food allergies/sensitivities. We avoid dairy, eggs and other foods but finding out her food issues has been a blessing!

I also did a food diary that helped a great deal when meeting with the Dr's. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WGibs Apprentice
my doctor said that of tTg, IgA, IgG, yes, tTg is more indicative of Celiac, but you only need one marker (IgG) to diagnose gluten sensitivity. I would also try a good naturopath if you can find one, that's who nailed it for me.

This is very interesting to me. I only had high IgG, and so my doc said there was nothing wrong with me and I should take Immodium. I decided to try gluten-free anyway, because I was desperate to feel better without popping pills constantly. My initial reaction was awesome -- my stools were better than they'd been in years. I actually realized that I'd forgotten what normal was. But now, after a month on the diet, the D is back. I was starting to think that the doctors were right and I was just kidding myself with the gluten thing. But maybe I'm not crazy after all; maybe I just need to give things more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini
This is very interesting to me. I only had high IgG, and so my doc said there was nothing wrong with me and I should take Immodium. I decided to try gluten-free anyway, because I was desperate to feel better without popping pills constantly. My initial reaction was awesome -- my stools were better than they'd been in years. I actually realized that I'd forgotten what normal was. But now, after a month on the diet, the D is back. I was starting to think that the doctors were right and I was just kidding myself with the gluten thing. But maybe I'm not crazy after all; maybe I just need to give things more time.

yep, one marker is sufficient to indicate that gluten is a problem... any dr. that says otherwise is operating on outdated information. If you have to take Immodium there IS something wrong with you. For years though I thought that it was normal to have constant D, and that everyone took Immodium all the time. Give yourself a lot longer than a month and make sure that everything is gluten free including makeup and shampoos and lotions etc... It took me a good 6 months to really see a major improvement in the D... and now almost 3 years into it, I still have occassional issues and constant muscle pain and fatigue... You aren't crazy. Listen to your body. It may be that you need to eliminate more than gluten until you get the D under control. Dairy and Soy would be the first things to look at...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WGibs Apprentice
If you have to take Immodium there IS something wrong with you.

I completely agree with this! I have never actually taken Immodium. At first, I always felt that if my body was having D, it was trying to flush something out, and it was a reasonable response to something and I should let it run its course. It was only when it became constant that I got worried. The doctor thought it was really strange that I wouldn't be comfortable just taking Immodium every day. :blink:

You have no idea how reassured I am that my high IgG does mean something. Do you have an article or reference for the claim that one elevated test means gluten sensitivity at least? My mother is on my case to go back on gluten for EMA tests and endoscopy, but I'm really reluctant. Even with the return of the D, I don't feel as bad as I did when I still ate gluten. The doctors she works with tell her I should have this done, but it sounds like they are outdated. The only reason they are willing to believe that I have any issue with gluten is because of my dietary response...they think the IgG alone means nothing.

I will stick with it. I have checked all makeup, etc., I think, but you have inspired me to do a double check! And I think in general, I need to take my diet back to simpler things and slowly add things back in once I get it under control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mcc011806 Newbie

My son had the same rash. His dermatologist, not being able to treat it with meds, biopsied the rash and sent the biopsy to a lab. His results indicated Dermatitis Herpetaformis, the rash that indicates gluten intolerance. A gluten free diet will clear it up eventually but it can take some time. Keep pushing the doctors to test, using a biopsy. This article is very useful to help educate people about celiac (even the doctors). Celiac has been under diagnosed in the US for many years. Open Original Shared Link

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gillijl Newbie
My son had the same rash. His dermatologist, not being able to treat it with meds, biopsied the rash and sent the biopsy to a lab. His results indicated Dermatitis Herpetaformis, the rash that indicates gluten intolerance. A gluten free diet will clear it up eventually but it can take some time. Keep pushing the doctors to test, using a biopsy. This article is very useful to help educate people about celiac (even the doctors). Celiac has been under diagnosed in the US for many years. Open Original Shared Link

Hope this helps.

Thanks to all of you for your responses. I appreciate all the information. I would be really interested to hear more about your son's rash. Was it hive-like? Hers is normally on her stomach, and the insides of her thighs. When it gets really bad, it's up her neck and on the insides of her forearms as well. Since the rash is normally her only symptom, I think the dermatologist is probably the best path forward for us right now. Plus, I like our dermatologist and I think she would be the easiest to work with.

Thanks again!

Jennifer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,470
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mimi of 4
    Newest Member
    Mimi of 4
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • JustGemi
      Where would I locate the reference ranges?  I'll take a look at my results again....
    • JustGemi
      Scott,   Can you look at my post and tell me if my numbers are off the chart!?  I won't be able to see my Gastro for another 7 weeks and I am freaking out at the numbers. JustGemi
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the forum!  Could you also post the reference ranges for your test results, unfortunately each lab has a different range, so there is no way to interpret your results without that info.
    • Scott Adams
      The number of genes associated with celiac disease is more than two, but there are two main genes that are commonly tested for celiac disease susceptibility. These genes are HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. HLA-DQ2: The majority of individuals with celiac disease (about 90-95%) carry the HLA-DQ2 gene. HLA-DQ8: Around 5-10% of individuals with celiac disease have the HLA-DQ8 gene. Other Genes: While HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 are the primary genes associated with celiac disease, having these genes doesn't guarantee that someone will develop celiac disease. Additionally, a small percentage of individuals with celiac disease don't have either of these genes. This suggests that other genetic factors may also play a role, though they are less common. This article has more information about the genes associated with celiac disease:    
    • Scott Adams
      The whole point of the gluten-free diet is to send the disease into remission. For some this process means strong reactions when exposed to even trace amounts of gluten, while for others it seems they have little to no reactions when exposed to larger amounts of gluten. In either case, research has shown that repeated gluten exposure will trigger the autoimmune reaction that leads to inflammation and various damage, as well as to possible additional autoimmune diseases. 
×
×
  • Create New...