Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Those Of You Who Know About Blood Tests....


CMCM

Recommended Posts

CMCM Rising Star

Well, this is kind of interesting. I found an old blood test from 2001....at that time I had requested a celiac test from my GP, who really knew nothing about celiac disease. Anyhow, I just found the old results....at the time I didn't realize this paper was the celiac test because it doesn't say that, but with my new-found knowedge I realize that's what it was. Here goes:

Antigliadin AB, gliadin AB IGG: 3 where less than 20 is called "normal."

Gliadin AB IGA was 2.

DO THESE SOUND LIKE THE RIGHT TESTS?

How about 'them apples! Of course, the doctor said "Your test was negative."

So 5 more years of digestive hell for me!

Yet in January 2006 Enterolab rates me like this based on a stool sample:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA: 24 (normal is <10)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 19 (normal is <10)

Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 67 (normal is <300)

HLA-DQ Gene DQB1 0201, 0604

Fecal Anti-casein IgA antibody 22 (normal <10).

Now I was having all sorts of problems back in 2001 when I requested the celiac blood panel. While I was eating gluten, I have always minimized what I ate. For whatever reason, not much showed up in my blood, yet I was having symptoms. Kind of strange. But my current fecal fat score was low, which indicates no malabsorption to speak of, so could that be why nothing showed up in my blood test???

I think the lesson in all this is that the blood test doesn't tell the whole story.

No wonder no one knows quite what to do with all this, and how to interpret things. After my "negative" blood test I was really looking to other possibilities to explain my digestive woes. But you know, my incredibly sensitive celiac mom would have a negative blood test now too. Maybe a lot of it has to do with how much gluten you eat. Although I ate gluten things, I have really minimized what I ate for many years. I didn't eat it every day.

I dunno....what do you more knowledgeable folks think about all this? :o


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

those tests are only a partial celiac panel... doesn't look like the complete panel, they only did the Anti Gliadins and those are not even in teh bare minimum that they would have needed to do to determine if Celiac was a possibility.

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

here is the complete panel... They would have to do at minimum the EMA, tTG and, total serum IgA to get a more accurate picture... plus the AGA's...

As the Celiac Specialist that spoke at our meeting said though, many people can have negative test results and still have damaged villi...

the blood tests are only part of the picture. Ultimately the dietary response is your best indicator. How does your body react to gluten? Doesn't like it? Then stay off it. Period. It's that simple.

CMCM Rising Star
those tests are only a partial celiac panel... doesn't look like the complete panel, they only did the Anti Gliadins and those are not even in teh bare minimum that they would have needed to do to determine if Celiac was a possibility.

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

here is the complete panel... They would have to do at minimum the EMA, tTG and, total serum IgA to get a more accurate picture... plus the AGA's...

As the Celiac Specialist that spoke at our meeting said though, many people can have negative test results and still have damaged villi...

the blood tests are only part of the picture. Ultimately the dietary response is your best indicator. How does your body react to gluten? Doesn't like it? Then stay off it. Period. It's that simple.

This incomplete blood test just shows how utterly CLUELESS most doctors are. At the time I requested the test, I was having a lot of digestive and OTHER symptoms, and I told my doctor about wanting to get tested, and he was of course totally ignorant about what test to order. And he was also a bit reluctant to order the test because, after all, I didn't fit the classic profile. Anyhow, I would say to anyone who is thinking of getting testing, make sure all your ducks are in a row before you go to the expense of blood tests!

nikki-uk Enthusiast

My husband was finally dx at aged 40.

He too had a neg result on the bloods,but a biopsy showed positive.

He has alway's been very thin,and (for as long as I've known him-20yrs!)hardly ever ate any sizeable amount.

By the time of diagnosis he could only manage a few mouthfuls(he was very ill),so hardly suprising he got a negative!

CMCM Rising Star
My husband was finally dx at aged 40.

He too had a neg result on the bloods,but a biopsy showed positive.

He has alway's been very thin,and (for as long as I've known him-20yrs!)hardly ever ate any sizeable amount.

By the time of diagnosis he could only manage a few mouthfuls(he was very ill),so hardly suprising he got a negative!

Hi Nikki...I see you are in the UK. I thought doctors in Europe were better at diagnosing celiac than they are here. Am I wrong? Is it just as tough to get a real diagnoses there too???

aikiducky Apprentice

It varies hugely from country to country in Europe, and it also depends on who you happens to see, of course.

Pauliina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,751
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Alison A
    Newest Member
    Alison A
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @RMJ, you have multiple positive tests so celiac disease is likely.  This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease.     
    • trents
      One small study found that 50% of celiacs react to the dairy protein "casein" like they do to gluten. It is also common for celiacs to be lactose (the sugar in milk) intolerant, though that often disappears in time as the villi heal. About 10% of celiacs react to the oat protein "avenin" like they do gluten.
    • K6315
      Thank you so much Trents (Scott?)! I have started working with a dietitian and did a deep research dive as soon as I got the diagnosis. I am aware of what you mentioned in the first two paragraphs, and was not aware of anything in the third, so I am grateful for that information, and will talk to the dietitian about that. I think I was most interested in the withdrawal process - it gives me hope that, although I have felt unwell recently, I just need to be patient (not a strong suit). I have printed the article you sent and will look at it more closely. Thanks again!
    • Sandi20
      I really like Thorne!  I've researched thier products.  Thank you so much.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @K6315! Gluten withdrawal typically lasts for a period of a few weeks. But there is a real learning curve involved in actually attaining to a gluten free dietary state. Much more is involved than just cutting out major sources of gluten such as bread and pasta. It's all the places that gluten is hidden in the food supply that is difficult to ferret out, like soy sauce and canned tomato soup, canned chili and canned pork n' beans, some "lite" pancake syrups, potato salad, flavorings, etc., etc. Gluten-containing grain products are hidden through alternate terminology and found in places you would never expect.  There is also "cross contamination" where naturally gluten free foods come into contact with gluten-containing grains during farming, transportation, storage and manufacturing processes. Then there is the issue of "cross reactivity" whereby you may be having gluten-like reaction to food proteins whose structure is similar to gluten. Chief among these are dairy, oats (even gluten-free oats), soy, corn and eggs. I am including this article that you might find helpful:   
×
×
  • Create New...