Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy & Biopsy Question


yunalesca

Recommended Posts

yunalesca Newbie

I had an endoscopy done yesterday and the specialist told me it was normal. I really couldn't find out anything else, other than there was alot of activity in my small intestine.

I'm worried because although I'm still waiting for the biopsy results (which will probably be in on Thursday/Friday), if there was no 'visual' evidence of damage then wouldn't it be unlikely that the biopsy would show any damage?

Is the flattening of the stomach villi something that can be seen with the endoscopy or only biopsy?

I'm just so disappointed right now and not sure what to do. I've been sick since late 2003 and after I had a blood test in September which showed 2/3 positive tests for Celiac's (Anti Gliadin IgA and Anti Gliadin IgG) I really felt sure that this was what was wrong with me, all the typical symptoms seemed to be exactly what I had been going through.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plantime Contributor

As far as I know, only severe damage can be seen without a microscope. Just because the doc didn't see anything doesn't really mean anything. Be patient until your biopsy results, and remember that feeling better on the gluten-free diet is also a positive result. The blood test you had also showed positive. A biopsy cannot give a definite negative, only a definite positive. Meaning it is possible to get a false negative, but not a false positive. It works the same way as a pregnancy test in that respect.

yunalesca Newbie

Thanks, I'll try to hang in there :) I find out my biopsy results tomorrow.

lemonade Enthusiast

Hey,

tommorow i will be having a biopsy aswell. I have had blood tests done for Celiac, and they didnt show naything abnormal. Althouhg, i have all the typical symptoms of Celiac disease,and every ailment in my life can some how be linked to Celiac. I am nervous about tommorow. If the results come back negative i will too be frusterated because I dont know what else all this disstress i am in can be caused by.

Lemonade

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Even if you have a negative biopsy, you still have AntiGliadin antibodies -- your body is in attack mode. The best thing you can do for your health, knowing that, is continue with a gluten-free diet. If you want to discuss at more length, e-mail me at bodyworxinc@hotmail.com (It's a long, involved story, and most of the people on the board are probably sick of it -- and shaking their heads yes right now!) . . . Lynne

yunalesca Newbie

Biopsy came back negative, my doctor said that Celiac's is now ruled out - I asked her about having positive bloodwork, did that mean that I was having some sort of reaction to Gluten? I didn't really follow what she was saying, she seems to think that I am just weak and tired from having Glandular Fever a few months ago. She didn't recommended going on a Gluten Free diet because she thinks I'm likely to lose more weight by doing that, I'm 175cm tall and weigh 54 kilos now, I was 68 kgs at the end of 2003 when it first happened. She said my weight loss could just be related to metabolism. I'm having further blood tests done and will know if anything is abnormal next week, other than that she said if I wanted a second opinion she can refer me to another doctor.

Hope you had better luck than me Lemonade & thanks Lynne, I will probably get in touch because I'm a bit lost at the moment and not sure where to go from here so advice would be great :)

Guest nini

yunalesca, ok, you've had positive bloodwork... the negative biopsy means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

First of all, how many samples did they take? 2? 3? They needed to take a MINIMUM 6-8 samples, and THEN, even if it's negative that never completely rules out Celiac. You want to know why? Because you may still be in the early stages of it and have not developed significant damage YET. But your bloodwork definitely indicates a problem with gluten...

From my experience, and from what I've heard from MANY people is that the Dr.s are unwilling to dx Celiac on bloodwork alone. The mentality that the biopsy is the gold standard is soon to be going by the wayside. It is outdated information.

Take your bloodwork for what it is, and go gluten free immediately. Do not wait for any more tests. You are better off as far as insurance is concerned without a dx on your permanent record anyway.

You are gluten intolerant, period. Your positive blood test results are enough to indicate that at least.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



yunalesca Newbie

My specialist wrote that he had taken 'lots' of samples in case (despite normal endoscopy) - though I'm not sure how many 'lots' is, I know when I had my appointment he said the standard now was to take about 6 samples. The strange thing is my doctor gave me a printout of the test report, and it says (I've cut a few things out)...

******

Specimen: Duodenum

Macroscopic: (SS/LG)

Two mucosal biopsies received 4 and 3mm respectively. All embedded.

Microscopic:

The sections show two fragments of small bowel mucosa which show normal villous and crypt morphology ...etc.

Summary: Biopsy, Duodenum

Normal Small Bowel Mucosa

****

I'm not sure if this means only two samples were taken? I know afterwards he told me there was alot of activity in my small intestine, that it kept pushing the endoscope back up, but hadn't said anything about only being able to take two samples.

I think I will be going gluten-free, or at least trying a gluten-free diet and seeing if that makes a difference for me.

plantime Contributor

Try the diet, see if you feel better. Just keep in mind that it sometimes takes a month or more to feel the difference. I recommend giving the diet 6 weeks. Stay on the board, and keep us posted!

hollyd Apprentice
Biopsy came back negative, my doctor said that Celiac's is now ruled out - I asked her about having positive bloodwork, did that mean that I was having some sort of reaction to Gluten? I didn't really follow what she was saying, she seems to think that I am just weak and tired from having Glandular Fever a few months ago. She didn't recommended going on a Gluten Free diet because she thinks I'm likely to lose more weight by doing that, I'm 175cm tall and weigh 54 kilos now, I was 68 kgs at the end of 2003 when it first happened. She said my weight loss could just be related to metabolism. I'm having further blood tests done and will know if anything is abnormal next week, other than that she said if I wanted a second opinion she can refer me to another doctor.

Hope you had better luck than me Lemonade & thanks Lynne, I will probably get in touch because I'm a bit lost at the moment and not sure where to go from here so advice would be great :)

Hi yunalesca,

I live in Australia also. I was getting the worst run around from the GI my former GP sent me to. I had no confidence in her and so joined a yahoo group for celiac and asked for a recommendation for the best GI for celiac in my city. I am now being seen by a celiac specialist who really seems to know his stuff, on recommendations from several people in the group. I'm scheduled for my scope but haven't had it yet.

Here's the link to the group: Open Original Shared Link

Maybe they will have another doctor you can go to for a second opinion. I'm not as knowledgable as other people here but I would do just as they say and go gluten free. Even if this doctor says I don't have it I have never tried going gluten-free but will most definitely do it if I come up negative - to see if it helps me.

Good luck!

CMCM Rising Star

For what it's worth, I recently read somewhere that the intestinal damage CAN be submicroscopic, and therefore would be missed. Presumably this would be an earlier stage of damage, and the damage would only be visible after it was more advanced. The blood test indicates activity, and you should take that seriously. How could following the diet for awhile hurt???? Try it!!!

yunalesca Newbie

I had an appointment with my doctor yesterday, I have to say she did seem alot more helpful - I was worried about asking if I could get the celiac blood test done again - but she actually said it would be worth doing & I also asked if this was something that should be checked on every now & then, and she thought it would be a good idea to get it checked twice a year.

My other tests were pretty much normal, I don't have a carry-over from glandular fever which is what I had thought so that doesn't explain the tiredness or weakness.

I'm going to try a gluten-free diet for a few months and see how I go.

Thanks for the link Holly, I'll definitely join & good luck with your endoscopy :)

I have wondered whether maybe I am just in the early stages and that's why I'm having problems with a diagnosis. When it first started I had really severe symptoms, and after awhile my symptoms were still bad but seemed to kind of level out - or maybe I just got more used to it. There seems to be alot of emphasis on having the positive Tissue transglutaminase (sp?) levels in the blood test and a positive biopsy and I wonder if this is causing people to be misdiagnosed because they're just in the onset stages of celiac's and enough time hasn't passed for the stomach to be in bad enough shape yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    2. - plumbago replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    3. - trents replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    4. - knitty kitty replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    5. - trents replied to Tyoung's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Celiac Disease and Mild Chronic Gastritis


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,908
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Rhan
    Newest Member
    Rhan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
    • knitty kitty
      Wow, @plumbago, Curiouser, and curioser... Have you been fasting?  Apparently HDL levels increase after fasting... https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)31185-7/abstract   I must say it, try taking some Thiamine.  Thiamine helps regulate lipoproteins... Thiamine helped lower HDL in this study whether they had diabetes or not. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921172/#:~:text=Serum thiamine and its derivatives,supplementation (p %3D 0.009).
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Tyoung! I would assume for the time being that the mild gastritis and the celiac disease are connected and that once you get a good handle on gluten free eating and experience significant healing in the lining of your duodenum, you will also see improvement in the gastritis as well. Gastritis is more often than not an accompanying finding that is commented on in the post scope/biopsy notes when people are positive for celiac disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...