Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

"gluten Free" Definition In Europe


CMCM

Recommended Posts

CMCM Rising Star

In the book "Living Well with Celiac Disease...Abundance Beyond Wheat & Gluten" by Claudine Crangle, she makes this comment:

"In Europe the celiac diet is considered "gluten restricted" rather than gluten free. Trace amounts of gluten in a product are permissible...food products can still contain a minute amount of gluten and and be marketed to those on a celiac diet.

_______

This Canadian author also says: Some foods including quinoa, millet, buckwheat and amaranth are permitted by the Canadian Celiac Association." She says she has never suffered from eating them in her own diet. She also said that those grains/grasses are not related to wheat, but they are simply considered questionable by the CSA/USA because of the molecular similarities between them and gluten-containing grains.

Another point she makes: The process of distillation leaves the end product free of any traces of gluten even if the grains from which the product was made contained gluten. This makes vinegar and vanilla extract gluten free as well.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient

Wow--since I've become even more sensitive to increasingly smaller amounts (traces) of gluten, I wouldn't last long over there! I wonder if the sensitive ones just never buy processed foods?

nikki-uk Enthusiast

In the UK we have a thing called Codex Alimentarius,(Codex A)Wheat Starch

Alot of 'replacement' foods(breads,biscuits etc) contain Codex A,but not all.

These foods are still labelled gluten-free as definition of Codex A means ''Less than 200 parts per million''

Coeliac UK deem Codex A as safe for 'most' coeliacs(whatever 'most' means)

They advise that if you can eat Codex A with no ill effects then you're ok.

This is a huge bone of contention in the UK at the moment.

There are alot of coeliacs who are also 'Wheaties'(people who cannot tolerate Codex A)and feel that 'gluten free' should mean 'gluten free' (however minute the amount).

For the 'wheaties' their food has to be labelled gluten-free and wheat free.

There's also the issue that if you eat alot of products with Codex A in any one day,at some point you will exeed your limit and damage will start to occur.

Coeliac UK recommend you do not eat more than 5 slices of CodexA bread in one day.

Not sure how you measure the limit in a tube of Pringles(crisps) for example which are labelled as containing the offending codex.

My husband avoids Codex A simply because he doesn't seem to have stomach pain when 'glutened'-so how can he tell if he tolerates it?

Another slightly worrying aspect of Codex A is that there have been no long term studies into the effect of eating it everyday for many years :unsure:

-But wouldn't you know it,bread with Codex A tastes infinitely better than without! :blink:

Wow,I hope all that made sense!!

jerseyangel Proficient

Wow Nikki--that's a lot to keep straight! Thanks for explaining that :) Hope your husband is doing well.

nikki-uk Enthusiast

Thanks Patti,he's doing okay!

I tend to treat the whole Codex issue much like the Oats issue-some seem to get away with it-some don't,

but hubbie prefers to err on the side of caution and not chance it

It's enough to make your head ache! :blink:

mmaccartney Explorer

A simliar situation occurs in Australia. I was using a boullion "ultracube" from Massel, Open Original Shared Link as the cubes are 100% vegan (even the beef and chicken!) and indicated Gluten Free right on the package!

My family checks everything due to over food allergies, and when we queried Massel, we got this response:

=============

Thank you so much for your message.

Our products do not contain any ingredient of animal nature whatsoever.

We do not use any ingredient involving nuts of any type.

Gluten content is nil however; we do use a small amount of vegetable protein extract which is wheat derived.

We take this opportunity to wish you a merry Christmas and happy 2006

Mark Caine Sales Manager

=============

I thought that was interesting, the package labeled gluten free, no indication of wheat derived products on the label, so I check Australian food labeling laws. Apparently if a manufactorer uses a wheat derived substance in their food product, they can label it as gluten free as long as they test the products to ensure that gluten content is less then 200 parts per billion.

So, gluten free...depends on how you define the term. I define it as not having anything derived from wheat rye or barley, others believe it means that " well we tested it, and we don't find any gluten! ". It seems that the world is favoring the second half.

  • 1 month later...
Jess Apprentice

Mmmh...I have to admit that I am obviously not as sensitive to gluten as some people but I have spent 21 years (my whole life) in Germany and I have to say that the situation is improving especially since they introduced the new laws for listing allergens. When I came over here I found it really sad when I found out that in the States you only list wheat but not gluten as an allergen.

The public awareness and availability of gluten-free products vary from country to country but if anyone is interested in going to Europe, especially Germany, you can turn to me for further info.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

I just wanted to add that I really don't think it's as bad as the author makes it seem! It's just like anywhere - you need to know the labeling laws and you need to do your research. When a manufacturer uses wheat derived ingredients that are "gluten free", yes they can call the product gluten free but they ALSO have to say on the label it contains wheat (or rye or barley! which is a big plus!). The annoying exception to this are glucose syrup, maltodextrin and dextrose from wheat, those don't need to be listed as containing wheat. But watching out for three ingredients isn't such a hassle really. And things like wheat in natural flavorings have to be listed!

So basically it's just that it's still necessary to read the label, just seeing "gluten free" on a package isn't enough.

Now the real probem, and I'm sure that's a problem everywhere in the world, is: labeling laws or no labeling laws, do I actually trust the manufacturers to obey the law, and to not make any mistakes? :blink: Here in Holland, and elsewhere in northern Europe, I haven't had a problem, but I remember someone posting here from somehwre in southern Europe saying that they had gotten glutened by a product that was supposed to not contain any gluten ingredients. But I have also read posts from US members who had the same happen to them.

Bottom line is I think for a celiac it's better not to eat too much processed food period. Whereever you live. :)

Pauliina

Guest TerpyTaylor

Oh dear, all of this has me a little worried!

I'm going to Europe for a month after my college graduation (YAY!) with some close friends. We'll be in Ireland, Austria and parts of Italy. I was particularly excited about Ireland because I understood that there are fantastic options there for celiacs. But after reading all of this, should I not trust a "gluten-free" label? I'm pretty sensitive, but I've also understood that Europeans adopted the less than 200 ppm standard because trace amounts like that shouldn't affect a celiac. I tend to stick to whole foods as much as possible anyway, but what about restaurants? If I go to a restaurant that has "gluten-free" food, can I trust it? Should I even be concerned?

I'm not too concerned about Austria because we'll be staying with a friend and I can cook my own food there. Italy...we'll see. I might be going hungry a lot, but I don't mind! That's the second half of the trip, I can live on nuts and fruit for a couple of weeks if I need to. I'm going to bring packets of tuna fish in my backpack! :P

aikiducky Apprentice

Taylor, I really think you're going to be ok. :) You know, if i was traveling to the US I would be worried as well! It's just always a hassle to travel to a place where you don't have your usual comforting routine...

What you should do with "gluten free" labels is READ THEM. :D If there are no obvious gluten sources listed, and the label says "gluten free", then most likely it's ok. The allowable limit for cross contamination is much lower than the allowable limit for gluten in Codex norm wheat starch, as crazy as it seems. So don't buy products that have wheat starch even if they are labeled gluten free, and you should be ok.

Restaurants... it's common sense really. You can't expect wait personnel to necessarily know what you are talking about. Call ahead if you can, and explain in detail what you want to eat and how it has to be prepared, again when you arrive at the restaurant.

There was a good informative thread about eating in Italy here not so long ago, I hope you have found that. :)

I hope you have a really nice trip and no accidents!

Pauliina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,952
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Althea W
    Newest Member
    Althea W
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mnofsinger
      Hi @CeliacMom502, As always, consult a medical professional on any advice you receive.  I experience have experienced this exact symptoms you're referring to and will receive them, typically after being accidentally glutened. I've recently been researching this (that's how I came across this posting), because I've been trying to nail down how long I've actually had the celiac genes "activated" or if I was just born with it. Now I wasn't diagnosed until 2023 with Celiac Disease, but not all these other health issues I've had previously point to it all connecting. In 2013 I ended up with Bell's Palsy that I had facial paralysis on one side of my face, where I couldn't even get a twitch for six months, but it took almost a year for "full recovery". I have now came to the conclusion that, because of the B12 vitamin deficiency caused by celiac disease (when not following a strict gluten free diet), caused me to have prolonged recovery from this, because the nerves were healing at a much lower rate> I'm not sure if your daughter has ever had Bell's Palsy, but ever since I have, some of my symptoms when I accidentally get glutened (including right now as I type this message 😄) include a migraine that goes across my eyes, and a shooting pain as you have described that will go across my left cheek and upper jaw, in addition to pain behind my left ear, and painful to the touch. Now, I did immediately go on a gluten free diet, and almost all these symptoms vanished after 3-4 months, but that time frame depends upon the "damage" already done previously.  Hope my situation helps even now this is now almost three years later from your message!  
    • Scott Adams
      It's nice to see celiac-safe options out there for guest homes.
    • Scott Adams
      Your situation involves interpreting elevated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgG levels, which can indeed be confusing without clear symptoms or additional diagnostic tools like a biopsy. Here’s a possible approach to help clarify your next steps: Understanding DGP IgG: DGP IgG is a blood test often used to help diagnose celiac disease, particularly in individuals with IgA deficiency. However, since you’ve confirmed you don’t have IgA deficiency, the focus should shift to other celiac-specific tests, such as tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) and endomysial antibodies (EMA-IgA), which are more specific for celiac disease. Elevated DGP IgG alone is not diagnostic of celiac disease but may indicate gluten-related immune activity. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): You’re correct that NCGS does not typically show abnormalities in blood tests like celiac disease does. NCGS is diagnosed based on symptoms (e.g., bloating, fatigue, brain fog) that improve on a gluten-free diet, after celiac disease and wheat allergy have been ruled out. Since you don’t currently have symptoms, NCGS seems less likely in your case. Possible Next Steps: Monitor Symptoms: If you remain asymptomatic, it’s reasonable to continue eating gluten and retest after some time. This is because celiac disease can develop or become symptomatic later, and ongoing gluten consumption is necessary for accurate testing. Repeat Testing: Consider repeating the tTG-IgA test, as it is the most sensitive and specific for celiac disease. If this is also elevated, it strengthens the case for further investigation. Genetic Testing: If available, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genetic testing can help rule out celiac disease if negative, as nearly all celiac patients carry one or both of these genes. However, a positive result doesn’t confirm celiac disease, as these genes are common in the general population. Dietary Trial: If testing remains inconclusive and you develop symptoms, a supervised gluten-free diet trial might provide clarity. However, this should only be done after thorough testing, as going gluten-free prematurely can interfere with accurate diagnosis. Biopsy Limitation: Since a biopsy is not available in your town, you’ll need to rely on blood tests and clinical judgment. If your tests remain inconclusive but you develop symptoms, you may need to travel to a facility that can perform a biopsy for definitive diagnosis. In summary, if I were in your position, I would continue consuming gluten, monitor for symptoms, and retest with more specific celiac markers (tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA) in a few months. If symptoms develop or tests remain ambiguous, consulting a gastroenterologist for further guidance would be advisable. Always work with a healthcare provider to interpret results and tailor next steps to your specific situation.
    • trents
      The fact is, we know very little about the mechanism of NCGS at this point. We know much more about celiac disease. Some experts believe that NCGS can transition into celiac disease. And I do not agree with what you read about NCGS not producing any elevated antibody tests. IMO, and I have no scientific data to support this, it's just a hunch base on reading many, many forum contributor test result reports, elevated igg antibodies may signal a transition from NCGS to celiac disease.  But there are other things besides gluten that can cause elevated dgp igg and ttg igg antibody levels. So, yes. I would continue to monitor the situation if I were you and get regular testing. Not necessarily every 6 months but yearly anyway if you can. In the meantime, if you know gluten causes you unwellness, continue to avoid it.
    • Scott Adams
      Statins are a widely prescribed class of medications used to lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes. Extensive scientific research, including large-scale randomized controlled trials, has demonstrated their efficacy and safety for most individuals. Statins work by inhibiting an enzyme involved in cholesterol production in the liver, thereby reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, often referred to as "bad" cholesterol. Importantly, statins do not "remove all fats" from the body, as suggested in your post. They specifically target cholesterol synthesis and do not deplete essential fats, such as those required for brain function, hormone production, or nutrient absorption. The body still maintains its necessary fat reserves, including healthy fats, which are critical for physiological processes. Regarding the claim that statins cause internal bleeding by making blood vessels permeable, this is not supported by scientific evidence. Statins are not known to increase the risk of internal bleeding. However, like all medications, they can have side effects, such as muscle pain or, in rare cases, liver enzyme abnormalities. The benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk generally outweigh the risks for most patients, particularly those with a history of heart disease or high cholesterol. The suggestion to use odorless garlic, magnesium, vitamin K, and calcium for heart health may have some merit, as these supplements can support cardiovascular function in certain contexts. For example, magnesium is involved in muscle and nerve function, while vitamin K plays a role in blood clotting and bone health. However, these should not replace evidence-based treatments like statins when prescribed by a healthcare provider. Always consult a medical professional before making changes to medication or starting new supplements, as individual health needs vary.
×
×
  • Create New...