Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac's--a Disease Or A Syndrome?


darlindeb25

Recommended Posts

darlindeb25 Collaborator

There is much discussion in another forum I attend about celiacs being a disease or a syndrome. This doctor believes it makes more sense to call it a syndrome. In my opinion, it doesn't matter what you call it--there is no cure--it is with us for life--this was my response to the forum:

Sometimes these people make it sound too easy. Celiacs is a disease and it doesn't have a cure. Gluten is the enemy. Celiac disease goes into remission when you go gluten free, but the disease is still there. Gluten free is not a cure, it's our medicine, so to speak. We can live normal lives according to us, but not normal. We don't have the freedom to eat what we want, we still have to worry about kisses from our gluten eating spouses, bf/gluten-free, kids, grandkids, and friends--we can't truly enjoy a family dinner unless we make it ourselves--we don't have freedom of choice in that respect. Yes, we do choose to be gluten free--but our choices are very slim---gluten free or sick--hmmmmmmmm, pretty easy choice for me. I don't really miss much of the gluten containing foods. I have pretty much made peace with myself about this disease. I do still have moments when I ask, "Why me?" I can go out with friends or family and enjoy their company without eating with them. I was sick for so many years (at least 25 that I can remember) before going gluten-free, so now I have peripheral neuropathy to deal with too. Celiacs takes a backseat to the neuropathy now. It is a disease--whateverwe call it, it needs more awareness out there. Deb


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plantime Contributor
It is a disease--whateverwe call it, it needs more awareness out there. Deb

AMEN!!

jerseyangel Proficient

I would say disease, also. Even though the symptoms may go away, the disease never does.

nikki-uk Enthusiast

I think they both mean pretty much the same thing.

In the dictionary definition of syndrome is as follows;

'A set of symptoms or conditions that occur together and suggest the presence of a certain disease or an increased chance of developing the disease'.

Either way you look at it celiac disease can be frustrating,inconvenient and sometimes a royal pain,but on the flip side,following a gluten-free diet does give alot of you guys the opportunity to go back to living full and healthy lives (hopefully!-I realise that a dx of celiac disease and gluten-free diet has not been the end of their medical problems :) )

CeliaCruz Rookie

This is one of those debates where it's like, "who cares?" Whether I call it a "disease" or a "syndrome" doesn't make any tangible difference in my life. I still can't eat in most restaurants and I can't go grocery shopping without sitting down at my computer and doing a buttload of research. My family and friends still ask me stupid questions and act insensitively. I still can't eat the pizza at work luncheons. Whatever it is -- disease, syndrome, condition, underground political alliance, etc. -- it still sucks. It's lifelong and -- at times -- socially crippling. And it's not like I can go to Krispy Kreme if I refer to myself as having a "syndrome" instead of a "disease."

If someone wants to make a difference in my life, either introduce better-tasting gluten-free products and make them available in convenient locations or develop a reasonably-priced over-the-counter drug that will make me impervious to cross contamination. Otherwise, don't waste my time with the semantics. I've got a pot of rice pasta boiling on the stove and if I get distracted for even a minute, that s&*t's gonna turn to mush.

penguin Community Regular

I don't think the symantics matter too much, either way the treatment is the same.

I think there is more of a social stigma with the term "disease" because it sounds tainted and contagious. Using words like "syndrome" or "condition" are a politically correct way to trivialize the problem.

Actually, when you think about it, Celiac is more of a disorder.

Or it's a good excuse to use a thesaurus :rolleyes:

Gotta keep those linguists employed

jerseyangel Proficient
Actually, when you think about it, Celiac is more of a disorder.

That, and a big, gigantic pain in the butt :ph34r:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rusla Enthusiast

I don't care what they call it, we have it, we can't get rid of it so it is a disease.

watkinson Apprentice

Well...I never thought about it before. I mean it's called celiac disease so I just think of it as a disease. I guess the meaning of disease is that the body is at dis-ease. Therefore when we are suffering from celiacs or an untreated celiac, and are sick, I guese we would be at dis-ease. But when we are gluten-free and feeling fine maybe we could call it a syndrome. I agree with you when you said that it really doesn't matter. It's incurable whatever it is so we are at dis-ease with it to some degree all the time.

However...all the other autoimmune dieases are also called just that....diseases,... not syndromes.

Wendy

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I prefer to think of it as a difference. If we had not been consuming great amounts of this stuff since birth I doubt we would see this genetic difference as a problem. I know I am in the minority but the disease is not with me, it is with a culture that overprocesses everything and then adds an addictive and toxic (I believe for everyone) compound into our foods instead of alternatives, for what reason again?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,788
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cookieldy
    Newest Member
    Cookieldy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • K6315
      Hi Lily Ivy. Thanks for responding. Did you have withdrawal? If so, what was it like and for how long?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Doris Barnes! You do realize don't you that the "gluten free" label does not mean the same thing as "free of gluten"? According to FDA regulations, using the "gluten free" label simply means the product does not contain gluten in excess of 20 ppm. "Certified Gluten Free" is labeling deployed by an independent testing group known as GFCO which means the product does not contain gluten in excess of 10 ppm. Either concentration of gluten can still cause a reaction in folks who fall into the more sensitive spectrum of the celiac community. 20 ppm is safe for most celiacs. Without knowing how sensitive you are to small amounts of gluten, I cannot speak to whether or not the Hu Kitechen chocolates are safe for you. But it sounds like they have taken sufficient precautions at their factory to ensure that this product will be safe for the large majority of celiacs.
    • Doris Barnes
      Buying choclate, I recently boght a bar from Hu Kitchen (on your list of recommended candy. It says it is free of gluten. However on the same package in small print it says "please be aware that the product is produced using equipment that also processes nuts, soy, milk and wheat. Allergen cleans are made prior to production". So my question is can I trust that there is no cross contamination.  If the allergy clean is not done carefully it could cause gluten exposure. Does anyone know of a choclate brand that is made at a facility that does not also use wheat, a gluten free facility. Thank you.
    • trents
      @Manaan2, have you considered the possibility that she might be cross reacting to some food or foods that technically don't contain gluten but whose proteins closely resemble gluten. Chief candidates might be dairy (casein), oats (avenin), soy, corn and eggs. One small study showed that 50% of celiacs react to CMP (Cow's Milk Protein) like they do gluten.
    • Manaan2
      I realize I'm super late in the game regarding this topic but in case anyone is still reading/commenting on this one-does anyone who is especially sensitive have their personal observations to share regarding Primal Kitchen brand?  My daughter was diagnosed almost 2 years ago with celiac and within 6 months, her follow up labs were normal and a year later vitamin levels significantly improving, but we are still battling GI symptoms; particularly, constipation, so much that she has been on MiraLax every day since she was 3.  We've managed to get her down to a half cap every other day but without that, she continues to have issues (when she has a known, accidental ingestion unfortunately it takes a lot more MiraLax and additional laxatives to help her).  I was searching for something else and found this and am wondering if anyone has any specific comments regarding Primal Kitchen.  I feel like we are so incredibly careful with diet, logging diet and symptoms to look for patterns (we've had multiple dieticians help with this piece as well), not eating out, contacting companies and of course, there is always room for improvement but I'm running out of ideas regarding where her issues could be coming from.  Even if the Primal Kitchen is contributing, I'm sure it's not the only thing contributing but I can't help but think there must be handful of things that are working together and against her.  The ingredients list distilled white vinegar, but also white wine vinegar and balsamic, then "spices" which I'm always cautious about.  However, after contacting the company, I felt more comfortable allowing her to consume their products but over time I've realized that the front-line customer service support people don't always provide the most accurate of information.  Thanks for reading to anyone that does.   
×
×
  • Create New...