Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help with test results


Johariellis

Recommended Posts

Johariellis Rookie

I am sooo confused by these test results. My tissue transglutaminase IG-A came back 236.17 but the ranges listed are 84.50-499. Ive seen people with an IG-A of 102 that is positive for celiac. I don’t know if they are running any additional panels. Any interpretations please? 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Johariellis Rookie
6 minutes ago, Johariellis said:

I am sooo confused by these test results. My tissue transglutaminase IG-A came back 236.17 but the ranges listed are 84.50-499. Ive seen people with an IG-A of 102 that is positive for celiac. I don’t know if they are running any additional panels. Any interpretations please? 

 

 

 

Test results are in mg/dL

Scott Adams Grand Master

From what you've just posted I don't have enough info to be sure how to interpret your results. Normally 236 tTG would be high on most scales I've seen, but your results should say something like <100 normal....any change  you can post an image of the results? Alternatively you should also ask your doctor of course.

RMJ Mentor
On 1/31/2023 at 9:52 AM, Johariellis said:

Test results are in mg/dL

I think 236.17 is a total IgA result, not a tissue transglutaminase IgA result.  84.5-499 is a reasonable range for total IgA.  Tissue transglutaminase IgA results do not have weight per volume (milligrams per deciliter i.e. mg/dL) units.  There was another forum member recently whose results were laid out in a very confusing manner on the printout and it was difficult for her to tell which was which.  Perhaps you could post a photo of your results?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,517
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CAROLD
    Newest Member
    CAROLD
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Newhere19
      Thank you both. I haven't had access to the test results but will get them and post here.
    • jjiillee
      The ulcers are prepyloric ulcers. Not sure if that makes any difference. 
    • trents
      Duodenal ulcers are not uncommon either and often result from H.Pylori infections. https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/duodenal-ulcer
    • trents
    • Scott Adams
      I had what was termed "lesions," and normally ulcers are in the stomach, rather than the small intestines. I'm not sure why they would want you to have her continue to eat gluten, since she had a positive blood test, but as her doctor said, if she is uncomfortable and having symptoms why not have her go gluten-free at this point? If her symptoms improve, it would be another indicator that she has celiac disease and/or gluten sensitivity. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...